Epidemiology of chronic non- malignant pain in Spain Professor Jos Kleijnen, MD, PhD Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd www.systematic-reviews.com Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cochrane Library. What is The Cochrane Library? The Cochrane Library offers high-quality evidence for health care decision making
Advertisements

Public Health Essential Service #2
Implementing NICE guidance
Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Integrating the gender aspects in research and promoting the participation of women in Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health.
1 Use of Cochrane review results in designing new studies Nicola Cooper Centre for Biostatistics and Genetic Epidemiology, University of Leicester UK
Fibromyalgia Association UK Fighting for Freedom from Fibromyalgia FIBROMYALGIA IN THE UK.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Institute for Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment 1 Results of the PanEuropean Hepatitis C Project 3 rd Paris Hepatitis.
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
金珊資訊有限公司 THE COCHRANE LIBRARY. The Cochrane Library is the single most reliable source for evidence on the effects of healthcare. Health care in the 21.
1 HIV and Aging: an Interprofessional Approach Le-Ann Dolan Program Director Canadian Working Group on HIV and Rehabilitation March 19, 2011.
Cochrane: the next decade DAVID TOVEY EDITOR IN CHIEF.
L1:Apply the concepts of health and wellness to identify health behaviours and factors influencing choice and change in health using an holistic approach.
Finding the Best Evidence Literature for Evidence Based Health Care.
PEBB Disease Burden Report PEBB Board of Directors August 21, 2007 Bdattach.10.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
Medicines Need and Access: Are there Gender Inequities? Anita Wagner Paul Ashigbie João Carapinha Aakanksha Pande Dennis Ross-Degnan Peter Stephens Saul.
Management of Hypertension according to JNC 7 BY SANDAR KYI, MD.
Readmission and Chronic illness that could benefit from end of life discussions.
As noted by Gary H. Lyman (JCO, 2012) “CER is an important framework for systematically identifying and summarizing the totality of evidence on the effectiveness,
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Chapter 17 Nursing Diagnosis
Essentials of Cultural Competence in Pharmacy Practice: Chapter 13 Notes Chapter Author: Dr. Jeanne Frenzel Patients with Disabilities.
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Shakila Thangaratinam Professor of Maternal and Perinatal Health Women’s Health Research Unit R & D Director of Women’s.
David A H Whiteman MD FAAP FACMG Global Clinical Sciences Leader Shire Pharmaceuticals.
Progress with the literature reviews for the CHOICE programme Chris Dickens.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care Provision of Preventive Services in the Complex Patient AHRQ.
Evidence based implementation for quality and health promotion in hospitals Professor Jos Kleijnen Director Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University.
©The Work Foundation Stephen Bevan Director, Centre for Workforce Effectiveness The Work Foundation & Honorary Professor Lancaster University The Clinical.
THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BACK PAIN Environmental Health 5700UG.
IMPORTANCE OF FOOT HEALTH IN OLDER PEOPLE – A REVIEW OF LITERATURE IFA 11th Global Conference on Aging , Prague, Czech Rebublic.
Medication Management Toolkit A guide to the use of medication algorithms to guide clinical care.
European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular diseases in women.
THE COCHRANE LIBRARY ON WILEY INTERSCIENCE. Presentation Agenda Brief introduction of Evidence-Based Medicine theories The Cochrane Collaboration – origins,
Education & Training Curriculum on Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC) Strategies & tools to support health professionals caring for people living with MCC.
Systematic Reviews.
NHPA’s. What are they? National Health Priority Areas (NHPAs) are diseases and conditions chosen for focused attention at a national level because of.
Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Interferences between depression and life quality on patients suffering of type 2 diabetes First Author : Madalina Crisan Coauthors: Madalina Salagean.
1 Administrative Delays And Secondary Disability Following Occupational Low Back Injury California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation.
EXAMINING THE BURDEN OF DISABILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CHRONIC DISEASE: IMPLICATION FOR TRINIDAD & TOBAGO Caroline Alexis-Thomas, RN, BSc, MPH People’s Space.
METHODS Articles used included children and adolescents ranging in age from infancy to 18 years of age who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of.
Healthy ageing in relation to chronic pain in the EU Jos Kleijnen and Nigel Armstrong Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
1. Mohammed Almasabi, Hui Yang, Shane Thomas World Applied Sciences Journal 31 (9): ,
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Chronic pelvic pain Journal Club 17 th June 2011 Dr Claire Hoxley (GPST1) Dr Harpreet Rayar (GPST2)
Primary studies Secondry studies. Primary studies Experimental studies Clinical trial studies Surveys studies.
Sources of systematic reviews Arash Etemadi, MD PhD Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
` ASystematic review of the effectiveness of nurse coordinated transitioning of care on readmission rates for patients with heart failure Jason T. Slyer.
Depression Screening in Primary Care and Impact on Suicide Prevention Anne-Marie T. Mann, BSN, RN, DNP Candidate Diane Kay Boyle, PhD, RN, FAAN.
Chapter 7: Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases. “The Change You Like to See….” (1 of 3) Chronic diseases result from prolongation of acute illness. – With.
T.Vasilopoulos1, C.Tatsi1, C. Lionis1
Prescribing for the Oldest Old
Prevention Diabetes.
by Spanning the Silos in Health of Investment Decision-Making
The Impact of Chronic Disease on a Future NHI
How to Find Systematic Reviews
Evidence-based Medicine
a review of outcome measures
Musculoskeletal Health in Europe
The Impact of Chronic Disease on a Future NHI
Prevention Diabetes Dr Abir Youssef 29/11/2018.
Characteristics of Patients who Choose to Participate in a Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) Program: Implication for Program Structure and Processes.
Physical and Mental Health Literacy and Its Impact on Asian Americans’ Health Outcomes Young-Me Lee, Kunsook Bernstein, Scarlett Choi, Shinhi Han, Hyeonkyong.
Presentation transcript:

Epidemiology of chronic non- malignant pain in Spain Professor Jos Kleijnen, MD, PhD Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd Report authors: Karla Soares Weiser, Ivan Sola, Ed Aromataris, Jesús Tornero, Concepción Pérez, César Margarit, Jos Kleijnen

Background Chronic pain is very common but good data are scarce about the prevalence, incidence, diagnosis, severity, treatment, utilization of health care, and the impact of chronic pain on society, health care systems and the patient. Information about the epidemiology of chronic pain can help health care professionals as well as decision and policy makers decide about health budgets and prioritization, patient segmenting and budget fencing, and therapy budgets, including behavioural therapy and drug budgets.

