Highlights from the IPSAS Governance Review Group Richard BELLIN Cour des comptes (France) PSC Meeting 19 June 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICP 7-th Regional Coordinators Meeting World Bank, Washington D.C.
Advertisements

2) Long term (1/4) UNJSPF : Evolution of Actuarial situation since
OECD public consultation on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting OECD Conference Centre, Paris 19 May 2014 Other Discussion.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Progress with Due Diligence Activities in Panama Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC5) La Lopé National Park, Gabon.
Performance Appraisals
1 School District Merger Study Alfred-Almond, Arkport and Canaseraga Central Schools January 30, 2014 Castallo and Silky Education Consultants Alan Pole.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
1 Revision of ISSAI 30 – Code of Ethics Project proposal to the Steering Committee of the INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Bahrain, May 2014.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
Comenius Individual Pupil Mobility. Individual Pupil Mobility Aims of the action-1  Allow secondary school pupils to spend between 3 and 10 months in.
WIOA Timeline and Action Plan for States
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
Implementation Council Meeting Structure and Resources Background: The Implementation Council (Council) roles and responsibilities are described in the.
2009 Performance Assessment Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
1 Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs Compliance monitoring in the Department of Home Affairs 30 April 2013.
Development of ISSAI 5300 on IT AUDIT
Survey on the Impact of the Working Group on Public Debt (WGPD) Annual Meeting of the WGPD Helsinki, Finland September 10-12, | ASF WGPD.
1 Budgeting in Greece Presentation at the annual meeting of Senior Budget Officials, Vienna, June 2008 Ian Hawkesworth, Budgeting and Public Expenditures.
5 th meeting of INTOSAI Knowledge Sharing Steering Committee New Delhi, 16 and 17 September 2013 Progress report of INTOSAI Working Group Accountability.
INTOSAI WORKING GROUP ON KEY NATIONAL INDICATORS Dmitry Zaytsev Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation Sofia, March 25, 2015 VIII MEETING WORKING GROUP.
Progress Report to the PSC Steering Committee INTOSAI PSC Subcommittee on Internal Control Standards SAI of Poland (NIK) June 2011, Wellington.
RACS coordination meeting 29 May 2008 Brussels. Review of the functioning of the RACs.
Summary UPR Cross Sectoral Steering Group What is the UPR? Women’s rights under the UPR How can you get involved and next steps? Why.
7 June 2012 Guidelines for the Compilation of Water Accounts and Statistics Guidelines for the Compilation of Water Accounts and Statistics UN Statistics.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. The regulatory framework in Romania allows the civil society to impact public decision making. There are.
School Finances for Finance Subcommittees School Councils.
Development of Management Information System for the Forestry Sector in Viet Nam F O R M I S II Implementation of PSC’s conclusion during the 2 nd meeting.
INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Due process – why? Suggested by subcommittee chairs… To ensure… Transparency Accountability Consistency and high.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Post-Secondary Education Program Joint AFN/INAC PSE Program Review with representation from NAIIHL and the Labrador Inuit Regional Information Process.
PPAR Workflow National Projects 1 Report request sent by PMO two weeks prior to the end of the reporting period, i.e. 15 June & 15 Dec. 2 CP can start.
Session 3 CPDP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)
Task Force on International Public Accounts Standards OECD National Accounts Experts meeting, Paris October, 2003 Task Force on International Public Accounts.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
Annual Report Constitution Public Audit Act Public Finance Management Act Other legislation Minister of Finance Establishment and operations National.
Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
DEVELOPMENT OF A WHITE PAPER ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Ministry of Correctional Services.
BPM6 Compilation Guide: Progress (item 17 on the Agenda) Balance of Payments Working Group Eurostat, Luxembourg April 2–3, 2012 Tamara Razin, Statistics.
1 Enforcing SAI and PAC Recommendations Parliamentary Oversight Strengthening the powers and Practices of Public Accounts Committee Kampala Uganda 6 th.
Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) :The Role of the Regulator International Monetary Fund.
Stage 3. Consultation and Review Standard Setting Training Course 2016.
Monitoring Visit to NatRisk Project
Field Analyst Support Team (FAST) School Finance Division
The Ugandan Budget Process A Presentation to the Association of Budget Offices Conference Montreal, Canada 17th -19th June 2013 by Hon. Okot.
Accounting Standards Board Annual Report 2006
The Codex Alimentarius Commission
Performance Audit Subcommittee
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
Good Governance in the Public Sector An international framework
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
Meeting Venue Date Public Interest Oversight Board Maria Helena Pettersson PIOB Board Member IESBA CAG Meeting New York – March 6, 2017.
Revision of IES 4 David McPeak IESBA Meeting October 2011 Event:
International Federation of Accountants
SAI Engagement with External Stakeholders
The IRES process in Vladimir Markhonko
Performance Audit Subcommittee Project for ISSAI Level 4 review 66th INTOSAI Governing Board Meeting Vienna, November 5-7, 2014.
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
Process for Publication of ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs
GAC Travel Support Rules Update
Eurostat D4 Feedback from outreach meetings First quarter 2012
INTOSAI WORKING GROUP ON KEY NATIONAL INDICATORS
12th annual meeting of the Performance Audit Subcommittee
TC-CCP Application of KPEI
Presentation transcript:

