PHEDERAL PHARMACEUTICAL ALPHABET SOUP The 5th National Product Stewardship Forum and the 2009 Northwest Hazardous Materials Conference for Household and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A prescription for a Healthy Planet
Advertisements

Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management Ordinance Case No. PH-ORD-041 Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection.
Waste is a Local Issue: Product Stewardship in the Northwest July 29, 2002 Shirli Axelrod Seattle Public Utilities.
Name Secure Medicine Return: PH:ARM Pilot in Washington State Shirley Reitz, Pharm.D., BCPS Associate Director, Pharmacy Clinical Services Group Health.
Name Secure Medicine Return Legislation: A Producer Responsibility Approach Cheri Grasso Local Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County
DRUG (R X & OTC) DISPOSAL PROGRAMS Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board 5/30/2012.
Implementation of waste management plans in Serbia 2013 workshop on Waste Policy Implementation May 2013 Copenhagen.
Universal Waste Management Training
1 What is a Universal Waste?. 2 Universal Waste is universally generated.
1 Universal Waste Case Study University of Rochester Strong Memorial Hospital Marvin Stillman, Manager Environmental Compliance.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Regulations & Reality Long Term Care & DEA’s New Rule for Controlled Substances June 26, 2013 NAHHMA Conference Mindy Collins, Local Source Control Specialist.
Integrated Waste Management Authority
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Disposal of Unused or Expired Drugs Attorneys General Education Program Public Policy Conference THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: ECONOMICS, REGULATION, AND.
Lessons Learned from the Reverse Distribution Industry and Implications for National Consumer Take-Back Programs 5th Annual Maine Benzodiazepine Study.
Keeping Our Sewers Pharmaceutical-Free Thru Public Education, Outreach and Resource Coordination Susanna Littell Section Manager, Environmental Compliance.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Reducing Pharmaceuticals in Water: DEC’s Proactive Approach to Household, Institutional, and Manufacturing.
Hazardous Materials: Risky Business, Safe Solutions Suzanne Metz, Workers Compensation Program Randy Benson, Rural Healthcare Quality Network.
Lock Your Meds BE AWARE. DON'T SHARE.. Your Home Medicine Cabinet: Does it look like this?
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS- SANITATION INPUTS ON NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 29 MAY 2012 By Mandisa Mangqalaza.
1.  Part I: Academic Labs Rule (Subpart K) › Finalized in 2008  Part II: HW Pharmaceuticals Proposed Rule › Under development  Questions 2.
1 Promoting Safe Medicine With Track and Trace Systems SRC Technologies, Inc.
PH:ARM (Pharmaceuticals from Households: A Return Mechanism) Washington State’s Medicine Return Cheri Grasso King County Hazardous Waste Management 4 th.
James R. Hunter, R.Ph., MPH Controlled Substance Staff
EU focus on waste management. European waste management is particularly challenging: environmental protection must be achieved without distroying the.
Secure and Responsible Drug Disposal Act of 2010 Takes Effect 10/9/2014 DEA’s goal in implementing the Act is to expand the options available to safely.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
La Crosse County Medication Collection Program Jeff Gloyd Special Waste Manager La Crosse County Hazardous Materials Program.
Consumer Drug Returns Regulatory Challenges, Proposed Solutions Joanie Burns Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Mary Hendrickson,RPh,MBA Capital.
PH:ARM – Pharmaceuticals from Households: A Return Mechanism Controlled Substance Act: Regulatory Barriers for A Pilot Waste Management Program April 18,
