Critical Areas Ordinance Workshop March 21, 2007 Jill Silver Amy Hiatt George Yount.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY RESULTS -PROGRAMMATIC ACTIONS- Presentation to the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009.
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Master Program Update: Process Overview City of Benton City August 30,
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Fish and Wildlife Protection through Critical Areas Ordinances: WDFW’s role.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Shoreline Master Program Update. Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline.
Regulatory Context Natural Environment Chapter Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Overview of the Growth Management Act (GMA) & Critical Areas Ordinances (CAOs)
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
Washington State Department of Commerce Comprehensive Planning: the Context and Basics City of Tacoma Short Course February 20, 2013 Edward G. McGuire.
Island County SMP Shoreline Residential Development Workshop December 5, 2011.
Wetland Assessment Methods FHWA Needs. Laws and Regulations National Environmental Policy Act Section 404 CWA Regulatory Program Executive Order 11990,
Alachua County Wetland Protection Regulations Alachua County Board of County Commissioners October 22, 2013.
Guidance on 2014 Updates to Wetland Rating Systems and Buffers April 2014 Regional Planners Forum Eastern Washington Catherine Reed, Andrea Jedel, David.
PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PARADIGM.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
KING COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE Harry Reinert King County Department of Development and Environmental Services.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Kitsap County Shoreline Master Program Update Task Force Work Group Meeting August 16, 2011.
Maintaining the Forest Land Base in Minnesota: Threat of Parcelization.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program City of Wenatchee April 15,
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
2013 Spokane River Conference March 26, Shelley Lake Gravel Pit Spokane River.
Shoreline Master Program Update First Review of Preliminary Draft Shoreline Master Program [Entity] [Month Day, 2009] 1.
KITSAP SMP TASK FORCE Reconvened Meeting #1 November 9, 2011 Draft SMP Progress Update.
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Community Development Department GRAHAM SWAMP AREA FUTURE LAND USE & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2623 & 2624.
Grays Harbor County Shoreline Master Program Update Our Heritage, Our Future Grays Harbor Master Builders January 9, 2012.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Shoreline Environments King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks King County Department of Development and Environmental Services.
Channel Migration Zones: What? Why? Where? Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Washington Department of Ecology Patricia L. Olson.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
12 July 2010 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Critical Environmental Areas Under SEQR What Do They Mean?
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Island County Planning and Community Development Permitting 101.
Washington’s Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program Updates City of Fife Special Planning Commission Meeting May 19, 2019.
LOCATIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA FOR UTILITY SCALE PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR FACILITIES.
Watershed Analysis Presented to the Washington State Forest Practices Board By Mary McDonald and Marc Engel Department of Natural Resources, Forest Practices.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
City of Dunnellon Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Future Land Use Element  Conservation Element  Concurrency Management System.
Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) 2 Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management Commission.
KITSAP COUNTY SMP UPDATE Board of County Commissioners Decision-only hearing to consider local adoption of SMP January 28, 2013 Kitsap County Department.
Ocean/ENVIR 260 Autumn 2010Lecture 13© 2010 University of Washington Ocean/Envir 260 Lecture 13: Overview, Land Use Law 1.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Reclaimed Water Funding
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Voluntary Stewardship Program An Alternative Approach to GMA and CAOs
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning
City of Lake Forest Park Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update
Presentation transcript:

Critical Areas Ordinance Workshop March 21, 2007 Jill Silver Amy Hiatt George Yount

Overview Background Background Process Process Timelines Timelines

Overview… Background Background Legislative Legislative Shoreline Management Act 1971 Shoreline Management Act 1971 Growth Management Act1990 Growth Management Act1990 Forest Practices Act1974, 1987, 1999 Forest Practices Act1974, 1987, 1999 Best Available Science1995 Best Available Science1995 Guidance Guidance Department of Community Trade and Economic Development Department of Community Trade and Economic Development Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Ecology

