 If it is assumed that  w is made up of a contribution from the mean wind and a contribution from the traffic, then it can be suggested that Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9 th INTERNATIONAL CFD CONFERENCE September Institute of Power Technology MOSCOW, Russia.
Advertisements

Dispersion modelling work at Kings College London David Carslaw Environmental Research Group Kings College London.
Colman C.C. Wong & Chun-Ho Liu
Ian Longley Physics Department, UMIST, Manchester, U.K. Fine scale temporal variation in ultrafine particle concentrations in a busy street canyon with.
Pollution levels plummet in clean air fight (but…) Ian Longley School of Earth, Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences University of Manchester.
I.D. Longley, J.R. Dorsey, M.W. Gallagher, J.D. Allan, M.R. Alfarra, H.Coe Physics Department, UMIST, Manchester, U.K. Exposure to ultrafine particles.
Ian Longley Street canyon aerosol pollutant transport measurements in Manchester I.D. Longley, M.W. Gallagher, J.R. Dorsey, M. Flynn, K. Bower, I. Barlow.
Ian Longley Street canyon aerosol pollutant transport measurements in Manchester I.D. Longley, M.W. Gallagher, J.R. Dorsey, M. Flynn, K. Bower, I. Barlow.
Attack of the Toxic Mist – Ian D. Longley School of Earth, Atmospheric & Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester Why we study Urban Aerosol Dispersion.
Fine-Scale Variations in Aerosol Transport within a Street Canyon – a Pilot Field Study I.D. Longley, M.W. Gallagher, M. Flynn, J.R. Dorsey, P.I. Williams.
Bridging the Gap Between Statistics and Engineering Statistical calibration of CFD simulations in Urban street canyons with Experimental data Liora Malki-Epshtein.
Summary of relevant information in the CAFE Position paper on PM Martin Meadows UNECE PMEG Berlin, 23 & 24 May 2005.
Gaseous And Particulate Dispersion In Street Canyons
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
Is Urban Air Quality a Problem? Ian Longley. The air is cleaner than it was, isn’t it?
10-Years Air Pollution Research In London. Sources of particles from a vehicle Emissions dependent upon vehicle speed (resuspension, tyre and road.
J. K. Gietl * and O. Klemm Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Germany Corresponding author:
NORTRIP NOn-exhaust Road TRaffic Induced Particle emissions - Development of tools for assessing the effect on air quality and exposure.
Wear particles Wear particles could strongly contribute to the PM10 concentrations in urban environments.
Large-eddy simulation of flow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons under different thermal stratifications W. C. Cheng and Chun-Ho Liu * Department.
THE PUMA PROJECT AND SUBSEQUENT AIR QUALITY MODELLING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ROY M. HARRISON AND XIAOMING CAI SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHY, EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Module 9 Atmospheric Stability Photochemistry Dispersion Modeling.
BACKGROUND Aerosols influence many things in the world around us from obvious visibility issues to climate changes to human health. The mortality and morbidity.
PARTICLE FLUXES MEASURED BY EDDY COVARIANCE ABOVE AND WITHIN A DOWNTOWN URBAN CANOPY I.D. Longley, M.W. Gallagher School of Earth, Atmospheric & Environmental.
Clean air for London: ClearfLo David Green, King’s College London.
Particle pollution is linked to adverse health effects ~350,000 premature deaths a year within the EU are related to exposure to particulate matter (PM)
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
Ultrafine Particles and Climate Change Peter J. Adams HDGC Seminar November 5, 2003.
THE REGENTS PARK AND TOWER ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIMENT REPARTEE 2006 & 2007 Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham.
Modelling Pollution Dispersion in Urban Areas Silvana Di Sabatino Universita’ di Lecce, Dipartimento Scienza dei Materiali, Via Arnesano, Lecce (I)
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
ULTRAFINE PM IN NEAR GROUND LAYER OF URBAN ATMOSPHERE, PRAGUE 2002/2003 JAN HOVORKA, LUBOMÍR BETUŠ ; Institute.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Lindsey Kuettner and Dr. Patricia Cleary  Department of Chemistry  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Back Trajectory Analysis and Measurement of Ozone.
Modelling of Complex Urban Systems and Areas of Possible Improvements
EFCOG Safety Analysis Working Group May 10, 2012 Jeremy Rishel Bruce Napier Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in Safety Analyses: GENII.
