Jan. 2005 France Telecom doc.: IEEE 802. 15-05-0014-02-004a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: e Submission Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /147r0 Submission March 2001 Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE P /359r0 TG4 July 2001 NOTE: Update all red fields replacing with your information; they are required. This is a manual update in appropriate.
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission May 2005 Zafer Sahinoglu, Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission Jan THALES CommunicationsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
June 2005 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, Vinno Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission Aug Liang Li, VSZJ Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Nov 2004 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, WXZJ Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission April 2005 Liang Li, WXZJ Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2012 Li, Hernandez, Dotlic, Miura, NICT Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE r July 2014 May 2012 Ben Rolfe (BCA) Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /211r2 Submission September, 2000 Jeyhan Karaoguz, Broadcom CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /235r0 Submission May 2001 Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
July 2005 France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE a TG4a July 18th 2005 P.Orlik, A. Molisch, Z. SahinogluSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2009 Michael SchmidtSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [UWB System Design for Low Power, Precision Location.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary PHY.
May 2005 Patricia MARTIGNE doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2009 Michael SchmidtSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Jan 2005 doc.: IEEE Jan 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TaiyoYuden/TRDA.
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY Proposal for the IEEE a standard]
May 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Flexible DSSS Proposal] Date Submitted: [01.
March 01 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4 RFWaves PHY Proposal Overview Date Submitted:
March 01 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4 RFWaves PHY Proposal Overview Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 18 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Multi-Rate PHY Proposal for the.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
Submission Title: [Compatible DSSS g Network Communications Proposal]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
March, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
Submission Title: [Narrow Band PHY Proposal for g]
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: UWB-IR (Impulse Radio) system proposed for the Low Rate.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Robust Ranging Algorithm for UWB radio]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
May, 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: PHY Proposal for the Low Rate Standard.
Submission Title: [Robust Ranging Algorithm for UWB radio]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Date Submitted: [March, 2007 ]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Robust Ranging Algorithm for UWB radio]
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
Submission Title: [Low duty cycle UWB piconet]
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: UWB-IR (Impulse Radio) system proposed for the Low Rate alt-PHY ( a) Date Submitted: Jan., 2005 Source: Benoit Miscopein (1), Patricia Martigne (2), Jean Schwoerer (3) Company: France Telecom R&D Address: 28 Chemin du Vieux Chêne – BP98 – Meylan Cedex - France Voice: (1) , (2) , (3) (1) (2) (3) Abstract: Complete proposal for a Purpose: This document is a presentation of a complete proposal for the IEEE alternate PHY standard Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 2 Commonalities with Other Proposals Many commonalities exist between proposals, including at least FT, CWC/AetherWire/LETI/STM and Mitsubishi, as all of these share similar views about: – UWB technology – Bandwidth usage – Ranging approach Discussions are under way for future collaborations and merging

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 3 UWB Technology Impulse-radio (IR) based: –Very short pulses  Reduced ISI –Robustness against fading –Episodic transmission (for LDR) allowing long sleep-mode periods and energy saving Low-complexity implementation

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 4 Bandwidth Usage Flexible use of (multi-)bands up to 7.5 GHz, depending on application and regulatory environment Use of TH and/or polarity randomization for smoothing of the spectrum Noise-like interference towards existing radio services

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 5 Ranging Approach Signal bandwidth  1GHz for very good location accuracy Two-way ranging protocol to avoid synchronization between nodes Location based on ranging from several nodes on a higher layer

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 6 Contents Structure of the UWB signal Modulation, coding, multiple access technique Spectrum aspects PHY Frame Structure System dimensioning The transmitter The antenna The receiver Ranging technique UWB prototyping Link Budget

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 7 Structure of the UWB Signal "Pure" Impulse radio: Very short pulses. Each pulse (a wavelet) is about 1ns wide in time domain 1GHz bandwidth in frequency domain Pulses are transmitted within slots of Tc each  pulse-spacing = Tc ± TH Pulse width = 1ns

