Juvenile Law in 30 Minutes or Less Otherwise known as “Tom’s Chance to Vent to the Court” Tom C. Rawlings Judge, Juvenile Courts, Middle Circuit Sandersville,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Advertisements

Child Protective Services Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance May 30, 2007.
Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) Liliana Hernandez, Childrens Bureau Child Welfare Program Specialist September 2010.
Introduction to Child Welfare Law in Washington
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
FUTURE OPTION LEFT OPEN Presented by: Honorable Bryan K. Murray Magistrate and Juvenile Judge - 6 th Judicial District.
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
On Behalf of the Parent’s – The ICWA - Transferring Proceedings to Tribal Court and Petitioning to Invalidate ICWA Proceedings.
Introducing the Law, the Child Protection System and the Courts Guardian Ad Litem Program.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS. 2 Court System  District Court  Trial Court  Some “specialty” courts including  Family Court  Drug Court  Juvenile Court 
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
The Path to Permanency Melissa D. Carter Committee on Justice for Children Parent Attorney Conference May 8-9, 2007.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Poverty Law 2 Permanency Planning Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2013 Copyright.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
11/13/2003 Child Placement Conference GUIDE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SENATE BILL 236 Prepared by the SB 236 Workgroup, a Project of the Georgia Model Courts.
Termination of Parental Rights Under OCGA §
Adoption & Safe Families Act
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Social Services Attorneys’ Conference March 9-10, 2006 Legislative Update: Juvenile Law Janet Mason Institute of Government.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Juvenile Law Update District Court Judges’ Conference June 17, 2004 Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
A production of National Foster Parent Association American Bar Association & Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting Dependency Court and Removal of.
Bethanie Barber Assistant Guardian ad Litem Program Coordinator Legal Aid Society of the O.C.B.A. 100 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Fl (407)
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 CHILD PROTECTION IN THE UNITED STATES Norma Threadgill-Goldson, Ph.D., MSW Eastern.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Pennsylvania Indian Child Welfare Handbook Developed By The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work.
Quality Representation for Parents in Child Welfare Cases: A Path to Better Outcomes for Families Presented by Dona Playton Assistant Lecturer at Law UW.
Understanding DCBS Custody & Medical Consent for Services Todd MeadeDebbie Acker, RN CPS Specialist Nurse Service Administrator Child Safety BranchMedical.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
Sharing confidential information Who DFCS can tell.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
Active Efforts Principles & Expectations Oregon Tribes Oregon Judicial Department Citizen Review Board Oregon Department of Human Services.
What does the Safe Haven Law provide? The law protects a parent who leaves their baby at a “Safe Haven” location. The parent will not face criminal prosecution.
Relevant provisions of the Act  S 62 provides  “ A care order may be made an interim order or a final order, except as provided by this Part.  The.
ADOPTIONS CM 124_ADP_PPT_October 2012 PPT 1. Objectives Professional standards & values Adoption program’s legal base. Florida adoption guidelines. Legal.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Dependency Basics Dependency and Termination Commissioner Thurman W. Lowans and Carrie Hoon Wayno, AAG October 2012.
The Multiethnic Placement Act of 1994 (MEPA) As Amended by the Interethnic Adoption Provisions of 1996 (IEAP)
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Permanency Planning in Juvenile Court The options GALs have in finding a safe, permanent home for our kids.
STANDARDS FOR GUARDIANS AD LITEM Supreme Court Rule 110A.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Permanency.
Helping Youth in Indiana. Indiana Department of Child Services Child Protection Services “protects Indiana's children from further abuse or neglect and.
The Indian Child Welfare Act (and the Minnesota Indian family preservation act) U.S.C. § 1901 et. seq. Minn. Stat. § et. seq.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Reunification: Brianna
Family Preservation in Georgia
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Child Abuse and Neglect Institute: The Role of the Judge
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
The Child Welfare System
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
ADOPTIONS.
The Context of Your Work as a Child Welfare Professional
Presented by The Foster Parent Advocacy Program
What does prevention services act mean for Iowa juvenile court judges?
Child Abuse and Neglect Institute
Presentation transcript:

Juvenile Law in 30 Minutes or Less Otherwise known as “Tom’s Chance to Vent to the Court” Tom C. Rawlings Judge, Juvenile Courts, Middle Circuit Sandersville, GA

