Riverside CL meeting, Feb. 15-18, 2005 Canadian accomplishments on Critical Load Mapping Forests Rock Ouimet, MRNFP, QC Paul A. Arp, UNB, N.B. Shaun Watmough,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Effective Change Detection Using Sampling Junghoo John Cho Alexandros Ntoulas UCLA.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
OECD World Forum Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Palermo, November
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
C OPPER AND N ICKEL TMDL D EVELOPMENT: L OWER S OUTH B AY.
1 Environmental Assessment of Trade Negotiations Government of Canada Approach WTO Public Forum September 25, 2006.
Extending the external costs framework Prof. Anil Markandya University of Bath External costs of energy and their internalisation in Europe Dialogue with.
1 Stocks of biomass / C soil organic matter Expert meeting on land use and Ecosystem accounting 18./
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, fractions, decimals, proportion & probability.
C1 Sequences and series. Write down the first 4 terms of the sequence u n+1 =u n +6, u 1 =6 6, 12, 18, 24.
Risk Management Awareness Presentation
Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe
Ground Water Mounding & P Evaluations
1 Chapter 5 Chemical Quantities and Reactions 5.5 Types of Reactions.
National Park Service Critical Loads:
© S Haughton more than 3?
Determining the Significant Aspects
History of Critical Loads meetings – how have we gotten to this point? Andrzej Bytnerowicz 1, Rich Fisher 2 and Al Riebau 3 USDA Forest Service 1 Pacific.
Air Transport Association of Canada A presentation by John McKenna ATAC President and CEO.
Wild Salmon Policy Update Yukon River Panel March 23, 2011.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
ICP Forests EB.AIR/WG.1/2011/ Report „Effects of air pollution on forests“ Two studies Forest soil condition Bruno De Vos et al. (FSCC at INBO, Belgium)
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change provides for the stabilization of concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at levels which ensure.
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.
METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF NATURE PROTECTION GEOINFORMATION SYSTEM CREATION Kyiv Mohyla Academy National Agricultural University V. Lavryk V. Bogolyubov
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
9th April 2014Kari Austnes1 Critical limits for acidification of surface waters vs boundary values in the Water Framework Directive (WFD) – a Norwegian.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Shenandoah National Park: Critical Load/Target Load Case Study WESTAR November 2005 Tamara Blett- National Park Service Photo credit: University of Virginia.
Estimating c ritical acid loads across the lower 48 US: Opportunities and challenges Steven McNulty USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Raleigh,
Critical Load Development for Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Elizabeth Waddell Air Resources Specialist Pacific West Region
Site-specific nutrient mass balances and critical loads for forests in Canada Shaun Watmough*, Julian Aherne, Rock Ouimet, Paul Arp, Ian Demerchant Critical.
Using Critical Loads to Protect Canadian Ecosystems from Damage due to Acid Deposition Kerri Timoffee* Environment Canada Transboundary Air Issues Branch,
Reducing Acidic Deposition: the Canadian Experience Using Critical Loads (CLs) Dean S. Jeffries * Environment Canada National Water Research Institute.
Non-pollutant ecosystem stress impacts on defining a critical load Or why long-term critical loads estimates are likely too high Steven McNulty USDA Forest.
Group 2: What’s missing? Nancy Grulke, Deb Hays, Tim Lewis, Trent Proctor, Debby Potter, Ellen Porter, Shyh Chen, Ricardo Cisneros, Rock Ouimet, Pat Temple,
Practical aspects of atmospheric corrosion Trends, experiences from Europe, experiences from Asia/Africa Policy aspects, costs.
Potential Risk of Acidification in South Asia Kevin Hicks Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)
Focus on the Headwaters The Shenandoah Watershed Study / The Virginia Trout Stream Sensitivity Study Rick Webb Department of Environmental Sciences University.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Potential Risk of Acidification in South Asia Kevin Hicks and Johan Kuylenstierna SEI
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Calculate, map and used of critical loads and exceedances for acidity and nitrogen in Europe Professor Harald Sverdrup Chemical Engineering, Lund University,
Critical Loads Meeting at Mission Inn, Riverside CA February Jack Cosby University of Virginia Scientific Justification for Using the Critical.
UNEP Global Partnership on Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research - Canadian Contribution - Grace Howland Environment Canada, Chemicals Management Division.
Alejandro Gallego Schmid Department of Chemical Engineering University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) Boston, 30 th September 2009 Calculation of LCA.
ARL Contributions to the WMO Atmospheric Deposition Program Richard S. Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016.
Table 1. Linkages between emissions of SO2 and NOx and important environmental issues From: Acidic Deposition in the Northeastern.
Estimating Mineral Weathering Rates in Catskills Watersheds
Air Resources Division – National Park Service
Presentation transcript:

Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Canadian accomplishments on Critical Load Mapping Forests Rock Ouimet, MRNFP, QC Paul A. Arp, UNB, N.B. Shaun Watmough, TU, ON Julian Aherne, TU, ON Ian DeMerchant, NRCan, N.B. Surface waters Dean Jeffries, EC, ON Jacques Dupont, MENV, QC Jill Franklyn, EC, ON David Lam, EC, ON Fred Norouzian, EC, ON Isaac Wong, EC, ON

2 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Canadian Accomplishments on Critical Loads  History  Definitions  Chemical thresholds and methods Aquatic Terrestrial  Critical loads and exceedances Aquatic Terrestrial  Combined critical loads and exceedances  Uncertainties

3 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 History, definitions  1983Target load: 20 kg/ha/yr wet SO 4 2- deposition  kg/ha/yr NSS-wet SO 4 2- deposition  1997Aquatic (6 18 kg/ha/yr) Terrestrial (90 < S&N-CL < 2900 eq/ha/yr)  1998NEG/ECP initiative  2005EC report on acid deposition science assessment First mapping of terrestrial CL for eastern Canada Updated mapping of aquatic CL for eastern and first mapping of CL for western Canada

4 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Definitions  Critical load « The highest deposition of acidifying compounds that will not cause chemical changes leading to long-term harmful effects on ecosystem structure and functions » Nilsson and Grennfelt (1988) « A quantitative estimate of an exposure to one or more pollutants below which significant harmful effects on specified elements do not occur according to present knowledge » UN ECE (1994) « A quantitative estimate of an exposure to one or more pollutants below which the probability of long-term unacceptable effects on specified elements is acceptable according to present knowledge and policy » Barkman (1998)

5 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Chemical thresholds and methods : the steady-state approach  Aquatic Biotic toxicity of the lower aquatic food web Acid neutralizing Capacity (ANC) = 40 µeq/L (~pH = 6.0) Model : Expert (Lam et al. 1994) SSWC (Henriksen & Posch 2001)  Terrestrial Maintaining current soil base saturation of forest soils Log(K Gibb ) = 9.0BC/Al = 10 (M/M) The Simple Mass-Balance Model (SMB)  Critical load

6 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Critical loads and exceedances  Aquatic CL

7 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Critical loads and exceedances  Aquatic CL Exceedance

8 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Critical loads and exceedances  Terrestrial CL (no harvesting, no forest fire)

9 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Critical loads and exceedances  Terrestrial CL Exceedance

10 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Combined critical load

11 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Combined critical load exceedances

12 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005 Uncertainties  Assumptions Steady state  Methodological, technical, epistemological  There is a potential for reducing uncertainties  Critical loads : an environmental risk assessment for international and domestic policy development The complete report of the Canadian Acid Deposition Science Assessment is available next week at

13 Riverside CL meeting, Feb , 2005  Terrestrial critical loads