Experience and Plans for High Speed Lines in Germany December 16th, 2010 Hermann Gitzelmann, Pöyry Infra GmbH Gunther Ellwanger, Ellwanger Consulting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

AKC Rally Signs These are copies of the 2008 AKC Rally signs, as re-drawn by Chuck Shultz. Use them to print your own signs. Be prepared to use a LOT of.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
A new approach for MM benefit-estimation Walter Bien ECOMM 2009 May 15 – San Sebastián.
1 7 th Progress Report: The regional and urban dimension of Europe 2020 Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit DG for Regional Policy European.
Green Mobility in Copenhagen Annette Kayser City of Copenhagen.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
CALENDAR.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt BlendsDigraphsShort.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
1 The Economic Impact of New Infrastructure Michael Wegener Spiekermann & Wegener Convegno "Il corridoio del Brennero nel quadro delle infrastrutture dell'Italia.
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
The 5S numbers game..
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Andrew McNaughton 1 Radical Change is Entirely Possible! 2 nd November 2011.
| | 1 Intermodality Air/Rail Intermodality air/rail at Munich Airport – reality and vision Flughafen München GmbH Dr. Wilhelm Wolters.
New York, 1st March 2010 Railways and Sustainable Development Henning Schwarz Head of Unit Sustainable Development.
The Aero30NG, the tethered gas balloon an extraordinary monument for a unique event AEROPHILE presentation – 15/12/2010.
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
EU market situation for eggs and poultry Management Committee 20 October 2011.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
VOORBLAD.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Before Between After.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
Clock will move after 1 minute
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health & Disease Sixth Edition
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Experience and Plans for High Speed Lines in Germany December 16th, 2010 Hermann Gitzelmann, Pöyry Infra GmbH Gunther Ellwanger, Ellwanger Consulting

GERMAN HSR LINES 2 EUROPEAN HS NETWORK ( Situation as at ) Information given by the Railways v > 250 km/h 180 < v < 250 km/h Other lines v > 250 km/h Planned UIC - High-Speed Updated OG/IB

GERMAN HSR LINES 3 HIGH SPEED TRAFFIC – EVOLUTION IN EUROPE

GERMAN HSR LINES 4 HIGH SPEED RAIL WINS MARKET SHARE before (left) and after HSR For distances up to km HSR is competitive ! Train (24%) Car (43%) Thalys (50%) Car (61%) Bus (5%) Bus (8%) Plane (7%) Plane (2%) Train (33%) AVE (83,6%) Plane (67%) Plane (16,4%) Eurostar (71%) Plane (26%) Plane, low cost (3%) Paris – Brussels (all modes)Madrid – Sevilla (rail – air) Paris - London Madrid – Barcelona Train (11,8%) Plane (88,2%) AVE (50,4%) Plane (49,6%)

GERMAN HSR LINES 5  Very ambitious plan  2200 km HSL (300 km/h) (number of HSL later reduced; design speed reduced to 250 km/h)  1250 km UL (existing lines up to 200 km/h)  Modernization of junctions  New urban and regional mass transport  Four new huge shunting yards for freight trains Source: E.Jänsch, RTR 2008 DB’S INFRASTRUCTURE EXPANSION PROGRAM 1970

GERMAN HSR LINES 6 HSR IN GERMANY Kiel Bremen Passau Nürnberg Erfurt München Stuttgart Köln Hannover Dresden Hamburg Schwerin Berlin Magdeburg Karlsruhe Saarbrücken Frankfurt/M Düsseldorf Actual situation  200 km/h Upgraded lines (UL) 230 km/h  250 km/h New HSL New HSL / UL in construction or planned  200 km/h  230 km/h  250 km/h Source: Feldwisch, DB 230

GERMAN HSR LINES 7  HSL Hannover – Würzburg – Length: 327 km – 60 tunnels: 121 km 37 %  HSL Mannheim – Stuttgart – Length:109 km – 15 tunnels: 31 km, 28 %  Both HSL – Mixed traffic – Minimum radius: 5100 m – Maximum gradient: 1,25 % Source map: W.Weigand, DB HSL HANNOVER – WÜRZBURG AND MANNHEIM – STUTTGART 1991 LAUNCH OF HSR IN GERMANY WITH ICE (InterCityExpress)

GERMAN HSR LINES 8  German HSR started 1991, ICE 1 trains in service  ICE 1 push and pull, 12 coaches, 650 places, 358 m  Mixed traffic: HSR: 250 km/h, Today: 280 km/h freight: 120 km/h - Day: HSR; EC, IC - Night: freight trains Source: E.Jänsch, RTR HSR (ICE) ON TWO HSL AND ON CONVENTIONAL LINES

