2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Neptune and Company, Inc. Modeling Uncertainty: Realism vs Conservatism in Radiological Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ground Water Mounding & P Evaluations
Advertisements

Assessing Uncertainty when Predicting Extreme Flood Processes.
Supporting documents Implement Work Plan Sub-Area CSM Sub-Area DQOs Sub-Area Work Plan (contains Sub-Area CSM and Sub-Area DQOs) BRC Decision 1. BRC Common.
Modeling Atmospheric Releases of Molecular Tritium 2005 RETS/REMP Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
Desktop Business Analytics -- Decision Intelligence l Time Series Forecasting l Risk Analysis l Optimization.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Data Mining of Environmental Models for Sensitivity Analysis Tom Stockton Paul Black, Andy Schuh, Kate Catlett, John Tauxe Neptune and Company, Inc.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
GoldSim 2006 User Conference Slide 1 Vancouver, B.C. The Submodel Element.
Implications of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Where Do We Stand on Regulations?
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE The Art of Modeling with Spreadsheets STEPHEN G. POWELL KENNETH R. BAKER Compatible with Analytic Solver Platform FOURTH EDITION CHAPTER.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Status report on Step1 of Task A, DECOVALEX-2011 modeling for Ventilation Experiment –modeling for Ventilation Experiment By Xiaoyan Liu, Chengyuan Zhang.
St. Johns River Water Supply Impact Study by Getachew Belaineh Ph. D., P.H. 1 Brian McGurk P.G. 1 Louis Motz Ph. D., P.E 2 Follow up Review meeting March,
Monté Carlo Simulation MGS 3100 – Chapter 9. Simulation Defined A computer-based model used to run experiments on a real system.  Typically done on a.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
Monte Carlo Simulation in Decision Making
Evaluation of Florida C&D Debris Groundwater Monitoring Data Presentation discusses: Results of analysis of groundwater monitoring data Results of groundwater.
Reliability Model for Compressor Failure SMRE Term Project Paul Zamjohn August 2008.
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
EGU General Assembly 2007 Neptune and Company, Inc. Los Alamos, NM, USA A Systems Modeling Approach for Performance Assessment of the Mochovce National.
Techniques for selecting projects
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
PMI Knowledge Areas Risk Management.
University of Sunderland CIFM02 Unit 3 COMM02 Project Evaluation Unit 3.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Environmental Modeling Steven I. Gordon Ohio Supercomputer Center June, 2004.
Hydrologic Modeling: Verification, Validation, Calibration, and Sensitivity Analysis Fritz R. Fiedler, P.E., Ph.D.
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Profitability Analysis Our client is evaluating a number of scenarios How does our process compare with the others?
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
IAEA Technical Meeting on Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites IAEA, Vienna, Austria September 24-28, 2012 Overview of NRC Approach to Human Intrusion.
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module f – Interpretation.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
# 1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Environmental Risk Assessment for Nanomaterials Jeff Steevens.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
Quantifying the Role of Ecological Uncertainty in a Public Health Policy Decision Annual Meeting American Association for the Advancement of Science Seattle,
AMERICA’S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Mort Anvari 1 Cost Risk and Uncertainty Analysis MORS Special Meeting | September.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 Simulation Modeling: A Reviewer’s Perspective David W. Esh 1 and Cynthia S. Barr 2 Division of Waste Management.
Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Sensitivity and Importance Analysis Risk Analysis for Water Resources Planning and Management Institute for Water Resources 2008.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
Experiences in assessing deposition model uncertainty and the consequences for policy application Rognvald I Smith Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh.
Monte Carlo Process Risk Analysis for Water Resources Planning and Management Institute for Water Resources 2008.
12/4/2015 Vijit Mittal (NBS, Gr. Noida) 1 Monte Carlo Simulation,Real Options and Decision Tree.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Probabilistic Scenario Analysis Institute for Water Resources 2009 Charles Yoe, PhD
Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting. Nature of Risk Risk exists because of the inability of the decision-maker to make perfect forecasts. the risk associated.
Probabilistic Modelling Golder Associates (UK) ltd Ruth Davison Attenborough House Browns Lane Stanton on the Wolds Nottingham NG12 5BL
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Sensitivity and Importance Analysis Charles Yoe
AGU Fall 2006 Meeting Neptune and Company, Inc. Radioactive Waste Disposal in Hydrologically-Challenged Environments: Opportunities for Waste Disposal.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
1 of 48 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Uncertainty & Variability Charles Yoe, Ph.D.
Why Stochastic Hydrology ?
of Heritage and New Hardware For Launch Vehicle Reliability Models
Safety Case Components and Documentation
Construction Projects
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
Presentation transcript:

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Neptune and Company, Inc. Modeling Uncertainty: Realism vs Conservatism in Radiological Performance Assessment John Tauxe, PhD, PE Paul K. Black, PhD Bruce M. Crowe, PhD Donald W. Lee, PhD, PE

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Presentation Outline What is Performance Assessment? Probabilistic PA modeling A Low-Level Radioactive Waste example Advantages of probabilistic modeling Modeling and uncertainty

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Quote of the Day “Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.” Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld DoD News Briefing – 12 Feb 2002 Source:

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Performance Assessment For the DOE and its LLW sites, PAs are intended to establish “reasonable expectation” that performance objectives are not exceeded (e.g. DOE M 435.1), in order to authorize waste disposal. PAs are traditionally deterministic and conservative, yet any such analysis has inherent uncertainties in assumptions, parameter values, and in the models themselves PA DAS

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Determinisitic vs Probabilistic procon deterministic analysis May be appropriate for simple compliance demonstration Easy for decision makers and public Uncertainties are unspecified What is conservative may not be known probabilistic analysis Better represents state of knowledge Makes for better informed decisions Requires development of input distributions

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 PAs and Uncertainty Sources of uncertainty in PA modeling include conceptual model assumptions and exposure scenarios, analytical and numerical models and their assumptions, and model input parameters in space and time (variability and knowledge uncertainty). ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Deterministic Modeling Deterministic models produce deterministic (single-valued) output with no uncertainty, are easy to compare to deterministic performance objectives, typically strive for conservatism*, and may be a good choice for simple demonstration of compliance. * What is conservative may not always be obvious, and conservatism can obscure model complexities.

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Probabilistic Modeling Probabilistic models strive to be realistic (not conservative), represent uncertainty using probability density functions for model parameters, propagate uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation, and calculate model outputs as probability density functions.

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 An Example from the Nevada Test Site Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site Photo courtesy NNSA/NSO

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 The Area 5 RWMS The conceptual model of transport at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site at the Nevada Test Site includes: upward flux of water driven by high evapotranspiration potentials, diffusion in liquid and gaseous phases, biotic transport of contamination and materials in the near surface, and resuspension by wind. Processes are nonlinear and tightly coupled, so what makes for a conservative estimate?

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 ground surface to groundwater unsaturated zone flow divide no-flux boundary Advective/Diffusive Transport What is conservative? Modeled processes: 1. advection of water down to distant water table up to “no-flux boundary” advection in water diffusion in water 2. diffusion in water below “no-flux boundary” (NFB) diffusion in air 3. diffusion in air phase throughout cap waste alluvium

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Plant-Induced Transport 1. Plant roots uptake contaminants during growth. 2. Contaminants are redistributed within the plants. 3. Contaminants are returned to soil upon senescence. Modeled processes: Again: What is conservative? cap waste

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Animal-Induced Transport Yet again: What is conservative? Modeled processes: 1. Animals excavate subsurface bulk materials and bring them to the surface. excavation 2. Burrows collapse, returning materials to the subsurface. collapse cap waste

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 GoldSim at the NTS

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 An example: These bulk density data need to be turned in to an input distribution. Stochastic Parameters Inventory Dimensions Material properties Biotic properties and rates of activities Human behavior Chemical properties

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Monte Carlo Simulation Select time stepping Select number of realizations Select seed Optional use of LHS

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Deterministic Results Comparison is easy, but is it honest? performance objective

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September time (yr) Probabilistic Results Comparison is challenging, but more honest. performance objective

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Statistical Summaries median 25% 75% 5% 95% upper bound lower bound mean performance objective

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Advantages of Probabilistic Analysis More realistic (honest) answers More information for decision makers (not doing their job for them) Provides information for statistical comparisons with monitoring data and for value of information analysis (when to stop monitoring) Identification of sensitive parameters

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Sensitivity Analysis 1 Sensitivity analysis provides a ranking of sensitive parameters, enhancing appreciation for their significance. For example, dose may be driven by: 1. Cap thickness 2. Volume of materials excavated by ants 3. Inventory of 238 U 4. Plant/soil concentration ratio for 99 Tc

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Sensitivity Analysis 2 Using the MART* statistical technique, the range over which a parameter is sensitive can be evaluated. *Multiple Additive Regression Trees That’s cool! Cap Thickness (m) Sensitivity Index

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Value of Information Analysis Evaluate VOI from monitoring activities. Determine value of continued monitoring (this cannot be done with a deterministic model). Decide when monitoring no longer provides useful information (time to stop).

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Take Home Points Environmental modeling is most useful if done stochastically. Confirmation of performance assessment (through monitoring) requires statistical analysis. Probabilistic modeling provides a technical basis for deciding when to stop monitoring.

2003 NGWA Midsouth Focus Conference September 2003 Yucca Flat, Nevada: The world’s best radioactive waste disposal site. The holes have already been “dug”!