Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: 2011-03-14 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0410r2 Submission March 2011 Slide 1 Data Transmission Protection on the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission May 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 M-QoS Comments Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r0 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0xxx March 2014 Giwon Park, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on power save mode for real time traffic Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0859r0 July 2012 Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Inc Short Block Ack Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0627r00 Submission Yuichi Morioka, Sony Corporation Date: Why we need Length Field in VHT SIG May 2010 Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 PLCP Rx Procedure Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /0578r0 Submission 2008 May Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Forwarding in mesh containing MPs in power save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0645r5 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Beamforming in IBSS, Mesh BSS, AP as Beamformee Date: Authors: Date: May 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/771r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 FILS STA Support for QoS, HT and VHT? Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0371r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom BF Feedback and Protocol Date: Authors: Slide 1.
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Doc.: IEEE /1244r1 Submission Nov.2010 Sun Bo, ZTE CorpSlide 1 Authors: Transmission Mechanism in MU-MIMO Date:
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0327r0 March 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Microsleep for HE STA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
MAC Header Compression
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0103r0 Submission January 2008 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Peer Service Period Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0110r8 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0883r0 Submission PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: February 5, 2016 Presenter: Haiming.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r3 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r6 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r7 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: April, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0097r0 SubmissionJarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Bandwidth Specific TXOP Limits Date: Authors: January 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /0110r1 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Multiple BSSID and MU Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
PHY Power Saving Features For 11ac
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
TXBF FB Vector Sanctity
VHT NAV Assertion Date: Authors: Month Year
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
EHT Power saving considering multi-link
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 2 Abstract The presentation describes means to detect: The BSSID (TA) of the BSS that transmitted the group addressed frame The group address (RA) of the transmitted frame The BSSID and group address detection from the VHT-SIG A enables group addressed receivers to skip the reception of unnecessary group addressed frames and to improve the non-AP STA power efficiency especially in the stand-by mode and in passive scanning. The presentation and normative text in r1 provide solution for CIDs: 124, 665, 666, 667, 669, 973 and 1341.

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 3 Recap, Address Indication in PLCP Header ac is introducing new PLCP header format –The PLCP header indicates the recipient(s) and transmitter of the PPDU Currently the PLCP header indicates: –Individually addressed PPDU to single user (SU) The AID defines the recipient –Individually addressed aggregated PPDU (A-PPDU) to multiple users (MU) The Group ID defines the recipients –Group addressed PPDU The AID set to 0 indicates group address

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 4 Challenges of the Address Indication in PLCP Header Currently PLCP header has partial AID set to 0 for group addressed frames. There is no means to detect: –Transmitter Address (BSSID) –Receiver Address (group address) The current format forces STAs to receive all group addressed PPDUs –Device cannot filter frames from other BSSIDs –Devices cannot filter frames from unnecessary group addresses that it is receiving

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 5 Solution, VHT-SIG A field of the PLCP header Currently VHT-SIG A field is capable to indicate: –63 MU – MIMO groups –1 SU – MIMO transmission type VHT-SIG A field will be capable to indicate: –62 MU – MIMO groups –2 SU – MIMO transmission types Bit9 set to 1 for individually addressed PPDU, Partial AID in Nsts field Bit9 set to 0 for group addressed PPDU, Group Address Indication in Nsts field

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 6 Solution, Group Address Indication Introduce GROUP_ADDR_IND: –TXVECTOR GROUP_ADDR_IND[0:3] = BSSID[0:3] XOR BSSID[4:7] Identification of transmitter address (TA) –TXVECTOR GROUP_ADDR_IND[4:7]= Group Address [0:3] Identification of receiver address (RA) –TXVECTOR GROUP_ADDR_IND[8] = More Data bit Are more group addressed frames transmitted by the transmitter Details of the scheme are described in XXXX ac-Indication-of-Group-Address.doc

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 7 Stand-by Power Consumption In the stand-by the devices receive and transmit very little individually addressed frames The group addressed data generation may be the only received frames in the stand-by –The device cannot control the amount of group addressed frames: Other BSSs may distribute a lot of group addressed frames A STA in BSS may generate and request a lot of group addressed frames transmission The reception of unnecessary group addressed frames increases the stand-by power consumption –The stand-by power consumption defines the battery life time

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 8 Filtering of Frames STAs may stop reception of individually addressed frames to PLCP header –The header contains indication of the transmitter and receiver addresses The current ac PLCP header has no means to specify the group address or transmitter of the PPDU –The transmitter and group address are present in MAC header forcing to receive the whole MPDU FCS at the end of MPDU ensures the correctness of the frame The PLCP header filtering should be used for both the individually and group addressed frames –The same operation simplify the implementation PLCP Synch + HeaderMAC Header Data Payload FCS

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 9 Comparing the filtering efficiency The SU-MIMO type for group addressed frames enable big increase to sleep durations. BeaconGroup addressed PPDU TXOP obtaining Operation flow: Time

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 10 Summary The improved group addressed PPDUs handling enables: –Better addressing of the transmitted PPDUs More reliability and better understanding of the transmitted traffic –Lower power consumption: The identifier for the transmitter of the group addressed frame enables filtering group addressed frames to other BSSs The identifier of group address enables to decide which frames to receive Especially the stand-by power consumption is reduced

doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 11 Pre-motion Do you accept to include the normative text as described in ac-SU-MIMO-type-for- group-addressed-frames-text.doc to the spec framework document? Y N A