Writing an Article for Publication David Taylor WISER Lunchtime Seminar, February 2009 “A theory is something nobody believes, except the person who made.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to review a paper for a journal Dr Stephanie Dancer Editor Journal of Hospital Infection.
Advertisements

Understanding the Basics of Peer Review: Part 1 – Receiving a Manuscript IMPULSE Journal for Undergraduate Neuroscience This is a the first of a two part.
Doug Elliott Professor, Critical Care Nursing The final step: Presentation and publication Research Workshop: Conducting research in a clinical setting.
How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
Scientific Literature Tutorial
Tips for Publishing Qualitative Research Sandra Mathison University of British Columbia Editor-in-Chief, New Directions for Evaluation.
Writing Abstracts Dr. Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development P: E:
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Duplicate Submission: Journal Roles and Responsibilities Diane M. Sullenberger Executive Editor, PNAS.
Scientific publishing Risto Lahdelma Aalto University School of Engineering.
Improving Learning, Persistence, and Transparency by Writing for the NASPA Journal Dr. Cary Anderson, Editor, NASPA Journal Kiersten Feeney, Editorial.
Understanding Research Articles Microbiology Laboratory.
PUBLISH OR PERISH Skills Building Workshop. Journal of the International AIDS Society Workshop Outline 1.Journal of the International.
Reviewing the work of others Referee reports. Components of a referee report Summary of the paper Overall evaluation Comments about content Comments about.
RESEARCH METHODS Getting your work published
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
H E L S I N G I N K A U P P A K O R K E A K O U L U H E L S I N K I S C H O O L O F E C O N O M I C S Orientaatiopäivät 1 Writing Scientific.
Reading the Literature
Presentation  Publication A few random thoughts.
Objectives: 1) Explain the importance of scientific inquiry. 2) Explain the differences between a scientific theory and a scientific law.
Writing for Law Reviews Professor Lisa Webley January 2013 © copyright reserved.
Publishing Research Papers Charles E. Dunlap, Ph.D. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation Arlington, Virginia
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Selection of a journal for the manuscript Kıymet Kübra YURT, PhD Student Department of Histology and Embryology Medical School Ondokuz Mayıs University.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Different Types of Scientific Writing. Overview Different types of papers Types of reviews Organization of papers What to leave in; what to leave out.
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
Total Submissions Total submissions rejected without review Total original articles Original articles sent for review % Rejected with review % Original.
How to Publish in JM and Other Top Journals Roland T. Rust Editor, JM.
Shobna Bhatia.  Telephone instrument  Computer  Software Instructions nearly always provided However, frequently not read At least, not until things.
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
How to write an article Dr. Zahra Abdulqader Amin
Planning & Writing Laboratory Reports A Brief Review of the Scientific Method.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
How to Write Defne Apul and Jill Shalabi. Papers Summarized Johnson, T.M Tips on how to write a paper. J Am Acad Dermatol 59:6, Lee,
Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.
Online Editorial Management On-line Management of Scholarly Journals Mahmoud Saghaei.
1. Scientific Writing Reason to publish Reward being a good writer Making it happen Achieving creativity Thought, structure and style The thrill of acceptance.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Conference Paper. 2 Disclaimer This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies.
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 Observations on assignment 4 - Reviews General observations  Good effort! Some even.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Medical Writing How to get funded and published November 2003.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Le parc japonais est beau et calme La fille japonaise est belle mais bavarde Ritsurin Park, Takamatsu.
1.3 Scientific Thinking and Processes KEY CONCEPT Scientific Method Science is a way of thinking, questioning, and gathering evidence.
Choose a journal for these papers  Get together with your team.  Together, read the three abstracts.  Read the three journal descriptions.  Based on.
B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department of Plant Physiology FS CU RNDr. Jan Petrášek, Ph.D. 5. Presentation.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
Warwick Business School James Hayton Associate Dean & Professor of HRM & Entrepreneurship Editor in Chief Human Resource Management (Wiley) Past Editor:
What’s Included in a Review Irving H. Zucker, Ph.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center A Primer for Potential Reviewers Experimental Biology 2014 San.
UEF // University of Eastern Finland How to publish scientific journal articles? 10 STEPS TO SUCCESS lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.
How to get your research published.
4 Steps to follow when writing an original research article.
How to get a paper published in IEEE
Publishing a paper.
The peer review process
Outline Goals: Searching scientific journal articles
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
The Scientific Method.
Information Literacy Peer Reviewed Sources
Dealing with reviewer comments
Writing an Article for Publication
Advice on getting published
5. Presenting a scientific work
5. Presenting a scientific work
For physicists, by physicists, since 1986
Presentation transcript:

Writing an Article for Publication David Taylor WISER Lunchtime Seminar, February 2009 “A theory is something nobody believes, except the person who made it. An experiment is something everybody believes, except the person who made it” Albert Einstein

Why Write? List three reasons why you want to write an article. List three reasons why you want to write an article.

