Some ideas on ET1 site Adalberto Giazotto INFN Pisa- EGO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Introduction.
Advertisements

WHAT DO THEY ALL MEAN?. Median Is the number that is in the middle of a set of numbers. (If two numbers make up the middle of a set of numbers then the.
Stefan Hild for the GEO600 team October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling.
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
1 Feasibility of measuring the Shapiro time delay over meter-scale distances Peter Shawhan (University of Maryland), Stefan Ballmer (LIGO - Caltech), Szabolcs.
Quiz Chapters 1 and 2  Numerical Accuracy  Space, Mass and Time  Vectors  Polar and Rectangular Coordinates.
Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
ET- WP2, Thermal noise issues Fulvio Ricci Assergi (L’Aquila) Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, February, 9th 2008.
Let’s take a 15 minute break Please be back on time.
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
Number Factors and Multiples Saturday, 09 September 2006 ©RSH.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
CLIO Current Status of Japanese Detectors Daisuke Tatsumi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site identification and infrastructure Jo van den Brand Tübingen, October.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
1 GWIC Gravitational Wave International Committee Report to PaNAGIC 9-Sept-03.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site identification and infrastructure Jo van den Brand Tübingen, October.
1 Amaldi 5 GWIC Report by B Barish, chair. 2 GWIC gravitational wave international committee  International Union of Physics and Applied Physics (IUPAP)
Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO Gravity waves GW detectors Strain measurement, sensitivity Newtonian Noise How do we throw away your signal.
Present Superatttenuator performance vs. AdV & ET Requirements S.Braccini for Virgo Suspension group.
Towards a Design Study Proposal for a 3rd Generation Interferometric Gravitational- wave Detector Harald Lück London, October 26th 2006.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
30 th January th IAGRG meeting Kolkata S. V. DHURANDHAR IUCAA PUNE.
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford G Directional Stochastic Search: a Gravitational Wave Radiometer Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts.
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Design study for ET 3rd generation Gravitational Wave Interferometer Work Package 2 Suspension, Thermal noise and Cryogenics Piero Rapagnani
Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
Silvia Poggi - GW burst detection strategy in non-homogeneus networks Detection strategies for bursts in networks of non-homogeneus gravitational waves.
New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
Minimizing the Resonant Frequency of MGAS Springs for Seismic Attenuation System in Low Frequency Gravitational Waves Interferometers Maddalena Mantovani,
New in-air seismic attenuation system for the next generation gravitational wave detector M.R. Blom, A. Bertolini, E. Hennes, A. Schimmel, H.J. Bulten,
Seismic Noise Coherence Measurements in Deep Salt Mines
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
WG3 Report Michele Punturo Harald Lück. WG3 composition Co-Chairmen M.Punturo INFN Perugia, Italy H.Lück MPI für Gravitationsphysik, AEI, Hannover, Germany.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
LIGO-G R LIGO R&D1 Improvement of the MGAS Filter Damping Performance Alberto Stochino University of Pisa, Italy SURF Student Mentor: Dr. Riccardo.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searching for the fifth dimension using gravitational waves.
G. Cella I.N.F.N. Sezione di Pisa.  The mass density fluctuates..... ..... and the gravitational field will do the same Direct gravitational coupling.
The quest for gravitational waves. 2 The Universe has been studied essentially through EM radiation. GWs have a different origin. The Scientific Motivation.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
Harald Lück AEI Hannover. Thank you Science Team! You did a great job!
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searches for very high frequency gravitational waves.
Overview of iLCGT & bLCGT Kazuaki Kuroda LCGT Collaboration F2f meeting 27 September, 2010.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1MGR13- ET.
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Present Superattenuator performance vs. ET Requirements S
Advanced VIRGO Experiment
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Stochastic Background
Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda M. Ando, K. Okada,
Albert Lazzarini California Institute of Technology
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
Current Status of TAMA300 Shuichi Sato
Some ideas on advanced Virgo Twins A. Giazotto-INFN Pisa
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Presentation transcript:

Some ideas on ET1 site Adalberto Giazotto INFN Pisa- EGO

Introduction ET will be a network of detectors whose target is the systematic observation of the Universe by means of Gravitational Waves: i.e. GW astronomy. GW astronomy implies, obviously, determination of GW sources celestial coordinates. The most efficient and precise way of measuring source celestial coordinates is by means of GW event time of flight measurement. This method requires several interferometers well spaced around the Earth in the way of attaining the highest angular resolution.

