The Social and Educational Factors Contributing to the Outcomes of Hispanics in Urban Schools.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

Advertisements

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.

Diverse Children: Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration in America’s New Non-Majority Generation by Donald J. Hernandez, Ph.D. Hunter College, City University.

State Council of Higher Education for Virginia January 2006State Council of Higher Education for Virginia GEAR UP Summer Programs.

Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.

Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.

Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

1 RESULTS. 2 60% % % 1986 (first year NYC tracked four-year graduation rate) CITY GRADUATION RATES.

1. 2 What is the E 3 Alliance? A catalyst for change in Central Texas and in regions across the state Building a research-based regional blueprint to.

1 Massachusetts College and Career Readiness Summit January 8, 2008 Holy Cross College Facing the Challenge of Increasing College and Career Readiness.

The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.

Education for a Democratic, Pluralistic Society EDU: 251 By: Joanna Daehling-Nelson.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.

Module 3: Using Local Data 1.

MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August

ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.

School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.

District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC | T | F | Empowering Males of.

1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.

ELL SURVEY PART I Selected Excerpts Bilingual, Immigrant and Refugee Director’s Meeting Seattle, Washington Gabriela Uro and Alejandra Barrio May 2011.

1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.

1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.

Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.

What the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children March 2008.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.

The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,

N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.

Department of Education Gillian Hampden-Thompson, Education, University of York Gill Main, Social Policy, University of York EDUCATIONAL OUTCOME INDICATORS.

N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.

PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.

Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5

Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.

The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.

The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.

The READY Accountability Report: Growth and Performance of North Carolina Public Schools State Board of Education November 7, 2013.

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.

2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.

Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.

Pennsylvania has a great future in STEM jobs

2017 FSA Grade 3 English Language Arts

Longitudinal Graduation Rates

Comparability of Assessment Results in the Era of Flexibility

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

Student Homelessness in NYC

2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade

What’s Driving Chicago’s Educational Progress?

2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.

NAEP and International Assessments

Starting Community Conversations

Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential

Presentation transcript:

The Social and Educational Factors Contributing to the Outcomes of Hispanics in Urban Schools

PURPOSE This study attempts to pull together achievement data specifically focusing on Hispanic students in our urban schools. This document will provide a reference point or baseline data to ignite and guide our future work. Still, the work is limited in that it examines only six areas in the lives of America’s Hispanic youth: 1. Readiness to learn 2. Hispanic and ELL Hispanic student achievement on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 3. Hispanic and ELL Hispanic student achievement on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in selected big city school districts 4. College and career preparedness 5. School experience 6. Postsecondary experience

FINDINGS

FactorMajor finding Readiness to learn- Since 2000, approximately 90 percent of Hispanic children under the age of 18 were born within the United States 2. Hispanic and ELL Hispanic student achievement on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) - Percentage of Hispanic formerly- ELLs (LC) performing at or above proficient in Reading and Mathematics in both grades 4 and 8 are significantly higher than ELLs (LC) and in some cases higher than Non-ELLs in (NP). 3. Hispanic and ELL Hispanic student achievement on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in selected big city school districts - Reading and Mathematics scores for Hispanic ELLs in large cities were lower than Hispanic ELLs across the nation in both grades 4 and College and career preparednessWhen compared with White students, Hispanic students were more likely to drop out of high school and not graduate. 5. School experienceHispanic students are less likely to participate in academic clubs, more likely to be suspended from school and more likely to be retained in a grade than their White peers. 6. Postsecondary experienceHispanic students have lower graduation rates, higher unemployment rates and more likely to earn a lower income than their White peers with similar education backgrounds.

FACTOR 1: Readiness to Learn

FACTOR 2: Hispanic Achievement on NAEP Between 2003 and 2009 average reading scores of grades 4 and 8 Hispanic (LC), Black (LC), and White (NP) students increased significantly. However, in 2009, average scores of Hispanic (LC) and Black (LC) students were not statistically different at both grades 4 and 8.

Between 2003 and 2009 scores of formerly ELLs(LC) were higher than Non-ELLs (NP). Additionally, in 2009 Formerly ELLs in large cities scored significantly higher than Non-ELLS in the nation. FACTOR 2: Hispanic Achievement on NAEP

TUDA DISTRICTS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN LC OR NP IN NAEP MATH AND READING,2009 READINGMATHEMATICS GRADE 4GRADE 8GRADE 4GRADE 8 LCNPLCNPLCNPLCNP Boston Miami- Dade County Austin Charlotte Boston Charlotte Miami- Dade County Charlotte Houston AustinHouston Miami- Dade County NYCMiami- Dade County NYC

Access the report online!

Data Collection Challenges Data not reported in a consistent manner across national databases, state database and district databases Districts do not collect data requested National and state data are not always disaggregated by race/ethnicity/ELL status

Moving Forward with Beating the Odds  Data Dashboard on website  District Demographics  State Assessment Achievement (disaggregated by student group)  SAT/ACT Achievement

Dashboard Considerations 1. Are the data the Council currently presents in the annual BTO reports useful? 2. How can we make the dashboard useful to your district? What additional data should be included?