The disc-jet-spin connection: 3C273 Chris Done Charles Finn, Emma Gardner… University of Durham.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extragalactic jets: a new perspective
Advertisements

The accretion mechanism in low power radio-galaxies Ranieri D. Baldi 1, Barbara Balmaverde 2 & Alessandro Capetti 2 1: Università degli Studi di Torino.
X-ray Polarimetry and Radio-Quiet AGN
ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI X-ray broad--band study A. De Rosa, L. Piro Ginga/ROSAT/ASCA IASF-Roma Universita' di Roma La Sapienza Institute of.
Relativistic Jets from Accreting Black Holes
Some issues on models of black hole X-ray binaries Feng Yuan Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Almost every galaxy hosts a BH 99% are silent 1% are active 0.1% have jets Extragalactic jets: a new perspective G. Ghisellini in coll. with F. Tavecchio.
Taxonomy of AGN - circa 1980 Seyfert 1 galaxy Seyfert 2 galaxy QSO
AY202a Galaxies & Dynamics Lecture 14: Galaxy Centers & Active Galactic Nuclei.
Tom Esposito Astr Feb 09. Seyfert 1, Seyfert 2, QSO, QSO2, LINER, FR I, FR II, Quasars, Blazars, NLXG, BALQ…
Disk corona in AGN: what do we expect? Bifang Liu Yunnan Observatory, CAS The disk corona evaporation model The model for X-ray binaries Similarities between.
Relativistic Astrophysics: general overview Jean-Pierre Lasota Lecture 1.
Strong gravity with Athena Jiří Svoboda Czech Academy of Sciences using simulations and figures done by the Athena Science working group “The Close Environments.
Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries! Chris Done University of Durham.
1/26 Introduction 1/28 Radio Loud AGN Unification: Connecting Jets and Accretion Eileen Meyer Space Telescope Science Institute Giovanni Fossati, Rice.
The Accretion Mode - Morphology Link in Radio-Loud AGN jets: Towards a More Complete Unification Scheme Eileen Meyer Rice University University of Maryland,
Radio Loud Quasars and GLAST Aneta Siemiginowska Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Black hole accretion and jet ejection James Miller-Jones Collaborators: Greg Sivakoff, the JACPOT XRB collaboration, Tom Russell, Peter Jonker, Dave Russell.
The high mass accretion rate spectra of GX 339-4: Black hole spin from reflection? Mari Kolehmainen & Chris Done, Durham University Maria Diaz Trigo, ESO.
Chris Done, Chichuin Jin, Mari Kolehmainen
COSPAR Workshop, Udaipur 2003 Active Galactic Nuclei : I Keith Arnaud NASA Goddard University of Maryland.
Min-zhi Kong Physical Parameters Related to AGN Variability ---- especially for NGC 5548.
USING LOW POWER RADIO GALAXIES AS BEACONS FOR CLUSTERS TO “FILL THE GAP” AT 1
Markus B ӧ ttcher Ohio University Athens, OH VHE Gamma-Ray Induced Pair Cascades in Blazars and Radio Galaxies.
Active Galactic Nuclei Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
July 4, 2006 P. Padovani, Unidentified  -ray Sources 1 The Blazar Sequence: Validity and Predictions Paolo Padovani (ESO) Blazar properties The Blazar.
Models for non-HBL VHE Gamma-Ray Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA “TeV Particle Astrophysics” SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, July 13 – 17,
Numerical Modeling of Electromagnetic Radiation from AGN Jets Based on  -ray emission and spectral evolution of pair plasmas in AGN jets Bottcher et al.
Multi-wavelength AGN spectra and modeling Paolo Giommi ASI.
Ionized absorbers in Galactic Binaries Chris Done & Marek Gierlinski University of Durham.
Active Galaxies Definition – –Amount of Energy –Type of Energy Non-thermal Polarized Other characteristics –Emission spectra Hydrogen – Balmer series &
Studying emission mechanisms of AGN Dr. Karsten Berger Fermi School, June ©NASA.
Blazars and Neutrinos C. Dermer (Naval Research Laboratory) Collaborators: A. M. Atoyan (Universite de Montreal) M. Böttcher (Rice University) R. Schlickeiser.
