RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Educational Consultant
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 Mathematics and Science Model Lesson Series Elementary Science Module Developed by the Florida Department of Education.
1 Early Childhood Assessment: Information for Early Childhood Program Administrators.
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Module 4: Establishing a Data-based Decision- making System.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” From Paper to Practice: Monitoring IEP Implementation.
Response to Intervention: School-Wide Multi-Level Prevention Carriage Crest Elementary.
Core Curriculum for Clinical Coaching Intro - VNIP Model
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
1 The Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Overview.
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
1 Deeper Investigation of Iowa Core Standards: K-5 English/Language Arts Iowa Department of Education In Partnership with AEA School Improvement ©2011.
25 seconds left…...
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
The Design and Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems, Variability of Systems and the Role of a Theory of Action Rhode Island Lisa Foehr Rhode Island.
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Using RTI Data to Inform Eligibility
BEST PRACTICES in RtI to Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D.
Holistic Rating Training Requirements Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention TRAINING OF TRAINERS Response to Intervention Implementer Series.
National Center on Response to Intervention Sara Prewett, The National Center on RTI The University of Kansas RTI Scheduling.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is Progress Monitoring?
National Center on Response to Intervention Developing an RTI Professional Development Plan: Things to Consider.
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
SWIFT Center Policy Alignment Influence on Building Capacity and Sustainability in Schoolwide Transformation Jenny Stonemeier, TASH.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Site Name Data Snapshots Date. Slide 12 swiftschools.org WHY? Data Snapshots engage education leaders in a concentrated analysis of what they do, how.
OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk
Resource Mapping & Matching
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTI: Response To Instruction
Site Name Priorities DATE.
Presentation transcript:

RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process National Center on Response to Intervention

RTI Implementer Series Overview Introduction Screening Progress Monitoring Multi-level Prevention System Defining the Essential Components What Is RTI? What Is Screening? What Is Progress Monitoring? What Is a Multi-level Prevention System? Assessment and Data-based Decision Making Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework Using Screening Data for Decision Making Using Progress Monitoring Data for Decision Making IDEA and Multi-level Prevention System Establishing Processes Implementing RTI Establishing a Screening Process Selecting Evidence-based Practices

Upon Completion Participants Will Be Able To: Determine needs, priorities, logistics Use needs, priorities, and logistics to select an appropriate screener Establish procedures for screening

Purpose for Screening Handout

Getting Started STEP 1: Determining Needs, Priorities, and Logistics STEP 2: Selecting a Screening Tool STEP 3: Establishing Procedures

STEP 1: Determining Needs, Priorities, and Logistics Outcome Measures Scope Population Timing Materials Funds Training

Outcomes Choice of outcome measure: What is the criterion? What are you predicting to? Should be educationally valid outcome. Schools must choose age-appropriate outcome measures that capture student ability. May have different screeners assess different outcomes

Activity: Outcomes What is your focus? Outcome (e.g., skill, academic, behavioral, both) Outcome measures (e.g., reading fluency) How are they aligned with the current curriculum and state standards?

Scope District or school focus Pros Cons Alignment of other initiatives, activities, and policies

Activity: Scope Is it a district- or school-level focus? Are efforts aligned? Are there other efforts in place that can be aligned with screening?

Target Population Screening tools may differ in their validity, reliability, and accuracy depending on the population Specific subgroups (ELL, special education) Test may need language or other accommodations Grade levels

Activity: Target Population Who is the target population? What schools (ES, MS, JH, HS)? What grade level(s)? Are there specific subgroup(s)? What are the demographics/characteristics of the population?

Timing Screening should occur more than one time per year. In many schools and districts it occurs at least three times per year. Fall, Winter, Spring Create a clear schedule before the year begins

Timing Screeners must target skills pertinent to the grade and times the screen is administered. Delivery option: Individually administered test approximately 1 to 5 minutes Class-wide tests range from 3 to 60 minutes

Activity: Timing When will screening occur? How frequently? Individually or as a group? Time available? for students to participate for administration and scoring of the assessments for reviewing results and incorporating them into instruction

Staff Roles Conducting the assessment Assessment team General education teacher Paraeducator Data team for analyzing and sharing data

Activity: Staff Roles What are staff roles related to screening? Conducting assessments Scoring assessments Interpreting results Does staff have adequate skills and knowledge?

Administration Delivery option: Location Analysis Paper and pencil Classroom Computer/Internet Other space (i.e. , Computer lab) Analysis Internet-based analysis and reporting software Statistical software

Activity: Administration What materials are required to administer the screening tools? Are there accommodations for students with special needs, languages? What statistical software will be used for analysis, reporting, and monitoring?

Funds Cost of screening tool Cost of necessary materials Many tools have a per- student cost ($1-5). Cost of instruction for identified students Some have additional systems costs. When making data decisions , you need to consider what resources are available to serve the students that you have identified in each level. Cost of training Many tools provide technical assistance and training (in person or Web based) for a price. .

Activity: Funds What funds are available to purchase screening tools and materials? What costs are associated with training? Are there additional cost demands for hiring staff?

Training Training helps to ensure the fidelity of implementation. Training may include: Field-tested training manuals Professional development activities (in person, Web based) Ongoing technical assistance support

Activity: Training How much time is available for training on screening tool administration and data analysis? Who will provide the training and technical assistance? Does the publisher provide training and technical assistance? Will you bring in outside trainers? How much training is needed to implement with fidelity? Use assessment results?

STEP 2: Selecting a Screening Tool

STEP 3: Establishing Procedures Conducting data reviews Identifying the at-risk population Assessing efficacy of core and interventions Assessing progress of groups of students Making decisions Reporting and sharing data

Establish Procedures for Sharing Data Communicating purpose of data collection AND results Occurs throughout the year For example, following benchmark testing Dissemination with discussion is preferred Encourage all school teams to talk about results, patterns, possible interpretations, and likely next steps.

Need More Information? National Center on Response to Intervention www.rti4success.org RTI Action Network www.rtinetwork.org IDEA Partnership www.ideapartnership.org

National Center on Response to Intervention This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Grant No. H326E07000.4 Grace Zamora Durán and Tina Diamond served as the OSEP project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred. This product is public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: www.rti4success.org.