Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia P-16 Initiatives Jan Kettlewell July 13, 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
P-16 Council Overall Goals Regional change agents for “Closing the Gaps” Engaging community stakeholders Parents K-12 teachers K-12 administrators College.
 A strategic plan is a guiding document for an organization. It clarifies organizational priorities, goals and desired outcomes.  For the SRCS school.
Head of Learning: Job description
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
P-16 Councils: A National Perspective Jennifer Dounay Education Commission of the States Presentation to the Nevada P-16 Council Las Vegas, NV December.
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
Georgia’s Alliance of Education Agency Heads Strengthening Georgia’s Education System Through Statewide Collaboration
School College Work Initiative: Phase May 11, 2006.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
SEM Planning Model.
Statewide Trustee’s Conference April 24, 2007 Julie Schaid, Ph.D.
1 GEARing UP for STEM Creating a Pathway from Secondary Education to the Workforce Presented at: STEMtech Conference Indianapolis, IN Tuesday, October.
Effective Outreach Strategies to IT Students Lessons Learned by BATEC National Career Pathways Network Louisville, Kentucky October 10 –
High Schools That Work A school reform design that provides a framework of goals, key practices, and key conditions for setting higher standards and accelerating.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Module 1 1. Overview 2 AVATAR: Academic Vertical Alignment Training and Renewal
ABLE State Update Jeff Gove, State ABLE Director.
Pre-Advanced Placement Tricia Renner, Director of State and Legislative Outreach, Midwest Region Deana Rainey, Teacher Monroe Middle School Omaha, Nebraska.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Leadership I and II February, 2011 Providing Services to Students, Families and Community through.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts SY Performance.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Implementation of the Student Success Task Force Recommendations Wheeler North, Treasurer, ASCCC Michelle Pilati, President, ASCCC.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
October 26,  FCSD Shared Decision Making Model The State of the District-The Big Picture District Guiding Principles Regents Reform Agenda FCSD.
Mark Roosevelt - Superintendent of Schools A Four-Year Comprehensive Framework for Improvement  Presented May 12,
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Strategic Plan 2017 How will you contribute to our success?
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (S/CDN) September 14, 2006 Albany Marriott Hotel Presented by: Jean C. Stevens Interim Deputy Commissioner New York.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council Moving the STEM Agenda Forward CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY STEM Advisory.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
ESOL/HILT Program Evaluation
kctcs action plan.
College and Career Readiness
The CCPS Strategic Plan
New Prospect Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia P-16 Initiatives Jan Kettlewell July 13,

Purposes Today  Brief history of P-16 work in Georgia  Close up view of the work of the P-16 Department within the University System of Georgia (USG)  Examples of how the work of the USG P-16 Department intersects with work of current State P-16 Structure in Georgia “Creating a More Educated Georgia”

Origins of P-16 Work in Georgia  1995: Jan Kettlewell hired by University System of Georgia to “strengthen” school- college collaboration  1995: Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia adopted the Pre- School-College (P-16) Policy Direction  1996: First statewide “P-16” Council “Creating a More Educated Georgia” History

Statewide P-16 Structures in Georgia  : Georgia P-16 Council  Created by XO by then Governor Miller  Participation voluntary  Membership: Mostly staff level from state agencies + college and school representatives  : Education Coordinating Council  Created by legislative action with then Governor Barnes as Chair  Participation of agency heads required  No structure through which staff do the work  2006-Present: Alliance of Education Agency Heads  Started by Governor Perdue  Re-energized legislation from Barnes administration  Two-tier structure: Implementation Team—staff level—works interactively with the Alliance  Charge: To direct, coordinate, implement, and monitor the success of Georgia’s public education systems Pre-K through college within the framework of five policy goals “Creating a More Educated Georgia” History

P-16 Department within University System of Georgia  Outreach arm of the USG Office to  Other state education agencies  Governor’s Office  P-12 schools  University System of Georgia institutions  Business partners  in collaborative efforts to influence improvements in education for Georgia’s students, pre-school through college “Creating a More Educated Georgia” Departmental Mission

 To promote high school graduation, college readiness, college transition, and college success  To promote continuous improvement in P-12 teacher, leader, and counselor recruitment, preparation, transition, development, and success “Creating a More Educated Georgia” Strategic Objectives USG P-16 Department

Generate and capitalize on opportunities to respond to state needs Conduct R&D and Demonstration Projects to test new ideas Identify and share lessons learned Use lessons learned to influence state policies and practices Coordinate the implementation of Board of Regents P-16 Policies and Initiatives  P-16 Policy  Teacher Preparation Policies  Work in Schools Policy  STEM Initiative “Creating a More Educated Georgia” Strategies USG P-16 Department