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 8 Modulation and coding Bit to symbol mapping : Binary (low speed mode) or quaternary (high speed) bit to symbol mapping. Symbol-to-chip mapping : Each symbol is a sequence of N chips. Symbols are energy-equivalent. 2 (low speed) or 4 (high speed) orthogonal sequences available OOK (On Off Keying) : Chips are OOK-modulated chip = '1'  a pulse is transmitted chip = '0'  no pulse Bit-to- Symbol Symbol- to-Chip OOK Binary data from PPDU Modulated signal

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 9 Multiple access Multiple access : TH (Time Hopping). Each Symbol-time (Ts) is divided in N chip-time (Tc). Each chip-time (Tc) is divided in M pulse-time (Tp). A PN-code selects a pulse-time within the chip-time in which a pulse will be transmitted. Each piconet has its own M-ary N-chip-long PN-code, selected in a set of nearly orthogonal sequences, and shared by all the members-devices. Within the piconet : Medium sharing is done via CSMA-CA (slotted if operating in beacon mode)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 10 Spectrum aspects Bandwidth : - At least 1GHz bandwidth (-3dB) Center frequency : 2 options - 4 GHz in the US and FCC-compliant country. - 7 GHz to have easier worldwide regulatory compliance. less potential for (current and future) interference. will cause fewer regulatory issues.

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 11 Modulation, coding and multiple access Example : if we choose : - 8 pulse-time of 20 ns each. - Tc = 8*20 = 160 ns chip period. - TH code chip = 8-ary 8-sequence. - 8 pulses transmitted for 1 symbol. - 1 symbol = 1 bit (low speed mode). This means : => a bit period of 8*160ns = 1280ns => PHY-SAP payload bit rate (Xo) = (1/( ))*(1000/1024) = 763 kb/s

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 12 PHY Frame Structure Example of a standard PPDU data frame : PHY Preamble sequence PHY Header : Frame length MAC Header : Frame control + Sequence nb + Addressing fields MAC footer 4 bytes1PSDU : 32 bytes (e.g.) 218 (e.g.)MSDU Data Payload2 MPDU The Start of Frame Delimiter is suppressed it is replaced by a detection of bit-mapping modification (bit-mapping used for the preamble sequence will differ from the one used otherwise) PPDU = 37 bytes for a 32-bytes standard PSDU

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 13 Example of system dimensioning (1/5) Example of a standard PPDU data frame Data frame (37 bytes)ACK t ACK LIFS Next data frame Time for an acknowledged transmission Calculation of the useful rate for the standard 32-bytes PSDU, using "standard" speed (X 0 = 763 kb/s) : t transmission = t data-frame + t ACK + t ACK-frame + t LIFS = 560,64 µs (considering 8 pulses/symbol, 1 symbol=1 bit, and t ACK = 22 symbol-time) This provides a useful rate of (32*8 bits / 560,64µs)*(1000/1024) = 446 kb/s …

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 14 Example of a standard PPDU data frame For T 0 = 1 kb/s (1024 bits/s), this useful rate of 446 kb/s (corresponding to the transmission of 32 payload bytes i.e. 256 bits) means that the idle time for the system will be t idle = 249 msec approx. Data frame ACK t ACKLIFS t transmission Transmission N Transmission N+1 Transmission N+2 Transmission N bits in 1 sec t idle Example of system dimensioning (2/5)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 15 Example of a maximum PPDU data frame (127 bytes) Calculation of the useful rate for the 127-bytes PSDU, using "high speed" mode (X 1 = 1526 kb/s) : In this mode, the mapping is made on 2 bit-symbols instead of being made on 1 bit-symbols for MSDU data payload bits, i.e. for (114 * 8) bits. PPDU = (5 bytes) std-speed + (114 bytes) high-speed + (13 bytes) std-speed t data-frame = 768µs t transmission = t data-frame + t ACK + t ACK-frame + t LIFS = 949,76 µs (considering 8 pulses/symbol, and t ACK = 22 symbol-time) This provides a useful rate of (127*8 bits / 949,76µs)*(1000/1024) = 1045 kb/s Example of system dimensioning (3/5)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 16 For T 1 = 500 kb/s ( bits/s), this useful rate of 1045 kb/s (corresponding to the transmission of 127 payload bytes i.e bits) means that the idle time for the system will be t idle = 1 msec approx. Data frame ACK t ACKLIFS t transmission Transmission N Transmission N+1 Transmission N+… Transmission N bits in 1 sec t idle Example of system dimensioning (4/5)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 17 Fixing t idle = 250 µs (minimum required for CSMA-CA) Example of system dimensioning (5/5) Data frame ACK t ACKLIFS t transmission Transmission N Transmission N+1 Transmission N+… Transmission N+(x-1) 1 sec t idle Looking for the maximum aggregate channel throughput : PSDU = 32 octets, std speed – t transmission = 560,64 µs – x = 1234 transmitted packets – Tmax-aggregate = 300 kb/s PSDU = 127 octets, high speed – t transmission = 949,76 µs – x = 834 transmitted packets – Tmax-aggregate = 825 kb/s

