An Inventor’s Perspective Harry K. Charles, Jr., Ph.D. presented to Patents and Pizza October 3, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects STCU/NATO Workshop From Science to Business Kiev, Ukraine October 11, 2006 Judson R. Hightower.
Advertisements

University Industry Collaboration Guven Yalcintas, Ph.D. Vice President Technology Transfer Office The Research Foundation of SUNY Alfred, NY-April 27,
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATION CENTER WIPO/INN/MCT/04/3 WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT Muscat, April 20, 2004.
The Utilization of Intellectual Property Rights in SMEs
From Invention to Patent -Patents as Tool for Economic Success- WIPO – INSME International Training Program IP and Management of Innovation in SMEs May.
Using ECF in the Company Market Alan Barlow: Claims Director Endurance Worldwide Insurance Ltd Automating the Claims Process Through Electronic Solutions.
Getting Your Intellectual Property Investor Ready A Presentation to TTI2001 – 27 September 2001 Malcolm McBratney, Partner – Technology Group.
Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer 1 JHTT: Translating the discoveries of the future Translating the discoveries of the future Wesley D. Blakeslee Executive.
Hopes Creek WHY PROTECT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY?
Manchester Science Enterprise Centre Intellectual Property Dr Robert A. Phillips Manchester Science Enterprise Centre.
Enrico Chesta Trasferimenti tecnologici dal CERN: come accelerare l'innovazione Enrico Chesta Head of CERN Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property.
June 8, 2006 PATENTS: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW Steven R. Ludwig, Ph.D., Esq.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OFFICE OF PATENT COUNSEL March 16, 2001.
LOWER SHORE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM Bringing the Benefits of Discovery to the World MAY 23, 2012 Wesley D. Blakeslee Executive Director Johns Hopkins.
2/2/09 - L14 Patents Part2Copyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU1 Patents Part 2.
1 Intellectual Property Basics Peggy Wade, Ph.D. Director, Division of Engineering Research, College of Engineering Michigan State University
Entrepreneurship Intellectual Property: Protecting Your Ideas 11.
Intellectual Property in the Classroom PI Institute – January 16, 2003 Dr. Stephen Boedo Department of Mechanical Engineering
1 Intellectual Property Basics What is intellectual property? Intellectual properties are intangible products of the mind. These include:
Intellectual Property (IP) GE 105 Introduction to Engineering Design.
Cochran Law Offices, LLC Patent Procedures Presented by William W. Cochran.
The Importance and Role of Patent Information Jerusalem 21 June 2010 Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected by Copyright and written permission should be obtained.
Intellectual Property – The Basics Christine Helliwell, PhD Scottish Health Innovations Ltd 25 th October 2012.
3/25/20041 How an Engineer Ends Up in Court: The Role of the Expert Witness Laurence W. Nagel Omega Enterprises Randolph, NJ.
Protection of knowledge in the shipbuilding industry Leading expertise for a safer world A Classification Society perspective Vaughan Pomeroy, Technical.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Training Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights (Jun17-18,2013, Heads Dept, sonu, champs) Intellectual Property Management Office.
The Role of Patent Information in Promoting Innovation Islamabad October 8, 2013 Mussadiq Hussain Program Officer, Innovation and Technology Support Section.
Intellectual Property Seminar
The Catholic University of America Office of Technology Transfer Discovery, Patenting and Commercialization of CUA- Developed Technologies January 9, 2003.
Intellectual Property, Nondisclosure agreements, Electronically Monitored Workplaces, And high level thinking questions.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Intellectual Property. John Ayers February 25, 2005.
The Patent Process. Protection of Ideas or Inventions An idea/know how Generally speaking, we would like to protect inventions that have significant commercial.
The Business of Technology Baker & McKenzie LLP Tamsen Valoir, Ph.D. Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the.
Intellectual Property GE 105 Introduction to Engineering Design.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
UARC Intellectual Property Management Burney Le Boeuf Director, Aligned Research Program of UARC Professor Emeritus UC Santa Cruz November 12, 2009.
Patents Physical Property Deed Intellectual Property Deed InventionHouse.
Unit 8: Specialty Legal Software. Topics for Seminar Assignments this week LexisNexis Westlaw Special law firm management software SmartDraw.
New York Washington, DC Silicon Valley May 8, 2010 Charles Weiss Kenyon & Kenyon LLP (212) Southern Area Entrepreneur's.
Navigating the University Technology Transfer August 23, 2012 Christopher Moulding Sr. Manager, Technology Advancement and Licensing I’ve got an idea…now.
Encounters with Ethics Michael Bass Professor Emeritus College of Optics and Photonics/CREOL University of Central Florida.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
New Unit: Analytical Reading You will need: Readers’ Notebook Post its Your novel Writing implement.
Promotion of Innovation: Usefulness and value of Patent Information Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section Ulaanbaatar March.
The most common cause for an eviction is Non payment of rent In many states, the only defense a tenant can offer for Non payment of rent is constructive.
Everything you wanted to know about patents. Intellectual property Product of the mind: idea, invention, artistic expression, name, business process,
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RELATED RIGHTS What Goes Out the Door When a Researcher Does? Presented by Gail Norris University of Rochester Office of Technology.
? ? ? ? ? ? What valuable skills can you develop by studying chemistry? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
Who, what, where and when. UCC Office of Technology Transfer.
Riga Technical University Innovation and Technology Transfer Centre Technology Transfer Office EIROPAS SAVIENĪBA Technology transfer activities in Riga.
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
1 Intellectual Property Rights David Worrall – Legal Department.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
Patent Applications Just the Frequently Asked Questions.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Lecture No: 18 BY CH. SHAHZAD ANSAR.
Technology Transfer Office
Brief Overview of Research Intellectual Property (IP)
“COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE” USING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFORMATION
ECE362 Principles of Design
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Presentation transcript:

An Inventor’s Perspective Harry K. Charles, Jr., Ph.D. presented to Patents and Pizza October 3, 2006

06VG Outline  Introduction  Background  Invention Experience  Records  Notebook  Disclosure  Process  How to invent?  Environment  Encouragement  Resources  Recognition  Inventor’s Responsibility  Closing Thoughts

06VG Introduction  Background: H. K. Charles, Jr.  BSEE Drexel University (EE)  Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University (EE)  APL Experience (~35 years) Post Doctoral Fellow (Research Center) Engineer (Microelectronics) Section Supervisor (Microelectronics) Group Supervisor (Microelectronics) Branch Head (Engineering, Design, and Fabrication) Department Head (Technical Services)  200 publications

06VG Introduction  Invention Experience  40 Invention Disclosures  10 Patents  Technical Expert (consultant) in three patent lawsuits (claims construction, lawyer education, etc.)  Deposed twice  Testified at trial

06VG Records  Notebook  diligence  idea linking  supporting documentation  witness(s)  Disclosure (to APL)  electronic form  relatively easy with quirks  assigned case number and lawyer  efficient process  Disclosure (to Others)  exercise care  check with case attorney  notify case attorney (about plans, etc.)

06VG Process  How to invent?  typically inventions are the outgrowth of the performance of everyday tasks (e.g., new way of doing something, a need for a simplified method, an identified technology gap, etc.)  individuals should be alert and recognize when their solution or process is different from the status quo (sometimes novel – but most often not – just unfamiliar to you)  do some homework (web, publications, patents, etc.); if solution still seems novel, disclose it  Can inventions be planned? No! But…  certain environments are conducive to the process  need for intellectual property is key to business success (planned activity)

06VG Environment  Encouragement  colleagues, business area, department, and APL  climate of change (my own experience)  Resources  time to work on ideas  support in the patents process (legal, dollars)  Office of Technology Transfer (OTT)  Recognition  spot payments (patent issuance)  plaques  royalty sharing 25 Years 1972 – Years Invention Disclosures1723 Patents19

06VG Responsibility  Invention does not stop with the idea or the disclosure  It needs to be supported by the staff member throughout the process  including reviewing similar patents  adding key information  reviewing patent text and claims  helping lawyers define what is novel  Process time: 2 to 4 years typically after disclosure  Patent time: Since filing ~ 27 months (own experience)  Work with OTT on marketing and licensing

06VG Closing Thoughts  Important to the Laboratory (royalties, recognition, proof that our work is challenging and state-of-the-art)  Rewarding process – recognition by peers  Supports credentials (just like publications, etc.)  Recognized by prospective employers