RCRA 101 Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Overview of Drug Return Programs Sego Jackson, Snohomish County WA and Northwest Product Stewardship Council May 18, 2006.
California Venue and Event Recycling Legislation Review of AB 2176 Model Ordinance For Waste Reduction at Venues and Events.
Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? What is an environmental impact.
Product Stewardship for Waste/Unwanted Pharmaceuticals Scott Cassel, Executive Director Product Stewardship Institute, Inc. NAHMMA Conference 2005 Tacoma,
Waste Management Overview & Land Disposal Restrictions.
Name Secure Medicine Return: PH:ARM Pilot in Washington State Shirley Reitz, Pharm.D., BCPS Associate Director, Pharmacy Clinical Services Group Health.
Regulatory Primer 101 Patrick Kennelly, Chief Food Safety Section California Department of Public Health March 11, 2014.
Pharmacists’ Perspective on Unwanted/Waste Pharmaceuticals PSI: Pharmaceuticals National Dialogue Sacramento, CA June 19, 2008 Shirley Reitz, Pharm.D.,
Chapter One. Drug Standards- rules set to assure consumers that they get what they pay for; all preparations called by the same drug name.
PHARMACEUTICAL TAKE-BACK PROGRAM MODELS International programs U.S. programs Program attributes Public need Essential program elements.
Beyond Collection: Washington State’s Beyond Waste Strategy for Reducing Hazardous Materials and Wastes Cheryl Smith Washington.
FHSA The FHSA requires precautionary labeling on the immediate container of hazardous household products. The Act also allows the Consumer Product Safety.
TURTLE MT BAND OF CHIPPEWA Ray Reed – Brownfield Coordinator EPA-TRP.
Pharmaceuticals from Households: A Return Mechanism.
The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together Jim Quinn Metro Solid Waste and Recycling Department Portland, Oregon.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Reducing Pharmaceuticals in our Waters: A DEC Update and Appeal for your Input Scott Stoner, Chief, Standards.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Regulatory Barriers/Disincentives Workgroup June 29 and 30, 2004 Washington, D.C. Dialogue.
Priority Environmental Investment Programme National Workshop Serbia Overview Of EU Waste Policy Belgrade, 8 th May 2008 Ruslan Zhechkov, REC
Chapter 39 Environmental Law. 2  Under what common law theories may polluters be held liable?  What is an environmental impact statement? What is the.
PSI National Dialogue on Waste Pharmaceuticals Product Stewardship Forum June 2, 2009.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Draft Year: 1976 (drafted as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act.) Amendment years: 1984(HSWA, Hazardous.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Consideration of Model Programs and Procedures for the Collection and Proper Disposal of Pharmaceutical.
Waste and Hazardous Materials
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Draft Year: 1976 Amendment years: 1989 National/ Internatinal: National Law Sean Petersen, per:3.
Department of Environmental Quality Review of 15A NCAC 13A.0101 Hazardous Waste Rules May 12, 2016.
Lecture (11): Waste Recycling
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Biomedical Waste Management
The importance of drug take-back programs: protecting our health and environment [TEMPLATE PRESENTATION] prepared by the product stewardship institute.
Biomedical Waste Management
UNIVERSAL WASTE and ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
RCRA Regulatory Overview for RPMs
The importance of drug take-back programs: protecting our health and environment [TEMPLATE PRESENTATION] prepared by the product stewardship institute.
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
What is driving this change????
Presentation transcript:

