1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning from Events 12th June 2013 The Tata Steel Approach
Advertisements

FAASTeam CFI Workshop 8 Pilot Deviations Including Runway Incursions
1 OBJECTIVES: TO HAVE A CLEAR IDEA ON HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL * TO UNDERSTAND THE METHODOLOGY TO PERFORM GROUP RISK ASSESSMENT.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
1 Acceptable Levels of Safety Severity Classification Likelihood Classification Risk Classification Scheme Safety Objective Classification Scheme Regulations.
1 Safety Assessment July SAFETY ASSESSMENT A Safety Assessment is essentially a process for finding answers to three fundamental questions: What.
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar Mexico City, Mexico April 2007.
1 Air Traffic Quality Assurance Program The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary D. Romero.
ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation Course
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
Human Performance Improvement Process
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ICAO Part 139 Review Aerodrome Certification Rule Design Proposal
Airside Capacity Enhancement
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System (SMS) at Airports : Principles APEC TPT-WG AEG-SAF Jim White, Deputy Director.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A AI Planning at airports:Departure Management PLANET Industry Day.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 (All of the commercial and general aviation aircraft currently in-flight in the United States.)
VOORBLAD.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Determining the Significant Aspects
Phase II/III Design: Case Study
Leadership ®. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Leadership ® 2 Objectives Describe different types of team leaders Describe roles and responsibilities.
Basic safety management concepts
1 Vince Galotti Chief/ATMICAO 27 March 2007 REGULATING THROUGH SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS.
Ken Jacobs Airport Planning & Environmental Division March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration 33.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Runway Incursions Presentation to the NZ Airport Association Conference 15 October 2009.
Chapter 14 Fraud Risk Assessment.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RWSL OpEval PilotTraining, page 1 Aug 2006 MPK Pilot Training for Continued Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Runway Incursion’s Affect on FAA Approved Pilot Training and Pilot and Flight Instructor Certification and Part 121 Pilot Checking – Andy Edwards – Manager.
TIWANA WALTON MENTOR: SHARON MONICA JONES High Level Aviation Safety Risk Assessment.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
Vincent Chu and Peter Hwoschinsky, FAA Maria Picardi Kuffner, MIT/LL
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Houston Flight Standards District Office Manager Holly W. Geiger
Outcome: Zero fatalities resulting from runway incursions.
0 Downloaded from FAA Runway Safety Briefing Sun ‘n Fun EAA Fly-In April 2002.
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
Presented to: Accident Investigation LAL By: Ben Coleman (CTR), ASO Runway Safety Team Date: May 11, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Runway.
U.S. National Airspace System: Runway Safety
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida FSDO Runway Safety Program- Pilot Deviations Runway Incursions Instructor and Student.
Sun-n-Fun 2001 Steve Shaffer National Runway Safety Program Steve Shaffer National Runway Safety Program April 13, 2001.
Wes Timmons, Director of Runway Safety, FAA April 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety: Sun ‘N Fun Update.
“ A location on an aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots/drivers.
SSAP The European Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP) The History & Rationale.
Presented to: International Civil Aviation Organization By: LaGretta Bowser Date: September 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Incursion Severity.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
Runway Safety Nets James Fee Manager | Runway Safety Group
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
Presentation transcript:

1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport Commissioners November 16, 2009 Michael D. Feldman Deputy Executive Director Facilities Management Group

2 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project LAWA’s Airfield Safety Goals Overall: Continue to be proactive in enhancing safety on the airfield while maintaining efficient movement of aircraft Interim: Reduce risk levels as much as possible while maintaining airfield operational efficiency pending ultimate North Airfield configuration decisions Long-Term Improvements: Eliminate and/or substantially reduce levels of risk while maintaining airfield operational efficiency

3 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Background of IRSIP Study North Airfield Technical Studies – Independent Airfield Safety Assessments 2007 North Airfield Safety Risk Assessment Report Independent North Airfield Safety Study (NASA, Academic Panel) - ongoing BOAC Direction to LAWA to Identify Further Safety Enhancements During Interim Period IRSIP Study Status Update Presentation to BOAC on April 6, 2009

4 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Airfield Safety Improvements Implemented South Airfield Improvement Project - completed Enhanced Marking and Lighting System – completed Runway Status Light System – pilot program completed ASDE-X system installation – completed Pilot and Controller Awareness Program – on-going

5 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Safety/Risk Terminology Hazard: condition that is necessary to lead to an incident or accident. Likelihood: Probable frequency of hazard occurrence (i.e. once per week/month/year/10 years/100 years). Severity: A measure of the end result (i.e. increased pilot and FAA workload, extreme pilot measures to avoid collision, loss of life and property). Risk: a predicted result of an event and the probability of the event occurring.

6 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project FAA Engineering Recommendations FAA places priority on runway separation and proper airfield geometry Pending resolution of the final airfield geometry, the FAA prefers the following: “.... The preference is for aircraft to cross in the last third of the runway whenever possible, since within the middle third of the runway the arriving/ departing aircraft is usually on the ground and traveling at a high rate of speed.” 1/ 1/ FAA Engineering Brief No. 75: Incorporation of Runway Incursion Prevention into Taxiway and Apron Design, November 19, 2007.

