How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Colorado Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution 1 Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Advertisements

EDGAR and OMB Circular Tutorial for SEAs and LEAs Bonnie Little Graham Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013 Brustein.
Allowability and Grants Management Test When Working With NonTraditional Providers Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
LEIGH M. MANASEVIT, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC FALL FORUM 2012 WHAT LAWS APPLY TO FEDERAL GRANTS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE.
Presented by Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2012 Maintenance of Effort, Comparability.
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
INTERNAL CONTROLS.
1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
1 CREATING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DRAW REQUEST (OCC) Complete a Checklist for Administrative Draw Requests (Form 16.08). Draw Requests amount must agree with.
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
FEDERAL GRANT MANAGEMENT Federal Programs New Directors Workshop March 11, 2013 WVDE Office of Federal Programs.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Some slides in this presentation were excerpted from US Eds February 2009 PowerPoint presentation titled: Help! Im a New Title I Director. What Do I Need.
Create an Application Title 1A - Adult Chapter 3.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Michelle L. Doyle For Catapult Learning 1.  What is IDEA?  Who is eligible?  How do they get identified?  How do they get services? ◦ Who pays? ◦
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Arizona Department of Homeland Security SAA Site Monitoring 6 th Annual Homeland Security UASI Conference May 2012 May 2012 Governor Janice K. BrewerDirector.
PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.
P-Card User Guide Standard Profile July RCNJ-BOA Purchasing Card User Guide – Standard Profile Ramapo College and Bank of America VISA Procurement.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Checking & Corrective Action
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
1 Human Resources Almanac For the State of Connecticut Executive Branch 12/31/2008 Edition.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Federal and State Monitoring Title I Directors Conference September
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMNI CIRCULAR KEY AREA #1: TIME AND EFFORT STEVEN SPILLAN, ESQ. MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2012.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
WELCOME - As you enter the room… Walk around, Read the posted questions, and Use the colored dots provided to select the four questions that are most important.
1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY Office of Special Education Programs.
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
To Accountability…and Beyond
Managing Perkins Funds
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III
Presentation transcript:

How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 1

AGENDA Overview of the Monitoring Process – SASA – OSEP Preparing for a Monitoring Visit Common Findings Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 2

OVERVIEW OF THE MONITORING PROCESS Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 3

SASA Monitoring Covers… New to : ESEA Flexibility Monitoring SASA Monitoring for Select Non-Flex States: – Title I, Part A – Title I, Part D (Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk) – Title X, Part C (McKinney-Vento Act/Homeless Program) – Title III, Part A Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 4

Non-Flex Selection Factors SEA has not been monitored since the or monitoring cycle Review of Audits and Previous Monitoring Findings Sta Leadership Turnover or New Sta Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 5

Monitoring Strategies, Pre-site document reviews SEA and LEA website reviews Previous corrective actions Combination of program specific – Desk – Teleconference / Videoconference – Web-based conference – On-site monitoring review of indicators Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 6

OSEP Monitoring Covers… Continuous Improvement Visits ame=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits ame=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits – Results Component – Stakeholder Input Process – Verification Component er_name=CrEAGs-+Part+B er_name=CrEAGs-+Part+B Determinations. State Performance Plan (SPP) / Annual Performance Report (APR) Review Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 7

Prior to Visit Desk monitoring of each State – State contact gathers and analyzes data and information – Information collected primarily through Web- based searches and document analysis – Specific documentation requested from SEA Selection of LEAs Receipt of Agenda and List of ED Participants Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 8

The Visit Itself – HOW LONG? Typically one full week – WHAT WILL ED BE DOING DURING THE VISIT? Review documentation not available prior to the trip Interview SEA and LEA staff, principals, teachers, parents, and other stakeholders Exit Conference Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 9

Post-Visit – SASA-specific DRAFT comprehensive monitoring report issued To be issued within 35 business days of the on-site visit SEA has 5 business days to review and provide technical edits and corrections FINAL report issued SEA Response SEA has 30 business days to respond to any required actions SASA sends a letter approving proposed actions or requiring revision/further action May require close collaboration (e.g., CAPs) and/or follow-up visits Significant compliance findings can lead to special conditions Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 10

TOP 10 WAYS TO PREPARE FOR A MONITORING VISIT Preparation is the Key! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 11

1. Organizational Meeting Meet with Key Personnel All about Communication! – Discuss program and areas that will be reviewed Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 12

2. Select Main Visit Contact 1 Main Visit Contact – Schedule meetings – Ensure lead personnel schedules clear – Organize travel requests / information (as requested by SASA) – Schedule visits to schools (as requested by SASA) Schedule conference calls with SASA prior to visit Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 13

3. Select Main Interview Contacts A representative should be appointed as lead interviewer for each program (and topic) as appropriate – Title I, Part A – Title I, Part D – Neglected, Delinquent or At-Risk – Title X, C - McKinney-Vento – Title III, Part A – SIG – IDEA Results These representatives must know who should be present for each indicator and where all documentation is located! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 14

4. Select Meeting Place Want meeting place separate from main offices so that all parties can remain focused – Dont completely isolate All personnel should have cleared scheduled and be ready to participate as necessary – Organized by the applicable lead contact Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 15

5. Complete Monitoring Documents Complete the Actual Monitoring Document the Monitors will be using! Put your best foot forward Narrative Form – How? – Answer the Question Being Asked! – Respond to correct fiscal year! Include Specific Citations as appropriate. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 16