Nanoparticles from Road Vehicle Exhaust. An Artifact or a Reality? Background Current emission standards for motor vehicles are mass based. Properties.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
NCAS/APRIL Meeting on Urban Air Quality Modelling Dispersion modelling at Imperial College London Professor Helen ApSimon and Dr Roy Colvile Page 1/N ©
Results from the SMEAR III urban measurement station
Measurement of aerosol and VOC turbulent fluxes and in-canopy particle characterization at a pristine forest in Amazonia Luciana Rizzo.
SUBMICRON AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A SMALL SETTLEMENT NEAR HIGHWAY J. HOVORKA, Z. STAŇKOVÁ Institute for Environmental.
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
1 Ultrafine Particles and Freeways Yifang Zhu, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Engineering Texas A&M University –Kingsville
Statistical and optimized results concerning the mobile measurements of fine and coarse emission factors by the Sniffer-system Jari Härkönen Senior Researcher.
Why Do Countries Use Capital Controls? INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND Why Do Countries Use Capital Controls? Prepared by R. Barry Johnston and Natalia T.
CITES 2005, Novosibirsk Modeling and Simulation of Global Structure of Urban Boundary Layer Kurbatskiy A. F. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
Study of ambient air particulates pollutants near Taichung airport sampling site in central Taiwan Journal of Hazardous Materials 144 (2007) 492–498 Student.
TNO Environment, Energy and Process Innovation Menno Keuken Impact of speed control on urban air quality (Rotterdam) Session 2: Mexico Workshop.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.
DAPPLE Science Meeting Tuesday 30 th November 2004, Imperial College London. Air Flow – Fieldwork: Sam Arnold (1&2), Adrian Dobre (2), Rob Smalley (3),
Intelligent Traffic Environmental System (ITES-AIR)
Air Pollution Meteorology Ñ Atmospheric thermodynamics Ñ Atmospheric stability Ñ Boundary layer development Ñ Effect of meteorology on plume dispersion.
Understanding The Effect Of Anthropogenic Aerosol Weekly Cycles Upon The Climate Using A Global Model Of Aerosol Processes (GLOMAP) Introduction GLOMAP.
TUG Roadside Measurements of Particulate Matter (PM) size distribution P.J. Sturm, S. Hausberger Graz University of Technology: Michael Bacher, Bernhard.
Atmospheric Lifetime and the Range of PM2.5 Transport Background and Rationale Atmospheric Residence Time and Spatial Scales Residence Time Dependence.
Exposure to air pollution in the transport microenvironment: how important is short-term exposure to high concentrations, and what are the determinants.
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN TO ULTRAFINE PARTICLES AROUND AN URBAN INTERSECTION S Kaur, M J Nieuwenhuijsen & R Colvile Environmental Processes & Systems Research.
Surbjit Kaur, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen & Roy Colvile
The science of urban air quality
Inter-Relations within DAPPLE - The Determinants for Exposure
Exposure to Air Pollution James Tate and Paul Seakins
Ian D. Longley, M.W. Gallagher
The Turbulent Structure of the Urban Boundary Layer
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
COMSOL Simulation of Air Pollutant Particle Transmission in a Building
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF PARTICLE TRANSPORT IN TURBULENT AIRFLOW
UFP  PARTICLE NUMBER (ToN)
Presentation transcript:

 If it is assumed that  w is made up of a contribution from the mean wind and a contribution from the traffic, then it can be suggested that Introduction Vehicle emissions of particles and pollutant gases are causing increasing concern due to their adverse effects upon the health of the public. The greatest numbers of people are exposed to the highest concentrations of such pollutants where the sources are most concentrated - in urban street canyons. In such canyons dispersion is constrained by the buildings and complicated by recirculation and the enhanced and highly localised turbulence associated with such a complex space. Regulation of urban air quality increasingly relies upon simple dispersion models such as ADMS-Urban (McHugh et al, 1997). Such models are based upon a simplified empirical transport scheme treating aerosol purely as a PM 10 metric and do not describe the differing behaviour of different size ranges or number concentrations. Recent concerns over the appropriateness of the PM 10 metric for regulation purposes (e.g. EPAQS, 2000, Harrison & Yin, 2000) has, in part, led to a need to understand the size-segregated behaviour of aerosols better in campaigns such as this one. Objectives The experimental campaign was named Street Canyon Aerosol Research, or SCAR. The principal aim of SCAR was to obtain the emission velocity and ventilation fluxes of aerosol from the canyon space. It was intended that these fluxes could then be parameterised with regard to controlling factors. The factors expected to have most