School Improvement slide

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RAPIDES PARISH SYSTEMIC INITIATIVE BOOK STUDY: CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION THAT WORKS BY Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, Jane E. Pollock.
Advertisements

Roosevelt Complex Improving Student Achievement. Complex Journey One Vision One Vision High School Graduate High School Graduate 6 GLOs.
Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works Session 1.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume XI Research-Based Instructional Management Practices.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume IX Monitoring Systems for Quality Curriculum and Instruction.
An Overview and Application of Classroom Instruction That Works Marzano’s Research-based High Yield Strategies.
Classroom Instruction that Works: 9 Strategies for Successful Student
Beginning with the End in Mind Overview of “Backwards Design” Jim Wright Kennesaw State University.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
Robert J. Marzano Debra J. Pickering Jane E. Pollock Presentation By: Renee Johnson, Teresa Castellaw, Dana Ledford.
LanguageInstruction that Works: Marzano’s Strategies for World Language Students and ELLs Presenter: Dr. Lori Langer de Ramírez
MARZANO’S HIGH YIELD STRATEGIES
Applying Research to Increase Student Achievement Meredith Greene, Ph.D.
Presented By: Heather Stewart Regional Literacy Consultant Region 4 State Support Team 1.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume VII System-Wide Standards-Based Mathematics Model.
CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION THAT WORKS
Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement
Strategies provided by: Robert J. Marzano Debra J. Pickering
Marzano’s Classroom Instruction that Works Robyn Lopez and Anne Laskey July 22, 2015.
Using Technology with Classroom Instruction That Works January 2011.
Robert Marzano.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Curriculum & Staff Development Center
Tier 1: Core, Instructional Interventions All Students, All Settings Preventive, proactive support (e.g. school-wide behavior support, high quality.
Improving Literacy Instruction: Strategies for All Content Areas
Welcome!.
Classroom Instruction That Works
Marzano’s Instructional Strategies that Work
Marzano Instructional Strategies. Research-Based Instruction Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock reviewed hundreds of studies on instructional.
Mabel Metallic-Bolton, Treena Wysote, & Tyler Gideon.
Generating & Testing Hypotheses
ED 557 August 6, The brain seeks patterns, connections, & relationships between & among prior & new learning. (Gregory & Chatman,2001) The ability.
Laine Ferguson 4 th Grade Class Literacy Facilitator: Susan Huntington Frank Tillery Elementary Rogers, AR January 19, 2012.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume X Nurturing and Supportive Classroom Environments with High Expectations for All.
Classroom Instruction that Works Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, & Jane Pollock.
Resources  Classroom Instruction that Works  A Handbook for Classroom Instruction that Works  Classroom Instruction that Works for English Language.
Classroom Instruction That Works
Marzano’s Effective Teaching Strategies Summarized by Matthew Rehl, M
+ Identify Words and Phrases to Describe Feelings By: Kenley Smith’s 1 st Grade Class Eastside Elementary Rogers, AR January 20,2012.
Identifying Similarities & Differences
Measurement Tools Mrs. Eide’s first grade class Mathias Elementary Rogers, Arkansas March 29, 2011 S. Hensley 2011.
Identifying Similarities and Differences Classroom Instruction That Works by Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering and Jane E. Pollock Instructional Strategy.
Using the High Yield Instructional Strategies to Help Narrow the Opportunity/Achievement Gap 2006 Texas Social Studies Supervisors’ Spring Conference March.
Marzano Strategies: Classroom Instruction That Works with Technology Created by Al Beamon TRT Portsmouth Public Schools.
Singular Pronouns Mrs. Davis’ First Grade ELL 2 Group Westside Elementary Rogers, AR October 14, 2011 Susan Hensley Rogers Public Schools.
Researching the History of “Old Glory” Mrs. Kendree Kilsch’s Third Grade Class Grace Hill Elementary / Rogers, AR February 7, 2012 Presentation by Anne.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Mrs. Padilla 4 th Grade Class Adria Trombley Literacy Facilitator Lowell Elementary Rogers, AR May 2, 2011.
© 2005 McREL.  Know generalizations from research and recommended classroom practices related to the nine categories of instructional strategies.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume VIII Support Systems for Quality Curriculum and Instruction.
ED 530 THEORIST PRESENTATION SPRING SEMESTER 2010 SCOTT LENIO Robert J. Marzano.
Effective Teaching Strategies Day 2
Inferring Mrs. Manning’s Third Grade Class Russell D. Jones Elementary Rogers, Arkansas January 10, 2012 K. Maloney Rogers Public Schools.
Welcome and Introductions. Two Year Time-Line for District Year One- Introduce All Nine Strategies & Buildings Will Design Implementation Process Marzano.
Mr. Finley 3 rd -5 th Grade Class Consultant Dr. Jane E. Pollock Grace Hill Elementary Rogers, AR May 11, 2011.
Improving Academic Achievement for All Students AVID Schoolwide Gloria McGehee-Koel, Director AVID, Region VIII Special Thanks to Jim Scarpino, S4 Director.
System Analysis Mrs. Grayson’s 4 th Grade Old Wire Elementary.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume III Curriculum Prioritization and Mapping.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Marzano’s Essential 9 Instructional Strategies Engaged Time = Student Gains.
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement
Is teaching an art or a science?. Do We make a difference? Coleman (1966) discovered that only 10% of student achievement is influenced by what goes on.
TESLA AND H IGH Y IELD S TRATEGIES Leslie Brodie, NBCT, M.Ed. Science Specialist Institute for Math and Science Education University of Arkansas-Fort Smith.
Classroom Instruction that Works: Effective Instructional Strategies February 20, 2009 BISD Investigates.
Classroom Instruction
Laura Brake Mathematics Achievement Specialist
Classroom Instruction that works
Pioneer Schools 5th Grade CCCM Unit 3 Mrs. Harp’s Class
Effective Research-Based Strategies Marzano
Effective Instructional Strategies
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement slide IMPORTANT! Before using this PowerPoint: Review the “Research-Based High Yield Instructional Strategies” Learning Community Resource Packet to better understand the PowerPoint content and for the resources needed to complete some of the activities in this PowerPoint. (In the PowerPoint, directions are italicized. Script is not italicized.) PRESENTER Welcome to this professional development program. Today’s session is part of a series of professional development programs on the practices used by high performing school systems.

West Virginia Department of Education Mission   The West Virginia Department of Education, in conjunction with the Regional Education Service Agencies and the Office of Performance Audits, will create systemic conditions, processes and structures within the West Virginia public school system that result in (1) all students achieving mastery and beyond and (2) closing the achievement gap among sub-groups of the student population. PRESENTER This session is designed to help school systems achieve the two core components of the West Virginia Department of Education Mission. Those two components are: 1. All students achieving mastery and beyond, and 2. Closing the achievement gap among sub-groups of the student population.

Robert Hutchins The Conflict in Education in a Democratic Society “Perhaps the greatest idea that America has given the world is education for all. The world is entitled to know whether this idea means that everybody can be educated or simply that everyone must go to school.” PRESENTER This mission allows us to address a statement made by Robert Hutchins over a decade ago: (Read quotation on slide.) Through No Child Left Behind we can say to the world that we accept not just the responsibility for compulsory education, but also the challenge of education for all.

What We Know… An emerging body of research identifies characteristics of high performing school systems. These school systems have made significant progress in bringing all students to mastery and in closing the achievement gap. These systems share characteristics described in The West Virginia Framework for High Performing Schools. PRESENTER We feel optimistic about this challenge because of a growing body of research. This research indicates that this challenge can be met…many school systems have already made significant progress in achieving the mission of bringing all students to mastery and beyond, and losing the achievement gap.