PHEDERAL PHARMACEUTICAL ALPHABET SOUP The 5th National Product Stewardship Forum and the 2009 Northwest Hazardous Materials Conference for Household and Small Business Programs Hyatt Olive 8 Hotel ~ Seattle, WA June 1-4, 2009 Presented By: David Stitzhal Northwest Product Stewardship Council & Full Circle Environmental, Inc. Federal Touchstones for State Medicine Return Policy DOT EPA DOJ FDA USPS ONDCP CSA

Overview There is a lot going on federally that interacts with state policy development and program design for management of unwanted medications.

Overview There is a lot going on federally that interacts with state policy development and program design for management of unwanted medications. Pharmaceuticals -- more than most products at end-of-life -- are regulated, or otherwise overseen, by several federal agencies and statutes.

Overview There is a lot going on federally that interacts with state policy development and program design for management of unwanted medications. Pharmaceuticals -- more than most products at end-of-life -- are regulated or otherwise overseen by several federal agencies and statutes. This presentation provides a snapshot of issues from a handful of federal agencies.

Overview There is a lot going on federally that interacts with state policy development and program design for management of unwanted medications. Pharmaceuticals -- more than most products at end-of-life -- are regulated or otherwise overseen by several federal agencies and statutes. This presentation provides a snapshot of issues from a handful of federal agencies. Some substantial progress has already been made against seemingly intractable obstacles.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION – Once you have collected unwanted medications through a take-back program, you have to ship them for disposal.

More specifically…… Household hazardous waste that is pharmaceutical waste should be shipped under: – Medicine, solid/ liquid, toxic, n.o.s. (not otherwise specified), division 6.1 or Consumer Commodity ORM-D (if in the original consumer package) defined in 49 CFR ORM-D includes medications. The volume limit for ORM-D is 66 lbs. – Unpackaged medicine, solid/liquid, toxic, n.o.s. had a shipping limit of 11 lbs (solid).

Progress: – For mixed pills that had been taken out of their consumer packaging (loose pills) the PH:ARM take-back program in Washington was using the DOT designation of “Medicine, Solid, Toxic, Not Otherwise Specified”.

Progress: – For mixed pills that had been taken out of their consumer packaging (loose pills) the PH:ARM take-back program in Washington was using the DOT designation of “Medicine, Solid, Toxic, Not Otherwise Specified”. – Materials shipped under this designation had been limited to 11 lbs (about 1/3 of a 5 gallon bucket).

Progress: – For mixed pills that had been taken out of their consumer packaging (loose pills) the PH:ARM take-back program in Washington was using the DOT designation of “Medicine, Solid, Toxic, Not Otherwise Specified”. – Materials shipped under this designation had been limited to 11 lbs (about 1/3 of a 5 gallon bucket). – DOT has removed that special provision from 3 medicine shipping names. The 11 pound limit no longer applies. (We changed a federal reg.!)

Drug Enforcement Administration The Primary Roadblock: Drugs specified by the Controlled Substances Act can not currently be accepted by anyone other than the DEA or law enforcement officials.

Drug Enforcement Administration The public doesn’t know which drugs are controlled substances. The Primary Roadblock: Drugs specified by the Controlled Substances Act can not currently be accepted by anyone other than the DEA or law enforcement officials.

Drug Enforcement Administration The public doesn’t know which drugs are controlled substances. There are challenges with arranging for law enforcement presence, and they arguably should not be spending their time collecting used medication. The Primary Roadblock: Drugs specified by the Controlled Substances Act can not currently be accepted by anyone other than the DEA or law enforcement officials.

Drug Enforcement Administration The public doesn’t know which drugs are controlled substances. There are challenges with arranging for law enforcement presence, and they arguably should not be spending their time collecting used medication. It is inefficient and impractical to collect controlled’s and other medication separately. The Primary Roadblock: Drugs specified by the Controlled Substances Act can not currently be accepted by anyone other than the DEA or law enforcement officials.

Change on the Horizon The DEA – through an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) issued January 21, has solicited opinions and responses to a set of questions for input on managing unwanted medications. The PSI Regulatory Workgroup (under the National Pharmaceuticals Dialogue) helped organize joint and individual agency comments to the ANPRM. REMINDER: There are limited legal options for collecting controlled substances from the public. Law enforcement presence at collection sites. Mail-back to authorized law enforcement receiver, such as the DEA program in Maine.

Proposed Inslee Bill Representative Inslee (D-WA) [with Representative Moran (D-VA)] introduced a bill to establish the Safe Drug Disposal Act of 2009.InsleeMoran Purpose: “To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for disposal of controlled substances by ultimate users and care takers through State take-back disposal programs,” “to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit recommendations on drug labels for disposal by flushing…” Referred to two Subcommittees: Energy & Commerce and Judiciary. No hearings currently scheduled.

