WI State Report RVIPP, Indianapolis, IN June 9-10, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Transition from Opti on B to B+: Rwanda Experience MUGWANEZA Placidie, Coordinator of HIV prevention Unit/RBC/MOH ART in pregnancy, breastfeeding.
Advertisements

Overview of the Study Protocol
June 11, 2009 Board Meeting Presented by: Sharonica L. Hardin, PHR, St. Louis Public Schools & Matt McGrath, Holmes Murphy & Associates.
1 American Community Survey: Update New Jersey State Data Center Meeting June 11, 2008 Nancy Torrieri American Community Survey Office.
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
1 Targeted Case Management (TCM) Changes Iowa Medicaid Enterprise October 14, 2008.
Title X Objectives How Writing Measurable Objectives Helps DSHS Evaluate the Success of Your Title X Project.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
1 Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (OCIIO) OCIIO Office of Oversight Office of Insurance Programs Office of Consumer Support Office.
Yudatiningsih I.1,Sunartono H.1,SuryawatiS.2
National Online HIV/STI Partner Notification Service Presented by Dónal Heath – Project Manager, GMFA.
Expanding and Improving STD Services during Resource Limited Times Heather James STD Field Services Supervisor Maricopa County STD Program.
Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2010 The Nielsen Company The New Zealand Farmers Weekly Readership Report National Readership Survey (January –
Wisconsin State Report RVIPP Meeting March 4-5, 2009 Highlight Updates Screening Projects: Prevalence Evaluation Update; Expanded GC Screening in Milwaukee.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS & PLANNING STRUCTURE & PROCESS.  BOCC Department of Justice Affairs obtained Federal VAWA grant to conduct planning  Contracted with.
Partner notification for chlamydia by postal kit: pilot study results Gill Bell Nurse Consultant Sexual Health Adviser.
1 RVIPP – Michigan Update Amy Peterson, MPH Michigan Department of Community Health June 10, 2010.
MINNESOTA STATE REPORT RVIPP Regional Meeting Indianapolis By Candy Hadsall June 9-10, 2010.
Oregon Project Independence Rule and Fee Schedule update September 26, 2013.
Annual Register Verification Training Presented By: OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL New York City Department of Education.
Assessment of Chlamydia Rescreening Practices Kelly Opdyke, MPH Region II IPP Advisory Committee Mtg May 16-17, 2007 Cicatelli Associates Inc.
STD Screening in HIV Clinics: Value and Implications Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University Deborah Cohen, MD MPH RAND Corporation.
Field Based Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Nilmarie Guzmán,MD & Michael Sands,MD University of Florida/Jacksonville and the Duval County Health Department.
Repeat Chlamydial Infections in Region III Family Planning Clinics: Implications for Screening Programs Pamela G. Nathanson, Family Planning Council, Inc.
RVIPP Regional Meeting June 23-26, 2009 Indiana State Report
Pertussis Prevention for Pregnant Women: P 3 W Protecting Infants.
Expedited Partner Therapy in Wisconsin STD Control Section Wisconsin Division of Public Health June 2010.
Screening and Treatment for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia as an HIV Prevention Strategy: Rationale and Implementation Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University.
Self-Select Voluntary Separation Program (SSVSP) 1.
Appropriate CT/GC Screening & Factors to Consider Becky McCoy MSN, RN, CEN STD Nurse Consultant.
Analysis of Chlamydia Re-testing Rates Massachusetts Family Planning Update.
Infertility Prevention Project Region I June 1, 2009 Wells Beach, Maine Infertility Prevention Project Region I June 1, 2009 Wells Beach, Maine Steven.
