Mark Tame QTeQ - Quantum Technology at Queen’s Queen’s University, Belfast Fault-tolerant one-way quantum computation using minimal resources - Decoherence-free.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henry Haselgrove School of Physical Sciences University of Queensland
Advertisements

Noise thresholds for optical quantum computers
ENTANGLEMENT AND QUANTUM CONTROL OF COLD ATOMS CONFINED IN AN OPTICAL LATTICE CARLO SIAS Università di Pisa Quantum Computers, algorithms and chaos – Varenna.
Entanglement Boosts Quantum Turbo Codes Mark M. Wilde School of Computer Science McGill University Seminar for the Quantum Computing Group at McGill Montreal,
Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits Scott Aaronson (UC Berkeley) Joint work with Daniel Gottesman (Perimeter)
Survey on the Bounds of the Threshold For Quantum Decoherence Chris Graves December 12, 2012.
New Computational Insights from Quantum Optics Scott Aaronson.
Topological Subsystem Codes with Local Gauge Group Generators Martin Suchara in collaboration with: Sergey Bravyi and Barbara Terhal December 08, 2010.
University of Strathclyde
Q U RE: T HE Q UANTUM R ESOURCE E STIMATOR T OOLBOX Martin Suchara (IBM Research) October 9, 2013 In collaboration with: Arvin Faruque, Ching-Yi Lai, Gerardo.
A Comparison of Two CNOT Gate Implementations in Optical Quantum Computing Adam Kleczewski March 2, 2007.
University of Queensland
Gregynog QIP meeting QIP Experiments with ions, atoms and molecules Christopher Foot, University of Oxford
Identifying universal phases for measurement-based quantum computing Stephen Bartlett in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
Quantum Walks, Quantum Gates, and Quantum Computers Andrew Hines P.C.E. Stamp [Palm Beach, Gold Coast, Australia]
Quantum Logic and Quantum gates with Photons
Three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits
Sergey Bravyi, IBM Watson Center Robert Raussendorf, Perimeter Institute Perugia July 16, 2007 Exactly solvable models of statistical physics: applications.
Approximate quantum error correction for correlated noise Avraham Ben-Aroya Amnon Ta-Shma Tel-Aviv University 1.
Quantum algorithms in the presence of decoherence: optical experiments Masoud Mohseni, Jeff Lundeen, Kevin Resch and Aephraim Steinberg Department of Physics,
The Threshold for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute.
Mark Tame QTeQ - Quantum Technology at Queen’s Queen’s University, Belfast Fault-tolerant One-way quantum computation using minimal resources.
Quantum versus Classical Correlations in Gaussian States Gerardo Adesso joint work with Animesh Datta (Imperial College / Oxford) School of Mathematical.
Applications of randomized techniques in quantum information theory Debbie Leung, Caltech & U. Waterloo roll up our sleeves & prove a few things.
Quantum Error Correction Joshua Kretchmer Gautam Wilkins Eric Zhou.
Holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces Lian-Ao Wu Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control In collaboration with Polao Zanardi.
Experimental quantum information processing - the of the art Nadav Katz A biased progress report Contact: Quantum computation.
A Universal Operator Theoretic Framework for Quantum Fault Tolerance Yaakov S. Weinstein MITRE Quantum Information Science Group MITRE Quantum Error Correction.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Encoded Universality – an Overview Julia Kempe University of California, Berkeley Department of Chemistry & Computer Science Division Sponsors:
Future Challenges in Long-Distance Quantum Communication Jian-Wei Pan Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, USTC and Physikalisches.
Schrödinger’s Elephants & Quantum Slide Rules A.M. Zagoskin (FRS RIKEN & UBC) S. Savel’ev (FRS RIKEN & Loughborough U.) F. Nori (FRS RIKEN & U. of Michigan)
Dogma and Heresy in Quantum Computing DoRon Motter February 18, 2002.
Transfer of entanglement from a Gaussian field to remote qubits Myungshik Kim Queen’s University, Belfast UniMilano 14 December 2004.
Research focusing on the foundations of the subject: 1) Algorithms/Complexity: Quantum algorithms that achieve speedups relative to classical algorithms,
In Search of a Magic Bottle of Error-Be-Gone Dave Bacon Caltech Department of Physics Institute for Quantum Information Decoherence errosol.
Simulating Physical Systems by Quantum Computers J. E. Gubernatis Theoretical Division Los Alamos National Laboratory.
School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL & PHYSICAL SCIENCE Parallel Transport & Entanglement Mark Williamson 1, Vlatko Vedral 1 and William.
Quantum Communication, Quantum Entanglement and All That Jazz Mark M. Wilde Communication Sciences Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering,
Paraty - II Quantum Information Workshop 11/09/2009 Fault-Tolerant Computing with Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits Frederico Brito Collaborators: P.
Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerance Todd A. Brun, Daniel A. Lidar, Ben Reichardt, Paolo Zanardi University of Southern California.
Decoherence-free/Noiseless Subsystems for Quantum Computation IPQI, Bhubaneswar February 24, 2014 Mark Byrd Physics Department, CS Department Southern.
Jian-Wei Pan Decoherence-free sub-space and quantum error-rejection Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note 7.
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
Towards practical classical processing for the surface code arXiv: Austin G. Fowler, Adam C. Whiteside, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg Centre for Quantum.
Quantum Convolutional Coding for Distillation and Error Correction Mark M. Wilde Communication Sciences Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical.
Michael A. Nielsen Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states School of Physical Sciences Chris Dawson (UQ) Henry Haselgrove (UQ) The University.
Global control, perpetual coupling and the like Easing the experimental burden Simon Benjamin, Oxford. EPSRC. DTI, Royal Soc.
September 12, 2014 Martin Suchara Andrew Cross Jay Gambetta Supported by ARO W911NF S IMULATING AND C ORRECTING Q UBIT L EAKAGE.
Quantum Computing Reversibility & Quantum Computing.
© 2015 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual.
Quantum Coding with Entanglement Mark M. Wilde Communication Sciences Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern.
Quantum Convolutional Coding Techniques Mark M. Wilde Communication Sciences Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of.
A simple nearest-neighbour two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation Stephen Bartlett Terry.
Entangling Quantum Virtual Subsytems Paolo Zanardi ISI Foundation February Universita’di Milano.
Hybrid quantum error prevention, reduction, and correction methods Daniel Lidar University of Toronto Quantum Information & Quantum Control Conference.
Entanglement and Topological order in 1D & 2D cluster states
Linear Quantum Error Correction
Quantum Information and Everything.
Optical qubits
Quantum Computing Dorca Lee.
Quantum Error Correction
PI: Leonid Pryadko (Physics)
Mark S. Byrd Departments of Physics and Computer Science
Improving Quantum Circuit Dependability
Quantum Computation – towards quantum circuits and algorithms
Introducing complex networks into quantum regime
Linear Optical Quantum Computing
Using Randomness for Coherent Quantum Control
in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
Presentation transcript:

Mark Tame QTeQ - Quantum Technology at Queen’s Queen’s University, Belfast Fault-tolerant one-way quantum computation using minimal resources - Decoherence-free subspaces (DFS)

2/14 Noise in the one-way model for quantum computation Environment effects during time evolution – Decoherence Pauli error General error Loss Local/Global noise: Pauli error General error Loss Preparation of |+> controlled phase gate error controlled unitary gate error Loss from non-deterministic gates Application of CZ ’s Measurement process error in measurement of qubits propagates into the remaining cluster

3/14 Work on Fault-tolerance in the one-way model -Raussendorf, PhD Thesis (2003) ( -Nielsen and Dawson, PRA 71, (2005) -Aliferis and Leung, PRA 73, (2006) Proved that an Error Threshold existed, which could be determined by mapping noise in the cluster state to noise in a corresponding circuit model. -Dawson, Haselgrove and Nielsen, PRL 96, (2006) PRA 73, (2006) Error correcting schemes and associated error threshold values for optical setups STEANE 7 qubit and GOLAY 23 qubit codes -Ralph, Hayes and Gilchrist PRL, 95, (2005) -Varnava, Browne and Rudolph PRL 97, (2006) Loss tolerant schemes for linear optics setups -Raussendorf, Harrington and Goyal, Ann. Phys. 321, 2242 (2006) -Raussendorf and Harrington, quant-ph/ (2006) Fault-tolerant using topological error correction and surface codes -Silva et al., quant-ph/ (2006) -Fujii and Yamamoto, quant-ph/ (2006) Most Recently: -Dawson, Haselgrove and Nielsen, PRL 96, (2006). -Silva et al., quant-ph/ (2006).

