Evaluation Independent Monitoring Presented at: LPSC Staffs Technical Conference and ESIs Bidders Conference for the Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
Advertisements

Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
RPG: September 24, Approach for ERCOT Independent Review of the 2013 Houston Import Project Jeff Billo, Manager, Transmission Planning September.
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
1 Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Representing LCRA and Rates and Resources Council (RRC) consisting of 31 NOIEs serving Central Texas TAC.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
Elizabeth Benson Energy Associates1 Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP Process.
Modeling Choices & Approaches Key Model Outputs: Carbon emissions Other emissions Electricity prices Total electricity system costs Fuel use and diversity.
The Outsourcing Process
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
1 March 2-3, 2015, Bonn Expert workshop Addressing Variable Renewables In Long‐Term Energy Planning (AVRIL) Renewables Energy Integration In Long‐Term.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
2001 South First Street Champaign, Illinois (217) Davis Power Consultants Strategic Location of Renewable Generation Based on Grid Reliability.
Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 1
Economic Transmission Case Study: Champlain Wind Link Vermont System Planning Committee March 10, 2010.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
George Bartlett Director, Transmission Operations Economic Transmission Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Steve Paulone Facilitator Financial Management Decisions The financial manager is concerned with three primary categories of financial decisions:  1.Capital.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Houston Area Dynamic Reactive Project March 11,
1 Non-Transmission Alternatives to Reduce Local Congestion Costs Bill Bojorquez June 3, 2004.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
All forecast information reflects planning assumptions as of December Entergy System Strategic Supply Resource Plan Plan Description (For the planning.
SYSTEM PLANNING 1 OVERVIEW OF FALL 2002 RFP Dave Harlan/ Sue Tierney ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. October 2002 This presentation summarizes certain matters related.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #2 July 15, 2010.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Bulk Power Transmission System
1 Interconnection Update Jay Zimmerman Manager, Transmission Policy Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
1 Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. September 11, 2006 This presentation summarizes certain matters related to ESI’s Fall 2006 Limited-Term.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF POWER PLANT RETIREMENTS ON THE ENTERGY SYSTEM Presented to the LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION November 9, 2005 Open Session.
Introduction Procurement of Consultant Services (based on PPA 2004 and Best Practices) Presented by: NM Lema Macrh, 2013.
Discussion of Reliability Must-Run (RMR) Protocol Provisions ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 6, 2002.
Project Procurement Management
© ABB Group August 23,2010 | Slide 1 MBPC Study – 1 st Load Pocket Preliminary Results for Discussion only Entergy Regional State Committee (ERSC) Southwest.
Long-Term Solution for Negative Generation Entergy Transmission AFC Stakeholder Meeting August 22, 2006.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
TAC02/01/2007 DW 1 TAC Briefing on: - Report on Constraints and Needs: Five Year Plan Development - Long Term System Assessment (LTSA) - Entergy Integration.
SPP.org 1. Final Report: Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting December 1, 2008 Austin, TX.
ISO New England State of the Markets Report May April 2002 Robert Ethier, Ph.D. Manager, Market Monitoring and Mitigation ISO New England June 26,
ERCOT TAC11/2/ CREZ Study Update ERCOT TAC 11/2/2006.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Grid Operations Report To ERCOT Board Of Directors December 16, 2003 Sam Jones, COO.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
ESI Alternate Economic Study Process E-RSC Meeting October 21, 2010.
ERCOT – MISO DC Tie Study Comments
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment Use and Conceptualization of Power Sector Baselines: Methodology and Case Study from El Salvador Lasse.
SERC Reliability Corporation 1 SERC RELIABILITY CORPORATION MID-AMERICA RELIABILITY CONFERENCE June 21, 2006 COLUMBUS, OHIO.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
RFPEG Belize 2013 Public Utilities Commission. Objectives of RFPEG Belize 2013 PUC Act: Section 22 (1)It shall be the duty of the Commission to ensure.
Proposed Market Solution for Bates RMR Exit Strategy Frontera Power Station.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
THE ART OF THE POSSIBLE: IRP CONSIDERING STATE-WIDE AND REGIONAL PERSPECTIVES IN INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING Horizons Energy Indiana Contemporary Issues.
CPUC Supply-side Procurement Processes
PRS Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Status Update for Reliability/Market Power Mitigation Assessment
GSR022: Review of Security and Economy Planned Transfer Conditions
Alternative ICAP Proposal
Comments on New England Regional State Committee*
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Independent Monitoring Presented at: LPSC Staffs Technical Conference and ESIs Bidders Conference for the Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP September 11, 2006 Marriott Hotel Intercontinental Airport Houston, Texas

- 2 - The Role of Evaluation IM Our monitoring function requires us to be active in four main areasOur monitoring function requires us to be active in four main areas 1.RFP Development –Review and comment on Entergys proposal evaluation methods, analysis tools and processes, data inputs and assumptions, and price and non-price evaluation criteria. –Review does not extend to Entergy's planning criteria or resource needs. –Participate in all technical and bidders conferences. 2.Proposal Evaluation –Economic evaluation –Transmission Evaluation (including any related studies provided by the Entergy Transmission Business Unit), and fuel evaluation. –The Evaluation IM will monitor credit evaluation.

