Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Advertisements

Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Department of Mathematical Sciences August 15, /20 Math 1319 “Mathematics in the Modern World”
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Assessment of General Education Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies February 11, 2008 University of Pittsburgh.
I Love Outcomes (or at least not dread them so much) Reedley College Institutional Learning Outcomes Workshop January 8, 2009.
Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council 1 Team members: Steve Abid, Stephen Barton, Jennifer Batten, Erin Busscher, Dillon Carr, Laurie.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Assessing General Education Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College.
1 General Education Assessment at Cleveland State University What We Have Accomplished What We Have Yet to Do.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Research Methods in MIS Dr. Deepak Khazanchi. Objectives for the Course Identify Problem Areas Conduct Interview Do Library Research Develop Theoretical.
How to Understand Michigan Merit Exam Results Lenawee ISD June, 2011.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Introduction to Educational Research
Leslie Dacosta M.S., G.E. Program Math Faculty, Kathleen Lodge, M.S., G.E. Program Math Faculty, Elizabeth Sieminski, M.S., M.A. Ed., G. E. Math Program.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
1 Assessment as Learning Presented at the Teaching & Learning Innovations 17 th Annual Conference University of Guelph May 12, 2004 Peggy Maki, Ph.D.
1 Module 1: Developing and Validating Learning Outcome Statements Presented at CSU San Marcos Peggy Maki April 25 and 25, 2007.
Language and communication in curricula for mathematics education. The problem of disciplinarity versus discursivity Mathematics education begins in language,
Exploring the Normal Distribution Rick Luttrell James Price South Iredell High School.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
Developing Programmatic Objectives Presentation to Department of English SUNY Oneonta October 1, 2008.
Literacy is...  the quality or state of being literate, esp. the ability to read and write  An individual’s ability to construct, create, and communicate.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Common Core Standards and Implications for CaMSP Meeting the Challenge of Complexity, Coherence and Integration.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Linking General Education Student Learning Outcomes to Course Embedded Assessment SMSU-WP Fall 2005 Assessment Target.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
Historical Thinking Skills
Quantitative Literacy and Mathematical Skills Cathryn A. Manduca Science Education Resource Center Carleton College serc.carleton.edu.
Welcome to IS299 Associate’s Capstone Rebecca Burton, Instructor AIM: rqbmom (by appt)
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
Historical Thinking Skills A.P. World History Mr. Schabo Crestwood High School All info care of College Board:
HISTORICAL THINKING A lesson on WHY and HOW we study history.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for grades pre-K-2.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
Navigating the ‘information jungle’ a Research Safari Leonie McIlvenny.
Common Core State Standards & Next Generation Science Standards Common Core State Standards & Next Generation Science Standards Grades Close Reading.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
General Education Assessment Workshop: Spring 2016 Attributes General Education Assessment Committee (GEAC) SUNY Oneonta November 17 & 20, 2015.
7 Themes. Chronological Reasoning 1. Historical Causation: relationships among multiple historical causes and effects, distinguishing between those that.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Arkansas State University – Jonesboro Institutional Priority “Develop a culture of learning to enhance institutional outcomes”
Integrating Quantitative Literacy into Your Course.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
General Education Assessment Report Assessment Cycle.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Quantitative Literacy at WOU. LEAP In November, Faculty Senate recommended that WOU adopt LEAP's (Liberal Education & America's Promise) learning outcomes.
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Mathematics 0580.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
Assessing Learning Outcomes
IPFW General Education
Frames Icons.
Norman L Webb.
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science and determine whether a statement constitutes a hypothesis that can be resolved within that domain. 2. D escribe through example how science literacy is important in everyday life to an educated person. 3. E xplain why the attribute of doubt has value in science. 4. Explain how scientists select which among several competing working hypotheses best explains a physical phenomenon. 5. E xplain how "theory" as used and understood in science differs from "theory "as commonly used and understood by the general public. 6. E xplain why peer review generally improves our quality of knowing within science. 7. E xplain how science employs the method of reproducible experiments to understand and explain the physical world. 8. Articulate how science’s way of knowing rests on some assumptions. 9. Distinguish between science and technology by examples of how these are different frameworks of reasoning. 10. C ite a single major theory from one of the science disciplines and explain its historical development. 11. E xplain and provide an example of how modeling i s used in science. 12. E xplain why ethical decision-making becomes increasingly important to a society as it becomes increasingly advanced in science.

DRAFT: Metadisciplinary Outcomes for the Arts Students should be able to… 1.Explain the significance of creative expression and art to the human experience. 2.Discern objective vs. subjective scholarship, criticism and analysis of the arts. 3.Articulate in his/her own words a definition for what constitutes the arts. 4.Communicate ideas and emotions through the practice and study of the arts. 5.Recognize and value creative expression from various cultural and historical perspectives. 6.Explain in his/her own words reasons why critical thinking and problem solving have value in the arts. 7.Describe, using at least two specific examples, how art literacy is important in everyday life.

DRAFT: Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Social Science Students should be able to… 1.explain the development of social and historical issues and problems. 2.critically analyze texts dealing with historical and contemporary problems and issues. 3.access sources and materials applicable to their own research within their discipline. 4.utilize appropriate sources to conduct their own analysis of social, historical, political, economic issues. 5.communicate effectively in written and oral form with regard to social and historical issues. 6.incorporate a consideration of culture and individual differences (including positions of privilege and power) in shaping social and historical experiences. 7.explain major theories that have shaped the interpretation of social and historical problems.

DRAFT: Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Humanities Students will be able to… 1.Communicate issues orally and in writing through providing the relevant information needed for clear understanding to an intended audience. 2.Construct a clear analysis or synthesis of an argument based on conflicting evidence furnished by high quality information sources. 3.Present an evidence-based argument that shows recognition of the relevance of context in making a decision. 4.Present an evidence-based argument that shows recognition of the validity of multiple conflicted viewpoints. 5.Render conclusions and decisions based on consideration of multiple perspectives and prioritization of available evidence. 6.Render conclusions/decisions to appropriate problems by applying the major concepts of an ethical framework of reasoning. 7. Explain the value to self that arises from acquiring the ability to use the frameworks of logic and ethical reasoning developed in the humanities.

DRAFT: Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Quantitative Literacy "A quantitatively literate college graduate should be able to… 1.Interpret mathematical models such as formulas, graphs, tables, and schematics, and draw inferences from them. 2.Represent mathematical information symbolically, visually, numerically, and verbally. 3.Use arithmetical, algebraic, geometric and statistical methods to solve problems. 4.Estimate and check answers to mathematical problems in order to determine reasonableness, identify alternatives, and select optimal results. 5.Recognize that mathematical and statistical methods have limits. (From recommendations/quantitative-literacy/quantitative-reasoning-college-graduates#Part2, Used - with minor modifications in subsequent national discussions about quantitative reasoning.). recommendations/quantitative-literacy/quantitative-reasoning-college-graduates#Part2

DRAFT: Metadisciplinary Concepts for Technology Students will be able to… 1. Provide case examples of creative and critical thinking as employed in an actual application of the technological framework of reasoning. 2. Explain the role of ethics in the practice of technology's professions. 3. Explain some approaches that technology experts can employ to increase successful communication with their clients and with laypersons. 4. Explain how technology's framework of reasoning differs from that of science or the arts. 5. Explain why development of professional competency in the technology professions commonly requires extended periods of mentoring. 6. Explain how expert practitioners of technology develop “informed affective domains” that enable effective utilization of knowledge and skills guided by nonverbal intuition.