influence over these fluxes were wind speed and direction and traffic flow both directly and indirectly through thermally and mechanically produced turbulence. Measurements of Aerosol Pollutant Transport in a Manchester Street Canyon I.D. Longley, M. Flynn, J.D. Dorsey, P.I. Williams, M.W. Gallagher, J.R. Allan, M.R. Alfarra, H. Coe. University Of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK Activities A measurement campaign has been conducted in an asymmetric street canyon with busy one-way traffic (Princess Street) in central Manchester. The principal experimental period (SCAR-4) covered two weeks (Monday to Friday, 24-hour operation) in October 2001, preceded by three week-long preparatory experiments in February, April and May The eddy correlation method was used to determine fluxes of size segregated accumulation mode aerosol. Measurements of accumulation mode aerosol and trace gases at a static location were made concurrently with measurements on a platform lift giving vertical profiles. Size segregated measurements of ultra-fine and coarse particle concentrations were also made simultaneously at various heights. Also, a small mobile system has made measurements of turbulence at various pavement locations within the canyon. Table 1. Instruments deployed during SCAR-4 discussed in this poster: Mean aerosol number concentrations (SMPS data, 4.7nm<D p <157nm)  As expected for a road-vehicle-dominated environment, number concentrations were dominated by ultra-fine particles.  Average total number concentrations at the lowest level of 4m were approximately cm -3. The total number concentration of particles in the range measured by the SMPS was found to exhibit some correlation with traffic activity in the street.  There was a clear vertical gradient in number concentration. Mean ultra-fine aerosol number size distributions  The SMPS revealed variations in particle number distributions at different heights within the canyon. Concentrations are reduced with height in the canyon, until the roof level is reached. At this level (17m in this case), the particle spectrum is very slightly broadened towards larger particles. The modal size increases by a few nanometres. It is believed that this is due to the mixing of the canyon-generated aerosol with aerosol from beyond the subject canyon.  Between day and night-time the concentrations vary considerably with the traffic level, but the shape of the number distribution spectrum remains the same. Aerosol Chemistry  An Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) was operated approximately 30m above street level at the UMIST building in central Manchester in January 2002 (campaign described by Allan, J, in preparation).  There is a persistent accumulation mode at around nm, which is manifested in nitrate, sulphate and organics.  There was a mode in the mass spectra at around nm consisting of aliphatic organic chemicals. This compares well with results obtained by Kleeman et al. [2000], in which different engine types produced a mode at nm, consisting mainly of organic carbon (OC).  Organic activity within the Manchester sampling periods, and particularly in the sub 200nm mode, correlates well with NO x activity.  We conclude that the Aitken mode consists mainly of motor vehicle emissions. This also agrees with the findings of Williams et al. [2000], who found that Manchester ambient particle number concentrations of the size range nm to be linked to traffic activity.  Concentrations increase at times of low temperature and wind speed.  This implies that there is reduced mixing and pollutants are being concentrated in a surface layer and not being dissipated by the wind.  In such conditions, the sampled aerosol are essentially being aged in situ and so observed changes of mass loadings and distributions with time may be explained to some extent by processing, though changes in emissions may also impact the aerosol. Mean aerosol vertical fluxes  The average total number flux in the range 100nm<D p <3  m ranged from around 100 cm -2 s -1 at night to 1600 cm -2 s -1 in the middle of the day.  The flux can be seen to be related to both source strength (traffic flow) and heat flux. The contribution of wind-dependent re-suspension of larger particles, thermal stability and the different behaviour of different size sub- ranges is under investigation for future publication. Emission velocity  An emission velocity v e can be defined such that, i.e. flux/number concentration.  The emission velocity was calculated for the data from the ASASP-X (100nm<D p <3  m) using the flux and concentration for the total size range.  This emission velocity was found to range from around 0.3 to 3 cms -1 at a height of 5m, with an average of around 1.5 cms -1.  The emission velocity showed a clear diurnal cycle, peaking around noon. Mean Air Flow  Means of wind speed and direction from the anemometers in the canyon show that the wind was mostly channelled along the axis of the canyon.  