Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: 2012-05-14 Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /037r1 Submission March 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0338r1 Submission March 2012 Hung-Yu Wei, National Taiwan UniversitySlide 1 DeepSleep: Power Saving Mode to Support a Large Number.
Doc.: IEEE /0410r2 Submission March 2011 Slide 1 Data Transmission Protection on the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.
Doc.: IEEE /0818r2 Submission July 2008 Jing Zhu, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Managed Contention Access – A technique to improve Video Streaming.
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0325r0 March 2012 Slide 1 TIM Enhancement With Group Bits Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /1097r1 Submission Sep 2012 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Reserve Channel List in ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1515r0 Submission November 2011 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide ah Wi-Fi Offloading Considerations Date:
Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0295r0 Submission PRAW Follow Up Date: Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0613r0 Submission May 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom US Channelization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /1550r1 Submission Nov 2011 Zander, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 Extension of AID and TIM to Support 6000 STAs in ah Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0696r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll Date: Authors: Date: July, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0074r0 Submission NDP Type PS-Poll Frame Follow-Up Date: Authors: Slide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0070r1 Enabling AP Sleep Date: Authors: Jafarian, Qualcomm Slide 1 January 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0839r0 Submission Slide 1S. Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. July 2010 DL MU-MIMO performance with QoS traffic and OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE /0798r1 Submission July 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide 1 HT Features in Mesh Network Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0798r3 Submission September 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide 1 HT Features in Mesh Network Date: Authors:
ZTE corporation doc.: IEEE /1086r2 September 2012 Submission TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1409r0 November 2013 Adriana Flores, Rice UniversitySlide 1 Dual Wi-Fi: Dual Channel Wi-Fi for Congested WLANs with Asymmetric.
Doc.: IEEE /0810r0 Submission May 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Selection of Key Requirement Elements for Baseline FR-EM Document Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0439r0 March 2012 Switching between DCF and PP-MAC Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0148r0 Nokia Internal Use Only January 2012 Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia Slide 1 Date: Authors: Uplink Throughput.
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
TIM Compression Date: Authors: January 2012 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /388r2 Submission TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Doc.:IEEE /0860r0 July 2012 Qualcomm Inc. Collision reduction after TIM Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0329r1 March 2012 Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia Slide 1 Date: Authors: Group Synchronized DCF.
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0028r1 Submission January 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Power Saving Possibilities for Networks Supporting.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r4 Submission Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations September 2012 Slide 1 I2R Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0370r3 Submission TIM Compression November 2012 Slide 1 Date: Haiguang Wang, I2R.
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Doc.: IEEE /117r0 Submission January 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah TIM Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /388r1 SubmissionMinyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: March 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1230r1 Submission ah Channel Access Improvement Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0619r3 Submission May 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0341r2 Submission March 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Usage Cases for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission ah M2M Channel Access Performance Date: September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0370r0 Submission January 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 TIM Compression Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Power Efficient PS Poll
TGah Efficient TIM Encoding
