FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP-149544 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Valencia, November 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP VALORISATION & SUSTAINIBILITY PLAN Budapest, June 2007.
FORESTUR ICT Presentation. Project website and On-line training platform. Valencia, November 2006.
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
High level expert meeting to develop the Near East Regional Action Plan to Implement the Global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Effective dissemination and evaluation
Leonardo da Vinci Project BLENDED LEARNING TRANSFER Rationalising, Learning and Transferring the use of technological platforms to enterprise-based learning.
Project Human Resource Management
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT November 06 – May 07 Budapest, June.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Florence, January 2008.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP VALORISATION & SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY Florence, January.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP VALORISATION & SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY Sucevita, May 2008.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Sucevita, May 2008.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
JCint - JobCreator International Network and Web Services n. LLP-LDV-TOI-09-IT-0502 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP VALORISATION & SUSTAINIBILITY PLAN Valencia, November 2006.
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP PROJECT PRESENTATION Valencia, November 2006.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP WORK PLAN REVISION Budapest, June 2007.
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis September, Nairobi, Kenya 1/18 Consultations with users in preparing.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Work Package 6 L2C Kick-off meeting Fontainebleau, March 7th 2006.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Antonio Mocci Mestre, January 17, 2011 Lead partner: Governance of the project monitoring, evaluation and dissemination systems.
Structuring of work related competences in Chemical Engineering STRENGTH Leonardo da Vinci ToI Project ES1-LEO RESULT 7 STRENGTH Quality.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP DRAFT QUALITY & MANAGEMENT PLAN Budapest, June 2007.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
OpenQAsS Quality Management Evaluation Strategy Budapest – Hungary 6th-7th November István Zsíros iTStudy Hungary Ltd.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Liviero Alessandra WP3 manager.  Defining a methodological framework for the establishment of the WP4 Platform  The WP3 defines the platform characteristics.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT - PART 2 MODULE 7
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDIT IN STRATEGY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
WP6. Quality Plan 6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan Edited by September, 2017.
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Saleh Al-Jufout/Tafila Technical University
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Project Management Group
Strengthening the Role of EQAVET National Reference Points
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
GSBPM AND ISO AS QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOOLS: AZERBAIJAN EXPERIENCE Yusif Yusifov, Deputy Chairman of the State Statistical Committee of the Republic.
Presentation transcript:

FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Valencia, November 2006

1 What was required by LdV? The work programme must include a quality management plan: procedures, criteria and resources for monitoring and evaluation of the progress of the project, and for internal or external evaluation –including quality control and testing, if applicable- of the interim and final results in comparison with the needs of the target groups and sector and of the potential users.

2 What is a QM plan? A Quality Management Project Plan is a written document that describes the quality assurance procedures, quality control specifications, and other technical activities that must be implemented to ensure that the results of the project or task to be performed will meet project specifications.

3 How do we develop a QM Plan? Development of a QM Plan should be a multi-step process involving a number of people. The following is a brief summary of the process: 1. Assemble a project team and "systematically plan" what needs to be done. 2. Write a QM Project Plan using the results of that planning process. 3. Review and approval this Project Plan.

4 Quality management responsibles EUROPROF. HU PIXEL IT CIDAf RO FCVRE Brussels FLORIDA ES Coordinators

5 What was said at the proposal? Objective of the QM Plan: To design and implement the quality management strategy for the project whose main objectives are to provide a framework for the evaluation and monitoring work to be performed, the issues to be addressed, and the criteria and indicators to be taken into account in order to asses the project development and results. Outputs: 1)Detailed and consolidated Quality Management Plan including actions to be carried out in order to ensure the quality of the project outputs. 2)Quality management concept including descriptions of the evaluation approach, target groups, methods and tools applied as well as quality and achievement indicators.

6 What was said at the proposal? Methodology: The Quality Management activities will take place throughout the project lifecycle with special sessions at project meetings and will involve, on the one hand, evaluation of the project itself and evaluation of the project outputs. −Evaluation of the project itself will focus on whether it has been successful and effective, it has achieved its objectives, and the outcomes have had the desired impact. −Evaluation of the project outputs will focus on their quality with regards to the programme objectives, and also whether they are useful, meet user/target needs, and perform well.

7 What was said at the proposal? - Both formative and summative evaluation approaches are envisaged: Formative evaluation will be carried out during the life of the project to improve the work in progress, both the project outputs and the successfulness of the project; summative evaluation will be done near the end of the project to provide evidence of its achievements and results. - In order to ensure the quality management of the project, a Project Management Committee (PMC) will be established and it will be composed by the assigned experts from the following institutions: FLORIDA, FCVRE, EUROPROFESSIONAL, PIXEL & CIDAf. The PMC will meet 4 times during the project lifetime to co−ordinate and evaluate the overall progress, share results and experiences and explore how to maximise success of the project.

8 What was said at the proposal? - Suitable criteria and indicators will be identified in order to judge the level of achievement of the project objectives. - Evaluation instruments that will form the bases for collecting evidence (qualitative and quantitative) will also be designed, such as: progress reports to be handed out by the partners on a regular basis and quality/satisfaction questionnaires for the different target groups and final users involved.

9 Forestur QM plan - draft Objetives: to ensure the smooth running and accomplishment of the action plan to check that the objectives achieved during the project fit the established programme to monitor fundamental changes that take place and take decisions in this regard to improve the project as it progresses and predict its future development to quantify the different results gained to analyse the quality of the project in terms of its local / regional / national / transnational impact

10 Forestur QM plan - draft Two-fold evaluation perspective: the evaluation of the management, running and accomplishment of the project as part of a European framework programme itself, and the evaluation of the achievement of the objectives described in the proposal  evaluation strategy for the project.

11 Tools to evaluate The evaluation of the management could be done by means of: Interim and Final reports for the LdV NA Quality/satisfaction questionnaires after transnational meetings Quality/satisfaction questionnaires or evaluation reports at the end of each WP (to send with the justification) Cost report analysis Internal justification after each WP Project Management Committee (PMC) meetings (during all the transnational meetings) Use of communication tools (website and platform)

12 Florida proposal We suggest that FCVRE - Valencian Community Foundation, within its role of expert adviser’s prepare a detailed evaluation plan and present it to the Forestur Project Management Committee (PMC): FLORIDA, EUROPROFESSIONAL, PIXEL, CIDAf & FCVRE.