Developing & Implementing a Patient Safety Reporting System New Jersey PSIC May 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Study Protocol
Advertisements

Protection of Sources of Safety- Related Information Doug Churchill EVP Professional IFATCA Protection of Sources of Safety- Related Information Doug Churchill.
GOALS FOR TODAY Understand how to write a HACCP Plan
Critical Event Review (Root Cause Analysis)
School Leadership that Works:
1.
Patient Safety at LLUMC. Quality Review/RCA »16-20 per year »32 in 2012 »Variety of cases ~Medication events ~Retained foreign objects ~Sedation ~Procedure.
Implementation of a Surgical Safety Check List
WVU Dept Family Medicine-Eastern Division
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
Date or reference University Fire Safety Committee Delivered by Mike O’Connor MSc FCIOB.
Taylor, ch 5.  A step-by-step dynamic process used to solve clinical problems  EBP solves problems by applying best research data, best clinical judgment.
An Imperative for Performance Improvement
Quality Auditing Dr Alan G Rowley
ORIENTATION FOR STUDENTS PATIENT SAFETY PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT Quality & Risk.
An Introduction to Patient Safety
Conducting Patient Safety Rounds with Staff. First Steps Set the stage –Unit and Hospital Leadership Support –Identify a “champion(s)” for each unit where.
Safety Training for Managers & Supervisors
Accident Investigation for Supervisors
Leading Teams.
2011 Areas for Improvement %60% %52%
ESRD Network 6 5 Diamond Patient Safety Program
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
Root Cause Analysis: Why? Why? Why?
Implementation Planning. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Implementation Planning Objectives  Describe the steps involved in implementing TeamSTEPPS.
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
Just Culture Assessing Readiness – Focus on Process Jill Hanson Certified Just Culture™ Champion WHA 1.
Using Root Cause Analysis to Make the Patient Care System Safe John Robert Dew The University of Alabama.
Scaling up Quality (our Perspectives & Lessons)
1 Patient Safety Is Job One Patient Safety New-Comers Orientation Evans Army Community Hospital.
Assisting Students with Disabilities: A Training Program
Module 2, Transparency #1 Assisting Students with Disabilities: A Training Program Module 2: Effective Supervision of Paraeducators.
Topic 5 Understanding and learning from error. LEARNING OBJECTIVE Understand the nature of error and how health care can learn from error to improve patient.
Talking to Your Nursing and Surgical Tech Colleagues.
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
Department of Quality and Regulatory Affairs Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center 2009 The Karmanos Cancer Center Quality, Patient Safety, and Performance.
QAPI What Medicare Really Wants? Presented to: Region 7 Presented on: February 13, 2015 Presented by: Gwen McNatt.
Module 5: Assuring the Quality of HIV Rapid Testing
Quality Directions Australia Improving clinical risk management systems: Root Cause Analysis.
Advancing Quality in Primary Care – What is Quality Improvement? 10 March 2011 Powys THB/IRH Paul Myres- Chair Primary Care Quality Forum.
Danish Society for Patient Safety Adapting Solutions for Wrong Site Surgery: The Danish Experience.
Introduction to Clinical Governance
Worker / Patient Safety: Steps in a Culture Change Mary Margaret Jackson Director, Performance Outcome Services Self Regional Healthcare.
Preventing Surgical Complications Prevent Harm from High Alert Medication- Anticoagulants in Primary Care Insert Date here Presenter:
Department of Quality and Regulatory Affairs Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center The Karmanos Cancer Center Regulatory Readiness (for Non Clinical Staff)
Without reference, identify basic facts and terms pertaining to professional relations, standards of ethics, and standards of conduct with at least 70.
Success and Challenges 2008 Mark Smithies Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust.
Checklist Modification 101 Make Me Your Own. The Basics One size doesn’t fit all. Every hospital should modify the checklist. Checklist modification creates.
Significant Events. Significant Event Analysis (SEA) An SEA is concerned with investigating any occurrence which are identified by any practice members.
Check-In Call. Welcome Back Where Are You? 1.What is the percentage of cases that now use the South Carolina Checklist? –< 50% –> 50% –Every team uses.
Check-In Call June 21 st, Welcome Back Today’s Topics A series of polls Common barriers Checklists for special needs Monitoring your progress How.
Disclosure of Medical Errors AND Risk Management
Promoting Quality Care Dr. Gwen Hollaar. Introduction We all want quality in health care –Communities –Patients –Health Care Workers –Managers –MOH /
Introduction to Universal Protocol (Pre-Procedure “Time-Out”) Office of Graduate Medical Education Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania.
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Pharmacy Significant Event Analysis Fiona McMillan Lead Pharmacist Educational Development April 2014.
Purchasing Forum – May The integration of the activities, plans, attitudes, policies, and efforts of the people of an organization working together.
Cynthia Spry, MA, MS, RN, CNOR, CSIT Independent Clinical Consultant 1.
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material Generating Solutions.
1 Module 4 Learning From When Things Go Wrong A Resource to Support Training Activity in Clinical Settings.
EFFECTIVE ACCIDENT/INCIDENT INVESTIGATION 15 FEBRUARY 2013 PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF SAFETY ENGINEERS -QATAR- -QATAR- COMMITTEE ON SAFETY EDUCATION 2013.
1 Root Cause Analysis. 2 - process for identifying the basic or causal factors that underlie variation in performance.
Texas Center for Quality and Patient Safety Dennis Cook, MSN, RN, CPPS Senior Director, Texas Center for Quality and & Patient Safety Texas Hospital Association.
JUST-IN-TIME TRAINING
Overview and Definitions
Root Cause Analysis: Why? Why? Why?
Introduction to Quality Improvement Methods
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Chapter 12 Leadership and Followership Skills
Chapter 12 Leadership and Followership Skills
Presentation transcript:

Developing & Implementing a Patient Safety Reporting System New Jersey PSIC May 2005

Goals for Legislation  Strengthen patient safety  Promote a systematic analysis  Emphasize confidentiality  Sets up reporting system

How Will Information be Used?  Hospital review of events & RCA  DHSS review of events & RCA  Summary of reports  Medical Alerts  Work with hospitals

Process for Reviewing Event Reports/RCAs  Started February 1 using forms and fax  Review each form submitted  May ask for additional information  Confirm receipt of event form  RCA due in 45 days  Also confirm receipt of RCA  Confirm that RCA is accepted

Requirements for RCAs  STEP 1:Facts of Event  STEP 2:Causality  STEP 3:Action Plan/Measures

Teaching Method  Explain the process  Model an example  Lead an example  Utilize repetition  Build knowledge base Model RepetitionEngagement

Case Example

Initial Event Report  42-year-old male admitted for right knee arthroscopy on 12/23/04  Surgery performed on left knee  Patient informed

Step 2: Causality  Determine pertinent areas  Focus on pertinent areas  Formulate causal statements

Areas of Causality Human Factors (HF) HF Communication HF Training HF Fatigue Scheduling

Areas of Causality Areas of Causality Environment Equipment Rules Policies Procedures Barriers

5 Rules of Causation  Must show “cause and effect”  No negative descriptions  Human error must have preceding cause Systems, not people  Violations of procedure must have preceding cause  Duty to act-only if pre-existing

RCA Process  Report of eventDescription of Event  Triage questions Areas of causality  Info. from causality Causal statements  Action plans Outcome measures

Teaching Method  Explain the process  Model an example  Lead an example  Utilize repetition  Build knowledge base Model RepeatEngage

Apply Triage Questions to Event

Surgeon Enters & Cuts (Triage Questions)  Was environment/equip.Env/Eqp involved in any way?  Were rules/policies/proceduresR/P/P - or lack thereof - a factor?

Focus on Areas of Causality

Areas of Causality R/P/P BARRIERENV/EQPHF Surg.site mark-not consistent Surg.site mark why failed? Change in OR Resident unfamiliar (HFT) Time-Out why not done? Time-Out why failed? Equipment positioning Tech silent (HFC)

No Time-Out Applying R/P/P Questions #2: Were key processes monitored? No #7: Were all staff oriented? No #8: Were there existing P/P? Yes #11: Were they used daily? No

Incision on Wrong Knee  Time-Out not doneNo monitoring

Causal Statement [Something] increased the likelihood of [something] happening……..

Causal Statement #1 Lack of monitoring of the Time-Out Policy increased the probability that it would not be part of the pre- operative routine, thereby increasing the probability of wrong site surgery.

Scrub Tech Silent Applying HF/Comm. Questions #5 Was communication among team adequate? No #13Did culture support/welcome observations? No. Staff afraid to speak

Incision on Wrong Knee  Time-Out not doneNo monitoring  Resident preps Different protocols “no X” knee  Staff silentCulture does not support input

Causal Statement # 3

Incision on Wrong Knee  Time-Out not doneNo monitoring  Resident preps Different protocols “no X” knee  Staff silentCulture does not support input  Change of OR Mirror images invites confusion

STEP 3: Action Plan  Addresses the cause  Specific and concrete  Doable  Consult process owners  Designate point person  Monitor and measure outcomes

Examine Causal Statements  Create action plans for each cause  Actions prevent or minimize future adverse events  Examine each cause; pick strong rather than weak action

Develop Action Plan for Causal Statement #1

Causal Statement #1 Lack of monitoring of the Time-Out Policy increased the probability that it would not be part of the pre- operative routine, thereby increasing the probability of wrong site surgery.

Action Plan #1  Stronger ?  Intermediate Designated staff  Weaker Memo to staff

Action Plan #1  Designated staff use check-list to ensure a time-out for each surgery; two signatures  Check lists reviewed weekly to ensure that time-outs occurred; records kept  Number of wrong site surgeries monitored

Develop an Action Plan for Each Causal Statement  Be specific  Choose strong rather than weak actions  Choose permanent over temporary  Monitor effectiveness Goal : minimize event recurrence

Culture of Safety  Confidentiality  Blame-free  Empowerment  Recognition  Leadership

Next Steps  FRANCES TO DEVELOP

Questions