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Introduction 11ah use case includes a large outdoor network [1] –For an outdoor smart grid network, the number of STAs can be –TIM element may cover few hundreds to few thousands STAs –Bits set to one in the TIM element may trigger too many PS-Poll/trigger frame transmissions from the STAs within a short period of time –Many stations at the edge of the coverage area could be hidden from each other for uplink transmissions due to a much higher path loss between STA-STA than AP-STA [2] This presentation proposes a uplink channel access scheme using information from an AP (e.g. TIM information) to mitigate the hidden node problem May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission TIM Triggered Hidden Node Problem Too many bits set in the TIM element may trigger too many PS- Poll/trigger frame transmissions right after the beacon frame within a short period of time –Increase collisions between the hidden nodes STA1 STA2 AP STA2’s transmission range STA1’s transmission range TIM (n bits set to 1) Beacon interval STA1 STA2 STAn … PS-Poll/trigger frame n transmissions within a short period of time (e.g. few mS) May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Basic Concept Utilize information from an AP (e.g. TIM element) to spread uplink transmissions over a period of time so that the uplink transmissions are not overlapping with each other TIM (n bits set to 1) Beacon interval STA1 STA2 STAn … PS-Poll/trigger frame Spread n transmissions over a much longer time period … May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Option 1 Randomly spread uplink transmission over a period of time –The total number of time slots, N, may be determined based on the number of paged (and unpaged) stations, n, indicated in the received TIM (e.g. N = f (n)) –The time slot duration T may be chosen to be large enough to complete PS- Poll/trigger+SIFS+DATA+SIFS+ACK (e.g. 20 ~ 40 mS) –A STA randomly chooses a time slot to start its uplink channel access If two or more hidden STAs choose the same time slot, they may collide TIM (n paged STAs)Total N time slots, each time slot duration = T STA 10 STA 2,8 (may collide) STA 3STA 7STA 5 STA 1 STA 4 STA 9STA 6 T May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Option 2 Deterministically spread uplink transmission over a period of time –The total number of time slots, N, may be determined based on the number of paged stations, n, indicated in the received TIM (e.g. N = n) –The time slot duration T may be chosen to be large enough to complete PS- Poll/trigger+SIFS+DATA+SIFS+ACK (e.g. 20 ~ 40 mS) –AP assigns a time slot for a STA Example: AID bit position of TIM may be used to determine the assigned time slot –Each STA starts to access the channel at the assigned time slot following EDCA STA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Total N time slots, each time slot duration = T … TIM bitmap STA10 STA1 May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Simulation Setup 1 1 AP and 10 STAs –STAs transmit Data frames –AP replies with Ack frame Parameters –PHY rate = 600Kbps, packet size = 260 bytes –Packet Tx time = ~3.7msec –Use AC_VO, max number of retransmissions = 11 Uplink channel access schemes –CW32 20mS Slot: each STA randomly chooses a 20mS time slot out of 32 time slots for uplink channel access –CW64 20mS Slot: each STA randomly chooses a 20mS time slot out of 64 time slots for uplink channel access –Deterministic 20mS Slot: a 20mS time slot for uplink channel access is determined by each STA’s AID bit position of the TIM bitmap –Deterministic 40mS Slot: a 40mS time slot for uplink channel access is determined by each STA’s AID bit position of the TIM bitmap STA1 AP STA2 STA3STA4 STA5 STA6 STA7 STA8STA9 STA10 STA5,6,7 are hidden to STA1 for ~55% of time STA4 is hidden from STA1 for ~30% of time STA3 is hidden from STA1 for ~10% of time May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Schemes - Examples TIM 32 time slots, each time slot duration = 20 mS 64 time slots, each time slot duration = 20mS TIM 10 time slots, each time slot duration = 20mS TIM Each STA starts to access channel at time t chosen from ~Uniform(5mS) STA STA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 STA 10 STA 2 STA 3STA 7 STA 5 STA 1STA 4 STA 9 STA 6 STA 8 STA 10 STA 2,8 (may collide) STA 3STA 7STA 5 STA 1 STA 4 STA 9STA 6 STA 1~10 uplink channel access … TIM bitmap Uniform(5mS) CW32 20mS Slot CW64 20mS Slot Deterministic (D) 20mS Slot Deterministic (D) 40mS Slot 10 time slots, each time slot duration = 40mS May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Average number of retransmissions Average Tx delay (=active duration) = medium access delay + time until successful packet transmission Comparisons 1 (AC_VO) STA active time reduced by 94% 99% less retransmissions CWmin[AC_VO]=3, CWmax[AC_VO]=7 Effect of hidden nodes When hidden nodes are present in the network, spreading the uplink channel accesses over a much longer period of time significantly reduces –the transmission delay by 94%* and –the retransmissions by 99%*. *) D 20mS slot gain over U(5mS) Effect of hidden nodes May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access using TIM Information -OBSS Example OBSS case –If a STA’s uplink channel access is delayed to the next time slot due to OBSS transmissions, the STA may contend with the other station in the next time slot. AID TUT of STA with AID6 TIM bitmap information of AID1~16 … PS-Poll or Null-Data or Data frame Slot Time T (e.g mS) t0t0 Un-paged STAs may also have uplink data to transmit 6 OBSS transmissions 2 2 May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission OBSS Scenarios Simulation Setup 2 1 AP and 10 STAs + 2 STAs (OBSS) –10 STAs transmit Data frames, AP replies with Ack frame AC_VO –OBSS: STA12  STA11 AC_BE Parameters –PHY rate = 600Kbps, packet size = 260 bytes –Packet Tx time = ~3.7msec –Max number of retransmissions = 11 –OBSS traffic: PHY rate=600Kbps Packet size=1500 bytes, Tx time~20mS Packet inter-arrival time: –Uniform(.1S)  occupies ~40% channel –Uniform(.2S)  occupies ~20% channel –Full buffered traffic STA1 AP STA2 STA3STA4 STA5 STA6 STA7 STA8STA9 STA10 STA5,6,7 are hidden to STA1 for ~55% of time STA4 is hidden from STA1 for ~30% of time STA3 is hidden from STA1 for ~10% of time STA12STA11 May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 12

