Www.transportation.ohio.gov John R. Kasich, GovernorJerry Wray, Director Ohio Department of Transportation CONSTRUCTION MONITORS MEETING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Advertisements

Metro Muncipal Agreement Program
Got Federal-aid? Then you must have all the required contract provisions.
Construction Contract Administration LPA/ODOT
Jeffery Peyton Office of Contracts Ohio Department of Transportation.
1 23 CFR Supervising agency (c) When a project is located on a street or highway over which the STD does not have legal jurisdiction, or when special.
LPA Projects LPA projects Alum Creek Bike Trail $3,200,000 Parsons/Livingston $14,500,000 Riversouth Phase $9,900,000 Lane Avenue $1,700,000 Arcadia.
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
Contracts (Charter School/Sponsor and Charter School/EMO) Dana C. Reed, Director of Compliance, South Carolina Public Charter School District.
Requirements for Federal Aid Project Contracts Kenneth Spear, Contracts & Estimates Engineer.
Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.
Regulations Governing the Conduct of Open Seasons for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission February 9, 2005.
Opportunities Exist to Strengthen FHWAs Coordination Guidance and Oversight of the Tribal Transportation Program October 30, 2013.
What You Must Know About Teacher Extension and Renewal Presented by: Maureen Sloane Dianna Hanlon.
Division of Finance Office of External Audits December 2011.
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Office of Management & Budget
Douglas County School District Re.1 Preliminary Budget Fiscal Year 2010 – 2011 Presented to the Board of Education Tuesday April 20, 2010.
Federal and State Monitoring Title I Directors Conference September
MnDOT Metro District State Aid Construction Thursday February 19 th, 2015.
District 4 Local Assistance
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid for Local Transportation Prepared for Minnesota County Highway Accountants Conference April 29, 2010.
4/28/2015 Presented by David McQuay, Jr., CPA 1 Non-Profit Financial Management Florida Non-profit Housing, Inc. Self-help Housing Conference.
Dr. Chellu S. Chetty Associate VP for Research and Sponsored Programs February 23, 2010 Time and Effort Reporting.
With the Genesee County Road Commission By Fred Peivandi, P.E. And Ken Johnson, P.E. Local Road Funding.
0 FY14 State Budget Discussion EEC Board Meeting May 13, 2013.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Review of 2010 Biennial Audit of Capital Projects Cyndi Fout Project Services Director February 28, 2011.
Overview of the Federal Aid Process for Transportation Projects.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES TxDot Grant Fund Project.
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reporting Requirements Presented by: Darryl Grant Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy &
PASBO Conference 3/14/ School District Business Operations – Efficiencies and Internal Controls Matthew J. Malinowski Business Manager Susquehanna.
Closing Out a Federal Aid Construction Project Missouri Local Programs How to Close-Out a Federal Aid Construction Project.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
From the Shredded Files of Big Business Assuring safeguards with effective Financial Policies Pam Baker and Ernest Werstler.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
STATEWIDE INITIATIVE TO BE CONSISTENT TO BE PREDICTABLE TO BE REPEATABLE.
The Auditors are Coming (Part I) Prepare for Federal Program Fiscal Monitoring Visits July 26, 2006.
Restricted Account Status Reports November 29, 2001.
1 BUYING LIGHTNING DATA LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE CHALLENGES TO AVOID ANTI-DEFICIENCY DAN CLEVER DIRECTOR NWS ACQUISITION DIVISION 6/15/05.
The Lifecycle of Grants: Grant Agreement and Fair Housing November 7, 2012.
THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES: WAGES
SCOH – Spring ‘07 Administration of Federal-aid Projects by Local Public Agencies AASHTO Spring Meeting Phoenix, AZ May 4, King W. Gee Associate.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Title I Administrative Meeting September 30, 2010.
San Marino Unified School District Contracts Presentation Presented by: Wesley Lee, Budget Analyst October 28, 2015.
Managing Chapter Funds Brent Woods, Esq., CAE, SPHR NIGP Executive Director for Business Operations and Finance.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
LPA Program Federal-aid Issues for Local Agencies Mike Morrow – December 10, 2010.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Office of Estimating 2015 OCA Leadership Forum.
1 © 2013 Protiviti Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared for use by OOCEA’s management, audit committee, and board of directors. This.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
MnDOT AUDIT 2016 COUNTY HIGHWAY ACCOUNTANTS CONFERENCE ANNUAL FEDERAL CITY COUNTY AUDIT DISCUSSION.
Compliance with CCNA F.S..  Advertisement  Longlist  Shortlist  Request for Proposal  Scope of Services Meeting  Technical Proposal Review.
Legal Services Public Information Policy Administration Board Services
District and Club Qualification
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
FHWA Funding, Monitoring & Reporting
State Aid Construction
SMAA SMAA 101 What is SMAA?.
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Rachelle Fougere:
District and Club Qualification
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
State Aid Construction
THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES: WAGES
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Britt Bell:
SMAA SMAA 101 What is SMAA?.
Presentation transcript:

John R. Kasich, GovernorJerry Wray, Director Ohio Department of Transportation CONSTRUCTION MONITORS MEETING

2 Updates to the Construction Section of the LPA Manual Preconstruction Conference Section Language added to include discussion of the EEO, DBE and Prevailing Wage responsibilities. LPA requirement to inform the general public of general project information, lane and road closures, and/or any temporary restrictions to road access that will be experienced during the construction.

3 Updates to the Construction Section of the LPA Manual Construction Contract Requirements for EEO, DBE & Prevailing Wage Compliance Section Interviews to be done no more frequently than once a month for single year projects Language added clarifying the new requirement that the project Bulletin Board be readily accessible to all employees, applicants for employment and potential employees. Language deleted stating that the Bulletin Board can be kept in the project Superintendent/foreman’s truck.

4 Updates to the Construction Section of the LPA Manual Recovery of Overhead and Fringe Section (added) Language added that outlines in detail the 3 methods that the LPAs may utilize to recover overhead and fringe costs associated with force account work on federally funded projects. Time Keeping Requirements of LPA Time Sheets must be completed for employees Must be prepared at least monthly Must be signed by the employee

5 Updates to the Construction Section of the LPA Manual Construction Monitor Responsibilities Section Invoices A copy of the fully executed Local-let Summary and Payable invoice should be sent to the LPA for their records. Finalization Language added stating that the CM will work with other District disciplines (REA, DEC, PW/EEOCC, LPA Manager, etc.) to complete the LPA Project Evaluation Form.

6 CSFs/ OPI/ Local Programs Distribution CSFs – Capital Program – Contribute towards $1.5 B Quarter of the Federal funds sold through LL Program Project Award On-Time Local-let 85% Award On-Time On-Time defined as actual project award occurring no later than 30 days after locked award

7 CSF/ OPI/ Local Programs Distribution Program Distribution Split (dollars awarded) Historically 4 th Qtr. Heavy; 50% Locals get budgets in Jan., PS & E late winter, sell in the spring OPI Plan File to meet 90% on time delivery Plan File from the District to C.O. to meet the locked program. Historically 80% Goal / 88% Hit last 2 years

8 LPA Process Reviews Purpose: To review local practices and procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements of State and Federal laws, regulations, and policies as outlined in the Department’s Stewardship and Oversight Agreement with FHWA. Report recommendations and Best Practices in LPA Program Management

9 Risk Factor Ratings How much will the LPA receive in Federal funds in the next two years? > $10M $10M - $5M $5M - $1M $1M - $500k <$500k 2 How much has the LPA received in Federal funds in the last three years? > $30M$15-$30M $7M- $15M $3M-$7M<$3M 3 How many projects will the LPA administer in the next two years? How many projects has the LPA administered in the last three years? Has a QAR been performed on the LPA in the last four years? No Yes 6 Is the LPA in a high risk ODOT district?*2, 612, 4 8, 7, 3, 11 5, 19, 10 7 Has the District recommended a LPA / specific project has high risk? Yes-- No

10 LPA Performance Reviews City of Kettering - 10/18 Seneca County Engineer - 11/21 City of Dayton - 12/14 Franklin County Engineer- 1/17 Montgomery County Engineer - 2/16 Hamilton County Engineer - 3/13 Cuyahoga County Engineer - 4/17 Stark County Engineer - 5/5 City of Toledo - 5/24

11 LPA Performance Reviews Review Team will include: Local Programs Section (Randy Lane and Jeff Peyton) Office of Construction Administration (Naureen Dar)

12 LPA Retainage Retainage of 8% on labor for the first 50% of the work is required on projects (ORC ) Find that Locals typically do not co-mingle the Federal fund reimbursement with retainage – i.e. take off the top prior to invoice There has been confusion regarding how to account for retainage and how to reimburse retainage without delaying closeout of the project with ODOT.

13 LPA Retainage Methods for discussion: funded locally / reimbursed with final invoice (not held for warranty period) OR have evidence of escrow accounts for federal participation. All funds retained shall be deposited in an escrow account (ORC ) to the contractor Require verification of account Set up separate encumbrance to the LPA for deposit into escrow Invoice details payments to contractor and payments to lpa for retainage

14 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES OF WORK ODOT C&MS (D) AND TABLE PROVIDES DECREASE FACTORS FOR SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN UNIT BID PRICE CONTRACT ITEMS INCOPRORATED INTO ODOT LPA BID DOCUMENT TEMPLATE INSTEAD OF (D) AND TABLE THE LPA HAS THE OPTION TO USE LANGUAGE FROM 23 CFR (A)(3)

15 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES OF WORK language from 23 CFR (a)(3): Significant changes in the character of work. (i) The engineer reserves the right to make, in writing, at any time during the work, such changes in quantities and such alterations in the work as are necessary to satisfactorily complete the project. Such changes in quantities and alterations shall not invalidate the contract nor release the surety, and the contractor agrees to perform the work as altered. (ii) If the alterations or changes in quantities significantly change the character of the work under the contract, whether such alterations or changes are in themselves significant changes to the character of the work or by affecting other work cause such other work to become significantly different in character, an adjustment, excluding anticipated profit, will be made to the contract. The basis for the adjustment shall be agreed upon prior to the performance of the work. If a basis cannot be agreed upon, then an adjustment will be made either for or against the contractor in such amount as the engineer may determine to be fair and equitable. (iii) If the alterations or changes in quantifies do not significantly change the character of the work to be performed under the contract, the altered work will be paid for as provided elsewhere in the contract. (iv) The term “significant change” shall be construed to apply only to the following circumstances: When the character of the work as altered differs materially in kind or nature from that involved or included in the original proposed construction; or When a major item of work, as defined elsewhere in the contract, is increased in excess of 125 percent or decreased below 75 percent of the original contract quantity. Any allowance for an increase in quantity shall apply only to that portion in excess of 125 percent of original contract item quantity, or in case of a decrease below 75 percent, to the actual amount of work performed.