TOD Toolkit: TOD potential at the Hi-Lake Station along Hiawatha Corridor Developed by Support from WORKING DRAFT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 7 STATION AREA PLANNING. Module 7 Station Area Planning Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed.
Advertisements

Our mission is to acquire, develop, and preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs such as schools, affordable housing,
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Waterfront Development Master Plan Kingston, Tennessee Bullock, Smith & Partners, Inc. Knoxville/Nashville, Tennessee Master Planners/Architects/Landscape.
ADVANCING REGIONAL TOD: CORRIDORS & CLASSIFICATIONS Partnership for Regional Opportunity TOD Work Group June 4, 2014 Mariia Zimmerman, MZ Strategies, LLC.
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
9 th & Colorado Proposed Urban Redevelopment Area 1 Land Use, Transportation & Infrastructure Council Committee June 4, 2013.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
GreenPlan Downtown Design and Greenberg Development Services Report.
Equitable Transit Oriented Development the Denver perspective.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
The Mystic River Corridor Strategy Project Metropolitan Area Planning Council Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Chelsea City of Everett City of Malden.
PLANNING IN A COLLEGE TOWN Implementing Smart Growth in College Park, Maryland.
Sustainable Community Principles and Air Quality 2010 East/Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit September 17, 2010 Carl E. Edlund, P.E. Director,
OSG Analysis on the Gloucester County Rail Line Study State Planning Commission December 3, 2008.
Where are we now Dover grew by 3,103 persons between 2000 and 2010 making it the fastest growing community in the region during that time, by.
VISION FOR A KEARNY TOD February 27, 2008 Rob Lane Regional Plan Association.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
The SMART CHOICES PROGRAM and TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Presentation to ETS Annual Community Conference March 11, 2006.
1 RTD TOD Program University of Denver November 2004.
Transportation and Housing Connections In Baltimore presented at the MAHRA Conference Panel: Strategies for Connecting Transportation and Affordable Housing.
Module 6 BUILDING MIXED-INCOME COMMUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT.
WAYNESBORO BROWNFIELDS ASSESSMENT & REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROJECT May 20 th, 2015 Reuse Planning: Environmental (Prime):
Part II: Case Studies 1.Arlington, VA: Transit-oriented Development Boosts Economy County-wide. 2.Portland, OR: Streetcar Increases Investment and Redevelopment.
Smart Growth / Smart Energy Toolkit Transit-Oriented Development Transit-Oriented Development TOD Smart Growth / Smart Energy Toolkit Making it Happen.
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
COROZAL LPWG Municipal Development Plan Presentation of draft chapters 1, 2 and 3 2 nd National Workshop Belmopan, December
East Central Florida Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Affordable Housing Group Bill O’Dell Shimberg Center for Housing Studies 7 April 2014.
 WHAT THE TASK FORCE COMMITTEE DID ?  WHY DOES ANDOVER NEED A NEW TOWN YARD?  WHAT ARE THE COST IMPACTS OF NOT DOING ANYTHING?  WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS.
Presented by: ECONorthwest March 3, Agenda Project progress report (5 minutes) Preliminary results of the HNA (20 minutes) Presentation by ECONorthwest.
How it changed perspective for one City and its residents.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
Downtown Ridgefield Planning & Development Open House Presentation June 18, 2015.
L H A I A L a n d U s e C o m m i t t e e P r o g r e s s U p d a t e 2 6 O c t o b e r Planning. Land Use. Zoning. Redevelopment. Density. Implementation.
Commonwealth Housing Task Force Draft – For Final Review Confidential – Not for Distribution Zoning Overlay Districts & State Financing Recommendations.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Presentation Template Creating Sustainable Places Planning Tools for Creating Sustainable Places.
Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility Study City of Berkeley City.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
Estimating Residential Infill Capacity: A Bay Area Application John D. Landis Department of City & Regional Planning UC Berkeley for Caltrans Horizons.
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
City of Carrollton Transit Oriented Development January 5, 2008 Peter J. Braster TOD Manager.
TOD Technical Assistance Panel June 21, rd STREET, San Pablo CA.
Alex Lin Emily Schwartz Sarah Snider Kate Wittels.
Rebecca Long November 9, Why is MTC interested in parking policies? 1.Land Use Impacts 2.Transportation Impacts 3.Other Regional Impacts.
Transit Orientated Development HENNEPIN COUNTY Housing, Community Works & Transit NACCED September 20, 2011.
Cornelius Candidate Projects For Funding Total Candidate Projects$ 22 million –Rail Improvements ($10 million) –Local CIP Projects NC-115 upgrades ($ 1.9.
BUILDING MIXED-INCOME COMMUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT
City of Seattle Mandatory Housing Affordability Program A program of Seattle’s Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda.
BASS RIVER DISTRICT. Master Plan Harbor Management Plan Open Space Plan Downtown Strategic Plan.
The Concept for City Center – The Power of TOD TOD Advisory Committee Meeting 3 December 10, 2009 The Premier Place for a Premier City.
RTD Board of Directors April 2, Roles in TOD Process.
C ENTRAL E STUARY P LAN A V ISION F OR O AKLAND’S W ATERFRONT Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND’S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
Downtown Stockton Housing Strategy Stockton City Council/ Stockton Redevelopment Agency Draft Report August 28, 2007.
ULI Presentation – Shifting Suburbs OLDE TOWN ARVADA TOD August 29, 2013.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
ARCH – 4601 Feasibility Study Presentation
Plan Goals: Improve walkability and pedestrian safety Preserve and celebrate neighborhood character and sense of place Address code violations Improve.
Gateway Specific Plan Concepts
2040 Comprehensive Plan Open House
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
Multifamily Housing Tax Exemption Program
With funding provided by the Appalachian Regional Commission
Presentation transcript:

TOD Toolkit: TOD potential at the Hi-Lake Station along Hiawatha Corridor Developed by Support from WORKING DRAFT

Twin Cities Regional Transit Vision Hiawatha Light Rail Corridor

● By 2030, between 110,000 – 124,000 Twin Cities’ households will have a potential demand for living near transit (roughly 6% of region’s households) ● Nationally, demand for housing near transit could double to over 15 million households. ● Household size is shrinking, with singles and couples without children being the new majority. ● 49% of the households with a potential demand for living near transit qualify as Low Income ● 4,000-9,000 new housing units could potentially be located on underutilized sites in the Hiawatha corridor to accommodate projected future demand Demand for Housing Near Transit

●As of December 2006, 11,931 housing units and 1,054,436 square feet of commercial space have been built, are under construction, planned or proposed within a half mile of the 17 stations. ●7,000 units of housing have already been either proposed or built within a half mile of the Hiawatha Line since ●The majority of these projects, (65 out of 108 total projects and 45 out of 72 residential and mixed use/residential projects), are within the half-mile areas surrounding the four Downtown stations ●Transit investment has leveraged higher-density TOD in historic industrial areas ●“Hot Market” for Downtown station areas Recent Planned and Proposed Development, since 2003 Tremendous Development Response in Last 3 Yrs.

Courtesy Metropolitan Council

●Corridor has a median household income of $31,000, versus $54,000 for region ●Only 37% of units are owner-occupied (versus 70% for the region) creating potential for displacement ●Out of 72 new residential projects since 2003, only 25% (18) are affordable or mixed income Residential Development along Hiawatha since 2003 Need to Ensure Long-Term Affordability

●Variety of distinct land uses and development types ●Civic uses (i.e. airport, VA Hospital, Fort Snelling) dominate the corridor at 54% of total land uses and limit redevelopment potential ●Multiple funding sources and jurisdictions, including Federal, impede coordination Land Constraints in the Corridor

●Little coordination of housing and transit policies have resulted in missed opportunities ●504 underutilized acres identified as potential redevelopment sites along the corridor ●Many new development projects outside downtown are smaller infill projects and not the larger “catalytic” projects necessary to promote a rider-transit link Lessons & Opportunities

●Located roughly mid-point on the Hiawatha line, divided by transportation infrastructure, with a number of large underutilized sites. The majority of households are low-income (median income in 1999 of only $23,342) and transit-dependent. ●Available sites are being bought up by speculators or developers building small projects that are not making highest and best use of property near the station. ●Plans for improvements and connections are now in place or moving forward but better coordination during initial planning and design would have ensured critical development preferred concept Station Example: Hiawatha and Lake Street ¼-mile and ½-mile radius around Hi-Lake station Station area plan developed in 2001

Corcoran Midtown Revival Plan

Yield Analysis Site Selected Area for Yield Analysis Development Scenarios

Yield Analysis: Two Strategies Tested 1)Critical Mass/ Master Developer Approach Single developer creates plan, obtains entitlements, prepares site, then sells for development of may develop some or all of site 2) Transit-Oriented Development Parking Ratios Assumes fewer parking spaces to help reduce costs and improve affordabilty

Yield Analysis: Results of 3 Scenarios

Scenario 1: Keep Existing Office

Scenario 2: Higher Density Mixed Use & Residential

Option 3 – 4 story mixed use & rowhouses

Key Hard Cost Assumptions

Revenue Assumptions Condominiums: Average $250 per SF or $236,000 per Unit (946 Net SF) Note: Lower Value for Apartments Row Houses: Average $225 per SF or $360,000 per Unit (1,600 Net SF) Retail & Office: $1.25 per SF/Mo. triple net

Preliminary Findings In the current market, development on the site would not generate enough value to pay to relocate the school district activities Lower-density development is more financially feasible in the short-term Over the longer term, higher densities may be possible, but timing will depend on the housing market and construction costs

Implications for Implementation A master developer approach is not a good idea at this site currently – current market conditions are not conducive to desired type of development –inability to assemble the land and wait to develop it later A “pioneering” project on the MnDOt site could help to increase development potential

Next Steps Generate a Master Plan for the site –Include flexibility to maintain existing office building Continue dialogue with the School District about future development options Monitor market conditions vis-à- vis timing of RFP for development of MinnDot site