Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Periodic Review Report Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Writing the Team Report Chairs and Evaluators Workshop.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Substantive Change Policy – Response to the HEOA of 2008 Accreditation Provisions Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Understanding Expectations for the Self Study from the HEOA 2008 Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Debra G. Klinman.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Probe Process New Program Request Process Substantive Change February 1, 2012.
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Self-Study Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle States Commission.
ESOS COMPLIANCE PROCESS 26 FEBRUARY REGULATORY APPROACH.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
2008 HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY ACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SELF- STUDY & EVALUATION TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President, MSCHE.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Authenticating Online Students: Practically Speaking Patricia James October 15, 2013 For audio call Toll Free and use PIN/code
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
The Process of Accreditation
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Assessing Learning: Before and After Prof. Janice M. Karlen Director of Business Programs Coordinator of Credit for Prior Learning CUNY – LaGuardia Community.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Addressing Past Recommendations; Substantive Change Reports; & Eligibility Requirements Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Maggie Taylor, Fresno City.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
Robert K. Clark.  I will present a Commissioner’s overview of the PRR process. ◦ Methods of preparation and evaluation of the report will be covered.
Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former Kentucky Tech System or Prior to 2004 in a Technical College grandfathered under Format.
PLA Advisory Board February 18, 2014 Ross GarmilNan Travers.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
Agenda Development Terms with definition and examples Governing Bodies Accreditation Terms Dual Credit Terms Assessment Terms.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Approval Criteria – Part II
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
NCAA Student-Athlete Eligibility
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ

Standard 13 The institution’s programs or activities that are characterized by particular content, focus, location, mode of delivery, or sponsorship meet appropriate standards.

To Misquote Erik Satie “There are three kinds of standards. The ones who are important; the ones who are less so; and those who aren’t important at all. The last two kinds don’t exist; all standards are important”

To Quote Erik Satie “There are three kinds of critics. The ones who are important; the ones who are less so; and those who aren’t important at all. The last two kinds don’t exist; all critics are important” Erik Satie

13 is an Extremely Diverse Standard Covering a great variety of areas.

An Extremely Diverse Standard Covers the following areas: – Basic Skills – Certificate Programs – Experiential Learning – Non-Credit Offerings – Branch Campuses, Additional Locations and Other Instructional Sites – Distance or Distributed Learning – Contractual Relationships and Affiliated Providers

Where to begin? Another misquote:

Where to begin? Another misquote: Boring to the uninitiated, mystifying to the non-participant, a secular religion for those who have felt its spell

Where to begin? Another misquote: Boring to the uninitiated, mystifying to the non-participant, a secular religion for those who have felt its spell, Characteristics of Excellence…

Where to begin? The actual quote: Boring to the uninitiated, mystifying to the non-participant, a secular religion for those who have felt its spell, rowing… Thomas C. Mendenhall

Characteristics is our touch stone.

You must familiarize yourself with Characteristics of Excellence.

Characteristics is our touch stone. You must familiarize yourself with Characteristics of Excellence. – Including the Context and Fundament Elements for each standard.

Understanding the Standard Once you have read the standard, examine the context. – Note that in this case, a relationship to Standard 11, Educational Offerings, is noted.

Standards within the standard Standard Thirteen can be thought of as a compound standard.

Standards within the standard Standard Thirteen can be thought of as a compound standard. – It contains a number of separate focuses (listed above). For each focus of this standard, we have a brief narrative statement.

Standards within the standard Standard Thirteen can be thought of as a compound standard. – It contains a number of separate focuses (listed above). For each focus of this standard, we have a brief narrative statement. – To some degree, these are standards within the standard.

Standards within the standard Standard Thirteen can be thought of as a compound standard. – It contains a number of separate focuses (listed above). For each focus of this standard, we have a brief narrative statement. – To some degree, these are standards within the standard. Note that not all apply to every institution.

Standards within the standard This is a compound standard. Note that not all apply to every institution. “The ‘Related Educational Activities’ contained in Standard 13 are to be addressed only as they relate to individual institutions.” Characteristics of Excellence, page vi

So, how do we decide which apply?

Examine this standard and its parts in the context of the institution’s mission.

