Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In the Matter of Stanley R. JUHNKE Kansas Supreme Court, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Richard A. ALCORN and Steven Feola Supreme Court of Arizona, 202 Ariz. 62, 41 P.3d 600.
Advertisements

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Richard A. ALCORN and Steven Feola Supreme Court of Arizona, 202 Ariz. 62, 41 P.3d 600.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re FROST Supreme Court of New Jersey, 171 N.J. 308, 793 A.2d 699 (2002) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SCHAFER Supreme Court of Washington, 149 Wash.2d 148,
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. JIMENEZ RECIO 537 U.S. 270 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. U.S. v. Willard JOHNSON U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 327 F.3d 554 (2003) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. COURCHESNE Supreme Court of Connecticut, 262 Conn. 537, 816 A.2d 562 (2003) Case.
Filing an Eviction Action The presentation will begin in approximately 20 seconds.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. TWEEDY, Supreme Court of Oklahoma 2000.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. DECK v. MISSOURI 125 S.Ct (2005) Case Brief.
© 2005 by Thomson DelmarLearning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ETHICS IN LITIGATION.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
(1) Basic Obligation of Care  Ethics Rules  MRPC 1.1) Competence reasonably necessary for the [particular] representation  legal knowledge  skill 
Mid-America Regulatory Conference Kansas City, Missouri June 8, 2010.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COHEN v. BAYSIDE S&L 62 Misc.2d 738, 309 N.Y.S.2d 980 (1970) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LUCY v. ZEHMER 196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954) Case Brief.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Introduction to Interviewing and Investigating.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BLANTON v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 489 U.S. 538 (1989) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. COLBY v. CARNEY HOSPITAL 356 Mass. 527, 254 N.E.2d 407 (1969) Case Brief.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
1 ABA Approved Paralegals Legal assistants approved by the Standing Committee on Paralegals within the American Bar Association are called ABA Approved.
Short Sales, Debt Adjustment and Unauthorized Practice of Law By Benjamin R. Kuhn The Kuhn Law Firm, PLLC Raleigh, NC.
LAWYER. Lawyers give people and companies advice and tell them what they can and can't do under the law. Sometimes, they hire lawyers to take their side.
Chapter 1 Lawyers, Legal Assistants, and the Regulation of the Legal Profession.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PAPACHRISTOU v. JACKSONVILLE 405 U.S. 156 (1972) Case Brief.
Chapter Two Unauthorized Practice of Law In this chapter, you will learn about: The history of the unauthorized practice of law Definitions of practice.
Calendaring, Docket Control, and Case Management Chapter 7 Practical Law Office Management, 3 rd Edition, Thomson Delmar Learning ©2007 Thomson Delmar.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. GRIFFIN v. CALIFORNIA 380 U.S. 609 (1965) Case Brief.
Ethical Issues of Case Management Unit 8 Seminar ©2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
PA 253- Legal Ethics SEMINAR UNIT TWO
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BROWN v. SOUTHLAND 620 F.Supp (E.D.Mo. 1985) Case Brief.
The Legal Team, Law Practices, and Law Firm Governance Practical Law Office Management, 3 rd Edition, Thomson Delmar Learning ©2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Week 9.  Arising out of prior or simultaneous representation of another party in the case  Arising out of relationship with opposing attorneys  Arising.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PENNSYLVANIA v. BRUDER 488 U.S. 9 (1988) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. Pamela L. PETERS Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 263 Wis.2d 475, 665 N.W.2d 171 (2003)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MASSACHUSETTS v. SHEPPARD 468 U.S. 981 (1984) Case Brief.
Kaplan University - Adjunct Professor Brian Tippens, J.D. - October 24, Welcome to Legal Ethics Unit One : Preview.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LYNCH v. LYNCH 164 Ariz. 127 (1990) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. LOWE v. QUINN 27 N.Y.2d 397, 267 N.E.2d (N.Y. 1971) Case Brief.
Concise Guide to Paralegal Ethics Third Edition Therese A. Cannon.
Unit 5 Midterm Review. What are some of the components of the ABA?
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PEOPLE v. MITCHELL 58 N.Y.2d 368, 448 N.E.2d 121 (1983) Case Brief.
Copyright Megan Gallagher, Esq Attorney OMG, Esq., a very successful sole practitioner, has hired 2 paralegals to help with her thriving practice.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. STAFFORD 223 Kan. 62, 573 P.2d 970 (Kan. 1977) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE v. LEE 353 N.W.2d 213 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE v. WILLIAMS Supreme Court of Iowa 695 N.W.2d 23 (2005) Case Brief.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. ISHMAEL v. MILLINGTON 241 Cal.App.2d 520, 50 Cal.Rptr.592 (1966) Case Brief.
Chapter 7 Calendaring, Docket Control & Case Management.
CHAPTER SEVEN COMMUNICATING RESEARCH RESULTS. EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES l Understand the various forms of communication l Appreciate the purpose of an.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. OREGON STATE BAR v. SMITH 149 Or.App. 171, 942 P.2d 793 (1997) Case Brief.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. FINE v. DELALANDE, INC. 545 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) Case Brief.
Eliseo Lugo III.  Objectives: By the end of class, students will be able to:  Name at least five situations in which a person might wish to consult.
1 ETHICAL LAWYERING CLASS 3. 2 Cal. Bus. & Prof (a) Any person advertising or holding himself or herself out as practicing or entitled to practice.
STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. v. WENTZ 172 F.2d 80 (3d Cir. 1948)
Chapter 6 Issue Identification
BROWN v. BROWN 300 So. 2d 719 (Fla. DCA 1974)
STATE v. KINGMAN 463 P.2d 638 (Wash. 1970)
Copyright 2006 Thomson Delmar Learning.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER 53 Ill.App.2d 299, 202 N.E.2d 841 (1964)
Chapter 2: The Importance of the Resume
Chapter 6 Issue Identification
Chapter 10 Legal Writing Process
Chapter 4 Case Law and Case Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In the Matter of Stanley R. JUHNKE Kansas Supreme Court, 273 Kan. 162, 41 P.3d 855 (2002) Case Brief

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re JUHNKE PURPOSE: Juhnke shows that an attorney may be disciplined for failing to supervise a nonattorney assistant.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re JUHNKE CAUSE OF ACTION: Disciplinary action against an attorney.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re JUHNKE FACTS: Hyter, a disbarred attorney, was hired by Juhnke as a legal assistant for several years. Hyter operated very much like an attorney with very little supervision from Juhnke, who charged clients for Hyters services at the same rate he charged for his own services.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re JUHNKE ISSUE: Should Juhnke be disciplined for failing to supervise a nonattorney assistant and for aiding the assistant in the unauthorized practice of law?

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re JUHNKE HOLDING: Juhnke should be disciplined by published censure for violating the Kansas attorney ethics rules.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. In re JUHNKE REASONING: An attorney employing a disbarred attorney as a legal assistant runs the risk that the disbarred attorney may perform services amounting to the practice of law without adequate supervision. The practice of law includes legal advice and counsel, and the preparation of legal instruments and contracts by which legal rights are secured, in addition to representation in court. Unlike other paralegals, the disbarred attorney is prohibited from contact with clients. Juhnke failed to properly supervise Hyter.

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.