Water Bureau Antidegradation Review of Bustorf Dairy NPDES Permit Application Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Nutrients through Precision Feed Management
Advertisements

U.S. Route 30 Environmental Impact Statement & Phase I Design Report Community Advisory Group Meeting Thursday May 8, 2008.
TeamAg, Inc 120 Lake Street Ephrata, PA Planning & Permitting Process for a Proposed CAFO Operation.
Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
State Waters and Stream Buffers
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Opportunities and Challenges of Marketing FGD - Gypsum to Agriculture David Flack Marketing Director Ag Spectrum Company.
Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
CREW CAMP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW L. David Glatt, P.E. North Dakota Department of Health Environmental Health Section.
Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.
Watershed Staff Videoconference October 17, 2012.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
City Council Meeting Agenda Items October 28, 2013.
Antidegradation Demonstration: Alternatives Analysis Analysis WHAT IS IN THIS PAPER- Distinguish between need and necessity Recognize three general types.
Murray River Project Update Coal Forum October 2013.
Overview of Changes To State Livestock Regulations Definitions Federal Requirements Updated Regulations Who must apply When must they apply How to apply.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
Ohio Livestock Environmental Assurance Program. KEY REGULATIONS Chapter 6, LEAP Federal State –Ohio EPA –Ohio Dept. of Agriculture –Ohio Dept. of Natural.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Modifications to the Storm Water Ordinance The City Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) drains rainwater and all runoff into natural streams. EPA’s.
Colorado Ag Regulations. Agriculture regulations can be broke into two very broad categories.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Missouri CAFO Regulations & Nutrient Management Requirements Randy Kixmiller, P.E. October 20, 2005 Jefferson City, MO.
ManPlan: A Dynamic Web-based Modeling Program For Managing Nutrient Balance at the Watershed Level.
Indiana Confined Feeding Operations Permit Program Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Overview of the Revised CAFO Regulations Ralph Summers EPA Region 7.
1 CERCLA/EPCRA Administrative Reporting Exemption for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances from Animal Waste at Farms Covers for Manure Storages: Workshop.
CAFO Rule Update and Region 4 CAFO NPDES Program Implementation by Wayne J. Aronson Chief, PGTA Branch Ag Meeting December 06, 2005.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue ADEC policy states: “If the quality of a water exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish,
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Regulations - Update Meg Collins Colorado Livestock Association & Landon Gates Colorado Farm Bureau Water.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Overview of the Final EPA Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Regulations April 1, 2003.
2008 CAFO Roundtable October 16,2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Wyoming State characteristics Conservation practices CNMP Planning and Implementation Partnership EQIP WY DEQ.
Manure Recycling ACP Compost Solutions Workshop February 28, 2007 John Gundlach Manager of Organics Management Inland Empire Utilities Agency.
EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING Wednesday, September 13, 2006.
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program
EMS in Agriculture and Agribusiness - United Egg Producers XL Project.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Confined and Concentrated Animal Feeding Permitting Indiana Soybean Alliance December 12, 2006.
Clarification of the Proposed ELG Request for comments (Item A.2, p 182) Alternative Groundwater Assessments.
The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update, 2007 The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update February 8, 2007.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
“Wisconsin and the Agricultural Economy” (Steve Deller, Professor of Agriculture and Applied Economics. UW-Madison)
1 Water Quality Antidegradation: Guidance to Implement Tier II Summary of Discussion: Review the Tier II Rule requirements. Clarify what feedback we are.
IDEM Update by Commissioner Easterly Indiana Professional Dairy Producers June 4, 2007.
Indiana Chamber of Commerce Environmental Roundtable August 25, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental.
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
Property Tax Exemptions A Brief Discussion on Benefits & Qualifications.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
Atlantic Coast Pipeline NCEDA MidWinter Conference March 9, 2016.
Suffolk County PDR Program Permits and Bi-Annual Review Andrew Amakawa Suffolk County Department of Economic Development and Planning.
Tools for Manure Management Records For: Animal Units For: 300 or more A. U.
CAFO Permitting by DEQ in Michigan Mike Bitondo & Bruce Washburn Water Resources Division Department of Environmental Quality.
PowerButte: Solar Overlay Replacement with PowerButte Guide
How Do CAFO’s Land Apply Manure?
May 12, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
May 11, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Department of Environmental Quality
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Manure Management Implementation by US Farmers
ManPlan Inc is a Technical Service Provider
The Emerging Role of Agriculture in Economic Development
Presentation transcript:

Water Bureau Antidegradation Review of Bustorf Dairy NPDES Permit Application Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 2009

Applicant Information NPDES Application received September This application followed a previous application that was denied, based on the applicant not meeting the requirements of Rule , Antidegradation. New Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Dairy farm – 2,260 head dairy cattle Manure storage facilities designed to contain 100 year 24 hour storm Site Location: –Leonidas Township, St. Joseph County –St. Joseph River Watershed –Lake Michigan Basin

NE Corner - Leonidas Township St. Joseph County Bustorf Dairy – CAFO St. Joseph River Watershed Facility Location

Applicable State Requirements Michigan Water Quality Standards Rule Subrule (4) requires… the applicant demonstrate that the discharge is exempt or provide a demonstration identifying the social or economic development and benefits that will be foregone to the area in which the waters are located if the lowering in water quality is not allowed.

Antidegradation Demonstration Summary of assertions made in the applicant’s Antidegradation Demonstration to show important social and/or economic benefits 1.Creation of 26 on-farm jobs, resulting in$770,880 total wages per year, plus bonuses and benefits. 2.Creation or support of indirect jobs, veterinarians, trucking, cattle haulers, custom crop harvesters, animal service technicians, sales and supply, farm consultants, and fuel suppliers. 3.Local silage purchase of approximately $2,250,000 per year. 4.Miscellaneous other items such as annual milk sales of $11,000,000, fertilizer cost savings due to manure utilization, and property taxes of $150,000 per year.

Public Participation Key Dates September 19, 2008 Public Notice of application, antidegradation demonstration, draft permit, and public hearing October 20, 2008 Public Hearing held

Public Comments Numerous written and verbal comments received during the public comment period, both in support and opposition to the permit Strong support for the proposed dairy was voiced by the local and state agricultural community Less rigorous comments were provided by the local unit of government (Leonidas Township), primarily questions on application clarifications

Response to Public Comments The NPDES permit was revised to add additional requirements that will provide for greater environmental protection. These revisions include: –Increased waste storage design, DEQ approval, and verification of the design. Failure to verify proper design will result in herd size reduction. –Increased operational requirement for the storage structure. Failure to maintain a proper margin of safety in the storage structure will result in herd size reduction. –Increased oversight of land application fields including a requirement to prohibit the use of fields where illegal discharges occur.

Conclusion The DEQ determined the applicant successfully showed there will be important social and economic development in the area as the result of the new dairy. The NPDES permit was issued March 10, 2009.

Closing Comment What is different this time that resulted in issuance of an NPDES permit for Bustorf Dairy? This decision on the application follows a denial of a previous application. That denial based on rebuttals provided by Leonidas Township, local residents, and other organizations to the statements contained in the Antidegradation demonstration, which failed to show how the potential lowering in water quality was necessary to support important social and economic development in the area. The new application included a much-improved Antidegradation demonstration with extensive supporting documentation which withstood rebuttals and successfully showed there would be important social and economic development in the area as a result of the new dairy. The Antidegradtion Demonstration submitted with the first application was typical of many demonstrations. It was brief and included very limited supporting documentation. The second application was lengthy, detailed, and included supporting documentation. The second application also included increased waste storage capacity.