SCIENCE & MATHEMATICS PRISM, MS-AIMS Cross Cultural Teaching Regents’ Principles Counselor Preparation TEACHER QUANTITY AND DIVERSITY Double, Double Teacher Working Conditions Birth-5 Teacher Prep Destination Teaching The Teacher Career Center TEACHER/LEADER DEVELOPMENT GLISI, PRISM Student Flow K-12 Schools Department of Education Educator Production University System P-16 Department Major systemic initiatives that align the K-12 and higher education systems USG P-16 Department Systemic and R&D/ Demonstration Projects P-16 Data Bridges American Diploma Project Regents’ Principles Teacher Preparation Regents’ Principles Leader Preparation Dual Enrollment P-16 Data Bridges Early College Gateway to College Major R&D or Demonstration Projects that seek answers to persistent questions, which impede the success of the student and educator pipelines

P-16 Department Uses a Balanced Scorecard  To translate organizational mission and vision into a comprehensive set of performance measures to strategically manage and communicate progress toward goals and objectives “Creating a More Educated Georgia”

Department of Pre-School - College (P-16) Initiatives BALANCED SCORECARD “Creating a More Educated Georgia”

GOALS Org. Culture Org. Effectiveness Customer & Stakeholder Changes in Policy & Practice Educational Improvement Pre- K to College P-16 DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES Identify and share lessons learned (what works for whom, under what conditions, and why) Generate and capitalize on opportunities to respond to needs Use lessons learned from P-16 Initiatives to influence state and national policies and practices Coordinate implementation of P- 16 policies with USG institutions Conduct research and development and demonstration projects to inform and influence changes in policies and practices Sustain P-16 Initiatives through active participation in collaborative school-college- business-state organizational structures Ensure customer satisfaction Promote and participate in school- college-business- state government partnerships Ensure effective and efficient administrative processes Ensure effective and efficient business processes Ensure ongoing and effective internal and external communication Ensure effective program, data, and evaluation management Ensure ongoing and effective external dissemination Require individual accountability Maintain a strategic focus Expect continuous learning Promote teamwork Cultivate innovation and high performance Expect quality service to all external customers Promote continuous improvement in teacher, leader, and counselor recruitment, preparation, transition, development and success Promote high school graduation, college readiness, college transition, and college success

A. Promote continuous improvement in teacher, leader, and counselor recruitment; preparation; transition; development; and success. EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT PRE-SCHOOL- THROUGH COLLEGE GOAL AREA 1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1. Teacher, Leader, and Counselor Recruitment 2. Teacher, Leader, and Counselor Preparation 3. Teacher, Leader, and Counselor Transition 4. Teacher, Leader, and Counselor Development GOAL AREA 1 PERFORMANCE MEASURE STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE “Creating a More Educated Georgia” 5. Teacher, Leader, and Counselor Success

B. Promote high school graduation; college readiness; college transition; and college success. EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT PRE- SCHOOL-COLLEGE GOAL AREA 1 1. High School Graduation 2. College and Work Readiness 3. College Transition 4. College Success GOAL AREA 2 PERFORMANCE MEASURESTRATEGIC OBJECTIVE “Creating a More Educated Georgia”

Increase high school graduation rate, decrease high school dropout rate, and increase post-secondary enrollment rate Strengthen teacher quality, recruitment, and retention Improve workforce readiness skills Develop strong education leaders, particularly at the building level Improve the SAT/ACT scores of Georgia students “Creating a More Educated Georgia” Five Goals Alliance of Education Agency Heads P-16 Dept W/ Alliance

 American Diploma Project  Early College  Gateway to College  Partnership for Reform in Science and Mathematics (PRISM)  P-16 Data and Analysis Systems “Creating a More Educated Georgia” Goal 1 as Example USG P-16 Department Participation in Alliance P-16 Dept W/ Alliance

American Diploma Project Standards: Align academic standards in high school with expectations for college and workplace success Course Requirements: Upgrade high school course requirements so college and work ready curriculum required for high school diploma Assessment: Redesign selected high school tests in English and math to serve as college and work readiness and college placement tests Accountability: Hold high schools and colleges accountable for the success of their students P-16 Dept W/ Alliance

Early College  New kind of institution—grades 9-14 Targets high minority, high poverty, English Language learners and at-risk groups underrepresented in college Gateway to College  Form of Early College for high school dropouts Both—high school diploma + 2 years of college Both—increased access to dual enrollment P-16 Dept W/ Alliance

PRISM Public Awareness Campaign PRISM is a comprehensive R&D project designed to  Test key strategies to increase student learning and achievement in science & mathematics in schools & colleges  Codify what works  Use it to influence change in policy and practice  Inform the nation about successes that should be replicated Public Awareness Campaign (1 Strategy)  Increase student interest in SM  Influence student course selection in SM  Reinforce parental involvement in student course selection in SM  Raise public consciousness as to importance of all students succeeding in SM P-16 Dept W/ Alliance

Data Marts Data and Analysis Systems Staff in P-16 Department builds data marts or “bridges” to link 2 or more existing data bases Rationale: When focus is on  Student pipeline, pre-school to college, or  Educator pipeline, college to school Analyses are needed from 2 or more agency data systems Relevant data mart here—School-to-College P-16 Dept W/ Alliance

Questions? University System of Georgia P-16 Department