Switch EFV to ETR - Efavirenz to Etravirine. Efavirenz to Etravirine switch in patients with CNS adverse events Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71 Design Endpoints.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy - Pilot LPV/r - M American Study - KalMo - OK - OK04 - KALESOLO - MOST - HIV-NAT 077.
Advertisements

Switch to LPV/r monotherapy - Pilot LPV/r - M American Study - KalMo - OK - OK04 - KALESOLO - MOST - HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
The impact of switching to etravirine on efavirenz-related CNS toxicity. Laura Waters 1, Martin Fisher 2, Alan Winston 3, Chris Higgs 1, Wendy Hadley 2,
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Switch EFV to ETR - Efavirenz to Etravirine

Efavirenz to Etravirine switch in patients with CNS adverse events Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71 Design Endpoints –Primary: change in the proportion of patients experiencing grade 2-4 CNS toxicity at week 12 –Secondary: change in CNS score, median number of grade 2-4 CNS adverse events, viral suppression, CD4 change, fasting lipids, safety 2 NRTI + ETR 400 mg QD + EFV placebo 2 NRTI + EFV 600 mg QD + ETR placebo Randomisation 1 : 1 HIV+ adults On 2 NRTI + EFV 12 weeks HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL CD4 > 50/mm 3 Ongoing CNS symptoms N = 18 N = 20 2 NRTI + ETR 400 mg QD 2 NRTI + ETR 400 mg QD Blinded Phase W0-W12 Open-label Phase W12-W24

Baseline characteristics, 38 patients –Median age 43 years –Median duration of EFV: 21.4 months (range: 3.5 – 117.5) –Median CD4: 510/mm 3 –NRTI backbone: TDF/FTC = 61% ; ABC/3TC = 29% –Similar frequency of individual grade 2-4 CNS adverse events (AE) in immediate and delayed ETR switch arm, except for insomnia (p=0.024) Immediate ETRDelayed ETRP** W0W12pW0W12p Grade 2-4 CNS AE 90%60% %81.3%1- Abnormal dreams 50%20% %62.5% Insomnia 75%50% %43.8%1- Median number of grade 2-4 CNS AE CNS score*, median * Sum of total of all grades of CNS AE ; ** change in immediate vs delayed switch Grade 2-4 CNS AE: change from baseline to Week 12 Efavirenz to Etravirine switch in patients with CNS adverse events Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71

Combined analysis, at W12 of ETR in both arms –Grade 2-4 CNS AE Significant reductions (baseline ; W12) in overall AE (89% ; 60% ; p=0.009), insomnia (63% ; 37% ; p=0.016), abnormal dreams (57% ; 20% ; p=0.001) and nervousness (29% ; 9% ; p=0.046) –Virologic and immunologic efficacy HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at all visits, median CD4 rise : + 43/mm 3 –Fasting lipids Reductions in total cholesterol ( mmol/L, p<0.001) and LDL-cholesterol ( mmol/L, p=0.021) –No rash or hepatotoxicity Conclusion –Switching EFV to ETR led to a significant reduction in some but not all grade 2-4 CNS adverse events –Once-daily ETR is an efficacious, tolerable and lipid-friendly alternative to EFV in patients with persistent CNS toxicity Efavirenz to Etravirine switch in patients with CNS adverse events Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71