Overview… Process Process Updates Updates Every 7 years Every 7 years Timeline for 2007 Timeline for 2007 May - October May - October

Rule Defined Critical Areas Wetlands Wetlands Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Critical Aquifer Recharge Zones Critical Aquifer Recharge Zones Geologic Hazard Zones Geologic Hazard Zones Floodprone Zones Floodprone Zones

Critical Areas Mandate Critical Areas regulations are to overlay all other land uses, including designated natural resource lands and designated urban growth areas, and are to preclude land uses and developments that are incompatible with the protection of critical areas. [WAC ] Critical Areas regulations are to overlay all other land uses, including designated natural resource lands and designated urban growth areas, and are to preclude land uses and developments that are incompatible with the protection of critical areas. [WAC ] All lands are designated in one of three categories: urban, natural resource land, or rural land. All lands are designated in one of three categories: urban, natural resource land, or rural land.

Fundamental Building Blocks of Land-Use Planning Under GMA Urban Land (i.e. within a designated urban growth area) Urban Land (i.e. within a designated urban growth area) Natural Resource Land (i.e. designated as agricultural, forest, or mineral resource land) Natural Resource Land (i.e. designated as agricultural, forest, or mineral resource land) Rural land (which may include limited areas of more intense rural development and a variety of land uses.) Rural land (which may include limited areas of more intense rural development and a variety of land uses.) As long as critical areas are protected, other non- critical portions of land can be developed as appropriate under the applicable land-use designation and zoning requirements. As long as critical areas are protected, other non- critical portions of land can be developed as appropriate under the applicable land-use designation and zoning requirements.

Best Available Science RCW 36.70A.172(1) requires all local governments to include the best available science when adopting development regulations to designate and protect critical areas. RCW 36.70A.172(1) requires all local governments to include the best available science when adopting development regulations to designate and protect critical areas. …give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries. …give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries. A local government cannot ignore the BAS in favor of the science it prefers simply because the latter supports the decision it wants to make. A local government cannot ignore the BAS in favor of the science it prefers simply because the latter supports the decision it wants to make.

CAO Recommendations Administration of CAO Administration of CAO Clear, well-organized – Stands alone Clear, well-organized – Stands alone Buffers Buffers Flexible, predictable, based on science Flexible, predictable, based on science Agriculture Agriculture Wetlands Wetlands Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Geologic Hazard Zones Geologic Hazard Zones Floodprone Zones Floodprone Zones

Land-Use Impact Levels Used to determine buffer requirements Used to determine buffer requirements Types of land-use that can result in high, moderate, or low levels of impact to adjacent wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs). Types of land-use that can result in high, moderate, or low levels of impact to adjacent wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs).

High Impact Land-Uses: High-intensity agricultural activities (see Definitions); High-intensity agricultural activities (see Definitions); Single-family residential use on parcels smaller than 1 acre; Single-family residential use on parcels smaller than 1 acre; Commercial, industrial, and institutional uses on lands designated as Rural Commercial, Rural Industrial, Public, or UGA; Commercial, industrial, and institutional uses on lands designated as Rural Commercial, Rural Industrial, Public, or UGA; Public roads; Public roads; Active recreation areas (see Definitions); Active recreation areas (see Definitions); Class IV-General forest conversions, including conversion option harvest plans, on lands not designated as Resource Lands or Rural Residential. Class IV-General forest conversions, including conversion option harvest plans, on lands not designated as Resource Lands or Rural Residential.

