Best Practices - Suggestions and Tips: Avoid The Most Common Mistakes Made By Practitioners: Andrew Faile Director TC 2600.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Office Action Practice
Advertisements

1 Practical Impact of Recent PCT Changes on US Practice Maria Eliseeva Houston Eliseeva LLP American Intellectual Property Law Association October 15,
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
AIA Final Rules Submission of Certified Foreign Priority Documents and Translations Under the AIA March 20, 2013.
Patents e-Filing Update Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership November 15, 2001.
The Procedure for Amending the Application under § Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner ;
Final Rule: Power of Attorney Practice and Assignment Rules Clarification of Power of Attorney Practice, and Revisions to Assignment Rules, 69 Fed. Reg.
1 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (with Demo) By: Bennett Celsa Jean Witz Kathleen Bragdon TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialists.
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
1 NEW PRE-APPEAL BRIEF CONFERENCE PRACTICE OVERVIEW & TIPS FOR PRACTICE November Off. Gaz. Pat. Office, Vol. 2 (July 12, 2005)
Incorporation by Reference
FITF Overview and Tips on Responding to Prior Art Rejections Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting United States Patent and.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Anatomy of a Patent Application Presented by: Jeong Oh Director, Office of Technology Transfer & Industrial Development Syracuse University April 30, 2009.
Joint Meeting of PIPLA and NJIPLA February 7, 2012 Kenneth N. Nigon RatnerPrestia 1.
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
1 Introduction General Accounting is responsible for managing the University’s general ledger accounting system. The General Accounting office’s main goal.
Kathleen Kahler Fonda Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration State Bar of Texas Patent Prosecution Workshop Prosecution Tips and New Initiatives.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association RCE Practice: Pilot Programs and Delays in Examination Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Signatures and Power of Attorney
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Accelerated Examination Bennett Celsa (TC 1600: QAS)
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office PATENT PRACTICE TIPS USPTO Biotechnology, Chemical & Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Biotechnology, Chemical.
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
Filing a Patent Application: Procedures and Tips
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
1 Electronic Filing System United States Patent and Trademark Office.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
American Conference Institute “USPTO Boot Camp-Patent Edition” September 22-23, 2008 Robert Clarke Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration Jessica.
Information Disclosure Statements
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
Remy Yucel Director, CRU (571) Central Reexamination Unit and the AIA.
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
International IP Issues Federal Lab Consortium Meeting International IP Issues Dr Roisin McNally - European Patent Attorney 20 September 2006.
PCT-SAFE and e-Services developments Webinar September 7/
November 29, Global Intellectual Property Academy Advanced Patents Program Kery Fries, Senior Legal Advisor Mark Polutta, Senior Legal Advisor Office.
Patent Prosecution at the USPTO: Tips and Recent Developments Kathleen Kahler Fonda Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal Administration Loyola Law School.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Medical Review Team.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
WORKING WITH TRADEMARK EXAMINING ATTORNEYS: TWO INSIDERS TELL ALL Danielle I. Mattessich Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould.
FY09 Restriction Petition Update; Comparison of US and National Stage Restriction Practice Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
1 Electronic Filing System (EFS) EFS Overview. 2  EFS General Overview  EFS Software Components.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent October PDF’s Now Available on USPTO Website.
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
USPTOUSPTO 1 Image File Wrapper (IFW) Processing Paula Hutzell Practice Specialist, TC 1600 (571)
Claims Proposed Rulemaking Main Purposes É Applicant Assistance to Improve Focus of Examination n Narrow scope of initial examination so the examiner is.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
January 25, Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice,
Bruce Kisliuk Group Director, Technology Center 1600.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
Claims and Continuations Final Rule
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Best practices in the PCT international phase Session 1
Filing of a U.S. Patent Application
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices - Suggestions and Tips: Avoid The Most Common Mistakes Made By Practitioners: Andrew Faile Director TC 2600

Avoid Mistakes Throughout Prosecution   Tips and Suggestions – – Preparing the Application – – Filing the Application – – Avoiding Publication Pitfalls – – Examination Processing Tips – – Post Allowance Tips – – Best Practice Tips (see Appendix)