Mari Kolehmainen & Chris Done Durham University 1.
Black hole accretion disc winds Which wind went where? Prof Chris Done University of Durham, UK.
Leptonic and Hadronic Models for the Spectral Energy Distributions and High- Energy Polarization of Blazars Markus Böttcher North-West University Potchefstroom.
THE HST VIEW OF LINERS AND OTHER LOCAL AGN MARCO CHIABERGE CNR - Istituto di Radioastronomia - Bologna Alessandro Capetti (INAF-OATo) Duccio Macchetto.
Black Hole Winds: the case of PDS 456  Paul O’Brien †  James Reeves*  Martin Ward †  Ken Pounds †  Kim Page † † X-ray & Observational Astronomy Group.
1 Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland (Stern, Poutanen, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1217; Stern, Poutanen, 2007, MNRAS, submitted, astro- ph/ ) A new.
Flat Radio Sources. Almost every galaxy hosts a BH 99% are silent 1% are active 0.1% have jets.
Acceleration and Energy Transport in the AGN jets: from sub-pc to kpc scale Jun Kataoka Tokyo Institute of Technology - Acceleration site in the universe.
Accretion flows onto black holes
FRI RADIO GALAXIES AT z > 1 STUDYING THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF TODAY'S MOST MASSIVE GALAXIES AND CLUSTERS Marco Chiaberge Space Telescope Science Institute.
On the role of BH spin and accretion in powering relativistic jets in AGN Laura Maraschi M.Colpi,G.Ghisellini,A.Perego,F.Tavecchio INAF - Brera Observatory,
Quasi-Stellar Objects (QSOs) and Schmidt’s Realization.
The Differences in the SEDs of Type 1 and Type 2 AGNs: Contributions from starbursts Xue-Bing Wu Collaborator: Ran Wang (Astronomy Department, Peking University)
Black holes and accretion flows Chris Done University of Durham.
From the Black Hole to the Telescope: Fundamental Physics of AGN Esko Valtaoja Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland Metsähovi Radio Observatory,
Accretion flows onto black holes
The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada, May A Jet-Emitting Disk model for the microquasar broad band emission G. Henri Coll. P.O Petrucci, J. Ferreira,
21 Aug 2014HEAD Meeting Chicago Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection Wilkes, Kuraszkiewicz, Atanas, Haas, Barthel, Willner,
Jets at different scales and the connection with accretion L. Maraschi and F.Tavecchio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera.
QUASAR-MICROQUASAR ANALOGY The scales of length and time are proportional to M BH R sh = 2GM BH /c 2 ;  T  M BH Unique system of equations: The maximum.
Constraining the Location of Gamma-ray Emission in Blazar Jets Manasvita Joshi, Boston University Collaborators: Alan Marscher & Svetlana Jorstad (Boston.
Multi-wavelength emission models in blazars Gabriele Ghisellini INAF-Osservatorio di Brera with A. Celotti, R. Della Ceca, L. Foschini, G. Ghirlanda, F.
RXTE Spectral Observations of the Galactic Microquasar GRO J1655-40
The black hole fundamental plane: revisit with a larger sample of radio and X-ray emitting broad line AGNs Zhao-Yu Li Astronomy Department, Peking University.
What do we know about L~Ledd accretion – BHB, ULX –
Junior Research Fellow,
Quasars, Active Galaxies, and super-massive black holes
Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)
How to classify a Gamma -ray source as a Blazar
The origin nuclear X-ray emission in the nuclei of radio galaxy-FR Is
Li Shuang-Liang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, China
Group Nov. 01, USTC 4/18/2019 Group Nov. 01, USTC AGN-dominated SFG-dominated.
Lecture 7: Jets on all scales Superluminal apparent motions.
Radio-loud quasars in SDSS DR3
Jingwei Hu
Center for Astrophysics
Properties of Blazars The “blazar sequence” BL Lacs FSRQs
Presentation transcript:

The disc-jet-spin connection: 3C273 Chris Done Charles Finn, Emma Gardner… University of Durham

AGN/QSO Zoo!!! Optical Mass, mass accretion rate, spin and inclination….

AGN/QSO Zoo!!! Radio loud Enormous, powerful, relativistic jets on Mpc scales FRI (fuzzy) - BL lacs FRII (hot spots) – FSRQ Urry & Padovani 1992; 1995

FRI is top of ADAF branch (low/hard state BHB) but  =15! Ghisellini et al 2010 BHB L/LEdd

FRI is top of ADAF branch (low/hard state BHB) but  =15! Ghisellini et al 2010 No UV inner disc – no BLR Sync-self compton (SSC) UV bright, BLR SSC+External compton

FRI is top of ADAF branch (low/hard state BHB) but  =15! Ghisellini et al 2010 No UV inner disc – no BLR Sync-self compton (SSC) UV bright, BLR SSC+External compton

Spin-jet paradijm Ghisellini et al 2010 Uncontroversial – very high spin to get  =10-15?

Spin-jet paradijm Ghisellini et al 2010 Uncontroversial – very high spin to get  =10-15? Mdot<0.01

Black hole mass & mdot Cosmological simulations gives number densities (M, mdot)… …As a function of cosmic time Colours are luminosity density ASSUME all RIAF (mdot<0.01) produce BL Lac jet Log M Log mdot

Black hole mass & mdot Log M Log mdot Cosmological simulations gives number densities (M, mdot)… …As a function of cosmic time Colours are luminosity density ASSUME all RIAF (mdot<0.01) produce BL Lac jet

Black hole mass & mdot Log M Log mdot Cosmological simulations gives number densities (M, mdot)… …As a function of cosmic time Colours are luminosity density ASSUME all RIAF (mdot<0.01) produce BL Lac jet

Black hole mass & mdot L/L Edd Gardner & Done 2013 Sync-self- Compton (SSC) Inject e -, cool Average jet parameters (Ghisellini et al 2010)  =15 Scale jet kinetic power to M and mdot - LBL to HBL (Heinz & Merloni 2004)

1000x more Fermi BL Lacs!! Paste scaled jet onto all mdot<0.01 AGN Random direction Predicted Fermi numbers of BL Lacs Gardner & Done 2013

1000x more Fermi BL Lacs!! WRONG!! Gardner & Done 2013 Observed!!

Spin-jet paradijm BL Lacs Ghisellini et al 2010 So high  jets RARE High spin rare (chaotic accretion, a * >0.8) High spin common, B flux rare (Sikora & Begelman 2013) Retrograde spin rare eg Garofalo et al 2014 BL lacs – no inner disc so hard to get spin constraints

Spin-jet paradijm: FSRQ Ghisellini et al 2010 So high  jets RARE High spin rare (chaotic accretion, a * >0.8) High spin common, B flux rare (Sikora & Begelman 2013) Retrograde spin rare eg Garofalo et al 2014 BL lacs – no inner disc so hard to get spin constraints FSRQ – retrograde thin disc or prograde large H/R flow?

Spin-jet paradijm Ghisellini et al 2010 Can’t use Fe line as the jet dominates the X- ray flux But can use disc continuum...

Spectra of accretion flow: disc Log Log f(  Thermal emission: L = A  T 4 Last stable orbit sets maximum temperature Tmax - (mdot/M) -1/4 X-ray for NLS1 ~ 10 7 M FUV for ~ 10 9 M FSRQ

Spectra of accretion flow: disc Log Log f(  Thermal emission: L = A  T 4 Last stable orbit sets maximum temperature Tmax - (mdot/M) -1/4 X-ray for NLS1 ~ 10 7 M FUV for ~ 10 9 M FSRQ Depends on spin!

Optxagnf: conserving energy! R corona MdotM Done et al 2012 Outer standard disc with colour temp correction down to R corona – quick way to model full photosphere results Then luminosity not completely thermalised to make soft X-ray excess ? Inner corona as in BHB NLS1: R corona small so disc dominated, and  steep

Jin et al 2012 Simple NLS1 Smaller R corona means spectra are dominated by disc! NLS1 have small SX and big disc - NOT huge SX

Optxagnf: conserving energy! R corona MdotM Done et al 2012 Outer standard disc with colour temp correction down to R corona Then luminosity not completely thermalised to make soft X-ray excess ? Inner corona as in BHB NLS1: R corona small so disc dominated, and  steep

Relativistic effects Fabian et al Energy (keV) flux Relativistic effects (special and general) affect all emission (Cunningham 1975) Emission from the side of the disc coming towards us is blueshifted and boosted by Doppler effects, while opposite side is redshifted and suppressed. Also time dilation and gravitational redshift Broadens spectrum at a give radius from a narrow blackbody

Optxconv: spin PG Done, Jin, Middleton Ward 2013 ‘Simple’ NLS1 Dominated by disc So can get spin! M: ×10 7 Inclination 0-60 But low spin a<0.8

Nearest FSRQ – 3C273 Dec 1990 Astro- 1 (Shuttle) mission UV and X-ray with simultaneous optical + soft and hard X-rays Very low Nh and E(B-V) so see peak of disc (Sembach et al 2000) Kriss 2000

3C273: Amazing data Is it disc dominated? Reverb. mass 8.9±1.9 x10 8 M (Peterson et al 2004) i=6±1 from jet VLBA (Jorstad et al 2005) a*=0: rcor=6, plus broad and narrow lines and FeII and Balmer continuum….

