School District Organization Informational Workshop on the Process and Fiscal Implications of School District Reorganization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Over 25 years of innovative management consulting Anne Arundel County Public Schools Strategic Facility Utilization Study Update Community Presentation.
Advertisements

SB 2795 / Public Act : August 11, 2006 Improving and Streamlining School District Reorganization.
Consumer Directed Service Agency (CDSA) Financial Errors Monitoring Guide DADS Form 1723, Instructions, and Appendices.
Welcome to... Everything you always wanted to know about New Growth... But... were afraid to ASK !
SUPPLEMENTAL LEVY ELECTION TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2011 Joint School District No. 2.
BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT
California Competes Tax Credit Workshop Presented by: Grace Arupo-Rodriguez, Deputy Director of Legal Affairs for GO-Biz Will Koch, Deputy Director of.
Seekonk Board of Assessors
1 Equity in School Lunch Pricing (Section 205) Howard Leikert Supervisor School Nutrition Programs March 22, 2011.
Maintenance and Operations Levy {YOUR} School District.
Budget Committee Roles & Responsibilities
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
FY12 and FY13 Budget Development Special Board Meeting Alachua County Office of Management and Budget June 7, 2011.
Capital Projects Management under EFCFA Department of Education Division of Finance August 29, 2001.
The Metro Schools Learning Community LB 641. Learning Community/Timeline 1.September 2007 – Commissioner of Education certifies Learning Community (LC)
1 School District of Escambia County Class Size Presentation August 2010.
1 School “H” Sardinia Avenue and Big Leaf Street Located south of I-75 and east of North Salford Boulevard.
35 ILCS 200 Article 27 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA TAXING DISTRICT Creating Community Excitement for Lake Dredging/Restoration Projects.
August 2011 Office of the State Auditor 1.  Analysis and ratios  Roles of the OSA and CDE  Trends and evaluation of ratios  Factors that impacted.
Mid-Year Budget Issues and Decisions Presented by Chris Straub.
INITIATIVES, REFERENDA AND RECALLS This PowerPoint Covers:
Cerritos Fresno Irvine Pleasanton Riverside Sacramento San Diego The Redistricting Process David A. Soldani Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud and Romo April.
Consolidation Study Recommendations and Possible Timeline
1 School Funding Discussion November 15, 2007 Brighton Area Schools.
SCHOOL DISTRICT REORGANIZATION for Municipal Clerks Wisconsin – May 2011 A collaborative presentation by the Department of Public Instruction and the Department.
Parkview School District Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 18, :30 p.m. Parkview Jr./Sr. High School LMC Monday, August.
SCHOOL DISTRICT REORGANIZATION Vicki L. Barber, Ed.D., Superintendent Terena Mendonca, Deputy Superintendent El Dorado County Office of Education El Dorado.
School District Reorganization Brief Outline of Process.
LAFCO Procedures: There’s a Lot Going On Behind the Scenes Roseanne Chamberlain Executive Officer Amador LAFCO Staff Workshop April 3, 2008.
District Unification Feasibility Study August 13, 2014 Presented by: Robert D. Miyashiro, Vice President Brianna García, Director, Management Consulting.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
West Contra Costa USD Update on Bonding Capacity Waiver Presentation to the Board of Education May 28, 2014.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
Plumas Lake Elementary School District Second Interim Presentation March 12, 2014.
School Budget Materials & Forms
Budget Development Kern County Superintendent of Schools Division of Administration and Finance.
Budget Development Kern County Superintendent of Schools Division of Administration and Finance.
South Kitsap School District Preliminary Budget July 17, 2013 Sandra Rotella SFO CPA Assistant Superintendent Business Operations.
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
Presentation to the Placer LAFCO Commission September 10, 2014.
School Budget (Draft)
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Incorporation and Annexation Process A Comparison November 1, 2005.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
FIRE DISTRICT FORMATION Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Pinal Rural Fire and Medical District.
BERRYESSA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT SECOND INTERIM REPORT MARCH 7, 2011.
County Funding Responsibility for Elections Kara A. Millonzi Associate Professor of Public Law and Government UNC-CH School of Government August 2013.
Amending the Regional Agreement Presentationby Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools 1.
FOR CLERKS AND RECORDERS  Planning Commission – public meeting and a public hearing  City Council – public hearing  Must contain: - a map of expansion.
Los Altos Hills Public Education Update A public forum to update the citizens of Los Altos Hills on efforts to Reorganize Public Education in Los Altos.
Horizon West Village Planned Development Code Update Adoption Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners February 11, 2014 Chapter 38, Article XIII,
Grade 7-8 Educational Options Study, 2015 Key Study Findings and Next Steps October 2015.
Niagara Wheatfield Central School District Preliminary Budget March 5, 2014.
School District Reorganization Elverado CUSD 196 Elverado High School Michelle Heninger / Illinois State Board of Education.
BUDGET HEARING II Presented to the Board of Education MAY 10, 2016.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Second Interim Financial Report
Panorama Heights (North Tustin) Petition to transfer from OUSD to TUSD
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
MACDC Intercounty Drain Procedures Training
Golden Plains Unified School District
Trimble County Public Schools
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 UPDATE REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA VOTER PARTICIPATION RIGHTS ACT (CVPRA) AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S.
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Roselle Park School District
Territory Transfer Request
Election Law Seminar December 2018
UNDERSTANDING HOW TO MAXIMIZE YOUR FEES
Effective Budgeting in County Government
Presentation transcript:

School District Organization Informational Workshop on the Process and Fiscal Implications of School District Reorganization

The Role of the County Committee The County Committee on School District Organization has a major role in review and approval of proposals to change school district organization in the county. This committee believes that requests for reorganization should not come from the committee, but from interested districts or members of the public.