Safe Drug Disposal Act of 2009 H.R (proposed) 2/25/2009--Introduced. Amends the Controlled Substances Act: (1) authorizes an ultimate user or care taker to dispose of a controlled substance in accordance with a prescribed state program; (2) includes five model state programs providing for such disposal through delivery to a designated facility; and (3) allows a state to work with the Attorney General to devise an alternative disposal program that is consistent with this Act.

Safe Drug Disposal Act 2009 (continued) Requires each such program to: (1) enact state legislation as a prerequisite to its adoption and implementation;

Safe Drug Disposal Act 2009 (continued) Requires each such program to: (1) require a state to enact legislation as a prerequisite to its adoption and implementation; (2) protect the public safety; (3) allow disposal of controlled substances through persons other than law enforcement personnel; (4) incorporate environmentally sound practices for disposal; (“by means other than flushing down a public or private wastewater treatment system or disposing in a municipal solid waste landfill”)

Safe Drug Disposal Act 2009 (continued) Requires each such program to: (1) require a state to enact legislation as a prerequisite to its adoption and implementation; (2) protect the public safety; (3) allow disposal of controlled substances through persons other than law enforcement personnel; (4) incorporate environmentally sound practices for disposal; (“by means other than flushing down a public or private wastewater treatment system or disposing in a municipal solid waste landfill”) (5) be cost-effective; (6) include convenient take-back options for urban and rural locations; and (7) not restrict the funding a state may use to implement it.

Food & Drug Administration FDA worked with the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) to develop consumer guidance for proper disposal of prescription drugs. tml tml There is no requirement that disposal information be included or excluded in the labeling.

Current FDA Guidance: Flush these: Actiq (fentanyl citrate), Daytrana Transdermal Patch (methylphenidate), Duragesic Transdermal System (fentanyl), OxyContin Tablets (oxycodone), Avinza Capsules (morphine sulfate), Baraclude Tablets (entecavir) Reyataz Capsules (atazanavir sulfate), Tequin Tablets (gatifloxacin), Zerit for Oral Solution (stavudine), Meperidine HCl Tablets, Percocet (Oxycodone and Acetaminophen), Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate), Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablet) Flush-recommended drugs are mostly controlled substances. FDA is concerned about diversion.

Recent Triumphs Through work growing out of the PSI National Dialogue, the FDA changed the priority order of their recommendations for drug disposal. 1)Don’t flush (except for the listed drugs) 2)Use take-back programs 3)Adulterate 4)Seal and dispose

A Sample of Remaining Issues Fentanyl patches (on the flush list) are a problem for wastewater treatment plants and on-site septic systems. Many groups are advocating for a no-flush policy for all medications.

EPA, THE UNIVERSAL WASTE RULE and RCRA What is the Universal Waste Rule? The universal waste rule (UWR) streamlines hazardous waste management standards for certain designated hazardous wastes, which are referred to as universal wastes (UW).

27 Why have a Universal Waste Rule? A universal waste is still a hazardous waste, but the generator requirements are simplified in order to: Promote the collection of these wastes; Promote the proper recycling, treatment or disposal of these wastes; and Reduce the burden on businesses.

What Are the Current Federal Universal Wastes? Batteries, pesticides, mercury-containing equipment (MCEs), and lamps

What Are the Current Federal Universal Wastes? Batteries, pesticides, mercury-containing equipment (MCEs), and lamps Why are these wastes special?  Compared to other hazardous wastes, these wastes are relatively low-risk during accumulation and transport.  They are frequently generated in a wide variety of settings.  They are generated by a vast community  Present in significant volumes in non-hazardous waste management systems (e.g., household trash).

30 So what about unwanted medicines and the Universal Waste Rule? To answer this we have to take a side trip to RCRA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. RCRA

31 So what about unwanted medicines and the Universal Waste Rule? To answer this we have to take a side trip to RCRA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Currently, hospitals that generate pharmaceutical wastes on RCRA’s so-called P- and U-lists (e.g., warfarin, physostigmine, and chemotherapy drugs) are classified as hazardous waste generators. However, these lists have not been updated since RCRA was written in the 1970’s, despite dramatic expansion of the universe of pharmaceuticals.

