Part 15 Public Hearing FDA Regulation of Combination Products November 25, 2002 Rockville, MD Michael Gross, Ph.D., RAC Vice-President Worldwide Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mary Ellen Turner MD, MPH Vice-President
Advertisements

EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Medical Device Software Development
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
Regulatory Pathway for Platform Technologies
Entering the US Market: Medical Devices
Investigational Device Exemptions 21 CFR Part 812
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Comparison GHTF/SG5/N5:2012 vs. MEDDEV 2.7/3:2010
Overview of FDA Device Regulations
Regulation of Medical Devices Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation.
AdvaMed Combination Products Seminar Case Studies and Practical Challenges Cross-Labeled Products May 29, 2008 Winifred C. Wu V.P. Regulatory Affairs Medtronic.
Replacement Reagent Policy Update
What is involved? What are your responsibilities? May 2013: Research Institute, Clinical Research Administration Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Pharmaceutical Compliance Current Trends: Hot Button Issues to Look at this Year in Sales, Marketing, Clinical, Medical Affairs and Government Pricing.
Public Health Issues Related to Mutually Conforming Labeling: CDRH Perspective Miriam C. Provost, Ph.D. Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Combination Products and Mutually Conforming Labeling David Eveleth Pfizer Inc.
Development of ISO standards for AD syringes SIGN Meeting Cambodia, October 2002 Injection technologies G Gerald Verollet.
Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. \\\71717/ v1 Slide 1 FDA Public Meeting David M. Fox Hogan & Hartson LLP (202) Regulation of.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Medical Devices Approval Process
Cross-Labeling: Legal and Regulatory Issues David M. Fox Hogan & Hartson LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
External Defibrillators: Recalls, Inspections, and the Quality System Regulation Melissa Torres Office of Compliance December 15, 2010.
The FDA Landscape AdvaMed September 2008 Judith K. Meritz
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Classification of HLA Devices FDA Introduction & Background Sheryl A. Kochman CBER/OBRR/DBA.
1 ACPS November 15, Update Nancy B. Sager, Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Food and.
Office of Combination Products: Current Initiatives
1 Regulatory Concepts for Dual Indication Combination Products Charu Mullick, M.D. Division of Antiviral Products, CDER U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
FDA Regulatory review in Minutes: What Product Development Executives Need-to-Know. Specifically, frequent causes of recalls and related areas that investigators.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
OIVD Workshop Premarket Notification (510(k)) April 22, 2003 Parklawn Building Rockville, MD Presented by Marjorie Shulman Premarket Notification Staff.
FDA Focus On Consumer Protection
March 28, 2006 Combination Products: Preparing for the Journey March 28, 2006 Pamela J. Weagraff Principal Consultant.
Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
1 Cross Labeling Combination Products Bradley Merrill Thompson, MBA, JD, RAC Epstein Becker & Green PC.
“513(g)s” Requests for Information Lawrence “Jake” Romanell, RM (AAM) Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
1 Combination Products: Jurisdictional Issues MassMEDIC Presentation March 28, 2006 Janice Hogan, Esq. Partner Hogan & Hartson, LLP
Legal Considerations in Cross Labeling Policy Nancy Stade Assoc. Chief Counsel, Devices FDA/DIA Combination Products and Mutually Conforming Labeling Workshop.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Public Hearing FDA Regulation of Combination Products November 25, 2002 Risk Classification of Combination Products (Biologic/Device) Zorina Pitkin, Ph.D.
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
Regulatory and Legal Challenges for Developers of Drug Delivery Devices Public Workshop: Innovative Systems for Delivery of Drugs.
ITFG/IPAC Collaboration BA/BE Technical Team ITFG/IPAC TECHNICAL TEAM: BA/BE IN VITRO AND IN VIVO TESTS Presented by: Stephen Farr, PhD 26 April 2000 Rockville,
COPYRIGHT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LEGAL DISCLOSURE. November 25, 2002 PRESENTATION TO: Public Hearing: FDA Regulation of Combination Products November.
75 years of excellence Combination Products NEMA’s Comments for the Office of Combination Products Public Hearing Terry Sweeney, Philips Medical Systems.
© Copyright IBM 2007DIA ERS SIAC Presentation, January 2008 The HL7 RPS and SPL Standards - A High Level View Terry Hardin Sr. IT Architect Emerging Software.
2Exceed IFF’s ERFA gruppe for combination products Risk Management 15. sept /Ingrid Malmberg.
Clinical Review Process for New Drug Development and Application
Guidance for review of studies involving HCT/Ps and IND Basics
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons (DCBs)
Regulatory– Terms & Definitions רגולציה - מונחים והגדרות
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Put Together an IDE Application
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The Current PMA Requirements
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
FDA GUI Summary of Contract Manufacturing Arrangement for Drugs: Quality Agreements November This summary was prepared by the Rx-360.
HOW TO FULFILL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ON PRODUCT RELATED HEALTH INFORMATION Samina Qureshi, M.D. PSI INTERNATIONAL Inc.
Combination products The paradigm shift
Michael Gross, Ph.D., RAC Vice-President Worldwide Compliance
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Part 15 Public Hearing FDA Regulation of Combination Products November 25, 2002 Rockville, MD Michael Gross, Ph.D., RAC Vice-President Worldwide Compliance Aventis Behring King of Prussia, PA

