Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Advertisements

Strengthening the State- Tribal-Federal Partnership to Assess the Condition of Nations Waters.
Status of Instream Flow Science in the Southeastern US Mary M. Davis, Ph.D., Technical Advisor Southern Instream Flow Network.
Update on Development of Expected Conditions for Colorado August 14, 2006 Chris Theel, WQCD.
Sediment Guidance Workgroup Daniels Fund Building Nov 12, 2013
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS Utah Division of Water Quality Snake Creek, Heber Valley, 2014.
New Hampshire Estuaries Project September 30, 2005 Estuarine Nutrient Criteria Presentation to New Hampshire Estuaries Project Technical Advisory Committee.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
Brian Hemsley- Flint B.Sc. C.Biol. M.I.Biol. Northeast Region Ecology Team Leader.
Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Standards and Assessment Linear Vegetation Survey (LVS) Sampling Method October 2012.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control
Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Tools Aquatic Life/Nutrient Workgroup August 11, 2008.
Draft Multimetric Indices for Colorado. Data Preparation Established reference and stressed criteria Identified reference and stressed sites Classified.
Algal metric approaches for assessing trophic condition and organic enrichment in U.S. streams and rivers Stephen D. Porter Norman E. Spahr David K. Mueller.
Introduction to the gradient analysis. Community concept (from Mike Austin)
Developing Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs: How it May Impact You J. Warren Schlechte and John B. Taylor - Inland Fisheries Patricia L. Radloff – Coastal.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
MJ Paul Tetra Tech Inc. Center for Ecological Sciences RTP, NC USING BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES IN NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT: APPLICATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES,
Development of a Southeastern Reference Stream Monitoring Network Debbie Arnwine Water Resources, TDEC
A Chemical and Vegetative Characterization of the Ichetucknee River Sky K. Notestein and Thomas K. Frazer.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Biologically based urban response models for the South Atlantic gulf and Tennessee River basins T.F. Cuffney, E.M. Giddings, and M.B. Gregory North Carolina.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
The Biological Condition Gradient and Tiered Aquatic Life Uses: With Applications in the State of Maine United States Environmental Protection Agency Tiered.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
Identifying Changes to Stream Condition caused by Urbanization How understanding the responses can improve ecological risk characterization
ECOSTAT meeting – Ispra (IT), July of 14 CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration.
1 Defining Least-Impacted Reference Condition for the National Wadeable Streams Assessment Alan Alan Herlihy (Oregon State University), John Stoddard (U.S.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Multimetric Concepts Index 101 Michael Paul; Jeroen Gerritsen Tetra Tech, Inc.
Module 11 Biological Criteria
NAWQA Nutrient Synthesis Past, Present, and Future USGS Workshop on Nutrient Processes in the Upper Mississippi River Basin UMESC, LaCrosse, WI March 25.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
BENTHIC INDICATORS FOR THE SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED LANDSCAPE OF THE MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL PLAINS Ben Jessup – Tetra Tech, Inc. Valerie Alley – Mississippi.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Developing relations among human activities, stressors, and stream ecosystem responses for integrated regional, multi- stressor models R. Jan Stevenson.
Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs – A Review of Missouri’s Proposed Approach Daniel V. Obrecht Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences University of Missouri.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
National Water Quality Monitoring Conference Session E4 April 29, 2014 Jonathan Witt & Britta Bierwagen, ORD/USEPA Jen Stamp & Anna Hamilton, Tetra Tech,
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Bioassessment in the lower Mekong River: technology transfer to a developing region Ian Campbell 1 and Bruce Chessman 2 1 Rhithroecology, Blackburn South,
THE USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE TRAITS TO ASSESS CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES AND VULNERABILITIES Anna Hamilton (Tetra Tech), Britta Bierwagen (US EPA),
View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Using periphyton communities to indicate nutrient levels in Pacific Northwest streams Dan Sobota 1, Shannon Hubler.
Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources
AIM-NAMF Project Evolution
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
An aquatic perspective
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
confidence in classification
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
Validation and alternative approaches
Developing, understanding and using nutrient boundaries
Presentation transcript:

Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824

Periphyton Data from Region 4 and National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University East Lansing, MI Chris Decker U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Athens, GA 30605

Outline Review “Diatom Responses to Nutrient Conditions in Region 4 Streams”, a report prepared for USEPA Region 4 by Chris Decker and me. Review results from NAWQA-NEET and NRSA periphyton studies that relate to Region 4 – NEET: Covariation in pH and NP with Human Disturbance Gradient confounds assessing nutrient effect – NRSA: Modeled MMIs with tested metrics, species characterizations for refined metric testing Next steps – Further species traits analysis – Website and Database

Streams sampled in Region 4 during summer 2006 and summer 2007 (SPNBR and SPNR) N=169

Wide range of nutrient concentrations should be sufficient to produce biological responses The 25 th percentiles of TP and TN at all sites sampled in Region 4 streams were and mg/L, respectively

pH was unusually low in Coastal Plain Streams Region 4 NRSA

Correlation Between Water Chemistry and Land Use Land Cover Variables

Diatom Species Composition Highly Related to Nutrient & pH/Cond Gradients

Region 4 TP Metric (Weighted Average (PLS) Regression) ∑p i Opt i – i=1-n spp Observed TP (ln(mg TP/L)) Inferred TP (ln(mg TP/L)) Inferred TP Jack (ln(mg TP/L)) Resid Inf TP (ln(mg TP/L)) Resid Inf TP Jack (ln(mg TP/L)) C D A B

Many Diatom Metrics Correlated to TP and Human Disturbance Gradient

Most Response is in Low Range of Nutrients Note Linearity and Non-linearity of Responses

Weighted Average Metric Better Related to Land Use than Indicator Species Metrics

Response of Periphyton Could Be Used to Justify Nutrient Criteria (thresholds or reference condition)

NAWQA-NEET

NARS: Periphyton MMI (no new metrics used) Site Class (R=reference, MD=moderately disturbed, HD=highly disturbed, V=reference validation)

Metrics Selected for National and Regional MMIs

NRSA Periphyton MMI by Ecoregion: Eastern Highlands and Lowland Plains Site Class (R=ref, MD=mod dist, HD=high dist, V= validation) Traditional MMIModeled MMI

NRSA: Species Traits

Web Site: Species Traits Trait Types – Weighted Average Optima – Indicator Species Values Indicate What? – Reference and Trashed or Human Disturbance Gradient Biological condition traits Sensitive and Tolerant Taxa Ecological Functions – Stressors Nutrients, pH, siltation, hydrologic alteration (dam upstream) Existing and New Traits based on NARS surveys

Web Site: Database Input Tables – Species names and traits (12 traits at a time) – Sample IDs, species names, counts – Taxa harmonization table QA – Matches for all taxa names, count totals Metric calculation – Weighted average metrics (∑p i Opt i ) – Indicator species metrics (% spp or ind w trait)

Summary Periphyton metrics work in Region 4 and can be use to support development of nutrient criteria Periphyton metrics could be better Lots of Potential from Existing and New Data Sets Next steps – Further species traits analysis – Website and Database