So, how do we decide which apply? Examine this standard and its parts in the context of the institution’s mission. – Do all parts apply? – Are elements present in the Self-Study Report that seem inappropriate given the institution’s current mission?

So, how do we decide which apply? Examine this standard and its parts in the context of the institution’s mission. – Do all parts apply? – Are elements present in the Self-Study Report that seem inappropriate given the institution’s current mission? – Some judgment is required. Remember to apply common sense. Remember to work with your team members!

Next, Examine the Fundamental Elements Fundamental elements are guideposts of ways in which an institution might meet a standard. They must not be used as a checklist for compliance. – Each institution is evaluated on its individual merits, against the accepted standards.

And then… Also examine the Optional Analysis and Evidence. – Examples of ways in which an institution might facilitate its own analysis of its compliance with the standard. – Again, not to be used as a checklist, more as potential guideposts.

Other Resources Note that the Commission has a number of valuable resources available at the Commission’s web site. – Examples that apply to Standard 13: Substantive Change Policy Statement Contracts for Accredited and Candidate Institutions for Education-Related Services Distance Learning Programs: Interregional Guidelines for Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs Standardized Language for Commission Actions on Accreditation and Examples of Options for Follow-up

Regulatory Requirements Some aspects of Standard Thirteen are linked to DOE regulatory requirements. – Distance/ Correspondence Education – New Sites/Additional Locations

Distance/Correspondence Regulatory Requirements g requires that institutions that offer distance or correspondence education have processes in place through which the institution establishes that the student who registers in a distance or correspondence education course or program is the same student who participates in and completes the course or program and receives the academic credit.

Distance/Correspondence Regulatory Requirements (1) Student identity can be verified through such methods as: (i) A secure login and pass code; (ii) Proctored examinations; and. (iii) New or other technologies and practices that are effective in verifying student identity; and

Distance/Correspondence Regulatory Requirements (1) Student identity can be verified through such methods as: (i) A secure login and pass code; (ii) Proctored examinations; and. (iii).New or other technologies and practices that are effective in verifying student identity; and (2) …Institutions must use process that protect student privacy and notify students of any projected additional student charges associated with the verification of student identity at the time of registration or enrollment.

Distance/Correspondence Regulatory Requirements Note that a Substantive Change Request must be submitted when 50% or more of a program’s courses are provided through alternate delivery. Approval must be achieved prior to initiation of the program.

Additional Location Regulatory Requirements Additional Locations/ Branch Campuses – Definitions are available on the MSCHE website. Look in the Substantive Change Policy Statement.

Additional Location Regulatory Requirements An Instructional Site is a location, other than a branch campus or additional location, at which the institution offers one or more courses for credit. – Substantive Change approval is not required. – Instructional Sites should be noted on the annual Institutional Profile.

Additional Location Regulatory Requirements An additional location is a location, other than a branch campus, that is; – geographically apart from the main campus and – at which the institution offers at least 50% of an educational program. These include corporate sites and locations for limited, rather than ongoing, provision of programs. Some additional locations might be subject to other substantive change policies, including contractual agreements for the provision of courses at the site, which might require additional substantive change requests.

Additional Location Regulatory Requirements A branch campus is a location of an institution that is geographically apart and independent of the main campus of the institution. – The location is independent if the location offers courses in educational programs leading to a degree, certificate, or other recognized educational credential; has its own faculty and administrative or supervisory organization; and Has its own budgetary and hiring authority. – The institution must notify the Commission if it plans to establish a branch campus and must submit a business plan for the branch campus.

Additional Location Regulatory Requirements Additional Locations/ Branch Campuses – Note that “Prior approval of the plan for substantive change is required before the change is included in the institution’s previously granted Candidate or Accreditation status.” Substantive Change Policy Statement

Some closing thoughts. Apply common sense.

Some closing thoughts. Apply common sense. – Remember that there are many different models for educational and operational excellence.

Some closing thoughts. Work with your team; try to build consensus.

Some closing thoughts. Work with your team; try to build consensus. – “Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.” The Borg

Some closing thoughts. Remember the ultimate goal of accreditation through peer review.

Some closing thoughts. Remember the ultimate goal of accreditation through peer review. Institutional Improvement

Some closing thoughts. Remember the ultimate goal of accreditation through peer review. Institutional Improvement That is really the heart of the matter.