Why Read List three reasons why you read published articles List three reasons why you read published articles

Science Works Through Publication The way we do science has developed over the last 300 years The way we do science has developed over the last 300 years Publication in widely-available form is a crucial element Publication in widely-available form is a crucial element New scientific ideas can be openly discussed, criticised, tested, accepted or rejected New scientific ideas can be openly discussed, criticised, tested, accepted or rejected Until you publish, you are not doing science Until you publish, you are not doing science

The Journal of the Mechanical Behaviour of Biomedical Materials

What Happens to Your Article? Submitted to Editor Submitted to Editor Editor’s “assessment” (reject; revise) Editor’s “assessment” (reject; revise) Sent to Reviewers Sent to Reviewers Reviewers reply to Editor Reviewers reply to Editor Editor’s decision (accept; reject; revise) Editor’s decision (accept; reject; revise) Back to you: revised version and letter Back to you: revised version and letter Editor may revert to Reviewers Editor may revert to Reviewers Note: It’s always the Editor who decides

What Do I Look For as an Editor? What do you think is the most important feature of an article?

What Do I Look For as an Editor? Originality Originality What’s new? What’s new? Content Content Is there enough? Is there enough? Simplicity Simplicity Can it be clearer, shorter? Can it be clearer, shorter?

A Perfect Article Brings together the two key scientific elements of THEORY and EXPERIMENT Brings together the two key scientific elements of THEORY and EXPERIMENT Shows how a variety of disparate data/results/observations can be understood through a single, elegant, hypothesis. Shows how a variety of disparate data/results/observations can be understood through a single, elegant, hypothesis.

It’s Your Work There’s no fixed formula for writing a paper There’s no fixed formula for writing a paper You need to develop your own style You need to develop your own style But…there are some useful guidelines… But…there are some useful guidelines… (…once you know them, you can decide when to break them…) (…once you know them, you can decide when to break them…)

Elements of an Article Abstract (Summary) Abstract (Summary) Keywords Keywords Introduction Introduction Methods (Experimental Details) Methods (Experimental Details) Results Results Discussion Discussion Conclusions Conclusions Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

What’s wrong with this abstract? “In this paper, we will describe some experiments that were conducted to measure the creep strain rate in a stainless steel, and we will discuss the significance of the results.”

This one is better, but could still be improved – how? “We conducted a series of experiments to measure the creep strain rate in the stainless steel alloy SUS678F. We showed that the creep strain rate is proportional to the applied stress.”

“Creep strain rate is an important measure of a material’s high-temperature performance. Creep has been measured in various materials but not in the stainless steel alloy SUS678F. We conducted a series of experiments which showed that the creep strain rate is proportional to the applied stress in this alloy. This strongly suggests that the mechanism of creep in this material is grain boundary diffusion.”

The Objectives The end of the Intro is a good place to state: The end of the Intro is a good place to state: Objectives, or Objectives, or Hypothesis, or Hypothesis, or Research Question Research Question

Discussion Discussion Most often done badly Most often done badly Most feared by young researchers Most feared by young researchers Say what’s good about your work Say what’s good about your work Say what’s bad (limitations) Say what’s bad (limitations) Compare to other published work Compare to other published work Speculate Speculate Criticise other work Criticise other work

Style Do you say… Do you say… “We did this…” or “We did this…” or “This was done…” or “This was done…” or “The present authors did this…” “The present authors did this…”

Feedback How to handle rejection! How to handle rejection! Increasing rejection rates, editorial policy Increasing rejection rates, editorial policy Revising your article: responding to reviewers’ comments Revising your article: responding to reviewers’ comments Point by point Point by point Explain what you changed Explain what you changed OR explain why you didn’t OR explain why you didn’t

Some Other Points for Discussion How do you choose which journal to submit to? How do you choose which journal to submit to? Impact factors Impact factors Reviewers Reviewers Readership Readership Turnaround time Turnaround time

Some Other Points for Discussion “Open Access” journals versus traditional journals “Open Access” journals versus traditional journals Here’s what Bentham Open publishers say… Here’s what Bentham Open publishers say… WHY PUBLISH IN OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS? WHY PUBLISH IN OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS? Your article will obtain more citations. Your article will obtain more citations. You own the copyright to your article. You own the copyright to your article. Your article will be peer-reviewed and published very fast. Your article will be peer-reviewed and published very fast. All interested readers can read, download, and/or print open access articles at no cost! All interested readers can read, download, and/or print open access articles at no cost! Your article can be read by potentially millions of readers, which is incomparable to publishing in a traditional subscription journal. Your article can be read by potentially millions of readers, which is incomparable to publishing in a traditional subscription journal. Open Access journals are FREE to view! Open Access journals are FREE to view! Elsevier’s monopoly Elsevier’s monopoly