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE Inhalation device [510(k)] Passive transdermal patches [ANDA] Medicated tooth paste [IND] Iontophoretic drug delivery systems [RFD, IND, 510(k)–NDA] Prefillable syringes [DMF] Pens, liquid- and liquid-dry [RFD, 510(k), MAF] Autoinjector [RFD, 510(k)] Nasal delivery syringe [BMF] Diluent syringes [RFD, 510(k)] Flush syringes [510(k)] Disposable syringes, needles [510(k)] Surgical kits [NDA, 510(k)] Surgical scrubs [NDA] Infusion Pumps [510(k)] Jet and powder injectors [510(k)] Inhalation delivery systems [510(k)-NDA]

DOWNSTREAM ISSUES User Fees  PDUFA, MDUFMA Quality Systems:  21CFR 210, 211, 820 Manufacturing/Design Changes:  21CFR , , Adverse Events/Experiences:  21CFR , 600.8, 803 Toxicology/Biocompatibility:  21CFR , ISO Orphan Drug/Humanitarian Device:  21CFR316, Applications:  21CFR 312, 314, 600, , 814

1. What guiding principles should be used when revising the existing Inter-center Agreements? Guidance level documents, subject to comment period Consistent format, clear language and content; examples Distinguish between combination products (Combination Products Office) and products of unclear designation (Product Jurisdiction Office) For a combination product do not say, “it’s a drug” or “it’s a device”, or “it’s regulated as a …” ;these statements pertain to a product of unclear designation. Address only jurisdiction and application of investigational exemptions and pre-market regulatory authorities; address “downstream issues” in separate guidance(s) Describe and diagram designation and dispute resolution processes Reaffirm that reviews are consultative and not collaborative Virtual Combination Products are created only when brand names are specified and labeling is mutually conforming

2. What factors should be considered in determining primary mode of action? Primary Jurisdiction established according to primary mode of action  In special cases where the effects are synergistic or mechanism is unclear also consider :  Risk  Toxic or adverse mode of action  Intended use  Center capability to assess safety and effectiveness Must have foundation in FD&CA, fit drug or device definitions Describe/diagram determination/dispute resolution processes in Inter-center Agreement rewrites

3. Is one pre-market review (notification) mechanism more suitable than another? Is it appropriate to regulate combination products under 510(k)?  Can there be “substantial equivalence” for a combination product?  Should a consistent level of regulatory approval be applied to all components [i.e., 510(k) is not pre-market approval]? Consider a new (unique) application (CPAA) for combination products? This would require legislation.

4. What criteria should be used in determining if single or multiple applications are necessary? Should the need to use a mixed regulatory approach influence this? 5., 6. What principles should be followed in determining the quality system and adverse event reporting requirements for a combination product? Each Guidance should include descriptions/diagrams of determination/dispute resolution processes. Guidance should be predictable and consistent on application formatting (e.g., single application, imbedded pull-out, linked or stand-alone). For quality systems, design control may be useful for managing combination products; perhaps design reviews throughout development and post-marketing should be required for all combination products, as it will help to identify and manage interactions between the components. For adverse events:  Reports should be sent to both Centers indicating the report is for a combination product  FDA must sort out duplicate reporting

7. Other comments? Virtual Combination Products are created only when brand names are specified and labeling is mutually conforming Certain combination product examples cited in the CDER-CDRH Inter-center Agreement (which are not composed of finished medical devices) should be reconsidered; if these pharmaceutical dosage forms are combination products then capsules, ointments, implants, depots, and suppositories would also be combination products.  passive transdermal patches  drug eluting disks