CURRICULLUM MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES STUDENT/PARENT SUPPORT SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS CULTURE OF COMMON BELIEFS & VALUES Dedicated to “Learning for ALL…Whatever It Takes” HIGH PERFORMING SCHOOL SYSTEM SYSTEMIC CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROCESS CURRICULLUM MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES STUDENT/PARENT SUPPORT Recommended Pre-Reading is The West Virginia Framework for High Performing School Systems. PRESENTER In January of 2004 the Office of School System Improvement formed teams of educators to develop a school system improvement “framework.” Through a series of meetings, the teams read and discussed educational research, developed common definitions of terms, examined the effective practices of high performing districts across the United States and came to consensus on the essential components for closing the achievement gap. These components shaped The West Virginia Framework for High Performing School Systems. Let’s take a look at the Framework. This graphic representation of the Framework illustrates the major components of a High Performing School System. High performing school systems: Have strong core beliefs that shape the culture of a system dedicated to “Learning for ALL...Whatever It Takes.” This culture forms the “base” or “foundation” of the Framework. Implement system wide high yield strategies related to: Curriculum – “what” we teach Instruction – “how” we teach School Effectiveness – “where” we teach Student/Parent Support – “who” we teach These strategies form the four “Pillars” of the Framework. Each Pillar lists high yield practices that need to be used consistently and pervasively throughout high performing school systems. These practices are summarized in The West Virginia Framework for High Performing School Systems. Use a systemic continuous improvement process to bring about improvement. This process forms the “roof” of the Framework. The school system must be dedicated to the concept and process of systemic continuous improvement. Today’s session will focus on one of the high yield practices found in the Instruction Pillar: Research-Based High Yield Instructional Strategies

Objectives Provide a rationale for why schools would benefit from using research-based high yield instructional strategies. Define and identify what research-based high yield instructional strategies look like and how they may be used to increase student achievement. Explain how designing effective professional development is critical to the implementation of high yield instructional strategies. Share objectives with participants

Why focus on research-based high yield instructional strategies? High performing school systems want to enhance the quality of instruction of ALL teachers! PRESENTER High yield strategies are not just for struggling teachers or the best teachers. Implementation of these strategies will improve all instruction. They work with all grade levels and ALL subject areas.

Why focus on research-based high yield instructional strategies? High performing school systems understand that the quality of instruction is a more powerful achievement variable than students’ background characteristics. PRESENTER Our students come from a wide range of home situations and family backgrounds. We cannot let any of that become an excuse for low achievement. We must have high expectations for all, especially those that might have been assumed to be less capable of high level achievement. The use of research-based, high yield instructional strategies can help any student learn, regardless of background. Quality of instruction can overcome what students may lack in their background.

Why focus on research-based high yield instructional strategies? “Sanders concludes that quality instruction is ‘the single biggest factor influencing gains in achievement, an influence many times greater than poverty or per-pupil expenditures.’ ” George Manathey, quoting William Sanders PRESENTER You can add that quality instruction can also overcome poor facilities, lack of materials, different types of schedules, long bus rides, etc. A teacher using high yield strategies can overcome many of the factors that may keep students from learning.

Why focus on research-based high yield instructional strategies? High performing school systems understand that the use of research-based high yield instructional strategies improves instruction, learning and achievement. Share information on slide with participants

Why focus on research-based high yield instructional strategies? “We will never channel productive energy into creating the schools we really want unless we give up the magical belief that test preparation is a suitable surrogate for education. It’s time we replace magical thinking with the real thing: research based… instruction.” Jacqueline Grennon Brooks PRESENTER Jacqueline Grennon Brooks is the author of the article “To See Beyond the Lesson” that is included in the Learning Community Resource Packet. This quote comes from that article. Brooks is also the author of “Schooling for Life: Reclaiming the Essence of Learning” (ASCD 2002). Discuss what “test preparation is a suitable surrogate for teaching” means and how that may differ from “researched based instruction”.

Classroom Instruction that works By School Improvement Instructional Pillar High Yield Instructional Strategies Classroom Instruction that works By Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock PRESENTER Classroom Instruction that Works by Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock contains the “essential nine” research-based high yield instructional strategies.

