Gail C. Rodin, Ph.D. Assessment Consultant Pearson/PsychCorp

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the DANVA 2 & the NEPSY-II
Advertisements

WMS-IV Wechsler Memory Scale - Fourth Edition
Copyright © by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All Rights Reserved. Objectives Use z-scores to find percentiles. Thinking Skill: Explicitly assess information.
1 Assessing Outcomes After Theyre Gone – Measuring Preparedness and Quality in Practice Presented by: Mary Pat Wohlford-Wessels, Ph.D. Vice President for.
4QC – Tampere September QC Common Assessment Framework CAF self-assessment eTool.
The BRIGANCE® Screens-II
Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop: Thursday 7th February IYW Conference, Llandrindod Wells Dr Dave Daley & Dr Tracey Bywater.
Why Take PLAN? PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college.
Scoring Terminology Used in Assessment in Special Education
Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D.
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Unlocking The ARMT and SAT 10 By Mrs. Dawne Gibson.
Intelligence Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D. 1. Intelligence Why do we want to measure intelligence? What are some of the reasons we measure intelligence?
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
Reading the CogAT Report: A Parent’s Guide Reading the CogAT Report.
1  Assessment of ADHD › Four 15 minute office visits  Treatment is NOT an emergency › Take your time › Ensure diagnosis is correct 1
Understanding Intelligence Tests
Measures of Central Tendency. Central Tendency “Values that describe the middle, or central, characteristics of a set of data” Terms used to describe.
Scaled Scoring.
The Normal Models/Distributions. Normal Distribution Parameters The first parameter specified here is shape: symmetric, unimodal, bell shaped. (A formula.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
1 Intellectual Disabilities Definitions. 2 Classification by IQ (Wechsler Scales) 130+ Very Superior (Gifted) Superior High Average
Aim: How do we calculate and interpret correlation coefficients with SPSS? SPSS Assignment Due Friday 2/12/10.
Interpretation of the WISC-IV
Variance and Standard Deviation. Variance: a measure of how data points differ from the mean Data Set 1: 3, 5, 7, 10, 10 Data Set 2: 7, 7, 7, 7, 7 What.
1.3 Psychology Statistics AP Psychology Mr. Loomis.
Review – Using Standard Deviation Here are eight test scores from a previous Stats 201 class: 35, 59, 70, 73, 75, 81, 84, 86. The mean and standard deviation.
Clinical assessment of intelligence, personality and achievement.
Part 2 in the SAS-E Clinician’s Toolbox Decoding the Psychoeducational Assessment 1.
Chapter 3 Understanding Test Scores Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition.
SAT 10 (Stanford 10) 2013 Nakornpayap International School Presentation by Ms.Pooh.
Review Measures of central tendency
Descriptive Statistics
Scatterplot and trendline. Scatterplot Scatterplot explores the relationship between two quantitative variables. Example:
Promising Practices Part II. DD License Developmental Disabilities (DD) –Teacher licensure –K-12 –Broad range (mild through severe) Developmental Cognitive.
INTELLIGENCE Mental quality consisting of the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations.
Find out where you can find rand and randInt in your calculator. Write down the keystrokes.
Co-Occurring Disorders Best Practices and Adolescent Mary Jane Alumbaugh, Ph.D.
Testing the Differences between Means Statistics for Political Science Levin and Fox Chapter Seven 1.
Data Summary Using Descriptive Measures Sections 3.1 – 3.6, 3.8
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Standardized Testing. Basic Terminology Evaluation: a judgment Measurement: a number Assessment: procedure to gather information.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Hertfordshire County Council ENF conference. Jan 16 Early Years Assessments.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Case Closed The New SAT Chapter 2 AP Stats at LSHS Mr. Molesky The New SAT Chapter 2 AP Stats at LSHS Mr. Molesky.
Psychology’s Statistics Appendix. Statistics Are a means to make data more meaningful Provide a method of organizing information so that it can be understood.
Cognitive Testing, Statistics and Dementia Ralph J. Kiernan Ph.D. 14 th May 2013.
Educational Research Descriptive Statistics Chapter th edition Chapter th edition Gay and Airasian.
Children with Autism and Adaptive Behaviour the ability to adapt to the environment The Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales Second Edition (Venn, 2007)
Interpreting Test Results using the Normal Distribution Dr. Amanda Hilsmier.
Vocab Unit 11. = a method of assessing an individual's mental aptitudes and comparing them with those of others, using numerical scores.
Unit 11 Vocabulary Individual Differences and Intelligence.
Keystone Heart Reflect Neurology
Defining Co-Teaching and Inclusion
Data Collection Challenge:
Kristen Davidson Alyssa Heggen Lauren Lafayette
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Definition Slides.
DSM and the ICD 1.
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Tier III Tier II Tier I A THREE TIERED APPROACH TO
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Data Tables Packet #19.
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
P ! A L S Interpreting Student Data to
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
61.1 – Discuss the history of intelligence testing.
Assessing Intelligence
Presentation transcript:

Gail C. Rodin, Ph.D. Assessment Consultant Pearson/PsychCorp Introducing NEPSY-II Gail C. Rodin, Ph.D. Assessment Consultant Pearson/PsychCorp

Use of NEPSY-II Typical use is to determine “Is child’s performance low in particular skill areas?” Gather data on child’s strengths and weaknesses But NP tests designed primarily to distinguish normal vs. deficient performance Above average or superior performance often not possible or relevant

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider WISC-IV mean subtest scores for children with Mild MR Range from: 3.8 (Arithmetic) -to- 6.2 (Cancellation) Most Mild MR means near 4.5

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider Most clinical groups are not as functionally impaired as children with MR Therefore, mean scores for most clinical groups expected to fall in range of 5 – 8 For mild to moderate disorders

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider Effect size above .8 is considered large for subtest scaled scores Large effects translate into clinical means of ~ 7.5 Moderate effect sizes: .4 – .8 Subtest scaled scores of 7.6 – 8.8

What is Considered a Low Score? Rules of thumb: Most clinical groups obtain scaled scores between 5 and 8 Can use scaled score of 7 or lower as rough break-point for problem areas But even scaled scores of 8 and 9 can be meaningful

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider Subtest scaled scores are not linear Distance btwn scaled scores of 9 & 8 = 12 percentiles Distance btwn scaled scores of 8 & 7 = 9 percentiles As approach the mean, scoring one subtest scaled score point lower drops child further compared to peers

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider Important to consider unequal subtest scaled score differences when: Looking at profiles of scores Deciding if a score seems low for particular child For example, same difference of 7 percentiles exists between scaled scores of: 6 and 7 -and- 4 and 6

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider Score on a specific test indicates only how far child’s performance is from mean of that test A low score does not necessarily imply: Impairment -or- A specific diagnosis

What is Considered a Low Score? Issues to Consider Attributions must be backed up by more than one piece of data Clinician must corroborate test findings with: Performance on other measures -or- Indicators of daily functioning Preponderance of evidence required to document an impairment

Gail C. Rodin, Ph.D. Assessment Consultant Pearson/PsychCorp Phone: 919.285.3652 Fax: 919.285.3654 E-mail: gail.rodin@pearson.com