Preparing the Application n Avoid submitting an application in the European problem/solution format.  Format the application according to US rules and procedures. See MPEP § 608 n Avoid including multiple dependent claims that depend from other multiple dependent claims  Craft claims according to US practice, see MPEP § (n) n Avoid including “Use” claims  Craft claims according to US practice, see MPEP § (k)

Pre-Examination Tips Forms n Do use USPTO forms without altering the language. n Do not use a combined declaration and power of attorney form. n USPTO forms can be found at:

Pre-examination Tips Application Data Sheets n Do use an Application Data Sheet (ADS), although an ADS is not required. Customers using an ADS can expect two advantages when applying for a patent: 1. Improved accuracy of filing receipts. 2. Accurately recorded application data.

Pre-examination Tips Application Data Sheets (Cont’d) n Use of a supplemental ADS is possible even though no original ADS was submitted on filing. n The following information can be supplied on an ADS:  Application Information  Applicant Information  Correspondence Information  Representative Information  Domestic Priority Information  Foreign Priority Information  Assignment Information

Pre-examination Tips Preliminary Amendments In New Applications  Avoid submitting Preliminary Amendments on filing  A substitute specification will be required if a preliminary amendment present on filing makes changes to the specification, except for:  Changes to title, abstract, claims or addition of benefit claim information to the specification  See the notice “ Revised Procedure for Preliminary Amendments Presented on Filing of a Patent Application,” 1300 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 69 (November 8, 2005), available at:

Pre-Examination Tips Preliminary Amendments in Continuations and Divisionals  Avoid submitting Preliminary Amendments on filing a Continuation or Divisional  Avoid Preliminary Amendments that cancel all the claims and add new ones

Filing the Application n Select a method of filing the application 1. Accelerated Examination 2. EFS-Web 3. Traditional Mail Route

Filing the Application n Accelerated Examination Common Failings n Failure to provide the text search logic. A mere listing of terms will not suffice. n Failure to search the claimed invention. The petition for accelerated examination may be dismissed if the search is not commensurate in scope with the claims. n Failure to show support in the specification and/or drawings for each limitation of each claim.

Filing the Application n Accelerated Examination Common Failings (Cont) n Failure to show support in the specification and/or drawings for each limitation of each claim for every document whose benefit is claimed. n Failure to specifically identify the limitations in each claim that are disclosed in each reference.

Filing the Application EFS-Web Filing n Avoid coding (identifying) a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) as an “Amendment” when filing an RCE n Avoid identifying papers after the initial filing as “new” n Avoid common PCT filing mistakes n Avoid filing color images or images that have a resolution higher than 300x300 dots per inch (dpi)

Avoid Publication Pitfalls Nonpublication Requests n Avoid inconspicuous requests for nonpublication. n Publication will generally include all preliminary amendments submitted in time to be included in the publication. n If amendments to the specification are desired to be included in publication, submit a substitute specification.

Avoid Publication Pitfalls Publication Corrections n Practitioners must include the assignment information in the transmittal letter or ADS. n Avoid misspelling the names of inventors or assignees. n Review the filing receipt promptly so that corrections can be requested before publication or export of data for publication. n Avoid filing requests for Corrected Publication 37 CFR § 1.221(b) that fail to recite material errors.

Examination Processing Tips General Prosecution Advice n Amendments to the claims and/or specification should be accompanied by a written statement indicating specific support for the change. If the support is implicit, an explanation is beneficial. n In response to restriction requirements, where inventions are indeed patentably indistinct, applicants should present arguments to that end. n Read the entire prior art reference cited by the examiner, not just the part relied upon by the examiner in the rejection.

Examination Processing Tips Pre-Appeal Brief Conference n Avoid sending the request separate from the Notice of Appeal. n Avoid making a request when there is an outstanding after-final amendment. n Avoid attaching more than five pages to the cover form. n Avoid sending in a supplemental request. n Avoid paying a second Notice of Appeal fee in the application.