32 So what about unwanted medicines and the Universal Waste Rule? To answer this we have to take a side trip to RCRA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Currently, hospitals that generate pharmaceutical wastes on RCRA’s P- and U-lists (e.g., warfarin, physostigmine, and chemotherapy drugs) are classified as hazardous waste generators. However, these lists have not been updated since RCRA was written in the 1970’s, despite dramatic expansion of the universe of pharmaceuticals. Some pharmaceuticals have ingredients with characteristics that cause them to ‘designate’ as hazardous waste when disposed, even if they are not on the P or U lists.

33 So what about unwanted medicines and the Universal Waste Rule? To answer this we have to take a side trip to RCRA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Currently, hospitals that generate pharmaceutical wastes on RCRA’s P- and U-lists (e.g., warfarin, physostigmine, and chemotherapy drugs) are classified as hazardous waste generators. However, these lists have not been updated since RCRA was written in the 1970’s, despite dramatic expansion of the universe of pharmaceuticals. Some pharmaceuticals have ingredients with characteristics that cause them to ‘designate’ as hazardous waste when disposed, even if they are not on the P or U lists. Note: pharmaceutical waste generated by households is exempt from the state Dangerous Waste and the federal RCRA rules. However, local jurisdictions responsible for municipal waste management may disallow household hazardous waste from regular solid waste, septic, or sewer disposal routes, as in the case of Snohomish County, Kitsap County, and the City of Seattle. EPA, Pharmaceuticals and U-Waste:

34 So what about unwanted medicines and the Universal Waste Rule? To answer this we have to take a side trip to RCRA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Currently, hospitals that generate pharmaceutical wastes on RCRA’s P- and U-lists (e.g., warfarin, physostigmine, and chemotherapy drugs) are classified as hazardous waste generators. However, these lists have not been updated since RCRA was written in the 1970’s, despite dramatic expansion of the universe of pharmaceuticals. Some pharmaceuticals have ingredients with characteristics that cause them to ‘designate’ as hazardous waste when disposed, even if they are not on the P or U lists. Note: pharmaceutical waste generated by households is exempt from the state Dangerous Waste and the federal RCRA rules. However, local jurisdictions responsible for municipal waste management may disallow household hazardous waste from regular solid waste, septic, or sewer disposal routes, as in the case of Snohomish County, Kitsap County, and the City of Seattle. “Approximately 4-5 percent of pharmaceutical products designate under the federal RCRA regulations as hazardous waste. If RCRA P and U lists were updated to include comparable products developed in the last 30 years, the number of products designating as hazardous waste would approach 15%.” Charlotte Smith, Founder of PharmEcology EPA, Pharmaceuticals and U-Waste:

Reasons to Manage all Consumer Take- Back Drugs Under the U-Waste Rules and as Hazardous Waste Nursing homes could dispose of medicines with a U-Waste reverse distributor. Best management practice for the environment.

Reasons to Manage all Consumer Take- Back Drugs Under the U-Waste Rules and as Hazardous Waste? Nursing homes could dispose of medicines with a U-Waste reverse distributor. Best management practice for the environment. Meets the intent of RCRA. Too difficult to separate into hazardous and non-hazardous during collection.

Reasons to Manage all Consumer Take- Back Drugs Under the U-Waste Rules and as Hazardous Waste? Nursing homes could dispose of medicines with a U-Waste reverse distributor. Best management practice for the environment. Meets the intent of RCRA. Too difficult to separate into hazardous and non-hazardous during collection. Tighter security and tracking to prevent diversion. Most medicines in Washington State designate as state only dangerous waste (hazardous waste).

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Issues include: – Postal regulations vis-à-vis drug mail- back programs. – Cost of mailers and postage. – Management of controlled substances (align with other reg’s). – Options for viable/ legal recipients (e.g. DEA agents; deputized haz. waste incinerators; reverse distributors).