Evidence of vortex motion can be seen in the sign of vertical wind angle which peaks when ambient winds are perpendicular to the canyon.  The mobile sonic recorded almost no downward winds when sited on the north pavement (2 to 4m above the road). This seems to indicate that the vortex did not penetrate this deep into the canyon, or was overwhelmed by other flows. Stress  Positive values of u’w’ co-variance were recorded quite frequently (e.g. 28% of data for one of the anemometers).  u’w’ co-variance was found to be very dependent upon wind direction, with large values in perpendicular winds, positive with winds approaching over the shorter wall of the canyon and larger negative values when the wind approached over the taller canyon wall.  u’w’/U 2 (or u * /U) converged when U > 1.5 ms -1, allowing a vertical profile to be constructed, showing enhanced shear near the roof level. Turbulent variances  Due to the positive stresses and dependence of stress upon wind direction it was found that the variances were best presented as standard deviations normalised by local sonic wind speed, i.e  u,v,w /U.   w /U was well-relate to sonic wind speed U, with increased values when U < 1.5 ms -1, indicating the relative importance of other sources, such as thermal and traffic-induced turbulence, when wind speeds are low.  A vertical profile of  w /U (when U > 1.5 ms -1 ) shows a weak positive gradient, but with a layer of greatly enhanced turbulence in the lower 2m or so.   v /U followed a similar pattern to  w /U, but  u /U was different in having larger values.  ‘Hot-spots’ of  w /U occurred wherever U/U roof fell below about 0.3. This was more likely to happen in the ‘sheltered zone’ at the downwind end of the canyon. This zone extended over a greater length of the canyon in more perpendicular winds, and when the wind blew over the higher canyon wall.  ‘Hot spots’ also occurred where winds blowing from opposite ends of the canyon met. Conclusions  The flux and emission velocity of fine mode aerosol (100nm<D p <3  m) have been measured in a city centre street canyon with busy traffic. The total number flux was of the order of 1000 cm -2 s -1, whereas the emission velocity was between 0 and 3 cms -1.  A vertical gradient was found in ultrafine aerosol number concentrations below roof level. The modal particle size was within 25 – 30 nm. At roof level ultrafine number concentrations were slightly raised in comparison to below, and the spectrum was slightly broadened with the number mode occurring at a slightly higher particle size.  A weak positive vertical gradient was seen in turbulent variances. However, greatly enhanced variances were seen at the bottom of the canyon (2m above floor).  A parameterisation has been derived for  w based upon local wind speed and traffic flow rate.  Evidence of a mean vortex motion within the canyon was observed, with upward flow on the lee wall of the canyon. However, downward flow on the downwind wall was only observed on the higher canyon wall, highlighting the significance of the canyon’s asymmetry.  Further analysis is to be published on the detail of the fluxes and turbulence, and how they relate to each other. References Allan, J, 2002: [in preparation] Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards (EPAQS), 2000: What is the appropriate measurement on which to base a standard ? Harrison, RM., Jianxin Yin, 2000: Particulate matter in the atmosphere: which particle properties are important for its effects on health ?, Sci. of Total Env. Vol. 249 pp Kleeman, MJ, Schauer, JJ, Cass, G.R, 2000: Size and composition distribution of fine particulate matter emitted from motor vehicles, Enviro. Science & Tech., vol. 34, no.7, pp McHugh, CA, Carruthers, DJ, Edmunds, HA, 1997: ADMS-Urban: an air quality management system for traffic, domestic and industrial pollution, Intl. Jl. Of Env. & Poll. Vol.8, nos.3-6, pp Williams PI, Gallagher MW, Choularton TW, Coe H, Bower KN, McFiggans G, 2000: Aerosol development and interaction in an urban plume, Aerosol Science & Tech., vol.32, no.2, pp Above: The experimental canyon, showing definitions of wind directions used in analysis. NOTE asymmetry of the canyon Right: equipment on site showing platform lift and instrument trailer InstrumentDetailsMeasuring SMPS – ultrafine mode TSI Model 3936number concentrations, 4.7nm<D p <157nm OPC – accumulation mode PMS ASASP-XAerosol number spectra & fluxes, 100nm<D p <3  m Ultrasonic anemometers RM Young D wind speed, temperature Ultrasonic anemometer (fixed) Gill Solent R23D wind speed, temperature Above: plan view contours of a) wind speed ratio U/U roof, and b)  w /U on one SCAR period Above: plan view contours of c) wind speed U, and d)  w /U on a different day a) b) c) d)  From Solent data,  was taken to be 0.16 at a height of 3.5m. It is possible that a rises with height – this is still being investigated.   wt was found to follow the relationship  wt = T 1/2 at 3.5m, where T is traffic flow rate in vehicles per hour. The correlation between  wt and traffic becomes poorer with increased height.