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 18 Contents Structure of the UWB signal Modulation, coding, multiple access technique Spectrum aspects PHY Frame Structure System dimensioning The transmitter The antenna The receiver Ranging technique UWB prototyping Link Budget

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 19 The transmitter Pulse Generator Clock F < 100 MHz Control Logic BaseBand signal RF Signal PSDU Data Guide Line : Keep it Simple – Main Goal : "Low cost & low consumption". – Pulses are generated in baseband. – No mixer, no VCO but pulse shaping. – Simple control logic and "reasonable" clock frequency (Crystal) Pulse shaper PA (option)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 20 Antenna characteristics Frequency band: [3-10] GHz Printed antenna 24x20 mm² Omnidirectional radiation Matching GHz SWR

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 21 Antenna frequency response Antenna gain 3 GHz: G ant = 4 to 5 dB 6 GHz: G ant = 3 dB Considering the losses in the printed antenna, we set G ant = 3 dB in the link budget 3 GHz 6 GHz

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 22 The receiver One major guideline : Keep It Simple Energy detection technique rather than coherent receiver, for relaxed synchronization constraints. Threshold detection (no A/D conversion). CThe threshold is set by the demodulation block at each symbol time, if needed. Synchronization fully re-acquired for each new packet received (=> no very accurate timebase needed). Low cost, low complexity

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 23 The receiver x2x2 Lowpass filter Threshold Bandpass filter

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 24 Packet Acquisition & Synchronization No sliding correlation. PHY preamble sequence of 4 bytes with special bit mapping (all chips are set to 1). Maximize the preamble energy. Every signal peak exceeding the treshold is acquired. Triggers shall match arrival times defined by TH-Code. Cost-effective synchronization. Synchronization is fully re-acquired for each new packet No need to maintain accurate timebase between packets.

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 25 Packet Acquisition & Synchronization The synchronization algorithm detects the threshold crossings and updates a assumption matrix, which can also be viewed as a tree exploration i Detected edge for t_pos(i) i No edge detection for t_pos(i) ? Δ1,2 Δ2,3 Δ3,4 Δ2,3 Δ3,4 ? = 1 Time base origin determination Δi,j = Known time offset between the pulses appearance, with respect to the TH code.

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 26 Packet acquisition & Synchronization The threshold level is set to detect a number of crossings consistent with the expectations. For any tested Channel Model, the synchronization is properly acquired (during the Synch preamble) Measured accuracy is around several tens of ps.

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 27 Performance simulations Simulations done with a C++ simulator only BER simulations performed, each data point averages 10 channel realizations. One operating piconet simulations for CM1, CM2, CM3 and CM5 CM1 realizations do not provide any error in the simulated range Range are computed with a 20xlog(D) relation.

