CM HOW-TO GENERAL OVERVIEW AND DELTAS FROM E2. OBJECTIVE u Upon completion of this training you will demonstrate an understanding of major differences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Advertisements

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
1 CM HOW-TO DETAILED DISCUSSION. 2 OBJECTIVE n Upon completion of this training you will demonstrate an understanding of how to perform a CM evaluation.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
1 CMBG 2009 Copyright 2009 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Configuration Management Activities, Including Margin Management David Hembree INPO June.
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Why You Should Care About ABET And how you can help with ABET accreditation of the Civil and Environmental Engineering undergraduate degrees A quick orientation.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
An evaluation framework
Information Systems Development and Acquisition Chapter 8 Jessup & Valacich Instructor: Ramesh Sankaranarayanan.
Chapter 2 Training For Organizations Needs Assessment.
1 College of Engineering and Computer Science Computer Science Department CSC 131 Computer Software Engineering Fall 2006 Lecture # 2 Chapter 6 & 7 System.
Procurement Engineering and Review Team (PERT) PEER REVIEW PROGRAM Patrick Marmo 2/7/2012 Independent Peer Review Program for Contractor’s Purchasing Systems.
Industry Nuclear Safety Culture* Process Thomas C. Houghton Director, Safety Focused Regulation Nuclear Energy Institute March 12, 2009 *Nuclear Safety.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Deployment of a Margin Model at Comanche Peak Presented.
Module 3: Five core practices of effective trainers MOA – FAO – TCP Workshop on Managing Training Institutions Beijing, 9 July 2012.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
Action Research March 12, 2012 Data Collection. Qualities of Data Collection  Generalizability – not necessary; goal is to improve school or classroom.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
1 Configuration Management “The Cookbook Approach”
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Ashley Briggs, Ed.D., case study lead Felix Fernandez, Ph.D, implementation lead ICF International 1 July 8, 2015.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
IIBA - Cedar Rapids Chapter Thursday, Sept. 22, 2011.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
System Analysis and Design Dr. Taysir Hassan Abdel Hamid Lecture 5: Analysis Chapter 3: Requirements Determination November 10, 2013.
Supporting Integrated and Comprehensive Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation in Africa AAP Country Conference “Celebrating our Successes” 12 th - 16.
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
INPO Update Operational Excellence Outcomes and Configuration Management Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator June 2004 CMBG Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator.
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Direct and Indirect Measures INPUTS OUTCOMES. Assessment Basics: Overview Characteristics of learning outcomes Introduction to assessment tools Validity.
CM Training Best Practices John Parler VC Summer Station.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
AS Psychology Self-report: Evaluation. AS Psychology By the end of this lesson you should... Be able to evaluate the strengths ad weaknesses of self-report.
ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Facility Evaluation Board Steve Johnson, Manager Operations Evaluation Department.
1 | 2010 Lecture 3: Project processes. Covered in this lecture Project processes Project Planning (PP) Project Assessment & Control (PAC) Risk Management.
John Maciejewski INPO I am John Maciejewski
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety Aerospace Process.
Understanding the EHS Management System Development Process David Downs President EHS Management Partners,Inc.
Ch-1 Introduction The processes used for executing a software project have major effect on quality of s/w produced and productivity achieved in project…
Josh Olson Southern Nuclear - Vogtle 3&4
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
Overview of System or Process Design and Improvement 1.
NUPIC Perspective Stan Mitchell – NUPIC Chair. Presentation Title2 NUPIC Overview NUPIC Organization established to accomplish the following objectives.
PROCESS ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT. Process Assessment  A formal assessment did not seem financially feasible at the onset of the company’s process improvement.
Logistics Community Competency Initiative Update November 20, 2006 Mark Tregar, CNAC Judith Bayliss, DAU “The Total Force must continue to adapt to different.
1 Peer Review Panel Questions & Answers Instructors: Gary Chapman Kelly Hammond Stan Sewell 1.
Primary Steps for Achieving ISO Certification.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
TA-V eB Performance Improvement Overview
STEM Learning Module PISA- Summer 2007
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach Northouse, 4th edition.
Standard Design Process (SDP) Change Management Ashley Taylor TVA
أساليب التقويم وأدواته
The BIG Idea INTERVIEWS
INPO Configuration Management Activities
Break Out 6: CM Organizational Structure
INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance
Facilitated By: John Meyer Rick Harris
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach Northouse, 4th edition.
Leadership Chapter 2 - Trait Approach Northouse, 4th edition.
New Plant Configuration Management Development and Implementation Process John Maciejewski INPO June 29, 2009 EN MRM Standardization Model.
Presentation transcript:

CM HOW-TO GENERAL OVERVIEW AND DELTAS FROM E2

OBJECTIVE u Upon completion of this training you will demonstrate an understanding of major differences between evaluating CM under the E2 and E3 processes.

REVIEW QUESTIONS u List five differences between E2 and E3 approaches to evaluating CM u What should E3 AFIs identify as the FOPs if possible? u What do the sites self- assess as part of the E3 process? u How does the INPO exit with the utility CEO differ in the E3 process? u How do margins relate to CM?

CM OVERVIEW u basics are the same –review documents –field observations –Interviews u What we review, observe, & ask relates to CM/Margin management

CM OVERVIEW u General High Level Overview of How-To –how-to based on pilots –concept validated on all pilots

DELTAS u focus is on organizational weaknesses –fewer performance examples (less focus on knowing everything about an example) Just make sure the key point you are making is factual. –organizational weakness is the FOP

DELTAS u more/better upfront analysis –limit scope of site work –early call on functional areas (design and reactor engineering) –why not evaluating some areas on site

DELTAS u CM questionnaire –analyze –share with counterpart

DELTAS u site self-assessment –functional areas –one pilot site did an OEO self-assessment

CONTAINMENT WALKDOWN u coordinate with whoever does a containment walkdown u important for configuration control of containment

DELTAS u management model (Larry to discuss later) –your input will be required u precursor AFIs –plants know performance problems –we look for the whys (organizational weaknesses)

DELTAS u counterpart teams –expect a number of counterparts from different site organizations –CM counterpart team leader was the design engineering manager on two pilots

CM MARGINS u must think of the relationship of margins to CM u margin model

DELTAS u micro and macro approach –developed during pilots for accomplishing a credible CM evaluation –Lesson from long term shutdowns – identify latent issues u relate all information to enablers –suggest writing only an observation for each enabler (include only important information)

DELTAS u identification of weak and strong enablers –2 ND Thursday (Larry to discuss later) u common Friday debrief (Larry to discuss later)

DELTAS u assessment meeting –delta sheet l deltas for each enabler l narrative for each enabler u INPO now gives the utility CEO a status of each OEO and enabler