Medium Impact Land-Uses: Medium-intensity agricultural activities (see Definitions); Medium-intensity agricultural activities (see Definitions); Single-family residential use on parcels of 1 acre to less than 5 acres; Single-family residential use on parcels of 1 acre to less than 5 acres; Single-family residential use on parcels of 5 acres or larger with agricultural activities, landscaping, and impervious surfaces exceeding the limitations for Low Impact Land- Uses (see Definitions); Single-family residential use on parcels of 5 acres or larger with agricultural activities, landscaping, and impervious surfaces exceeding the limitations for Low Impact Land- Uses (see Definitions); Private roads or driveways serving 3 or more residential parcels; Private roads or driveways serving 3 or more residential parcels; Paved trails; Paved trails; Passive recreation areas (see Definitions); Passive recreation areas (see Definitions); Utility corridors (private or public) with a maintenance road; Utility corridors (private or public) with a maintenance road; Class IV-General forest conversions, including conversion option harvest plans, on lands designated as Resource Lands or Rural Residential. Class IV-General forest conversions, including conversion option harvest plans, on lands designated as Resource Lands or Rural Residential.

Low Impact Land-Uses: Low-intensity agricultural activities (see Definitions); Low-intensity agricultural activities (see Definitions); Single-family residential use on parcels of 5 acres or larger with agricultural activities, landscaping, and impervious surfaces not exceeding the limitations for Low Impact Land-Uses (see Definitions); Single-family residential use on parcels of 5 acres or larger with agricultural activities, landscaping, and impervious surfaces not exceeding the limitations for Low Impact Land-Uses (see Definitions); Private driveways serving no more than 2 residential parcels; Private driveways serving no more than 2 residential parcels; Unpaved trails; Unpaved trails; Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; Class I, II, III, and IV-Special forest practices on lands of any Comprehensive Plan land-use designation except Urban Growth Area; Class I, II, III, and IV-Special forest practices on lands of any Comprehensive Plan land-use designation except Urban Growth Area; Class IV-General non-conversion forest practices (equal to Class I, II, III, and IV-Special forest practices) conducted on lands platted after January 1, 1960 and of any Comprehensive Plan land-use designation except UGA. Class IV-General non-conversion forest practices (equal to Class I, II, III, and IV-Special forest practices) conducted on lands platted after January 1, 1960 and of any Comprehensive Plan land-use designation except UGA.

Agriculture WEC Settlement Agreement WEC Settlement Agreement Existing and Ongoing vs. New Agriculture Existing and Ongoing vs. New Agriculture Lands of long-term commercial significance Lands of long-term commercial significance Rural Residential Agricultural Activities Rural Residential Agricultural Activities Exemption vs. Alternative Regulation Exemption vs. Alternative Regulation Farm Plans, BMPs, and Monitoring Farm Plans, BMPs, and Monitoring Adaptive Management and Enforcement Adaptive Management and Enforcement

Wetlands RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON: Wetlands Functions Wetlands Functions DOE Best Available Science Volumes I & II DOE Best Available Science Volumes I & II Wetlands in Washington State: A Synthesis of the Science Wetlands in Washington State: A Synthesis of the Science DOE Wetland Rating System DOE Wetland Rating System Moderate Risk Strategy Moderate Risk Strategy Issue: Who rates and delineates? By what method? Issue: Who rates and delineates? By what method?

Wetland Buffer Recommendations The following tables contain the prescribed buffer widths for each combination of factors, established in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Wetlands in Washington State - Volume 2: Guidance for Protecting and Managing Wetlands (Publication # ). The following tables contain the prescribed buffer widths for each combination of factors, established in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Wetlands in Washington State - Volume 2: Guidance for Protecting and Managing Wetlands (Publication # ).

1. For wetlands that have a habitat function score of twenty nine (29) points or more on the wetland rating form, the prescribed buffers shall be as follows: Wetland Category High Impact Medium Impact Low Impact Prescribed Buffer Width (feet) Category I Category II Category III Definitions for high, medium and low impact land-use are provided in Appendix B.

2.For wetlands that have a habitat function score of twenty to twenty eight (20-28) points on the wetland rating form, the prescribed buffers shall be as follows: Wetland Category High Impact Medium Impact Low Impact Prescribed Buffer Width (feet) Category I Category II Category III Category IV Definitions for high, medium and low impact land-use are provided in Appendix B.