- 3 - The Role of Evaluation IM 3.Proposal Selection ­ The Evaluation IM will review any preliminary and final proposal rankings, portfolio selections and proposal awards. 4.Due Diligence ­ The Evaluation IM shall have access to any documentation, processes, and other information necessary to ensure that the due diligence and negotiations process is conducted in a fair and impartial manner.

- 4 - Current Evaluation Issues In the process of monitoring, issues arise that require our attention.In the process of monitoring, issues arise that require our attention. Some of these issues have also been raised in the collaborative.Some of these issues have also been raised in the collaborative. This presentation addresses five issues that are important at this stage of the RFP development:This presentation addresses five issues that are important at this stage of the RFP development: Contract length Contract length Evaluation of multiple product categories and contract lengths Evaluation of multiple product categories and contract lengths Economy energy modeling in Prosym Economy energy modeling in Prosym Transmission analysis Transmission analysis Displacement (inactive reserves or retirement) Displacement (inactive reserves or retirement)

- 5 - Current Evaluation Issues Contract lengthContract length Entergy has limited the contract length to 5 years. Entergy has limited the contract length to 5 years. Entergy may extend selected proposals if capacity displacement is economic for the extended term. Entergy may extend selected proposals if capacity displacement is economic for the extended term. We believe Entergys approach is reasonable. We believe Entergys approach is reasonable. –Given the flexibility in product types, the evaluation of multiple product types with multiple contract lengths is already challenging. –Allowing more variation in contract length may create an unreasonably complex evaluation process without clear benefits to meeting Entergys stated needs.

- 6 - Current Evaluation Issues Evaluation of proposalsEvaluation of proposals All proposals will be ranked individually and by product category and term. All proposals will be ranked individually and by product category and term. An initial portfolio will be created based on economics, mixing product categories and contract term. An initial portfolio will be created based on economics, mixing product categories and contract term. Portfolio will be modified incrementally to help ensure an optimal mix of proposals is selected. Portfolio will be modified incrementally to help ensure an optimal mix of proposals is selected. The portfolio will be adjusted to meet non-economic objectives (e.g., location, mix of contract lengths) The portfolio will be adjusted to meet non-economic objectives (e.g., location, mix of contract lengths)

- 7 - Current Evaluation Issues Economy energyEconomy energy Economy energy market based on estimated supply curves for three sources of supply: Economy energy market based on estimated supply curves for three sources of supply: –TVA –Southern Company –Internal to Entergy Supply curves based on simulation of regional dispatch and inter-regional transfers using MIDAS. Supply curves based on simulation of regional dispatch and inter-regional transfers using MIDAS. –MIDAS provides hourly supply stacks based on the available unloaded generation in each region. –These hourly results are used to estimate monthly peak-hour supply curves. We are reviewing the MIDAS results to ensure it is reasonably consistent with actual economy energy prices. We are reviewing the MIDAS results to ensure it is reasonably consistent with actual economy energy prices. ESI will perform sensitivities regarding the economy energy market. ESI will perform sensitivities regarding the economy energy market. We believe Entergys approach is reasonable. We believe Entergys approach is reasonable.

- 8 - Current Evaluation Issues Transmission analysis is conducted to evaluate transmission access and to identify potential benefits (RMR and counterflow).Transmission analysis is conducted to evaluate transmission access and to identify potential benefits (RMR and counterflow). Transmission access is determined by identifying transmission constraints that may exist for a proposal; These constraints may be mitigated by:Transmission access is determined by identifying transmission constraints that may exist for a proposal; These constraints may be mitigated by: Delisting/displacement: existing units that can be designated non-network resources in order to free up transmission capacity for proposed resources. Delisting/displacement: existing units that can be designated non-network resources in order to free up transmission capacity for proposed resources. Active transmission management (purchase of shorter-term service to the extent available), benefits are pro rated under this mitigation strategy. Active transmission management (purchase of shorter-term service to the extent available), benefits are pro rated under this mitigation strategy. No physical upgrades are considered. No physical upgrades are considered. The transmission access evaluation is based on principles and methods used in the long-term RFP that we have monitored and with which we are comfortable.The transmission access evaluation is based on principles and methods used in the long-term RFP that we have monitored and with which we are comfortable.

- 9 - Current Evaluation Issues Capacity Displacement issueCapacity Displacement issue After ESI fills incremental reliability needs (Appr. 800 MW), remaining proposals (with terms of at least three years) will be tested to see if their economics are such that they could displace an existing Entergy plant. After ESI fills incremental reliability needs (Appr. 800 MW), remaining proposals (with terms of at least three years) will be tested to see if their economics are such that they could displace an existing Entergy plant. The selected plants are existing active status reserve units totaling close to 1500 MW. The selected plants are existing active status reserve units totaling close to 1500 MW. Displacement in this context generally means transitioning the unit to an extended inactive reserve status rather than to permanent retirement. Displacement in this context generally means transitioning the unit to an extended inactive reserve status rather than to permanent retirement. The criteria is whether the economic energy benefit plus the avoided costs of the displaced unit exceeds the proposed option premium. The criteria is whether the economic energy benefit plus the avoided costs of the displaced unit exceeds the proposed option premium. –We will evaluate the information underlying the estimates of the avoided costs We believe Entergys approach is reasonable. We believe Entergys approach is reasonable.