Knowledge Management Info Days, 10 July 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kirsty McCormack.
Advertisements

Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
Global Implementation Strategy for SEEA
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
1 Workshop I - Introduction: Monitoring and evaluation (M+E) financial engineering instruments for SMEs 5 th Plenary Meeting JEREMIE Networking Platform.
Guide to statistics in European Commission Development Co-operation
Together. Free your energies How open and collaborative are public administrations in Europe? A benchmarking perspective October 2011.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Inspiring other policy domains – towards the establishment of a European.
1 S3 Platform: Achievements and outlook on activities for 2014 Moritz Haller JRC, Unit for International, Interinstitutional and Stakeholder Relations.
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
Directorate E: Agriculture and environment statistics; Statistical cooperation Unit E3: Environment statistics and accounts Environmental Accounts European.
Training for Participants Date, Location, Venue 1 Welcome! Welcome to PEM 2 Module!
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
Eye on Earth (EoE), Citizen Science and the Invasive Alien Species project Malene Bruun NRC’s for EIS June 17, 2011.
Building the knowledge base for the implementation/ monitoring of biodiversity strategies Breakout group discussion 1.
EuropeAid’s today’s quality framework and the Results agenda
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA-Energy Implementation United Nations Statistics Division Oslo Group Meeting September 2013 Baku,
Benchmarking Energy Use in Commercial Buildings Satish Kumar, Ph.D. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Public Sector Energy Management Workshop Mumbai,
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
1 Metagora: Current Progress and the Way Forward PARIS21 Steering Committee Paris, 13 November 2007.
FLLLEX – Final Evaluation
Understanding monitoring and evaluation FACTSHEET 8 Food and Garden Organics Best Practice Collection Manual.
 Advancing Quality in Higher Education  DEEWR web site  PDF – ‘A strengthened Australian Graduate Survey’
1 GROUP 1 - OUTPUT OBJECTIVES 1 and 2 (ENGLISH/BCS group) o PRVA GRUPA 1 - CILJEVI IZLAZNOG REZULTATA 1 i 2 (ENGLESKO/BHS grupa)
Sustainability Metrics  Lecture 1-Weak Sustainability Metrics Dr Bernadette O’Regan  Lecture 2-Strong Sustainability Metrics Prof Richard Moles  Lecture.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Mr. Walter Balfe, Development Officer, FETAC Provider Self Evaluation of Programmes and Services Walter Balfe Development Officer – FETAC 4 October 2007.
Introduction to the Continual Service Improvement Toolkit Welcome.
1 Tracer Study: University Graduates and Labor Market Project Manager Prof. Dr. Eng. Radu Mircea Damian University Graduates and Labor Market Romanian.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
NRC Soil working group on contaminated sites and brownfields EC JRC, Ispra, Italy – March 2015 EEA approach to setting indicators Geertrui Louwagie.
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
ISMS Implementation Workshop Adaptive Processes Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
Department Speaker’s name 24/12/2015 NOUVELLE LÉGISLATION EUROPÉENNE POUR ÉCONOMISER L’ÉNERGIE Améliorer les bâtiments High Level Safety Conference 2010.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Update on ESCAP Work on Trade Facilitation and implementation of the ROC-TF mechanism Regional Organizations Cooperation Mechanism for Trade Facilitation.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Plan Waste Assessment MWM01A. What is the purpose of a waste assessment?  The main aims of a waste assessment are to:  Identify each waste stream on.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
1 Introducing the ARC: The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs March 2016.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
"Learning and achievements of SWA Global platform and its relevance to achieving Hygiene and Sanitation Development in India" India WASH Summit 17 th February.
Development Account: 6th Tranche Strengthening the capacity of National Statistical Offices (NSOs) in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States to fulfill.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Global Coordination Platform
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
Europe’s Environment Assessment of Assessments EE-AoA 2011
Global Coordination Platform
Benchmarking.
44th Meeting of the Standing Committee Bonn, Germany, October 2015 Report on activities of the Strategic Plan Working Group Ines Verleye,
Global Coordination Platform
Guidelines and Template for project oral presentation
Guidelines and Template for project oral presentation
Longer-Term Evaluation of APEC Projects:
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
Data collection and validation support for the management of the ESF
Quality Reporting in CBS
The EuroGroups Register Agne Bikauskaite, August Götzfried
The Joint Research Centre and the power of data to support decision making on protected and conserved areas Gran Paradiso National Park, Cogne, Aosta,
PRD 2019 GUIDELINES & TEMPLATE
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge Management Info Days, 10 July 2014

Knowledge Management aims firstly to establish where we are Knowledge management (KM) is identifying, capturing, evaluating, compiling & sharing of an organisation’s information assets => here, technol-related information KM process will facilitate measurement of technological progress being achieved via our programme: – At a project level we evaluate what the project is achieving compared to the project's objectives and targets – We are now bringing this to a programme level, to evaluate, quantitatively, how the FCH JU programme is contributing, through its portfolio of projects and their achievements, to advancing the technology towards commercialization => in accordance with the mandate of the FCH JU

We are building on the picture of individual project achievements

To obtain a global view of what the programme is doing vs objectives

To achieve this we need harmonised data collection Projects of similar type don’t always measure/collect same data Not all data collected by projects are KM-relevant

Harmonised data collection process & implications FCH JU is developing parameter templates per technology type, with key techno-economic indicators/data requirements for KM purposes Staged data collection is envisaged: 1.Finished projects: internal (FCH JU) compilation of data based on data in final project report, to fill out template; “missing” data requested by FCH JU to coordinators via Excel format 2.Ongoing and future projects: project data reporting/collection done directly by the project via software interface (TEMONAS) Much of the data already collected systematically – we’re aiming for centralized data collection on averaged data Not all data collected within the projects is required/KM- relevant

All of this in the context of wider objectives Engaging support for the technology: by confirming the progress of the European FCH industry and its relevance in Europe’s energy future Providing input to policy-making: identifying and justifying areas warranting policy support Gauging our position in the worldwide industry: enabling us to capitalize on strengths Orient FCH JU programme: identifying gaps that require addressing to meet objectives/targets

TEMONAS will be main means for external data reporting TEMONAS (TEchnology MONitoring and ASsessment tool) – Tool developed via FCH JU project (delivered end 2013) – Allows centralised entry, treatment and analysis of data from all FCH JU projects in a secure environment – Facilitate creation of a programme-level picture to evaluate technological progress, achievements of the programme (vs MAIP, AIP, international SOTA), gaps, support needs – First step will be pilot with sample of project(s) using external (web- interface) data entry – Simultaneously, working on in-house data population (MAIP/AIP targets, industry benchmark) – Implementation of pilot before end-year, and conducting of first analyses, working towards full implementation & operation for 2015

Thank you! Contacts: Suzanne Shaw – Knowledge Manager

Extra slides

FCH JU Knowledge Management Process Clean Room Project monitoring Portfolio monitoring Analysis & Interpretation Consolidation Reports, Presentations Confidential In-house Projects Studies TEMONAS (internal, web) Policy Input USA, Korea, Japan, EU External Publications Personal communications IPHEIEA PO JRC General Knowledge sharing Website (update end-2014), PRD, presentations Progress monitoring Programme steering MAWP, AWP EC RG IG SRG All/ Public SC Programme metrics Aggregated results, benchmarking Other analy- tical tools