3.For wetlands that have a habitat function score of nineteen (19) points or less on the wetland rating form, the prescribed buffers shall be as follows: Wetland Category High Impact Medium Impact Low Impact Prescribed Buffer Width (feet) Category I Category II Category III Category IV Definitions for high, medium and low impact land-use are provided in Appendix B.

Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Channel Migration Zones Channel Migration Zones Rivers and Streams Rivers and Streams Lakes and Ponds Lakes and Ponds Marine Shorelines Marine Shorelines Wildlife Corridors Wildlife Corridors Regulatory Overlap Regulatory Overlap

Channel Migration Zones Contain all five rule-defined Critical Areas Contain all five rule-defined Critical Areas Very high habitat value Very high habitat value Very high risk for development Very high risk for development Human health and safety issues Human health and safety issues CAO regulations must be met or exceeded in SMP CAO regulations must be met or exceeded in SMP Jefferson County is unique in having large functional CMZs Jefferson County is unique in having large functional CMZs

Banks prone to landsliding (i.e., mass wasting) are part of CMZs Lower Elwha River Courtesy of Department of Ecology

Rivers and Streams Buffer widths based on BAS from years of negotiations in forestlands and in CAOs Buffer widths based on BAS from years of negotiations in forestlands and in CAOs Vegetation Management Standards Vegetation Management Standards Applies to all critical areas Applies to all critical areas Hazard Trees Hazard Trees Noxious Weeds Noxious Weeds View Corridors View Corridors Existing Development or Landscaping Existing Development or Landscaping

FWHCA Buffer Recommendations CMZs100 – 200 feet from edge of CMZ CMZs100 – 200 feet from edge of CMZ Shorelines150 feet from OHWM Shorelines150 feet from OHWM Fish-bearing150 feet from OHWM Fish-bearing150 feet from OHWM Non-fish, Perennial100 feet from OHWM Non-fish, Perennial100 feet from OHWM Non-fish, Seasonal feet from OHWM Non-fish, Seasonal feet from OHWM Lakes > 20 acres Lakes > 20 acres Lakes < 20 acres Lakes < 20 acres Marine Shorelines (under development) Marine Shorelines (under development)

Forestry and Conversions WAC 222 Forest Practices Rules WAC 222 Forest Practices Rules FP rules were developed for lands expected to remain in forestry, with gravel roads FP rules were developed for lands expected to remain in forestry, with gravel roads FP rules apply to zoned forestlands and rural residential lands, less than 5K bf per year FP rules apply to zoned forestlands and rural residential lands, less than 5K bf per year CAO applies to: CAO applies to: UGAs – Quilcene, Brinnon, Port Hadlock UGAs – Quilcene, Brinnon, Port Hadlock Conversions – loopholes re: buffers Conversions – loopholes re: buffers NEEDS WORK! NEEDS WORK!

CAO Implementation Resources Mapping Mapping Current Gaps Current Gaps Need LiDAR Need LiDAR Inventory and Characterization Needs Inventory and Characterization Needs Wetland Inventory (i.e. Adamus) Wetland Inventory (i.e. Adamus) Wildlife Corridors (i.e. JLT Quimper) Wildlife Corridors (i.e. JLT Quimper) Critical Areas (i.e. streams, wetlands) Critical Areas (i.e. streams, wetlands)

Education and Resources Washington State University Washington State University Conservation District Conservation District NGOs – NOSC, JLT, NWWI NGOs – NOSC, JLT, NWWI State Agencies – WDFW, WDNR, WDOE State Agencies – WDFW, WDNR, WDOE Watershed Stewardship and Resource Center Watershed Stewardship and Resource Center Web-based Resources and Information Web-based Resources and Information

Monitoring DOE DOE Conservation District Conservation District County Staff County Staff Tribes Tribes NGOs NGOs Streamkeepers (?) Streamkeepers (?)