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Average number of retransmissions Average Tx delay (=active duration) = medium access delay + time until successful packet transmission OBSS Scenarios 2 - Comparisons STA active time reduced by 78 ~91% 92-98% less retransmissions Observation –From the comparison between U(5mS) without OBSS and U(5mS) with OBSS shows that contentions between the hidden nodes are the major contributor for the large transmission delay and retransmissions. –Spreading the uplink channel accesses over a longer period of time reduces both the transmission delay and the number of retransmissions significantly even when there is OBSS traffic. Effect of OBSS traffic May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 13

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission OBSS Scenario Setup 3 – Hidden Node 1 AP and 10 STAs + 2 STAs (OBSS) –10 STAs transmit Data frames, AP replies with Ack frame AC_VO –OBSS: STA12  STA11 AC_BE Parameters –PHY rate = 600Kbps, packet size = 260 bytes –Packet Tx time = ~3.7msec –Max number of retransmissions = 11 –OBSS traffic: PHY rate=600Kbps Packet size=1500 bytes, Tx time~20mS Packet inter-arrival time: –Full buffered traffic STA1 AP STA2 STA3STA4 STA5 STA6 STA7 STA8STA9 STA10 STA5,6,7 are hidden to STA1 for ~55% of time STA4 is hidden from STA1 for ~30% of time STA3 is hidden from STA1 for ~10% of time STA12STA11 Full buffered traffic interference BSS1 BSS2 May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 14

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission OBSS Scenarios 3 - Comparisons Observation –STA1, STA2, STA3, STA10 are hidden from STA12 –The hidden nodes (STA1, STA2, STA3, STA10) suffer from very high packet drop rate (45-62%) –Even in the OBSS with a hidden node with full buffered traffic, spreading the uplink channel accesses over a longer period of time reduces both the transmission delay and the number of retransmissions significantly. Tx delay, retransmissions, and packet drop rate STA1, STA2, STA3, STA10 are hidden from STA12 May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Summary 11ah use case includes a large outdoor network –Many stations at the edge of the coverage area could be hidden from each other The 11ah channel model [2] shows that the channel between STA-STA experiences a higher path loss than the channel between AP-STA. –Bits set in the TIM element may trigger collisions between the hidden nodes –Uplink data transmissions from the hidden nodes within a short period of time (e.g. ~ few mS) also result in collisions at the AP When hidden nodes are present in the network, spreading the uplink channel accesses over a period of time so that the uplink transmissions are not overlapped with each other significantly reduces –the transmission delay (STA active time) by 94%* and –the number of retransmissions by 99%*. *) Deterministic 20mS time slot gain over Uniform(5mS) We propose to utilize the information from the AP to spread out the uplink transmissions (e.g. PS-Poll/Data) over a period of time to mitigate the hidden node problem –The exact definition of the information from the AP is TBD (e.g. TIM element) –The definition of the period of time is TBD E.g. DTIM interval or (the number of STAs in a TIM bitmap) x (the slot time duration) may be used May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 16

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Straw Poll 1 Do you support the concept of utilizing information from an AP to spread out uplink transmissions over a period of time to mitigate the hidden node problem? –Y: –N: –A: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 17

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Motion 1 Move to accept the concept of utilizing information from an AP to spread out uplink transmissions over a period of time to mitigate the hidden node problem in the TGah Specification Framework document. –Y: –N: –A: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 18

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Reference [1] Potential compromise of ah use case document, /457r0 [2] TGah Channel Model, /968r3 May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 19

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Backup May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 20

doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission CWmin[AC_BE]=15, CWmax[AC_BE]=1023 Average number of retransmissions Comparisons 1 (AC_BE) Average Tx delay (= active duration) = medium access delay + time until successful packet transmission STA active time reduced by 93% 99% less retransmissions May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 21