DEPRIVED Juvenile Court has jurisdiction over any child alleged to be deprived. OCGA Deprived means “without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for the child's physical, mental, or emotional health or morals.” OCGA (8). “The definition of a deprived child focuses upon the needs of the child regardless of parental fault. The petition is brought on behalf of the child and it is the child's welfare and not who is responsible for the conditions which amount to deprivation that is the issue.” – In the Interest of J.P., 280 Ga. App. 100, (2006) SO HOW CAN A CHILD BE DEPRIVED “AS TO ONE PARENT ONLY?” In re: Tidwell, 279 Ga. App. 734 (2006)

OCGA § Reasonable efforts regarding reunification of family; reports and plans; custody orders when reunification found not to be in child's best interest; duration of orders; review of determinations; hearings; supplemental orders (a) A court's order removing a child from the child's home shall be based upon a finding by that court that continuation in the home would be contrary to the welfare of the child. If the court places custody of the child in the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources, the court shall also determine as a finding of fact whether reasonable efforts were made by the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources and any other appropriate agencies to preserve and reunify families prior to the placement of a child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources, to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from that child's home, and to make it possible for the child to return safely to the child's home. Such findings shall also be made at every subsequent review of the court's order under this chapter. (1) In determining reasonable efforts to be made with respect to a child, as described in this subsection, and in making such reasonable efforts, the child's health and safety shall be the paramount concern; (2) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of this subsection, reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify families: (A) Prior to the placement of a child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources, to prevent or eliminate the need for removing the child from the child's home; and (B) To make it possible for a child to return safely to the child's home;

Child Abuse Prevention & Treatment Act of 1974 (CAPTA) Made grants available to states that comply with CAPTA requirements Requirements include: –Coordination of investigation –Provision of GAL in court proceeding –Confidentiality of records –Mandated reporting of abuse by specified professionals –Reporting of data

Adoption Assistance & Child Welfare Act of 1980 Strengthened the role of the state judiciary – all children in the child welfare system must have judicial oversight Set up a federal dollar system that was triggered by a judge’s order –Reasonable efforts findings –Approved foster home Plan was to get significant federal dollars into the foster care system Established adoption assistance program s/cblaws/public_law/pl105_89/pl105_89.htm

Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 Focus of law is on health and safety of the child Goal = end “foster care drift” and move children into permanent homes more quickly Limits number of months child can be in foster care before TPR is filed Provides financial incentives to states to increase number of adoptions

“In all interpretations of statutes, the courts shall look diligently for the intention of the General Assembly, keeping in view at all times the old law, the evil, and the remedy.”O.C.G.A. § “The disposition portion of the juvenile court's order giving temporary legal custody of the child to the petitioners failed to comply with the requirements of O.C.G.A. § because it did not contain necessary findings about reasonable efforts by DFACS or any other appropriate agencies to reunify the mother with the child and foreclosed any consideration of a DFACS plan to provide reunification services” –In the Interest of J.W.K., 254 Ga. App. 661 (2002) What’s the Poipose?

Termination of Parental Rights: Must prove that continued deprivation “will cause or is likely to cause serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to the child.” OCGA § (b)(4)(A)(IV). “We find that the state failed to present any evidence as to the effect that such continued deprivation would have on the child... [T]here was no testimony from any professional, or from any lay witness, that the child would suffer physical, mental, emotional or moral harm from the current situation.... It is not automatically true that finding deprivation likely to continue will support a finding of harm.” –In the Interest of T.P., 270 Ga. App. 700 (2004) In the Int. of J.K., 278 Ga. App. 564 (629 SE2d 529) (2006) –Whole Court, not one mention of ASFA What’s the Poipose?

Other Federal Law Worth Noting Foster Care Independence Act (a.k.a. Chafee Act; ILP) Multi-Ethnic Placement Act (MEPA) Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (I.C.P.C.)

New Rights? In the Int. of J.L.B., 280 Ga. App. 556 (___ SE2d ___) (7/14/2006). In a delinquency case involving their child, PARENTS have the right to: –Their own attorney, and their own free attorney if they can’t afford one; –If they want to proceed pro se, to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, argue, make objections, etc.; and –To file an independent appeal

Links –Emory’s Barton Child Policy Clinic –U.S. Government child welfare information gateway –U.S. Administration for Children and Families –The World’s Greatest Website, a True Fount of Wisdom and the Closest Thing to A Modern Recreation of the Oracle at Delphi.