Reaching Out to Providers Summary of Region II IPP Tools.
AcademyHealth Public Health Systems Research Interest Group Meeting Public Health Data Panel.
Development and evaluation of software to support prescribing and drug supply management in the treatment of MDR-TB in Peru. Fraser H, Choi S, Jazayeri.
Re-Screening of CT Positive Clients in Region X IPP, Goldenkranz S., 1 Fine D. 1 1 Center for Health Training 2010 CDC STD Prevention Meeting,
Billing at the Milwaukee Health Department Clinics: An Analysis of Potential Revenue Gains Presented by: Jamie Aulik Victoria Deitch Emily Pope Eric Thomasgard.
Baltimore Update: SSuN, Challenges in implementation Clinic-based dataset: – Existing clinic data system (Insight™) – Minimal barriers to electronic.
Region I IPP Clinic Staff and Provider Assessment Kim Watson, Jennifer Kawatu.
STDs among Men who Have Sex with Men (MSM), San Francisco 2007—2010 STD Prevention and Control Services San Francisco Department of Public Health.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Increasing the Efficiency of STI Clinics by Tailoring Services Based on a Risk Triage System Julie A. Subiadur, BSN, CCRC BC Brandy Mitchell, RN Dean McEwen.
US Virgin Islands IPP: Use of Limited Resources Taetia Phillips-Dorsett, MS Territorial Director, USVI DOH STD/HIV/TB Program Region II IPP Advisory Meeting.
GC Outbreak in Philadelphia Greta Anschuetz, MPH Philadelphia Department of Public Health
SSuN: MSM prevalence monitoring and HIV Testing in STD Clinics Kristen Mahle & Lori Newman SSuN Call #3 Oct 30, 2008.
Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department National Coalition of STD Directors Phoenix,
WI State Report RVIPP Meeting Chicago: February 2-3, 2011.
Region II IPP Data & Infrastructure Performance Measures Kelly Opdyke, MPH Region II IPP Advisory Committee Mtg May 16-17, 2007 Cicatelli Associates Inc.
IPP Measures of Effectiveness Utilization of Data to Evaluate and Inform Project Activities December 12, 2007 Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH Region II Infertility.
Infrastructure Update Jennifer Kawatu Kim Watson Andee Krasner
Targeting Chlamydia Screening Resources Region II IPP Advisory Meeting May 31, 2006 Kelly Opdyke, MPH Cicatelli Associates Inc.
BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF CHLAMYDIA REINFECTION IN REGION VIII FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS FOR Hamby, Y, JSI Research & Training Institute Donovan,
Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department.
Using an Outreach Planner to Accelerate Private Provider Recruitment Jennifer West, MPH Health Educator VaxTrack Immunization Registry Riverside County.
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
IPP Infrastructure Measures of Effectiveness: Preliminary Data and Next Steps Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH Region II Infertility Prevention Project Cicatelli.
Check Your Risk: Increasing School-Based STI Screening Participation Among District of Columbia High School Students Michelle Jasczyński, Ed.M. Public.
STOP CHLAMYDIA PROGRAM
City of Milwaukee Health Department
Universal Screening to Assess Chlamydia Prevalence and Risk Among Older Women Attending Family Planning Clinics in Wisconsin Roberta (Bobbie) McDonald.
Cost of Screening Outside of IPP Chlamydia Screening Guidelines
Infertility Prevention Project Coordinator CDC/CCID/NCHHSTP/DSTDP/PTB
2008 National STD Prevention Conference Chicago, Illinois
Region II IPP Performance Measure IPP CS1 and IPP CS2 Project Area Trend Report IPP CS1: Timely treatment of women with chlamydia at IPP Family Planning.
Finding Sex Partners On-Line: What’s the Risk for STI
Review of Recommendations for Partner Services
Addressing Overscreening at MIC: A Team Approach
Presentation transcript:

WI State Report RVIPP, Indianapolis, IN June 9-10, 2010

Wisconsin State Report RVIPP Meeting Indianapolis: June 9-10, 2010 Timeliness to Treatment Update State Report Update Status of Re-testing for Chlamydia

Timeliness to Treatment Update  Status on Wisconsin Action Items Reported Morbidity Positives vs. RVIPP Positives  To be addressed by December 2010 Treatment Rates vs. Data Collection Issues  To be addressed through Tx Audits in PPW, FP and STD clinics WI Planned Parenthood Chart Audit  To be completed July 2010 Family Planning & STD Clinic Chart Audits  To be completed by December 2010

Timeliness to Treatment  WI Planned Parenthood STD Tx Audit STD Treatment Audit Tool to be completed by the end of June 2010  Will field test tool in one PPW clinic in early June  25 charts to be reviewed: (20 females, 5 males) Positive CT and/or GC test results for males and females

Timeliness to Treatment  Conduct Chart Audit July 2010 in all PPW Sites Statewide (27 clinics) using STD Tx Audit Tool WSLH will generate a line list of positive female and male patients for CT and GC for each clinic site from SLH laboratory positives  Select date range for positive patients to allow 120 days for quality assurance check on practice of re-test High volume clinics: randomly select maximum of 25 positives from 4 th quarter 2009 Medium volume clinics: randomly select maximum of 25 positives from 4 th quarter 2009 Low volume clinics: select positives from 2009 up to a maximum of 25 positives

Timeliness to Treatment  Evaluation of Chart Audit for STD Tx Rate PPW sites will complete the audit tool electronically from chart review HCET will compile electronic forms into an STD TX audit database Results available for STD Grant application August 2010

Wisconsin State Report Update  April GYT 2010 Update  School Based Clinics in Milwaukee Update  Male FP Medicaid Waiver  EPT Update  Rural Screening Project  Status of Re-screening in Wisconsin

April GYT 2010 Update  Universal testing on 4 days in April 2010 offered at 27 PPW clinics for CT (& GC in Milwaukee clinics only)  In 2009, we were able to offer “free” CT-GC testing for entire month; used data in lieu of planned “Universal Screening” study. Identified approximately 1200 “extra” tests based on average month.

GYT 2010 PPW Data  Criteria for noting “GYT” on lab slip not consistently defined  Similar proportion met SSC (74 vs. 81%)  Higher number reached via GYT?  Possibly higher risk patients? Numbers are small… Met Selective Screening Criteria Did NOT meet SSC # Pos# Tested% Pos# Pos# Tested% Pos “GYT” on LRF % % “GYT” not on LRF % %

Milwaukee School Based Clinics Update 2010  Testing in 15 SBC began Jan 2009 Low volume of testing/positivity at first Volume and positivity picking up Higher-risk kids more comfortable with health center presence? Staff efforts? # Tested#/% Pos CT#/%Pos GC 1-2 Q ‘ / 9.3%0/0% 3-4 Q ‘ /14.2%6/3.5% 1-2Q ’10* 18538/20.5%10/5.4%

Male FP Waiver Update  Male FP Waiver Effective May 1, 2010 Covers office visit, STD tests, treatment, condoms for year olds, up to 200% poverty, with 30 days to complete enrollment application following presumptive eligibility enrollment

EPT Update  EPT signed into Wisconsin Law May 11, 2010  Becomes effective May 26, 2010  EPT allowed for one dose therapy for CT, GC, Trichomoniasis No name prescription allowed if partner name not obtainable, in which case, ‘EPT’ required to be written on prescription  An information sheet for patient/partner developed by the Wisconsin DPH must be delivered by the provider with EPT, as required by the new law ready for distribution June 1  WEB site and official DPH letter of announcement to providers launched June 1  Guidance for providers under development, ready for distribution June 15 th  Training for implementation for Family Planning Providers scheduled for July and September WFPRHA meetings  Plans for evaluation under development

Rural Screening Project  4 sites in Northern Wisconsin participated in Universal screening for the months of April and May Objective: to estimate CT prevalence in rural clinic populations Determine if there are risk criteria outside of the evidence based SSC currently in use in WI FP which add greater sensitivity to the risk assessment for CT and GC infection in men and women attending these clinics

Rural Screening Project  Preliminary Findings Nuances of interviewing patients important  Consider the consistency and how questions are asked and perceived by the patient Numbers are small, but prevalence appears to be under 3% threshold Final analysis pending  Will present at Winter RVIPP meeting

Status of Re-Screening  Plan to evaluate rates of re-screening in FP as a quality assurance measure in FP clinics Plan to include ‘Re-screened?’ field in STD Tx Audit Tool in PPW in July 2010  PPW will add a required field for ‘Re-screened?’ to Electronic Medical Record when ready in July 2011  Re-screening will be discussed during annual WFPRHA meeting in September 2010 as part of Quality Assurance discussion  Specific guidance on writing in re-screened information on the LRF until a permanent field is in place on the LRF will be provided during a November SLH and STD Update Teleconference Recommendations in guidance to re-screen will include males (any input from RVIPP group during June 2010 meeting?) and females  When have SSC changes from prevalence evaluations finalized, will add these changes and ‘Re-screened?’ field to laboratory request form at SLH