5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.) OSEP: Critical Elements Analysis Guide (CrEAG) Part B – Gen. Supervision – Fiscal Systems SASA Monitoring Plan for Formula Grant Programs – SIG: Application Process, Implementation, Fiscal, Technical Assistance, Monitoring, Data Collection – Title I Team Title I-A Fiduciary Title I-D McKinney-Vento – Title III-A: Monitoring of Subgrantees; Standards, Assessments & Accountability, Instructional Support, Fiduciary Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 17

5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.) OSEPs CrEAG Format Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 18

5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.) SIG Format Title I & Title III Team Format Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 19

6. Organize Documentation Corresponding Binders – Tabbed! – Organized! – Complete Examples! – Connect-the-Dots! Copies for yourself Include any additional documents given to SASA during the visit Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 20

7. Mock Visit Practice Makes Perfect! (sort of) Take the monitoring instrument and review the current system in place Interview selected personnel (test) CONDUCT PRIOR TO VISIT – Chance to change systems as needed! – Chance to create corrective action plans and begin implementation as needed! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 21

8. Be Prepared to Address Noncompliance Be prepared to address any corrective action plan already created or implemented. If no corrective action plan then attempt to create a plan prior to SASAs arrival. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 22

9. Review Findings From Your State Review old monitoring reports Special Conditions State Plans – Did you complete everything you said you would? Review audits – Including A-133 Single Audit Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 23

10. Review Monitoring Findings In Other States Title I & Title III Reports ( ): s12/index.html s12/index.html SIG Reports: OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters: date.html date.html Review reports to identify focus areas, trends in findings. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 24

COMMON FINDINGS ACROSS THE BOARD Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 25

Written Policies and Procedures Conflicting policies Out-of-date policies Non-existent policies If you have to explain how something is done without being able to point to a clear and current written policy or procedure, you probably have some work to do!!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 26

Notification Requirements Timeliness Required Items Public Reporting Examples: – Title I-A: Annual LEA Report Card, HQT Status Letter, School Improvement Status, SES and Choice Notice – Title III: Student Identification, AMAO Determination – IDEA: Procedural Safeguards, Stakeholder Input for SPP/APR Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 27

Fiduciary Timely review and approval of LEA applications Timely allocation of subgrants Period of availability of funds to LEAs Process for Reallocating Funds Timely Obligation and Liquidation Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 28

Fiduciary Ensuring Funds are Used for Allowable Uses – Consistent with Federal Cost Principles? – Consistent with EDGAR? – Consistent with program-specific rules? – How does SEA/LEA ensure and document allowability? Program-specific Fiscal Rules – MOE – Supplement not Supplant – Caps Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 29

Fiduciary – High Dollar Areas of Concern Procurement Property / Inventory Management Time Distribution Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 30

EDGAR Procurement Rules Section of EDGAR All procurement transactions must be conducted with full and open competition Conflict of Interest: – Must have written code of conduct for all employees engaged in contract award and administration Must have protest procedures to handle disputes Follow Procurement Rules!!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 31

Inventory Management: Common Problems Determining betweenequipment and supply Determining level of control over item Tracking non-equipment items Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 32

Equipment Rules Section of EDGAR Must have adequate controls in place to account for: – Location of equipment – Custody of equipment – Security of equipment Property records – Description, serial number or other ID, title information, acquisition date, cost, percent of federal participation, location, use and condition, and disposition (if applicable) Physical inventory – Must be performed at least every 2 years Control system to prevent loss, damage and theft – All incidents must be investigated Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 33

Equipment Rules (cont.) Must protect against unauthorized use – May use for other projects as long as use is incidental and does not interfere with authorized use When property is no longer needed, must follow disposition rules: – Transfer to another federal program – Over $5,000 – Keep or sell, but must pay a share based on the percentage of federal ED participation at initial acquisition – Under $5,000 – May keep, sell, or dispose of it with no obligation to ED Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 34

Supplies Section of EDGAR Supplies are everything else – Do not cost much money – Used fairly quickly Examples: pens, paper, toner, laptops EDGAR does not set out any specific tracking requirements As a practical matter, ED expects subgrantees to track all property purchased with federal funds, in order to prove there has been an allocable benefit to the federal program Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 35

Time Distribution Selected Items of Cost: Salaries and Wages – Allowable if proper time distribution records Time Distribution Records must be maintained for all employees whose salaries are: – Paid in whole or in part with federal funds – Used to meet a match/cost share requirement Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 36

Time Distribution – Common Problems Proper Identification of Cost Objective(s) Completion of Required Documentation – PAR vs. Semi-annual Certification – Correct Signatory? – Correct Time Period? – Time reported add up to 100% time worked? – Signed after-the-fact? Quarterly Reconciliations Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 37

Equitable Services Timely and Meaningful Consultation LEA Maintaining Control – Program – Fundsno reimbursement! – Propertytags, inventory Evaluation of Services Identification of Eligible Students Administration Costs NOT Charged Against Equitable Services Set-Aside Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 38

Subrecipient Monitoring Comprehensive Monitoring Protocol Follow-up procedures to ensure corrective actions taken to address compliance issues Linking Monitoring Findings with Technical Assistance Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 39

RESOURCES - SASA ESEA Flexibility Monitoring SASA Monitoring Indicators ( ) Title I & Title III Reports ( ): NASTID Presentation on SASA Monitoring for _overview_sasa_moni.pdf Office of School Turnaround – SIG Monitoring SIG Monitoring Plan SIG Reports: Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 40

RESOURCES - OSEP Continuous Improvement Visit Page folder_name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits folder_name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters: Part B SPP and APR Determination Letters: ml ml Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 41

Questions? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 42

This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 43 Disclaimer