GERMAN HSR LINES 9 MIXED TRAFFIC ON GERMAN HSL HANNOVER – WÜRZBURG  Section Göttingen – Kassel, 2001  Day: 6 – 22 h : passenger: ICE (red), IC, EC (orange)  Night: 23 – 4 h: freight (blue) Source: E.Jänsch, RTR 2008 Passenger trains Freight trains

GERMAN HSR LINES 10 ICE 1 ON THE LEFT RHINE VALLEY (CONVENTIONAL LINE)

GERMAN HSR LINES 11 DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH SPEED TRAINS Triebkopf- Konzept (Push-Pull PP) Verteilte Traktion (EMU) Technologie Revolution Evolution Revolution 2. Generation 3. Generation 4. Generation Evolution Wettbewerb ICE® ist eine registrierte Marke der DB AG, Source:Siemens 1. Generation Velaro CN Velaro E Velaro RUS Velaro D Evolution ICE 3 ICE 2 ICE 1 TGV PSE

GERMAN HSR LINES 12 ICE 3

GERMAN HSR LINES 13  HSL Köln – Frankfurt, dedicated – Length:180 km – 30 tunnels: 47 km, 26 % – Minimum Radius: 3425 m – Maximum Gradient: 4 % – Travel time: 1 h 15, before: 2 h 15 – ICE 3: EMU  HSL Nürnberg – Ingolstadt, mixed – Length:89 km – 9 tunnels: 27 km, 30 % – also regional trains: 200 km/h Source map: W.Weigand, DB HSL COLOGNE – FRANKFURT (2002) HSL NUREMBERG – INGOLSTADT (2006) BOTH 300 km/h

GERMAN HSR LINES 14 GERMAN HSR MIXED – DEDICATED

GERMAN HSR LINES 15  5 HSL (4 + Han – Bln) (red: NBS) 250 – 300 km/h, total length: 900 km  Several UL (green: ABS) 160 – 200 km/h  1 UL (blue) 230 km/h  ICE work on about 6900 km, of which 2100 km are HSL or UL  ICE 3 trains are running to 6 neighbor countries (1300 km) Source: E.Jänsch, RTR 2008 GERMAN HSR 2007

GERMAN HSR LINES 16 HSR AND ENVIRONMENT: CONSTRUCTION OF NEW LINES (1) Impact on nature: geology microclimate vegetation land occupation impact on landscape Targets: avoid damages reduce damages expertise / EIA

GERMAN HSR LINES 17 HSR AND ENVIRONMENT: CONSTRUCTION OF NEW LINES (2) Linkage with highways: Paris-Lille135 km Paris-Lyon 60 km Paris-Atlantique 35 km Mannheim-Stuttgart 35 km Köln-Frankfurt140 km Land occupation for German highways9,3 ha/km HSL Hannover-Würzburg3,0 ha/km HSL Mannheim-Stuttgart4,0 ha/km average3,2 ha/km

GERMAN HSR LINES 18 HSR AND ENVIRONMENT: OPERATION OF NEW LINES Noise: big improvements of noise reduction to the source layout away from inhabited areas passive noise protection (walls, embankments, tunnels) Air pollution: along electric lines: O by production of energy: very low (energy mix!) depends on energy consumption

GERMAN HSR LINES 19 HSR AND EXTERNAL COSTS € / 1,000 PKM ThalysCarAir Up/downstream Urban effects Climate change Air pollution Noise Accidents Source: IWW-Infras - 3/2000 Corridor nr II Paris - Brussels results SRMC by mean of transport

GERMAN HSR LINES 20 SPECIFIC CO 2 EMISSIONS / PKM FRANCE (ADEME)

GERMAN HSR LINES 21 LONG DISTANCE TRANSPORT 1978 – SPFV gesamt ↓ ICE 60 % ↑ ↓ IC/EC ↑ ↓ Interregio (IR) D E │ ││ ││ ││ billion Pkm Source: E.Jänsch ↑ ↓

GERMAN HSR LINES 22  Western Europe (old EU + Norway, CH)  Long distance passenger (more than 80 km) traffic  5 different scenarios: – Basis scenario (this figure) – WE:total 315 bn Pkm of which 90 bn Pkm by HSR ( 30 % from air, 34 % from private car, 34 % induced traffic, 2 % bus) – Environment Scenario bn Pkm for rail UIC TRAFFIC FORECAST STUDY 2020

GERMAN HSR LINES 23  modal split and trends of traffic are not sustainable  Sustainability only with more rail traffic: – Infrastructure policy (HSL, UL, Freight L) – Reduce distortion effects – Client oriented rail products (i.e.: HSR, CT, Quality, …) CONCLUSIONS Good future for HSR

GERMAN HSR LINES 24 CONTACT: NAME: HERMANN GITZELMANN MAIL: PHONE: