Screening, Assessment and Detention Continuum for Juveniles Presented by: Jeff McDonald April 12 – 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of State Health Services (DSHS) House Human Services Committee August 8, 2006.
Advertisements

Senate Criminal Justice Committee Interim Charge 1 June 21, 2006.
Chicago Police Department University of Illinois at Chicago
Stephen R. Gruchacz, M.P.A., CNHA, LNHA Administrator
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Miami-Dade County Florida Juvenile Justice Model
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT (MHSA) “THE NEXT STEP” PREVENTION EDUCATION INTERVENTION (PEI)
Treatment Alternatives to Prison A Health Impact Assessment Scope of research February 2012 Health Impact Assessment – a structured yet flexible research.
Ex-Offenders and Housing
Truancy Court Of Randolph County
Student Welfare: Child Abuse and Neglect Source: Human Resources Department Student Services Department Region I Education Service Center Director of Health.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Preparing for Lease Up: Staff Training for Successful MHSA Supportive Housing Operations MHSA Operations TA Call January 5, 2011 Anne Cory, CSH
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
The Colorado Senate Bill (SB 94) Community Based Detention Program
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Duty to Report Child Abuse, Neglect, and Dependency in North Carolina Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
CHILDREN & FAMILIES IN NEED OF SERVICES Amy Howell Southern Juvenile Defender Center Emory University School of Law.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
DENVER CHILDREN’S ADVOCACY CENTER. ABOUT DCAC: Our mission is to prevent abuse, strengthen families, and restore childhood. DCAC works to improve the.
ADR and ODR in Colorado by Cynthia A. Savage, ODR Director.
Community & Family Resource Center. (CFRC) CFRC is dedicated to strengthening families and communities by providing information, education and support.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
Addressing the Needs of Multi- System Youth: Strengthening the connections between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. DOUGLAS COUNTY CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE.
1 Worcester Public Schools A Collaborative-Proactive Approach to provide a Safe Teaching and Learning Environment.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
Onondaga County DMC Final Report December 13, 2011 Center for Community Alternatives Emily NaPier Juanita Gamble Co-Coordinators.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Combating Truancy Knox County Truancy Initiative and the
May 18, 2009 Montebello Unified School District Presentation By: Debbie Nelson, Director.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
PREPARING YOUR CASE- MEETING & DEALING WITH PROBATION Rachele M. Guerrero SAFE Unit Supervisor Bexar County Juvenile Probation Department.
Juvenile Justice Funding in PA
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FY Budget Worksession July 18, 2007 Scott Bradstreet Deputy Chief of Operations.
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Alternatives to Arrest for School Based Law Enforcement Instructor.
Why We Do It! YOUTH BENEFITS Improved academic performance – Grades, attendances, referrals Ability to address transportation issues Appropriate educational.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,
Office of Juvenile Justice The Office of Juvenile Justice protects the public by providing safe and effective individualized services to youth, who will.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Community Justice Services a Division of the
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
TRIAD Prevention Program
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
House Select Committee on School Safety - Prevention and Response Protocol Subcommittee Recommendations Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative.
Presentation transcript:

Screening, Assessment and Detention Continuum for Juveniles Presented by: Jeff McDonald April 12 – 13, 2011

Why an Assessment Center?

Why an Assessment Center for Jefferson County?  Lack of coordinated juvenile services  Juvenile information exchange  Increased lethality of juvenile violence  Need for a single point of entry  Too many separate juvenile court filings  Lengthy time between arrest and court  Low-level offenses-high level of intervention

JSPC Mission The mission of the Jefferson County Juvenile Assessment Center: We are an assessment center that is responsive to the safety and well being of youth, families, victims, and the Jefferson County Community.

JCJAC Goals  Family and youth have a single access point  Reduce time officers spend with juveniles  Respond comprehensively to the whole juvenile  Provide multi-agency screening and assessment  Ensure community safety The goals of the Jefferson County Juvenile Assessment Center:

Ten Essential Elements of a Juvenile Assessment Center

Target Population First Essential Element

Target Population  Juveniles from the age of  Mildly Intoxicated (BAC below.05)  Mild drug impairment  Delinquent youth  Truant, suspended, expelled youth  Fire setters  Beyond control of parent  Parent/child conflict  Mental health issues  Municipal juvenile violators/warrants

Second Essential Element Referrals

Who Refers to JCJAC ? District Attorney SB-94 R-1 Schools JCMH Police officers: Whether to detain Alternative to detention Criminal and academic information Human Services Runaways & homeless Beyond control of parent Abused and neglected Arvada & Golden Municipal probation and diversion services Municipal warrants: all police agencies District Attorney Sheriff’s Dept. Low risk offenders and case management services Community Education Juvenile Justice education and training: Semi-annual police training Teacher in-services Advice Center: In person or by phone Self referral Parents who need help with children School District Truant At risk youth School based threat assessment Suspended and expelled youth JCJAC

Third Essential Element Single Point of Entry

 Law enforcement  Stakeholder referrals  Family referrals  Self referrals  No wrong door

JCJAC Benefits for Law Enforcement  Law enforcement transports from municipalities and the sheriff's office make up 85% of the youth seen at the JCJAC  Average length of stay of the officer is 5 minutes  Average length of stay of the youth is 4 hours Financial benefit per transport avg. $90.00 per hour 1594 youth served in X $360 = $573, X 4 hours = 6376 officer hours saved 3 years transport: ; ;

Primary Services: Law Enforcement Transport After Transport to JCJAC  Screening and assessment  Referral and recommendations  Release to parents/adults  Detain/placement via Human Services  Psychiatric hold  Detention

Fourth Essential Element Comprehensive Assessments

Immediate and Comprehensive Assessment  Strength based needs assessment  Validated/evidence based screening and assessment tools  Best principles and practices interventions  All community focused

Immediate and Comprehensive Assessment  Colorado Juvenile Risk Assessment (CJRA)  Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument Second Version (MAYSI-2)  Substance Use Survey Second Version (SUS-2)  FEMA Fire Risk Interview Forms  Kearney School Refusal Assessment Scale

Primary Services: Detention Screens Youth assessed in the field with the Colorado Juvenile Detention Screening and Assessment Guide (JDSAG) 1. Mandatory hold factors 2. Juvenile warrants 3. Risk of serious/repeated delinquency 4. Risk of self harm (weapons) 5. Public safety risk 6. Family or community resources

Primary Services: Community Based Treatment Referrals: Linkage to services made based on screens and assessment:  Counseling services  Anger management  Drug/alcohol intervention  Mentoring  School based interventions  Mediation services

Menu of Services Primary Services  Detention Screens  Law Enforcement Transports  Phone Screens  Court Information  Juvenile Justice Training  Community Intervention Referrals  Case Management Secondary Services  Arson Education  Time Out  Bonding  Sex Offender Supervision  School Risk Assessment  School Notification  Data Access  Future….

Fifth Essential Element Terms of Participation

 Voluntary participation  Limited length of stay  Controlled entrance  Informed consent and confidentially

Sixth Essential Element Confidentiality

 Follow federal and state guidelines  Memorandum of Understanding  Mandatory reporters  Protect to the best ability

Seventh Essential Element Juvenile Information Systems

JUVENILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS  Access to view multiple databases  All systems web based  JAC based systems are individualized  All systems secure Juvenile Information Systems

Information Systems Based or used by JAC’s  Colorado Trails  Lexis Nexis / Courtlink  Case Management Systems  Record Management Systems  Juvenile Information Sharing  C.O.P.S.  COPLINK  CCIC/NCIC  Infinite Campus  Mental Health databases

From the Office of the Colorado Attorney General (10.5) "Assessment center for children", as used in sections and , means a multi- disciplinary, community-based center that provides services to children and their families, including, but not limited to, detention screening, case management, and therapeutic intervention relating to delinquency, abuse or neglect, family conflict, and truancy.

From the Office of the Colorado Attorney General Sharing of Information (4.3) School and school district personnel, employees of the state judicial department, employees of state agencies, employees of criminal justice agencies, and employees of assessment centers for children who share information concerning a child pursuant to this part 3 shall be immune from civil and criminal liability if such personnel or employee acted in good faith compliance with the provisions of this part 3.

National JIS Initiative  A national OJJDP initiative supported by the Center for Network Development  JCJAC is the local pilot site vetting the Juvenile Justice XML Data Model (JJXDM)  JJXDM is based on the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)  JCJAC is participating with the State of Colorado’s Children and Youth Information Sharing Project using the JIS Guidelines and the NIEM.  JJAC will be the first site in the nation to conduct data exchanges in a juvenile environment using the JJXDM

Juvenile Information Sharing Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing

Eighth Essential Element Program Administration

 Diverse board representation  Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for multi-agencies  Multi-funding of program  Federal, state and local  Established mission/goals

Ninth Essential Element Sustainability

 Multi-agency co-location  Ongoing assessment of community needs  Diversity of board  Multi-funding streams

JCJAC IGA Contributions The breakdown for contributing partners in the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) is as follows:  Jefferson County (including the District Attorney, Social Services, Mental Health) 46%  Jefferson County Public Schools 14%  12 Local Municipalities and Sheriff’s Office40%

Why JCJAC Works  Cost-effectiveness: co-located budget + operating expense  Collaboration with multiple agencies  Family limitations: less travel=less time=better rapport  Multi-systemic approach to youth and families  Ability to be flexible meeting local needs  Maximizing community partnerships  Low-cost alternative to detaining youth  Co-location of data/information: more comprehensive view of juvenile & family history  Reduction in recidivism Two Federal studies prove the effectiveness

Tenth Essential Element Statewide Initiative

Colorado Juvenile Assessment Center Coalition JAC written into Colorado statues in 2001  Memorandum of Understanding between JACs  Collaboration in ongoing training of center staff  Sharing of information  Description is included in Title 19 of the Colorado Children’s Code Colorado’s six sites  Jefferson County  Larimer County  Arapahoe County  Colorado Springs  Adams County  Pueblo

Questions from Participants?

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention or Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention National Training and Technical Assistance Center For more information or assistance