Goals for Today  Understand the process  Understand fiscal implications

Types of Reorganization Proposals 1. Territory Transfers Boundary Changes – a portion of a district is transferred to another district. Consolidation – an entire district is transferred to another district. 2. Unification The combination of elementary and high school districts into a K-12 district.

Territory Transfers: Signature Requirements for Petitions A petition may be signed by: The majority of owners of uninhabited territory. 25% of the registered voters in an inhabited area. The majority of Board Members in each of the affected districts. 10% of the registered voters in an inhabited area.

Differences Between Petitions Signed by 10% or 25% of the Registered Voters in an Area 10% Petition –the county committee must hold a preliminary public hearing and may approve the proposal and adopt it as its own tentative recommendation; however, if the county committee does not approve the proposal, further action is halted. 25% Petition – the county committee recommends approval or disapproval to the State Board of Education.

What’s Common Between Petitions Signed by 10% or 25% of the Registered Voters in an Area See Flowcharts A and B on pages 39 and 43 of Chapter 5 of the CDE District Organization Handbook Beginning with the Notice of Public Hearings (lower middle portion of both flowcharts) the processes for 10% and 25% petitions are the same.

Flowchart A

Flowchart B

Information to be Included Three items of basic information should be included in a petition: A legal description and map of the territory to be covered by the proposed action. A list of school districts affected by the proposal. The reasons for the proposed reorganization.

Determination of Sufficiency County superintendent must determine the sufficiency of the petition. A petition signed by registered voters must be verified by the county elections department.

Public Hearings The county committee must hold a public hearing in each affected district within 60 days of receipt of a valid petition.

CEQA Review The county committee must determine the impact that the territory transfer may have on the environment.

County Committee Study Ed. Code Criteria The county committee must determine the impact of the territory transfer on the 10 criteria listed in Ed. Code (1) The reorganized districts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled. (2) The districts are each organized on the basis of a substantial community identity. (3) The proposal will result in an equitable division of property and facilities of the original district or districts.

(4) The reorganization of the districts will preserve each affected district's ability to educate students in an integrated environment and will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. (5) Any increase in costs to the state as a result of the proposed reorganization will be insignificant and otherwise incidental to the reorganization.

(6) The proposed reorganization will continue to promote sound education performance and will not significantly disrupt the educational programs in the districts affected by the proposed reorganization. (7) Any increase in school facilities costs as a result of the proposed reorganization will be insignificant and otherwise incidental to the reorganization.

(8) The proposed reorganization is primarily designed for purposes other than to significantly increase property values. (9) The proposed reorganization will continue to promote sound fiscal management and not cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization.

(10) Any other criteria as the board may, by regulation, prescribe. (b) The State Board of Education may approve a proposal for the reorganization of school districts if the board determines that it is not practical or possible to apply the criteria of this section literally, and that the circumstances with respect to the proposals provide an exceptional situation sufficient to justify approval of the proposals.

Approval Process All territory transfers are decided at the local level. If all the criteria of Ed. Code are substantially met within 120 days of the first public hearing, the county committee must approve or disapprove the petition to transfer territory.

If the county committee approves the transfer the county superintendent must call an election unless: If inhabited, the territory consists of less than 10% of the assessed valuation of the district or If uninhabited, a majority of the owners of the territory consent, and Whether inhabited or uninhabited, the governing boards of all affected districts consent to the transfer.

Unification Process See Flowcharts C and D on pages 46 and 49 of Chapter 5 of the CDE District Organization Handbook The unification process is very similar to the Territory Transfer process.

Sample Petition to Election Timeline  Gather Petition  Petition Verified  CEQA Hearing  County Committee Hearing  County Committee Study  SBE Study and Hearing  Election order delivered  County Clerk  From a November Election to the effective date of unification Copyright © School Services of California 90 days 30 days Within 60 days of hearing 60 days 120 days 120 days (or more) 35 days 120 days 235 days 810 days (2.2 years or longer)

Fiscal Implications Base Revenue Limit (see next slide for example) Revenue Neutral

Example: Blended Base Revenue Limit Using Date – for a Reorganization Effective District Base revenue Limit per ADA (A) Revenue Limit ADA (B) Affected ADA (C) Percent of District in Reorganization (D) = (C) (B) Computed Total Base Revenue Limit (E) = (A) x (C) Elementary District 1$4, %$4,070,700 Elementary District 2$4, , %$6,822,000 Elementary District 3$4, %$957,600 High School District$5, ,0001, %$6,535,200 Totals3,800$18,385,500 Blended Base Revenue Limit per ADA $18,385,500 divided by 3,800 affected ADA = $4, Check: $4, times 3,800 ADA = $18,385,502 (or same amount to within a $2 round-off error) Copyright © 2006 by School Services of California

Salary and Benefit Adjustment Based on differences and average cost per FTE Calculate one average for all certificated staff Calculate a second average for all classified staff Cost to “level-up” is capped at 10% of the blended base revenue limit Salary and Benefit adjustment may provide more or less than is needed to move all employees to the highest schedule of component districts There is no requirement that the reorganized district adopt the highest schedule In a unification, classified salaries/benefits may not be negotiated below the level paid at the time of election.

Options and Alternatives New Millennium Example