Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
Advertisements

2.5 If-Then Statements and Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning. Objectives I can identify an example of inductive reasoning. I can give an example of inductive reasoning. I can identify an example.
Lesson 2.3 p. 87 Deductive Reasoning Goals: to use symbolic notation to apply the laws of logic.
Bell Work 1) Find the value of the variables 2)Write the conditional and converse of each biconditional, and state if the biconditional is true or false.
4.3 Warm Up Find the distance between the points. Then find the midpoint between the points. (5, 2), (3, 8) (7, -1), (-5, 3) (-9, -5), (7, -14)
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning
2.3: Deductive Reasoning p Deductive Reasoning Use facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.
Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.
Chapter 2.1 Common Core G.CO.9, G.CO.10 & G.CO.11 Prove theorems about lines, angles, triangles and parallelograms. Objective – To use inductive reasoning.
Section 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.
Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?
Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.
 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.
2.4 Ms. Verdino.  Biconditional Statement: use this symbol ↔  Example ◦ Biconditional Statement: The weather is good if and only if the sun is out 
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment to make a valid conclusion in the true situation. If two segments have the same length, then.
Section 3.3 Using Laws of Logic. Using contrapositives  The negation of a hypothesis or of a conclusion is formed by denying the original hypothesis.
WARM UP. DEDUCTIVE REASONING LEARNING OUTCOMES I will be able to use the law of detachment and syllogism to make conjectures from other statements I.
GEOMETRIC PROOFS A Keystone Geometry Mini-Unit. Geometric Proofs – An Intro Why do we have to learn “Proofs”? A proof is an argument, a justification,
Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
5-Minute Check Converse: Inverse: Contrapositive: Hypothesis: Conclusion: The measure of an angle is less than 90  The angle is acute If an angle is.
Logic Puzzle.
3/15/ : Deductive Reasoning1 Expectations: L3.1.1: Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning, identifying and providing examples of each.
Inductive Reasoning Notes 2.1 through 2.4. Definitions Conjecture – An unproven statement based on your observations EXAMPLE: The sum of 2 numbers is.
Chapter 2, Section 1 Conditional Statements. Conditional Statement Also know as an “If-then” statement. If it’s Monday, then I will go to school. Hypothesis:
2.3 Warm Up Warm Up Lesson Quiz Lesson Quiz Lesson Presentation Lesson Presentation Apply Deductive Reasoning.
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If
Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning, Postulates, and Proofs
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.
Reasoning Proof and Chapter 2 If ….., then what?
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
CST 24 – Logic.
Applying Deductive Reasoning
M1 Lesson 4.4 January 21, 2009 Deductive Reasoning.
2.2 Deductive Reasoning Objective:
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Look at specific examples. • Recognize patterns, which.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
2-4 Deductive Reasoning 8th Grade Geometry.
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Reasoning and Proofs Deductive Reasoning Conditional Statement
Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.
Angles, Angle Pairs, Conditionals, Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Law of Detachment Law of Syllogism
2-4 Deductive Reasoning Vocab:
Goal 1: Using Symbolic Notation Goal 2: Using the Laws of Logic
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Proving Statements about Segments
Presentation transcript:

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning: The use of facts, definitions, accepted properties and laws of logic to form a logical argument.

Comparison Inductive: specific general Deductive: general specific

Laws of Logic are reasonings commonly accepted to be true statements Laws of Logic are reasonings commonly accepted to be true statements. They are used to construct a logical argument that something is true or not true.

Law of Detachment If the hypothesis of a true conditional statement is true, then the conclusion is also true.

Ex. ) If 2 segments have the same length, then they are congruent Ex.) If 2 segments have the same length, then they are congruent. (True conditional statement) Let’s say you are then given that

Because the given information satisfies the hypothesis of the conditional statement, then it follows that the conclusion is also true:

(sort of like transitive property) Law of Syllogism (sort of like transitive property) If hypothesis p, then conclusion q. If hypothesis q, then conclusion r. If the above 2 statements are true, then the following statement is true: If hypothesis p, then conclusion r.

Ex.1) If James takes chemistry next year, then Maria will be his lab partner. (Assume this is true.)

If Maria is James’ lab partner, then James will get an “A” If Maria is James’ lab partner, then James will get an “A”. (Also assume this is true.)

If James takes chemistry next year, then James will get an “A” in chemistry. (You can say this because the conclusion of the first statement is the hypothesis of the second statement which are both assumed to be true statements.)

You have just made a logical argument using the Law of Syllogism You have just made a logical argument using the Law of Syllogism. You created a new conditional statement that follows logically from a pair of true statements.

Ex. 2) If x > 5, then x2 > 25. If x2 > 25, then x2 > 20 Ex.2) If x > 5, then x2 > 25. If x2 > 25, then x2 > 20. (conclusion of second statement is hypothesis of first statement) Therefore: If x > 5, then x2 > 20.

Identifying Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning Inductive: if using specific examples to discover a pattern and that pattern leads you to the answer Deductive: if proving a pattern holds true for specific examples