“We need to discover how a student’s unique brain is wired for reading and writing and then use a range of approaches that matches his or her “literacy style.” - Thomas Armstrong Share information on slide with participants

What about students below grade level? What strategies do you use when you encounter text you don’t understand? What strategies do STUDENTS use when they encounter text they don’t understand? What about students below grade level? The participants provide ways they manage to understand difficult text. Examples from the participants may include: look up the word in a dictionary skip the word and go on to see if other words reveal the meaning see if parts of the word can be broken down using prefixes, suffixes, and root word origin. The participants provide ways students manage to understand difficult text. stay with the text and not give up continue to read on for meaning try to figure out the word’s meaning ask the teacher The participants provide insight on what students below grade level may do. quit reading all together become disruptive and frustrated sleep

Categories of Instructional Strategies That Affect Student Achievement Include identifying similarities and differences Include summarizing and note taking Include reinforcing effort and providing recognition Include homework and practice Include nonlinguistic representations Include cooperative learning Include setting objectives and providing feedback Include generating and testing hypotheses Include questions, cues, and advance organizers PRESENTER The “essential nine” categories of instructional strategies are explained in Classroom Instruction that Works by Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock. Robert J. Marzano, Debra J. Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock have examined decades or research findings to distill their results into nine broad teaching strategies that have positive effects on student learning. This list is not new. But what is surprising is finding out what a big difference it makes, for example, when students learn how to take good notes, work in groups, and use graphic organizers. The authors provide statistical effect sizes and show how these translate into percentile gains for students, for each strategy. Each chapter presents extended classroom examples of teachers and students in action, models of successful instruction; and many rubrics, organizers, and charts to help teachers plan and implement the strategies. To prepare for this book, researchers at Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning McREL analyzed selected research studies on instructional strategies that could be used by teachers in K-12 classrooms.

Identifying Similarities and Differences Presenting students with explicit guidance in identifying similarities and differences enhances students’ understanding of and ability to use knowledge. Asking students to independently identify similarities and differences enhances students’ understanding of and ability to use knowledge. PRESENTER Identifying similarities and differences can be accomplished in a variety of ways: 1. Comparing – identifying similarities and differences among items. 2. Classifying – grouping items into definable categories on the basis of their attributes. 3. Creating Metaphors and Analogies – Identifying a general or basic pattern in a specific topic and then finding another topic that appears to be quite different but that has the same general pattern.

Identifying Similarities and Differences (continued) Representing similarities and differences in graphic or symbolic form enhances students’ understanding of ability to use knowledge. Identification of similarities and differences can be accomplished in a variety of ways. The identification of similarities and differences is a robust activity. Share information on slide with participants

Summarizing and Note Taking “Rule-Based” Strategy Delete trivial material that is unnecessary to understanding. Delete redundant material. Substitute super ordinate terms for lists (e.g., flowers” for “daisies, tulips, and roses”). Select a topic sentence, or invent one if it is missing. PRESENTER What teachers can do: Model how to summarize Model how to paraphrase Encourage students to write about what they read Have students journal about what they’ve read Formats for taking notes are; informal outline, web, and combination notes. Combination notes use both written and graphic representations, and are usually done side-by-side. Teach students a variety of note-taking strategies. Give students teacher-prepared notes. Remind students to review their notes.

The more notes that are taken, the better! Note Taking Verbatim note taking is, perhaps, the least effective way to take notes. Notes should be considered a work in progress. Notes should be used as a study guide for tests. PRESENTER These are generalizations from the research. The more notes that are taken, the better!

Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition If a person is engaged in some activity for reasons of intrinsic motivation and if he begins to receive the external reward, money, for performing the activity, the degree to which he is intrinsically motivated to perform the activity decreases (Deci, 1971, p. 108). PRESENTER Reinforcing Effort Generalizations from the research also include Not all students realize the importance of believing in effort. Students can learn to change their beliefs to an emphasis on effort.