4 well spaced ITF’s determine univocally GW source Celestial Coordinates. Per example angular resolution of the V-L network are : Virgo-LIGO Declinazione: 4°30‘ Ascensione retta: 3° 32‘ Courtesy Simona Birindelli Virgo-LIGO-AIGO Declinazione: 2° 52‘ Ascensione retta:1° 51‘ Courtesy Simona Birindelli LIGO+AIGOLIGO For this reason I refere to ET1 as the first of, at least, 4 interferometer which will form the ET network

Correlation between detectors Another reason for getting well separated ITF’s for ET is that this configuration has the lowest correlation between single network detectors. For these reasons I refere to ET1 as the first of, at least, 4 interferometer which will form the ET network

ET a Global network of Detectors Coherent Analysis: why? -Sensitivity increase -Source direction determination from time of flight differences -Polarizations measurement -Test of GW Theory and GW Physical properties Astrophysical targets - Far Universe expansion rate Measurement -GW energy density in the Universe -Knowledge of Universe at times close to Planck’s time

ET Sensitivity Harald Lück for the European Gravitational-Wave Community

TAMA 300 GEO600 LIGO Virgo AURIGA, NAUTILUS, EXPLORER GW DETECTORS SENSITIVITY

Some exercise:Use of Superattenuators for ET 1) Inverted Pend. 40 mHz 2) 50 m tall mechanical filter chain By assuming a seismic noise underground from theTF optimized at 1Hz we obtain h(1Hz)= /sqrt(Hz ~50 m N 1 Hz 2 Hz {3, 1.6*10-7, 5.4*10-10} {4, 4.8*10-8, 3.3*10-11} {5, 2.6*10-8, 3.4*10-12} {6, 2.3*10-8, 6.7*10-12} {7, 2.1*10-8, 2.6*10-12} Optimized at 1Hz Courtesy G. Cella Horizontal

ET sens. 2 HZ Superattenuator NEWTONIAN

Isolation in Vertical Direction In Virgo, SA Vertical attenuation has been tuned to the horizontal one evaluated with length module of 1m. Considering length module of 7m we obtain: This frequency can be easily obtained both by tuning magnetic antispring or geometrical springs.

15-20 m diam. 10 km 4k 300k Tunnel standard ~100 m 15 m clean room

10 km 4k 300k Tunnel standard m ~100 m 15 m clean room

Some exercise:Use of Superattenuators for ET 1) Inverted Pend. 40 mHz 2) 50 m tall mechanical filter chain By assuming a seismic noise underground from the TF optimized at 2Hz we obtain h(2Hz)= /sqrt(Hz)<< /sqrt(Hz) N 1 Hz 2 Hz {3, 1.6*10-7, 5.4*10-10} {4, 4.8*10-8, 3.3*10-11} {5, 2.7*10-8, 3.3*10-12} {6, 2.8*10-8, 4.9*10-13} {7, 6.3*10-8, 1.0*10-13} Optimized at 2 Hz N 1 Hz 2 Hz {3, 1.6*10-7, 5.4*10-10} {4, 4.8*10-8, 3.3*10-11} {5, 2.6*10-8, 3.4*10-12} {6, 2.3*10-8, 6.7*10-12} {7, 2.1*10-8, 2.6*10-12} Optimized at 1Hz ~50 m Courtesy G. Cella