Effect of Age at Weaning and Post-Weaning Management on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Angus and Charolais-Angus Steers John F. Grimes County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Advertisements

Livestock Management and Marketing Considerations in Dealing With Drought Dr. Curt Lacy and Dr. John McKissick Extension Economists-Livestock University.
When to Market Cows and Bulls Represent 15-20% of Cow-calf income Prices are seasonal Body condition affects price Markets are cyclical Opportunities exist.
Selection and Judging of Beef
R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D Agricultural & Applied Economics UGA-Tifton ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COW CULLING VS. REPLACEMENT HEIFERS.
Feeder Calf Grades: Do Better Grades Really Pay? David Gonsoulin USDA.
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
EVOLUTION of USDA FEEDER GRADES By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
GeneMax™ Mark McCully Certified Angus Beef LLC. Supply challenges for future growth?
Livestock & Poultry Evaluation & Showmanship
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Animal Selection and Evaluation Livestock Evaluation.
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
The Cattle Feeding Industry By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Mini Test! When: Wednesday 4/8/15
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Producers breed for improved genetics Produce all breeding stock (Bulls and Heifers) Raise purebred or registered cattle Pay close attention to EPD’s.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
1 The Value of SimGenetics to Retail Carcass– a New York case study M. J. Baker, G. Jacimovski, M. E. Hannon, L. Bliven.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Beef Lifecycle. Step 1 On cow-calf farms and ranches, cows are bred and give birth to a calf each year.
Nutrition and Reproduction in Beef Cows Cattlemen’s College January 29, 2003 David Lalman Oklahoma State University.
1 Scientific Farm Animal Production, 10 th ed Field and Taylor Copyright ©2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Chapter 2: Breeds and Life Cycles of Livestock and Poultry Unit 2a: Beef Life Cycle - history and general production of beef cattle.
- Typically, retained ownership refers to a producer sending calves/feeders to a feedlot and owning some percentage of them. The calves/feeders can be.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Beef and Dairy Cattle. Objectives: 1.Label the parts of cattle 2.Define key terms associated with cattle 3.Detail the history of cattle 4.Explain the.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
Charolais By: Maria and Aaron. Breed Characteristics They are usually white in color with a pink muzzle and pale hooves. There are now Charolais cattle.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Beef Cattle. BEFORE THE 1960’s… Approximately 20 different breeds were available in the United States. Today, there are over 70 breeds found in the United.
Heifer Retention in Down Cycle Keith Vander Velde, Livestock Specialist.
BEEF CATTLE OPERTATIONS. Objectives  Students should be able to :  Plan a feeding program for a cow calf herd  List and describe approved practices.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Introduction to Beef Cattle Bovine Humor Objectives Describe terms commonly used with beef cattle. Learning the language Identify external parts of.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
Heifer Development OSU Beef Team Growing Phase Lesson 4.
Overview of Pasture to Plate Program 2016 DARRH BULLOCK UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Sustainable Agriculture
The Beef Industry Original Power Point Created by Randal Cales
Exploring the Beef Industry
Beef Cattle Production
Beef Cattle Opertations
Exploring the Beef Industry
Pre-weaned calf management and weaning outlets
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Greg Highfill Woods County Extension Educator, Ag/4-H
Using EPDs in Selection
Expected Progeny Differences
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

Effect of Age at Weaning and Post-Weaning Management on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Angus and Charolais-Angus Steers John F. Grimes County Extension Educator, ANR OSU Extension – Highland Co.

HISTORY AT SOUTHERN ARS Early weaning work began in the mid-1980s. Most recent study began with purchase of bred heifers in Replacement females came from one additional female purchase and retained heifer calves. First four calf crops were sired by Angus bulls. Last two calf crops were sired by Charolais bulls.

INVESTIGATORS John F. Grimes, OSU Extension-Highland Co. Francis L. Fluharty, OSU Dept. of Animal Sciences, Wooster Thomas B. Turner, OSU Dept. of Animal Sciences, Columbus Henry N. Zerby, OSU Dept. of Animal Sciences, Columbus Gary D. Lowe, OSU Dept. of Animal Sciences, Wooster

STUDY OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of different calf management systems on live animal performance and carcass merit.

Days on Feed Determines Marbling Smith (1995) predicted that cattle needed to be on feed 167 to 236 days, and be 835 to 945 pounds before lipogenesis begins, but the cattle were 265 d. of age when they started in the feedlot, which meant that they had to be 14 to 16 months old before they were predicted to begin marbling.

Days on Feed Determines Marbling HOWEVER, Myers et al. (1999) weaned steers at 117 days of age, and fed them a high-concentrate diet for 268 days before they were slaughtered at 394 days of age (13 months of age). The cattle graded 89% low choice or higher, with 56% in the upper 2/3 of the choice grade or higher.

