Rule 47 Petitions Beverly Flanagan Supervisory Petitions Examiner (703) 305-7202.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Advertisements

1. Parties have contractual capacity 2. Contract has legal purpose 3. Offer 4. Acceptance 5. Consideration 6. Statute of Frauds compliance.
Landlord-Tenant Issues in JP Court
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
Joint Meeting of PIPLA and NJIPLA February 7, 2012 Kenneth N. Nigon RatnerPrestia 1.
The Patent Bar March 10, 2015 Scott Skiles, JD ‘15
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
Collecting a Judgment Small Claims Court Advisory Program of the Legal Aid Society of Orange County Revised
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
Presented by Jennifer Coughlin Eugene, Oregon April 10, 2013.
Filing for a United States Patent “Helpful Hints” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
CHAGAL - OATH AND POWER OF ATTORNEY 1 The inventor must provide an oath (swearing) or a declaration (acknowledging the penalties of perjury: see.
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
New Attorney Seminar February 26, OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION Documents generally Notices of Hearings Motions Proposed Orders.
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
Form I-9 Process An Online Training for Supervisors and Designees Presented by Human Resources Revised November 2009.
Law and Motion. A Motion is an application to the court requesting some kind of relief or court order May be oral or written General types of motions.
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 13, 2008 Trade Secret – Part 3.
Filing a Patent Application: Procedures and Tips
FAMILY LAW WORKSHOP. PRESENTED BY FAMILY LAW FACILITATOR VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Title Records Chapter 13 D. Zaharopoulos.  Title: bundle of rights recognized & protected by law  Deed: document used in the transfer of ownership in.
Filing in the Law Office A Primer. Filing in the Law Office Materials: File folders Sub-file Folders (suggestions)  Accounting  Correspondence (attorney/client)
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor Legal Representative of Inventor or Assignee.
EService Process Descriptions. COSCA/NACM Standards for Electronic Filing Processes Technical and Business Approaches Section 1.2A Court rules may provide.
2010 USPAP Changes & Common USPAP/UA Interfaces Federal Agency Update Sponsored by the Appraisal Institute and the International Right of Way Assoc. 1/26/10.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
Starring: Ofelia Calderón, Esq. – Calderón Seguin, as Immigration Judge Ivan Yacub, Esq. – Yacub Law Offices, LLC as Private Immigration Counsel Edward.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 8 September 13, 2002 Professor Fischer.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Civil Procedure – L.A. 310 Summons, Complaint Service of Process.
Legal Document Preparation Class 12Slide 1 Functions of the Discovery Process Narrow the issues –After investigation, you can more easily determine which.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
1 10 ways to prevent legal malpractice Protect yourself and your firm.
Supervision SICOR Securities, Inc.. Why? NASD 3110 requires the firm to “…establish and maintain a system to supervise the activities of each registered.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Chapter 38 Agency Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
CHAPTER 15 Writing to the Court. The Bluebook Rule 3.2 – Pinpoint Citations Directs the reader to the exact page that the cite information can be found.
Field Work Laws and Regulations. Field Work Laws and Regulations This is one of a series of mini – modules designed to give the auditor guidance in the.
to be able to read and understand letters of engagement when communicating with a patent agent Documents involved: A Letter of Engagement IP Language.
Revised C.A.R. 3.4 and D&N Appeals. Jurisdictional Requirements C.A.R. 3.4(a) and (b) A final, appealable order A timely filed notice of appeal Standing.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
No-answer and Post-answer
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor
SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL WRITING Patents
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
The Procurement and Supply Manager’s Desk Reference Second Edition
Agreements OSR Symposium
Target Hires Key Executive Away From Amazon Ch-6 Pg
Filing of a U.S. Patent Application
EVICTIONS.
Presentation transcript:

Rule 47 Petitions Beverly Flanagan Supervisory Petitions Examiner (703)

47(a) and 47(b) – The Difference 47(a) –When one or more of the named inventors did not sign the declaration –Other inventors have signed (ex. two inventors sign and one does not) 47(b) –When none of the of the named inventors signs the declaration –Entity with sufficient proprietary interest steps in

Two “Types” of Petition Non-Signing inventor refuses to sign Non-Signing inventor cannot be found

47(a) – Refuses to Sign Petition Requirements 1) Petition fee ($130) 2) Surcharge ($130 or $65) if the petition is filed in response to a Notice to File Missing Parts - must be the address where the non-signing inventor customarily receives mail 3) Last Known Address of the non-signing inventor(s) [MPEP (e)]