Highlights from the IPSAS Governance Review Group Richard BELLIN Cour des comptes (France) PSC Meeting 19 June 2013

BACKGROUND The G 20 meeting in Moscow (February 2013) called to the IMF and World Bank to report on issues of transparency and comparability of public sector reporting An IPSAS Governance Review Group (IPSAS GRG) was appointed to make recommandations on the Governance of the IPSAS Board to the G20 (not the content of IPSAS) The GRG comes after multiple consultations made for years on arrangements for governance and oversight for International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) The IPSAS GRG comprises representatives of the IMF, World Bank, OECD, EU, IOSCO and INTOSAI.

BACKGROUND The members of the Accounting and Reporting Subcommittee (ARS) received a call for interest regarding representation of the INTOSAI to the IPSAS GRG France’s Court of Accounts expressed its interest and was officially accepted as representative A first meeting was held in the WB Office in Paris on 31 May

BACKGROUND Questions raised during previous consultations : A competent and well-balanced standard-setting for the public sector must respond to public sector specificities Should Members of the IPSASB oversight/governance body not be primarily from the public sector rather than from securities and bank regulators? Should Governments and Parliaments and other public stakeholders as national standard setters not have their say in consultation on governance and standards elaboration?

EXPECTED OUTPUTS To make recommendations to strengthen the current governance and oversight arrangements for the setting of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) To enhance the perceived relevance, quality and legitimacy of those standards and pronouncements A consultation document, seeking input from interested stakeholders will be issued in the third quarter of 2013, with a final report and recommendations being issued and made public in Spring 2014.

TENTATIVE TIMELINE By 30 June 2013, a draft public consultation document on the IPSAS Governance will be issued to the GRG for consultation By 31 July 2013 the public consultation document should be issued for comments, with deadline date of 31 October for submissions WB and OECD should prepare a draft report to be discussed by GRG Members early in 2014 A final report with recommendations should be adressed to G 20 mid-2014

OUR THREE COMMITMENTS  Make sure that all INTOSAI Members are informed about each substantial step of the GRG. This means that : We will inform ARS on dates of consultations and deadlines We will stay available to provide and obtain any information requested by INTOSAI Members on the process We will offer to provide a feedback on GRG at each INTOSAI relevant meeting that we will attend

OUR THREE COMMITMENTS  Make sure that the consultation and draft report are submitted to each INTOSAI Member for individual comment. This means that : We will act as dissemination points to ensure that all INTOSAI Members are informed We will not answer for other Members : each Member will comment individually the consultations

Our committements  Make sure that all individual comments are taken into consideration to elaborate the report. This means : We will verify that all your comments are published on the official GRG web site (we recommend that each INTOSAI Member copy us with their comments while sending them to the GRG) We will verify that all your comments are reflected in the report (the GRG will operate by consensus) We will make sure that enough time is allowed to SAI to inform their Governments and other national IPSASB stakeholders interested in providing comments (in many countries the national public sector accounting standard setter is under the auspices of the Ministry of Budget while being autonomous).

Thank you