Days on Feed Determines Marbling Fluharty (2000) weaned steers at 103 days of age, and fed them a high- concentrate diet for 282 days before they were slaughtered at 385 days of age (13 months of age). The cattle graded 85% low choice or higher, with 60% in the upper 2/3 of the choice grade or higher.

Days on Feed Determines Marbling Research has shown that cattle can grade choice anywhere from 13 to 26 months of age. Diet, management, and genetics determine whether an animal will grade choice within this age range. Many of the papers that have reported that cattle needed to be a certain age to grade choice already started with yearlings.

Days on Feed Determines Marbling In fact, many animals that do not grade choice at an advanced age probably would have graded choice at a younger age under management and diet strategies that used a high concentrate diet earlier in life. University of Illinois research shows that yearlings need 1/4 inch more backfat to achieve the same marbling score as early weaned calves harvested at the same marbling end point.

USDA Quality Grades Slight = USDA Select Small = USDA Low Choice Modest = USDA Avg. Choice Moderate = USDA High Choice Sl. Abundant = USDA Low Prime Mod. Abundant = USDA Avg. Prime

TREATMENTS 1. Early wean (EW) at approximately 100 days, fast-track feeding, harvest at months of age. 2. Normal wean (NW) at approximately 200 days, fast-track feeding, harvest at months of age. 3. Normal wean at approximately 200 days, stocker (YR) to lbs., finish and harvest at months of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Calving season of approx. 90 days in early Feb. to early May & 2002 calf crops were sired by Angus bulls & 2004 calf crops were sired by Charolais bulls. No calves received creep feed while nursing their dams.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Once the entire calf crop was born, the average birth date was established. Steer calves were alternately assigned into the three treatment groups based on chronological birth order. Once placed into their treatment groups, calves were alternately assigned to replication groups based on chronological birth order.

MATERIALS AND METHODS All calves were fed a high-gain diet during the finishing phase. Harvest time for the steers was determined by a combination of visual appraisal and monitoring the weight and average daily gain for each steer. All steers were processed at The OSU Animal Science Dept.s Meat Laboratory in Columbus.

RESULTS Harvest weight increased as age at feedlot entry increased: EW: 1143 lbs., NW: 1164 lbs., and YR: 1216 lbs. (P<.01) Dressing % decreased as age at feedlot entry increased: EW: 63.6%, NW: 62.8%, and YR: 60.9% (P<.01) Backfat decreased as age at feedlot entry increased: EW:.70, NW:.59, and YR:.52 (P<.01)

RESULTS The percentage of carcasses grading USDA Average or High Choice was higher for EW (75.9%) and NW (75.9%) than YR (45%). (P<.05) The percentage of carcasses grading USDA Prime was higher for EW (15.8%) and NW (8.3%) than YR (0%). Yield Grades tended to be numerically higher with the EW cattle than the other 2 groups. No clear trends in tenderness emerged in this study.

RESULTS Age at harvest: EW days, NW – 408 days, YR – 535 days Feed conversion (lbs. feed per lb. gain): EW – 5.1, NW – 5.7, YR – 6.4

RESULTS Harvest weight increased as age at feedlot entry increased: EW: 1163 lbs., NW: 1179 lbs., and YR: 1280 lbs. (P<.01) Dressing % decreased as age at feedlot entry increased: EW: 63.4%, NW: 62.8%, and YR: 61.3% (P<.01) Backfat decreased as age at feedlot entry increased: EW:.54, NW:.45, and YR:.39 (P<.01)

RESULTS The percentage of carcasses grading USDA Average or High Choice trended higher for EW (49.2%) and NW (40.3%) than YR (38.1%). The percentage of carcasses grading USDA Prime was higher for EW (4.2%) than NW (0%) and YR (0%). Yield Grades were numerically higher with the EW (3.2) than the NW (3.1) or YR (3.0) cattle. (P<.05)

RESULTS Age at harvest: EW days, NW – 419 days, YR – 559 days Feed conversion (lbs. feed per lb. gain): EW – 5.3, NW – 5.4, YR – 6.6 Feed conversion (lbs. feed per lb. gain): EW – 5.3, NW – 5.4, YR – 6.6

SIRE DIFFERENCES Charolais-sired calves had less backfat at harvest: EW: -.16 in., NW: -.15 in., YR: -.13 in. Charolais-sired calves had more rib eye area at harvest: EW: 1.0 in., NW:.6 in., YR: 1.0 in. Charolais-sired calves had numerically lower Yield Grades: EW: -.7, NW: -.5, YR: -.6

SIRE DIFFERENCES Angus-sired calves had higher Quality Grades (% Avg. Choice and higher): EW: +26.7%, NW: +35.6%, YR: +6.9% Both sire groups had similar feed conversion rates across treatment groups