Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Imperial College 1 Progress at the RAL Front End Test Stand J. Pozimski Talk outline : Overview Ion source development LEBT RFQ Beam Chopper MEBT.
Advertisements

Lyon 2005 DIPAC Lyon th DIPAC Lyon June 2005Ulrich Raich CERN AB/BDI Instrumentation in small, low energy machines Ulrich Raich CERN AB-BDI.
Cyclotron Refurbishing & Development Meeting March 6, 2008.
1 Project X Proton Driver David Neuffer September 2011.
1 J-PARC and T2K 1.Accelerator construction status and commissioning 2.Accelerator upgrade plan in first 5 years 3.Experiments with slow extracted beam.
ISIS Accelerator Division
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Space Charge Issues in the SNS Linac and Ring
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Space Charge and High Intensity Studies on ISIS C M Warsop Reporting the work of D J Adams, B Jones, B G Pine, C M Warsop, R E Williamson ISIS Synchrotron.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS MEBT : Beam Dynamics, Diagnostics, Performance. Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
ISIS Upgrade Options ISIS Accelerator Division John Thomason.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Cooler Injector Synchrotron (CIS) at IUCF V.S. Morozov MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30-31, 2015.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
MW Upgrades for the ISIS Facility John Thomason. OptionCommentsBeam Power (MW) Neutron Yield 1(a)Add 180 MeV LinacTechnical Issues~ (b)Add 800.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
FFAG-Workshop Dec Kumatori Japan Diagnostics for FFAG- accelerator Takahisa ITAHASHI Department of Physics, Osaka Univ. Toyonaka, Osaka, ,Japan.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
ISIS Upgrade Modelling Dean Adams On behalf of STFC/ISIS C Warsop, B Jones, B Pine, R Williamson, H Smith, M Hughes, A McFarland, A Seville, I Gardner,
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
CERN/GSI beam dynamics and collective effects collaboration meeting 18 th February 2009 High Intensity Operation of the CERN PS Booster (PSB) Christian.
3 GeV, 1.2 MW, RCS Booster and 10 GeV, 4.0 MW, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
On behalf of the whole MedAustron Therapy Accelerator Division
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
The Preparation for CSNS Accelerator Commissioning Sheng Wang June 8, 2015, Dongguan.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
ISIS Accelerator Division
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
High Intensity Challenges
ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps
Injection and Extraction in the J-PARC RCS
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Physics Design on Injector I
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)

Machine Physics at ISIS ISIS delivers ~ 225 µA, 800 MeV proton 50 Hz onto 2 neutron and 1 muon target for condensed matter and muon research. Accelerator chain consists of: – 60 mA H- Ion source – 665 KeV RFQ – 70 MeV Linac – HEDS transport line – 70 – 800 MeV RCS running at 50 Hz – 800 MeV beamlines feeding 2 neutron and 1 muon target. Beam diagnostics include : Intensity, position, profile, temporal and beam loss. Machine Physics measurements/simulations presented focus mainly on those which support ISIS operations.

Injector Machine Physics Two Beam pickups in the HEDS TOF dt = ns = 71.8 MeV Chop a 100 ns injector pulse (1/15 th turn) Inject into ring with RF off. Beam de-coheres over 100 turns giving dp/p

70 MeV HEDS beam line Envelope and alignment control based on MAD models and IDL front end software. Phase Space matching studies at foil Beam Profiles Measured using wire scanner monitor Horizontal envelope Vertical envelope Beam Half width (mm)

Synchrotron: Injection Painting H- charge exchange injection, 70 MeV, Accumulate ~3e13 ppp, 200 µs (133 turns) Injection Septum Vertical Sweeper Injection Dipoles Foil Injected Beam Closed Orbit Dispersive Closed Orbit Anti-correlated Painting Measured betatron amplitude Fitted betatron amplitude Measured closed orbit Fitted closed orbit 600 ns chopped beam ( 2/5 th turn) measured on 2 ring position monitors HorizontalVertical

Injection Measurements vs ORBIT Simulations 2.5x10 13 ppp -0.3ms -0.2ms -0.1ms -0.3ms -0.2ms -0.1ms Anti Correlated Anti Correlated Correlated Horizontal Vertical Vertical

Coherent Tune Measurements 0.26 Position (mm) Turns Abs(FFT) Freq(n-Q) Fractional Tune Measurement available: During injection with chopped beams During Acceleration with fast magnetic kickers Vertical Q vs Intensity per bunch at 3 ms Intensity per bunch E13

Measurement of Beam Widths ISIS Q law π mm mrad Horizontal Profile Scan -0.4 – 2 ms ORBIT 3d Simulation Results turns

Ring Closed Orbit and Envelope Control Closed Orbits use 10 position monitors 7 steering magnets per plane MAD model and MICADO or SVD Relative Beta Envelope Measurement based on injected 600 ns chopped beam measured on 10 position monitors per plane. Correction uses 20 Trim quadrupoles and MAD model – In comissioning phase.

Longitudinal Measurements (V = V h=2 sin (φ)) Tomographic Reconstruction at 0 ms Measure Position Monitor Electrode sum signal over acceleration Split into turns wrt RF Phase Phase Turns 0ms ORBIT 1d Simulation

Longitudinal Measurements V = V h=2 sin (φ) - V h=4 sin (2φ+Ѳ) Measure Position Monitor Electrode sum signal over acceleration Split into turns wrt RF Phase 0ms Tomographic Reconstruction at 0 msORBIT 1d Simulation

Beam loss Measurements Time (ms) Measured Sum Ring Beamloss ORBIT Simulated Loss with 2.5d space charge ORBIT Simulation, Adam Dobbs, Imperial) No Space Charge 39 ring beam loss measurements over ISIS Cycle

Dipole 2 Scintillators Collector system is made of 13 copper/graphite collectors used to stop ~ 5 KW of beam lost during ISIS trapping and acceleration. Beam not collected can be dumped in dipole 2 leading to RF screen damage. Array of 12 scintillators ~ 20hx10v cm inside dipole

800 MeV Beamlines to Target 1 and 2 Q m lattice MAD Lattice Models allow envelope and trajectory control on EPB1 (left) and EPB2 (bottom) EPB1 Muon and Neutron Targets Beam Half width (mm) EPB2 Neutron Target