47(a) – Refuses to Sign, con’t - must be stated to be the last known address of the inventor 4) Proof that a copy of the entire application was sent or given to the non-signing inventor for review [MPEP (d)] - must be a copy of the entire application papers (spec, claims, drawings and declaration) - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of a cover letter transmitting the entire

47(a) – Refuses to Sign, con’t application papers b. affidavit setting forth facts and details, signed by a person having first-hand knowledge 5) Proof that the inventor refuses to sign - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of a written refusal b. oral refusal – affidavit providing facts and details of the refusal signed by the person to whom the refusal was made

47(a) – Refuses to Sign, con’t - no response may be tantamount to a refusal to sign 6) Declaration in compliance with 37 CFR 1.63

47(a) – Cannot Be Found Petition Requirements 1) Petition fee ($130) 2) Surcharge ($65 or $130) if the petition is filed in response to a Notice to File Missing Parts 3) Last Known Address of the non-signing inventor [MPEP (e)] - must be stated to be the last known address of the inventor

47(a) – Cannot Be Found, con’t 4) Proof that diligent efforts have been made to locate the non-signing inventor [MPEP (d)] - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of an envelope showing that a letter was sent to the last know address of the inventor and was returned as undeliverable b. affidavit setting forth facts and details regarding the efforts made to locate the non-signing inventor; signed by a person having first hand knowledge of the facts

47(a) – Cannot Be Found, con’t 5) Declaration in compliance with 37 CFR 1.63

47(b) – Refuses to Sign Petition Requirements 1) Petition fee ($130) 2) Surcharge ($65 or $130) if the petition is filed in response to a Notice to File Missing Parts 3) Last Known Address of the non-signing inventor [MPEP (e)] - must be stated to be the last known address of the inventor

47(b) – Refuses to Sign, con’t 4) Proof that a copy of the entire application was sent or given to the non-signing inventor for review [MPEP (d)] - must be a copy of the entire application papers (spec, claims, drawings and declaration) - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of a cover letter transmitting the entire

47(b) – Refuses to Sign, con’t application papers b. affidavit setting forth facts and details, signed by a person having first-hand knowledge 5) Proof that all of the inventors refuse to sign - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of a written refusal b. oral refusal – affidavit providing facts and details of the refusal signed by the person to whom the refusal was made

47(b) – Refuses to Sign, con’t - no response may be tantamount to a refusal to sign - may require individual proof of refusal for each inventor 6) Proof that the Rule 47 Applicant has sufficient proprietary interest in the subject matter to justify the filing of the application - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of the employment agreement b. copy of an assignment agreement

47(b) – Refuses to Sign, con’t c. legal memorandum signed by an attorney familiar with the law of the jurisdiction stating that a court of competent jurisdiction would, by the weight of the authority, award the title of the invention to the Rule 47(b) applicant 7) Proof of irreparable damage - Acceptable Proof: - statement by the Rule 47(b) applicant that the filing of the application is necessary to preserve the rights of the parties

47(b) – Refuses to Sign, con’t 5) Declaration in compliance with 37 CFR 1.63

47(b) – Cannot Be Found Petition Requirements 1) Petition fee ($130) 2) Surcharge ($65 or $130) if the petition is filed in response to a Notice to File Missing Parts 3) Last Known Address of the non-signing inventor [MPEP (e)] - must be stated to be the last known address of the inventor

47(b) – Cannot Be Found, con’t 4) Proof that diligent efforts have been made to locate the non-signing inventor [MPEP (d)] - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of an envelope showing that a letter was sent to the last know address of the inventor and was returned as undeliverable b. affidavit setting forth facts and details regarding the efforts made to locate the non-signing inventor; signed by a person having first hand knowledge of the facts

47(b) – Cannot Be Found, con’t 6) Proof that the Rule 47 Applicant has sufficient proprietary interest in the subject matter to justify the filing of the application - Acceptable Proof: a. copy of the employment agreement b. copy of an assignment agreement c. legal memorandum signed by an attorney familiar with the law of the jurisdiction stating that a court of competent jurisdiction would, by the weight of the authority, award the title of the invention to the Rule

47(b) – Cannot Be Found, con’t 7) Proof of irreparable damage - Acceptable Proof: - statement by the Rule 47(b) applicant that the filing of the application is necessary to preserve the rights of the parties 8) Declaration in compliance with 37 CFR 1.63

Thank you!