Effective Rewards Reward is most effective when it is contingent on the attainment of some standard of performance (Wiersma, 1992, and Cameron and Pierce, 1994). PRESENTER Providing Recognition Generalizations from the research also include Rewards do not necessarily have a negative effect on intrinsic motivation. Reward is most effective when it is contingent on the attainment of some standard of performance. Abstract symbolic recognition is more effective than tangible rewards.

Homework and Practice Homework and practice are ways of extending the school day and providing students with opportunities to refine and extend their knowledge. Teachers can use both of these practices as powerful instructional tools. PRESENTER Homework Generalizations from the research also include The amount of homework assigned to students should be different from elementary to high school. Parent involvement in homework should be kept to a minimum. “While it is certainly legitimate to inform parents of the homework assigned to their children, it does not seem advisable to have parents help their children with this homework.” “Specifically, many studies show minimal and even negative effects when parents are asked to help student with homework. (Classroom Instruction that Works).”

Homework The amount of homework assigned to students should be different from elementary to middle school to high school. Rule of thumb: 10 minutes a night per grade level. Parent involvement in homework should be kept at a minimum. The purpose of homework should be identified and articulated. If homework is assigned, students should receive comments on it. Homework policies should be established. PRESENTER Purposes of Homework Source: No Child Left Behind (website); Homework Tips for Parents Practice homework is meant to reinforce learning and help students master specific skills. Preparation homework introduces material presented in future lessons. These assignments aim to help students learn new material when it is covered in class. Extension homework asks students to apply skills they already have in new situations. Integration homework requires the students to apply many different skills to a large task, such as book reports, science projects, and creative writing.

Practice Mastering a skill requires a fair amount of focused practice (Anderson, J.R., 1995; Newell & Rosenbloom, 1981). PRESENTER Generalizations from the research also include While practicing, students should adapt and shape what they have learned. Recommendations for classroom practice 1. Charting Accuracy and Speed 2. Focused Practice 3. Conceptual understanding

Nonlinguistic Representations A variety of activities produce nonlinguistic representations Creating graphic representations Making physical models Generating mental pictures Drawing pictures and pictographs Engaging in kinesthetic activity PRESENTER Above are generalizations from the research and also include Nonlinguistic representation should elaborate on knowledge. One of the best ways to learn a new word is to associate an image with it. Using nonlinguistic representations help students represent the knowledge they are learning through Graphic organizers, Pictographic representation, Mental images, Physical models, and Kinesthetic representation

Cooperative Learning Benefits Positive interdependence Face-to-face promotes interaction Individual and group accountability Interpersonal and small group skills Group processing (David Johnson and Roger Johnson, 1999). PRESENTER Cooperative Learning Generalizations from the research also include Organizing groups based on ability levels should be done sparingly. Cooperative groups should be kept rather small in size. Cooperative learning should be applied consistently and systemically, but not overused.

Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback “Providing students with specific information about their standing in terms of particular objectives increased their achievement by 37 percentile points. The most powerful single modification that enhances achievement is feedback. The simplest prescription for improving education must be “dollops of feedback”. (Hattie, 1992, p. 9) PRESENTER Setting Objectives Generalizations from the research also include Instructional goals narrow students’ focus. Instructional goals should not be too specific. Students should be encouraged to personalize the teacher’s goals. Setting Objectives Recommendations for Classroom Practice Set objectives that are not too specific. Personalize objectives for students. Communicate objectives to parents. Negotiate contracts. Providing Feedback Generalizations from the research include Feedback should be “corrective” in nature. Feedback should be timely Feedback should be specific to a curriculum. Students can effectively provide their own feedback.

When students know what they are learning, their performance, on average, has been shown to be 27 percentile points higher than students who do not know what they are learning. PRESENTER These are generalizations from the research.

