Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Making Connections – Past, Present and Future Sharon Seslija, Mat Young, Erica Oliphant.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Understanding by Design The ‘Big Ideas’ of UbD © 2002 Wiggins & McTighe –UbD.
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Beginning with the End in Mind Overview of “Backwards Design” Jim Wright Kennesaw State University.
Understanding Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center 1.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Authentic Performance Tasks
The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Understanding By Design
AN OVERVIEW OF UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN The Pedagogy of Project Archaeology.
Understanding by Design
Introduction to UbD Stages 1
Lesson Planning Finding your way…
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
46th Annual MPESA Fall Conference
Understanding by Design in action Joanne Stewart Hope College How to develop student learning goals and assessments of student learning June 2009.
EdSe 4244 Social Studies Methods Understanding by Design: A Review.
Backward Design Christina Fritz Assessment Manager
Understanding By Design A Contemporary Approach to Curriculum Design.
MI/MIS PDU April 2013 Agenda: 4:30-5:00 Deep Dive in LEAP Indicator I.8 5:00-5:15, Networking, Feedback on AT and Special Olympics 5:30 – 6:30 Stage 2.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Understanding by Design
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
Using Understanding by Design
Stage 3: Learning Activities and Performance Tasks Thursday, August 4th, 2010.
PLANNING for INQUIRY Backward Design Information to Knowledge Journey Wiggins and McTighe, Kuhlthau, Todd.
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
The Backward Design Process
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe UBD 08/ Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe UBD 08/ Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
Backward Mapping... beginning with the end in mind... NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way With.
Chapter 7- Thinking Like an Assessor Amy Broadbent and Mary Beck EDU 5103.
Lenape School District Understanding by Design Day 2 June 26, 2012 Day 2 June 26, 2012.
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 Session VI.
Evidence of Understanding
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design by Wiggins & McTighe
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Understanding By Design Introduction September 17th , 2009
3 Stages of Backward Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Backward Mapping beginning with the end in mind . . .
Presentation transcript:

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012

So… What kind of learner are you? What were your biggest take-aways about assessment? Secret Strips! What do you remember about your classmates?

Understanding by Design The Big Ideas of UbD Forthcoming slides adapted from the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe

3 Stages of (Backward) Design Stage 1: Identify desired results Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence Stage 3: Plan learning experiences & instruction

Why backward? The stages are logical, but they go against habits Were used to jumping to lesson and activity ideas - before clarifying our performance goals for students By thinking through the assessments upfront, we ensure greater alignment of our goals and means, and that teaching is focused on desired results

3 Stages of (Backward) Design Stage 1: Identify desired results Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence Stage 3: Plan learning experiences & instruction

Key: Focus on Big ideas Enduring Understandings: What specific insights about big ideas do we want students to leave with? What essential questions will frame the teaching and learning, pointing toward key issues and ideas, and suggest meaningful and provocative inquiry into content? What should students know and be able to do? What content standards are addressed explicitly by the unit?

Establishing Priorities

Six Facets of Understanding Explain - provide thorough, supported, and justifiable accounts of phenomena, facts and data Interpret - tell meaningful stories; offer apt translations; provide a revealing historical or personal dimension to ideas and events; make it personal or accessible through images, anecdotes, analogies, and models. Apply - effectively use and adapt what is known in diverse contexts. Perspective - can see and hear points of view through critical eyes and ears; see the big picture. Empathize - find value in what others might find odd, alien, or implausible; perceive sensitively on the basis of prior direct experience. Self-Knowledge - perceive the personal style, prejudices, projections, and habits of mind that both shape and impede our own understanding; having an awareness of what one does not understand and why understanding is so hard

Brainstorming Essential Questions Based on the Facets

Provocative Essential Questions Have no one obvious right answer. Raise other important questions. Address the philosophical or conceptual foundations of a discipline. Recur naturally. Are framed to provoke and sustain student interest.

Reflection - Stage 1 Choose 1 to answer individually. Share response in a small group. Group selects 2 to share with class. I was surprised… I have been wondering… I realized that… Tonight I learned...

3 Stages of Design: Stage 2 1. Identify desired results 2. Determine acceptable evidence 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction

Just because the studentknows it … Evidence of understanding is a greater challenge than evidence that the student knows a correct or valid answer Understanding is inferred, not seen It can only be inferred if we see evidence that the student knows why (it works) so what? (why it matters), how (to apply it) – not just knowing that specific inference

Reliability: Snapshot vs. Photo Album We need patterns that overcome inherent measurement error Sound assessment (particularly of State Standards) requires multiple evidence over time - a photo album vs. a single snapshot

For Reliability & Sufficiency: Use a Variety of Assessments Varied types, over time: authentic tasks and projects academic exam questions, prompts, and problems quizzes and test items informal checks for understanding student self-assessments

Curricular Priorities and Assessment Methods

Assessment of Understanding Brainstorming…. Using the Facets of Understanding Considering a Range of Evidence Determining Possible Performances

A Performance Task is Authentic if it… Is realistic. Requires judgment and innovation. Asks a student to do the subject. Replicates or simulates the contexts in which adults are tested in the workplace. Assess a students ability to efficiently and effectively use a repertoire of knowledge and skills to negotiate a complex task. Allows appropriate opportunities to rehearse, practice, and consult resources; obtain feedback on performances; and refine performances and products.

Rubrics, Checklists, and Other Evidence UBD Templates RubiStar PBL Checklists QuizStar

3 Stages of Design: Stage 3 1. Identify desired results 2. Determine acceptable evidence 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction

Stage 3 big idea:

Think of your obligations via W. H. E. R. E. T. O. Where are we headed? How will the student be hooked? What opportunities will there be to be equipped, and to experience and explore key ideas? What will provide opportunities to rethink, rehearse, refine and revise? How will students evaluate their work? How will the work be tailored to individual needs, interests, styles? How will the work be organized for maximal engagement and effectiveness?

Reflection – Stage 2 Choose 1 to answer individually. Share response in a small group. Group selects 2 to share with class. I feel comfortable with...I would like to learn more about...I am still unclear or unsure about...I realize I need to take a closer look at...

Exit Card When I think of implementing the UbD model, I feel ______ because _____________________.