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 28 Proposed ranging technique Ranging capability based on the TOA/TWR technique Ranging capabilities with fine precision : system with an 1 GHz bandwidth, leading to an expected ranging accuracy of 30 cm. Based on the synchronization acquisition algorithm, aiming at detecting the direct path – The synchronization acquisition looks efficient, even in difficult environments (CM4) – Direct path detection is likely to be possible, thanks to a long synchronization preamble (15 dB can theoretically be compensated), if the RF front-end sensibility enables this detection

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 29 Proposed ranging technique Not yet fully tested. Acquisition of a common time reference, thanks to 2 successive steps between initiator and responder – Short packets exchange (to get a first range measurement) – Responder device sends a Channel Sounding Frame (CSF) afterwards, to refine the measurement (first path selection), at initiator side. Can also be used for mutualized measurements, where the differents initiators can use the same CSF (e.g. inscription of a new device in the piconet), for free

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 30 Proposed ranging technique A Request ACK Channel Sounding Frame Z Tw T>Tg B Tw ACK Request Tw ACK Request N t

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 31 Energy Detection uses exactly the same algorithm as synchronization, processes 1 byte of data instead of the 4-byte-packet synchronization preamble (which is twice more energetic than data) About 9 dB less efficient than packet synchronization. Consistent with ED requirements for IEEE (at most 10 dB above sensivity)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 32 Clear Channel Assessment Introduction of a new value for the PhyCCAMode to allow a channel virtual listening operation (VLO) PhyCCAMode = 4 The CCA is made by Energy Detection (ED) In beaconed or non beaconed systems, an active listening is processed at each Backoff period to get potentially addressed packets. In PhyCCAMode = 4 – Signal detection and acquisition – Decode the framelength byte, the ACKrequest bit and the adress fields to arm a VLO timer, including the Tack_max, if the packet is not addressed to the device – In this case, any PLME-CCA.request leads to a PLME-CCA.confirm{BUSY}, during this time

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 33 Clear Channel Assessment Detection of a "competing" packet, by reading Framelength, ACKreq and address fields Set a VLO vector = Framelength+Tack_max+ACKlength (if needed) PLME-CCA-request BUSY t PLME-CCA-request ED measure Slot Backoff period ACK

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 34 Clear Channel Assessment Introduction of the VLO is valuable to lower the collision risks and the power consumption as TRX is shut down during VLO The ED is performed by the signal acquisition block : can discriminate – Clear channel – Intrapiconet activity : PLME-CCA.confirm{BUSY} – Interpiconet interference : PLME-CCA.confirm{IDLE}

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 35 Summary of MAC Modifications aBaseSlotDuration240 symbol time instead of 60 aBackoffPeriod80 symbol time instead of 20 CCAmodeMode 4 (with VLO enabled) added Frame Type subfield000Beacon 001Data (low speed) 010ACK 011MAC Command 100Data (high speed) 101Data (optionnal very high speed)

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 36 PHY prototyping Besides simulations, we also developed a working prototype for such a PHY layer. The main guideline was the use of COTS components, amenable to high density integration We developed a full TX plateform, compliant with our proposal The RX processing is partially taken in charge by a Digital Sampling Oscilloscope, on which our C++ receiver code is run – Enveloppe detector – Synchronization acquisition – Demodulation

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 37 PHY prototyping The pulse generation is based on high speed logic, and the doublet is formed by a Wilkinson power coupler Features: – 600 ps, – 400 mVpp, – Bw = 3.5 GHz

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 38 PHY prototyping The TX control logic is implemented on a 10 kGate FPGA – Modulation, – Frame building, – Multiple access

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 39 PHY prototyping Results – Meets the spectral bandwidth and raw bit rate specifications, and integrated TX is proven feasable – Synchronization acquisition and demodulation operate in "real life" – On the RX side, we are testing an enveloppe detector, whose simulations are consistent with our sensibility expectations

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 40

Jan France Telecom doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 41 Meets the a objectives We presented a system, optimized for : – Energy – Cost – Technical complexity Early simulations tend to prove the validity of such a PHY layer The proof of concept of the prototype highlights very interesting features concerning the ability to define a low cost system – use of a reasonable frequency clock (50 MHz) – 8 chips are transmitted per binary symbol, for redundancy and hence robustness : very simple coding technique.