3C273: Amazing data Is it disc dominated? Reverb. mass 8.9±1.9 x10 8 M (Peterson et al 2004) i=6±1 from jet VLBA (Jorstad et al 2005) a*=0: rcor=6, plus broad and narrow lines and FeII and Balmer continuum….

3C273: Amazing data disc dominated as need Rcor<6Rg to get through FUV data Hubeny – full disk models a*=0 Underpredicts FUV a*=0.9 better Need mdot constant from R<6-100 Rg

3C273: Amazing data But Rcor>Rmsco to make Lx Mdot = 9e26 though outer disc L=  Mdot c 2 L_opt-UV+L_x =6-8e46 requires a*=0.7 (  Black hole is spinning!! As expected from jet

FSRQ jets Ghisellini & Tavecchio 2009 Add a jet!! Standard FSRQ from Ghisellini et al 2010 Cooling by Sync, and Compton scattering of sync and BLR photons (and torus) make spectrum from self consistent N(  ) after cooling  ±  from VLBA 

Amazing data (>20 years) interpolate on other wavelengths – comes out very close to mean level Hard X Radio Soldi et al 2008

3C273: radio-TeV! Done, Jin, Middleton Ward 2013 Add a jet EC+SSC Ljet>3x10 46 ergs/s Ltot=1.1x10 47 =  Mdot c 2  i.e a * >0.9 Very high spin…

Spin-jet paradijm Ghisellini et al 2010 Ljet = ∑ i  rdiss 2  2  U i ’ Dominated by protons with energy density U p ’=m p c 2 ∫N(  ) d  –  depends on  min Ghisellini had Ljet=3e47!!! 10x larger as  min ~ 1 (ours 40)

Conclusions: 3C273 Fermi BL lacs show  ~15 jets rare Spin rare, spin common but B flux rare, retrograde rare? FSRQ Accretion flow – optical gives Mdot Total accretion power L=  Mdot c 2 (Davis & Laor 2009) Observed L(UV+X) already requires a * >0 And have L(jet) ≥ L(UV+X) - need a * >0.9 in order to power both accretion flow radiation and jet (and wind?) FSRQ 3C273 is high spin, spin-jet paradijm (not retrograde!) but doesn’t say if B field + spin or just spin There is actually enough accretion power to power the flow and the jet…. ….but the MHD models all tap spin at these high a *

Optxagnf: conserving energy! R corona MdotM Done et al 2012 Outer standard disc with colour temp correction down to R corona – quick way to model full photosphere results Then luminosity not completely thermalised to make soft X-ray excess ? Inner corona as in BHB NLS1: R corona small so disc dominated, and  steep

Jin et al 2012 Simple NLS1 Smaller R corona means spectra are dominated by disc! NLS1 have small SX and big disc - NOT huge SX

Models conserving energy!! Outer standard disc with colour temp correction down to R corona Then luminosity not completely thermalised to make soft X-ray excess ? Inner corona as in BHB difference is R corona larger and  flat R corona MdotM Done et al 2012

Optxagnf: conserving energy! R corona MdotM Done et al 2012 Outer standard disc with colour temp correction down to R corona – quick way to model full photosphere results Then luminosity not completely thermalised to make soft X-ray excess ? Inner corona as in BHB NLS1: R corona small so disc dominated, and  steep

Jin et al 2012 So what do AGN look like? More standard BLS1/QSO ~10 8, ~0.1 Not disc dominated so can’t use to get BH spin

So what do AGN look like?

3C273 Nearest bright QSO with jet Accretion disc IR dust Soldi et al 2008

3C273 Nearest bright QSO with jet Accretion disc IR dust Base of compact jet Soldi et al 2008

3C273 Nearest bright QSO with jet Accretion disc + flow IR dust Base of compact jet Soldi et al 2008

3C273 Nearest bright QSO with jet Accretion disc + flow IR dust Base of compact jet Conical compact jet Soldi et al 2008

3C273 Nearest bright QSO with jet Accretion disc + flow IR dust Base of compact jet Conical compact jet Host galaxy (E4) Extended jet Soldi et al 2008