4/14 Problems with Fault-tolerant schemes in the one-way model Large resource overheads: - A minimum of 7 qubits for an encoded qubit (STEANE code) Complicated structure for the encoded qubit: - Underlying graph to encode qubit is complex Error syndrome extraction techniques add additional overheads “One-buffered”, “two-at-a-time” and “fully-parallel” approaches complicate the model: - They modify the measurement patterns and entangling steps Off-line preparation of ancilla qubits can also be a cumbersome process: - setup dependent Q: Is there a way to achieve fault-tolerence using less resources?

5/14 Minimal-resource Fault-tolerance in the one-way model Local Collective noise 4-qubit collective noise 2-qubit collective noise 3-qubit collective noise Universal resource for one-way QC -Van den Nest et al., PRL 97, (2006)

6/14 Decoherence-free subspace one-way model - Simple protection from collective noise G. M. Palma et al., Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 452, (1996) Basic 1-bit teleportation unit: 4 physical qubits

7/14 Decoherence-free subspace one-way model - Protection from all types of collective noise (I) Theory: Kempe et al., PRA (2001) Experiment: Bourenanne et al., PRL (2004)

8/14 Decoherence-free subspace one-way model - Protection from all types of collective noise (II) Knill, Laflamme and Viola PRL 84, 2525 (2000) (Decoherence-free subsystems) Basic 1-bit teleportation unit: 6 physical qubits

9/14 Performance of Decoherence-free subspace one-way model - Theoretical (I) M. S. Tame, M. Paternostro, M. S. Kim -submitted (2007) Probe states: QPT techniques: H H H H

10/14 Performance of Decoherence-free subspace one-way model - Theoretical (I)

11/14 Performance of Decoherence-free subspace one-way model - Experimental (II) R. Prevedel, M. S. Tame, A. Stefanov, M. Paternostro, M. S. Kim and A. Zeilinger -submitted (2007) Standard DFS encoded Information transfer protocol: 4 physical qubits Linear optical setup See also: Kwiat et al., Science 290, (2000) for single qubit DFS encoding.

12/14 Summary and Outlook M. S. Tame et al., work in progress (2007) 1) Investigating the error threshold performance for asymmetries in the collective approximation How does the performance of the 2- and 3-qubit Codes with asymmetries compare to standard cluster state Quantum Error Correcting Codes (QECC) and the natural fault-tolerance of cluster states? 2) Most resourceful method for the 3-qubit code

13/14 Special thanks to Collaborators Queen’s, UK : Mauro Paternostro and Myungshik Kim Vienna, Austria : Robert Prevedel, André Stefanov, Pascal Böhi, Anton Zeilinger Leeds, UK : Vlatko Vedral London, UK : Chris Hadley, Sougato Bose Palermo, Italy : Massimo Palma

14/14 References DFS one-way QC -Hein et al., Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" on "Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos", Varenna, Italy, July, 2005; also at quant-ph/ Raussendorf, Browne and Briegel, PRA 68, (2003). -Dawson, Haselgrove and Nielsen, PRL 96, (2006) PRA 73, (2006) -Lidar and Birgitta Whaley, "Irreversible Quantum Dynamics", F. Benatti and R. Floreanini (Eds.), pp (Springer Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 622, Berlin, 2003); also at quant-ph/ Introduction to graph states and one-way QC using cluster states Fault-tolerant one-way QC using QECC Introduction to DFS -M. S. Tame, M. Paternostro, M. S. Kim -submitted (2007) -R. Prevedel, M. S. Tame, A. Stefanov, M. Paternostro, M. S. Kim and A. Zeilinger -submitted (2007)

 t=0.15  t=0.5  t=1  t=5