Objectives To provide information about chronic pain in Spain, by preparing a review of the available published and unpublished data, using the principles of systematic reviews in searching and identifying relevant studies, and summarizing their findings. Given the types of questions to be addressed, we aimed to use the most representative, recent, comprehensive and valid studies, rather than summarizing the results of all studies that were found.

Questions – epidemiology flow What are the population and demographics of Spain? What is the prevalence of chronic pain conditions? What is the incidence of chronic pain conditions? What percentage of chronic pain patients are untreated or inadequately treated? How many chronic pain patients present themselves for treatment? How many chronic pain patients get treated broken down by treatment? What is the compliance of treated chronic pain patients?

Questions – impact What is the disease duration of chronic pain conditions? What are the demographics of pain sufferers? What are the co-morbidities of pain sufferers? How many sufferers have inadequate pain control? What is the impact of chronic pain on: – Quality of life – Activities of daily living – Depression and other mental illness – Isolation, helplessness – Days off work – Incapacity benefits What are the costs of chronic pain from a – Societal perspective? – Health care system perspective? – Patient perspective?

Questions – awareness What are issues/determinants of patients’ awareness of chronic pain? What are issues/determinants of health care professionals’ awareness of chronic pain? What are the main symptoms and complaints with which patients present themselves to health care professionals? What are the frequencies of drug (per WHO class), non-drug, and combined treatments? What are determinants of treatment choice between drug treatment and non-drug treatment? What are determinants of treatment choice within drug treatments? What are determinants of compliance / adherence to drug treatments? What is patients’ satisfaction about drug treatments?

Methods Inclusion criteria: patients with chronic non-malignant moderate and/or severe pain from Spain. We aimed to identify all relevant studies regardless of publication status (published, unpublished, in press, and in progress), or language. We searched the following databases: – MEDLINE (1995 to August 2009) – EMBASE (1995 to August 2009) – CDSR (Cochrane Library issue ) – CENTRAL (Cochrane Library issue ) – DARE (August 2009, CRD website) – HTA (August 2009, CRD website) – Guidelines International Network database (August 2009, GIN website) Furthermore, references in retrieved articles and systematic reviews were checked. Relevant websites were searched for national statistics, insurance data, health surveys and other relevant data.

Prevalence

Demographics of chronic pain patients

Average age of chronic pain patients

Proportion presenting for treatment Fibromyalgia patients Non- fibromyalgia patients

Breakdown per treatment

Types of drugs used

Determinants of compliance / adherence to therapy

Control of pain

Duration of chronic pain

Co-morbidities

Sick leave due to pain

Proportion receiving disability compensations

Conclusions (1) Pain is a common condition that is a major source of suffering and disability in patients worldwide and has a considerable impact on quality of life. This condition has direct social repercussions and also direct work related and economic costs. To our knowledge this is the most comprehensive literature review on epidemiological Spanish data in this field. We have focused on the most representative, recent and valid studies published about chronic pain in Spain, including data from the main collaborative research projects (EPISER, EPIDOR, Miró 2007, PREVADOL). Prevalence of chronic pain in Spain is estimated at 12% (Breivik 06), and data suggest that prevalence increases with increasing age (Miró 07). Those most commonly afflicted by the condition are women between the age of 51 to 57 years, live with their families in an urban setting, and are often also overweight. The duration of chronic non-malignant pain ranges from 6 to 14 years.

Conclusions (2) Chronic pain has an enormous impact on patients. The literature shows that it affects all the areas of patients’ quality of life, with variations depending on type of pain, gender, age, or disease duration. It is important to note that this condition interferes in half of all patients older than 65 years (Miró 05). Although the majority of patients with chronic pain in Spain are treated, a significant percentage appear to be inadequately treated. Often patients perceived that their treatments had no effect (EPIDOR). The paucity of data on satisfaction and/or compliance with treatment is worrying. Some studies have shown that up to 60% of patients are dissatisfied or highly dissatisfied with the treatment received (VIOXX study). Hypertension was the main co-morbidity in patients with chronic pain, followed by other cardiovascular conditions, diabetes and mental health problems in the case of fibromyalgia. There is a need for more accurate data about the main co-morbidities and risk factors to allow physicians to identify the patients that are more prone to suffer from chronic pain.

Conclusions (3) The variability in the collected data reflects an inconsistency in the definition of the condition, and the measurement approach to assess its impact. To have feasible and reliable epidemiological data about chronic pain, researchers should join efforts to define minimum standards to approach the research in this field. Research should also encourage and promote studies designed with a multidisciplinary approach, including different healthcare professionals and specialities responsible for pain management. These studies should be based on common and standardised diagnostic criteria, focusing on the treatments used, the social impact of chronic pain, and its related costs. Only studies with a broad approach will provide healthcare professionals and Spanish society with a clear image of the implications derived from a complex problem such as chronic pain, and will contribute to identify the gaps and neglected needs related to this condition.