7 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Existing North Airfield System

8 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Current Configuration – Risk Matrix Severity No Safety Effect MinorMajorHazardousCatastrophic Likelihood54321 Frequent – A More than once per week Probable – B Once every month Remote – C Once every year Extremely Remote – D Once every years Extremely Improbable – E Less than once every 100 years LAX 005 LAX 008 LAX 009 LAX 001 LAX 002 LAX 007 LAX 006 Source: LAX-WCG, Inc. Safety Risk Management Panel, May 2007 * Unacceptable with Single Point and Common Cause Failures High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk LAX 003 LAX 004 LAX 010 *

9 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Safety Risk Assessment Panel FAA Subject Matter Experts Air Traffic Control Runway Safety LAWA Subject Matter Experts Airfield Operations Planning Safety Risk Assessment Expert Panel Focus Review Hazards LAX001 and LAX002 to confirm that the hazards still exist based on current operations and the implementation of short-term enhancements Review the Preferred Alternative and determine if it would reduce the severity and/or likelihood of the hazards occurring Evaluate the potential of the Preferred Alternative causing additional hazards and/or worsening other existing hazards

10 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project IRSIP – Taxiway Relocations

11 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Interim Improvements (IRSIP) – Initial Safety Panel Findings Risk Matrix Severity No Safety Effect MinorMajorHazardousCatastrophic Likelihood54321 Frequent – A More than once per week Probable – B Once every month Remote – C Once every year Extremely Remote – D Once every years Extremely Improbable – E Less than once every 100 years LAX 005 LAX 008 LAX 009 LAX 001 LAX 002 LAX 007 LAX 001 LAX 006 Source: LAX Safety Risk Management Panel, September 2009 * Unacceptable with Single Point and Common Cause Failures High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk LAX 003 LAX 004 LAX 010 LAX 002 *

12 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Runway Status Light Locations

13 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Next Steps December Board Meeting: Staff will request authority to initiate IRSIP design and environmental review Provide results of this work to NORSAC Committee and the Academic Panel. On-going collaboration with the FAA regarding additional Runway Status Light Installations and IRSIP Finalize Safety Risk Management Panel Report

14 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Discussions/Questions

15 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX001 – Taxiway Y What is going on: Simultaneous use of Runway 24R for Arrivals and Runway 24L for Non-Heavy Departures What may occur: The departing Non-Heavy aircraft is cleared for departure and begins its takeoff roll and the arrival on Runway 24L, instructed to hold on Taxiway Y, approaches to hold line at the same time. What is the hazard: The aircraft that landed on Runway 24R inadvertently crosses past the hold line on Taxiway Y and crosses Runway 24L at the same time a Non-Heavy begins its departure roll down Runway 24L. What may be the outcome if the hazard occurs: Either or both pilots conduct a severe maneuver to avoid a potential collision, which would be classified by the FAA as a “severe operational error.”

16 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX001 – Taxiway Y

17 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX001 – Taxiway Z What is going on: Simultaneous use of Runway 24R for Arrivals and Runway 24L for Non-Heavy Departures What may occur: The departing Non-Heavy aircraft is cleared for departure and begins its takeoff roll and the arrival on Runway 24L, instructed to hold on Taxiway Z, approaches to hold line at the same time. What is the hazard: The aircraft that landed on Runway 24R inadvertently crosses past the hold line on Taxiway Z and crosses Runway 24L at the same time a Non-Heavy begins its departure roll down Runway 24L. What may be the outcome if the hazard occurs: Either or both pilots conduct a severe maneuver to avoid a potential collision, which would be classified by the FAA as a “severe operational error.”

18 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX001 – Taxiway Z

19 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX002 – Taxiway Y What is going on: Simultaneous use of Runway 24R for Arrivals and Runway 24L for Heavy Departures What may occur: The departing Heavy aircraft is cleared for departure and begins its takeoff roll and the arrival on Runway 24L, instructed to hold on Taxiway Y, approaches to hold line at the same time. What is the hazard: The aircraft that landed on Runway 24R inadvertently crosses past the hold line on Taxiway Y and crosses Runway 24L at the same time a Heavy begins its departure roll down Runway 24L. What may be the outcome if the hazard occurs: Either or both pilots conduct a severe maneuver to avoid a potential collision, which would be classified by the FAA as a “severe operational error.”

20 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX002 – Taxiway Y

21 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX002 – Taxiway Z What is going on: Simultaneous use of Runway 24R for Arrivals and Runway 24L for Heavy Departures What may occur: The departing Heavy aircraft is cleared for departure and begins its takeoff roll and the arrival on Runway 24L, instructed to hold on Taxiway Z, approaches to hold line at the same time. What is the hazard: The aircraft that landed on Runway 24R inadvertently crosses past the hold line on Taxiway Z and crosses Runway 24L at the same time a Heavy begins its departure roll down Runway 24L. What may be the outcome if the hazard occurs: Either or both pilots conduct a severe maneuver to avoid a potential collision, which would be classified by the FAA as a “severe operational error.”

22 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project North Airfield Hazards Hazard LAX002 – Taxiway Z