Generating and Testing Hypotheses Using a variety of structured tasks to guide students through generating and testing hypotheses Systems analysis Problem solving Historical investigation Invention Experimental inquiry Decision making PRESENTER System Analysis – Analyzing the parts of a system and the manner in which they interact. Problem Solving – Overcoming constraints or limiting conditions that are in the way of pursuing goals Historical Investigation – Identifying and resolving issues about which there are confusions or contradictions. Invention – Developing unique products or processes that fulfill perceived needs. Experimental Inquiry – Generating and testing explanations of observed phenomena. Decision Making – Generating and applying criteria to select from among seemingly equal alternatives. Generating and Testing Hypotheses Generalizations from the research include: Hypothesis generation and testing can be approached in a more inductive or deductive manner. Teachers should ask students to clearly explain their hypotheses and their conclusions.

Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers Cues and questions should focus on what is important as opposed to what is unusual. “Higher level” questions produce deeper learning than “lower level” questions. “Waiting” briefly before accepting responses from students has the effect of increasing the depth of students’ answers (Rowe, 1974). PRESENTER These are generalizations from the research.

Questions Questions are effective learning tools when asked before, during and after a learning experience. PRESENTER Using Cues and Questions Generalizations from the research include Cues and questions should focus on what is important, as opposed to what is unusual. “Higher level” questions produce deeper learning than “lower level” questions.

Cues are straightforward ways of activating prior knowledge. Share information on slide with participants .

Advance Organizers Advance organizers should focus on what is important, as opposed to what is unusual. “Higher level” advance organizers produce deeper learning than the “lower level” advance organizers. PRESENTER These are generalizations from the research. Word sort and short articles are provided in presenter’s packet. Word sort is an example of a graphic organizer used to introduce a direct vocabulary instruction and is also used as a pre-reading strategy.

Different types of advance organizers produce different results. Advance organizers are most useful with information that is not well organized. Different types of advance organizers produce different results. Share information on slide with participants

Getting the Full Meaning Students often know how to read, they just don’t use (or know how to use) effective strategies to get the full meaning from the text they read. Share information on slide with participants .

Implementation of Strategies Only one or two strategies should be selected for initial implementation DISCUSSION POINT: Which strategy of the nine you have just studied would be the one you would select for implementation in your district and why? PRESENTER To avoid overwhelming teachers and administrators, high performing districts focus initial implementation of strategies on one or two strategies. Once teachers are comfortable and can effectively use the selected strategies, the district can then provide additional professional development and support to help teachers expand their repertoire. Turn to a partner and discuss the following question: Which strategy of the nine you have just studied would be the one you would select for implementation in your district and why? [Give two or three minutes for partners to discuss, then ask a few participants to share.]

Who should implement? Implementation of one or two selected strategies could begin with --an entire school --designated grade levels --a particular content area DISCUSSION POINT: Refer to the strategy you selected from the the previous discussion. In your district, where would you begin implementation of the strategy? PRESENTER Before implementation of any new strategy begins, district leaders will have some decisions to make about how implementation will occur. For example, will selected strategies be implemented by all teachers in one school (or a selected number of schools). Will implementation begin only with certain grade levels or with teachers in a specific content area? Turn to your partner again and discuss the following question. Refer to the strategy you selected from the previous discussion: In your district, where would you begin implementation of the strategy? [Give two or three minutes for partners to discuss, then ask a few participants to share.]

How will implementation be supported? In high performing school systems, quality professional development, support and monitoring systems related to high yield instructional strategies are a priority. DISCUSSION POINT: As new strategies are implemented, how will your district support and monitor teachers? PRESENTER When high yield instructional strategies are being implemented, high performing school districts make every aspect of implementation a priority, which includes the professional development that introduces the strategies, the systems that help to support teachers as they try new strategies, and the monitoring systems that allow administrators to be aware of how well teachers are implementing new strategies. Let’s consider as a whole group the following question: As new strategies are implemented, how will your district support and monitor teachers? [Lead a whole group discussion around the question on the slide. If participants don’t mention support structures such as study groups and coaches, insert those into the conversation. Participants may also mention monitoring structures such as classroom walkthroughs.]

Primary Source Marzano, R., Pickering, D. and Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works – Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.