Examination Processing Tips Filing of Continuation-in-Part (CIP) Applications n Consider prosecuting an improved CIP invention independently of the prior invention :  File, if need be, a continuation only to the original invention, or take an appeal on the original invention, and  File a new application, rather than a CIP, for only the new invention: n without a benefit claim (35 U.S.C. §120, 37 CFR § 1.78) to the initial application, and n therefore without shortening the patent term of the initial invention if it were to be included in the CIP application, as n any benefit claim in a CIP cannot protect the new invention.

Post Allowance Tips Issue Fee Payments n Avoid filing an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) after payment of the issue fee.  File an IDS filed after payment of the issue fee with a Petition for Withdrawal from Issue (37 CFR 1.313(c)) and an RCE (37 CFR § 1.114). Otherwise, the IDS will be placed in the file and the cited documents will not be considered by the examiner. n Avoid delays in paying the issue fee.  The issue fee payment may be submitted via facsimile to the Office of Patent Publications ((571) ) or EFS- Web to ensure the payment is received within the non- extendable time period set forth in the Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due (PTOL-85).

Post Allowance Tips Withdrawal from Issue n Petitions to Withdraw from Issue may be hand carried or sent via facsimile to the Office of Petitions.  Hand carries should be brought to the security guard station of the Madison West building, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria VA  The facsimile number for the Office of Petitions is (571) Note: All other types of petitions must be directed to the Central FAX ((571) ).

Thank You.

APPENDIX BEST PRACTICES

Best Practices Use of S-signatures (37 CFR § 1.4(c)(2)) n A practitioner creates a document and S-signature signs it on his/her PC. The practitioner can then:  Facsimile transmit the document directly from the PC to the Office; or  Print the document and then facsimile transmit, mail, or hand- carry the document to the Office. n An affidavit under 37 CFR § is S-signed by the party making the affidavit, the S-signed affidavit is then:  Electronically sent to the practitioner, e.g., via an . The practitioner can then facsimile transmit, mail or hand-carry the S- signature signed document to the Office.

Best Practices n Power of Attorney Tips:  Do direct a Power of Attorney to the Attorneys Associated with the Customer Number to the Customer Number  Do provide a separate Power of Attorney and a separate Oath/Declaration

Best Practices n Priority Document Exchange Tips  Do provide a valid power of attorney with a submission for permission to access  Only the designated attorney or agent may grant permission to access.

Best Practices Fee Payment Tips n Avoid placing a stop payment on a check for USPTO services or to circumvent the rules of practice. This action is not appropriate.  Request a refund (37 CFR § 1.26) where fees were paid by mistake or in excess of the amount required. n Avoid drafting a check to the USPTO for services on an account with insufficient funds.  Ensure that the account from which the check is drawn contains sufficient funds prior to submitting the check to the USPTO.

Best Practices Fee Payment Tips n Do use a Deposit Account Number on a transmittal form authorizing payment  Do not use a Customer Number to authorize payment of fees. n Be clear with payment authorization statements.  Avoid contradictory statements on payment

Best Practices Maintenance Fees/Deposit Accounts n Maintenance fees and replenishing of deposit accounts at the USPTO can be done online: n Inquiries related to deposit accounts, maintenance fees and refunds may be directed to the Office of Finance (571)

Best Practices Prosecution Tips n Proofread claims for clarity and precision n Present all cogent arguments and evidence before final rejection n If the examiner is believed to be ignoring a claim limitation, a personal or telephonic interview may facilitate the prosecution to completion.

Best Practices Prosecution Tips (cont’d) n Don’t initiate a response on the absolute last day of the statutory period, if possible. n Don’t personally attack the Examiner in a response to Office Action. n Follow the chain of command for assistance :  First, call the Examiner.  If he or she is non-responsive or unavailable, contact the Supervisor.  If the issue is still not resolved, contact the Technology Center Director.

Further Information USPTO Useful Web Links - Helpful Web Pages: n Notices, Recent Patent-Related – a very current list of all Federal Register, Official Gazette and pre-Official Gazette notices, and certain Office memoranda: n Forms Page – current USPTO forms available for use by the Public: n Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP):

Further Information USPTO Useful Web Links (cont’d) n Mailing Addresses and Mail Stops: n Facsimile Numbers: patcorr.htm n USPTO Glossary: