P ARENTAL MAGMAS OF MAFIC LAYERED INTRUSIONS : USING AN UPDATED COMAGMAT MODEL FOR CALCULATIONS OF SULFIDE - SILICATE COTECTICS DURING THEIR CRYSTALLIZATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Chapter 7- Molecular Formulas
T ESTING OF SULFIDE SOLUBILITY MODELS AND CALCULATIONS OF SCSS DURING CRYSTALLIZATION OF MAFIC MAGMAS PARENTAL TO LAYERED INTRUSIONS K IRILL B YCHKOV 1,2,
Chemical Quantities or
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
Chapter 7 Chemical Quantities
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
Worksheets.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
1 Changing Profile of Household Sector Credit and Deposits in Indian Banking System -Deepak Mathur November 30, 2010.
Jeopardy Game The Rock Cycle.
LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients ISHLT 2006 J Heart Lung Transplant 2006;25:
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
Chemical Quantities or
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
LABORATORY ACTIVITIES FOR REGENTS CHEMISTRY. Many laboratory activities require measurements. Science uses the S.I. (Metric System) of measurements.
1 1  1 =.
1 How many layers of the Earth are there? The part of the Earth that consists of molten metal.
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
2.11.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Learning to show the remainder
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
Physical Transformations of Pure Substances
Introduction to Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume Relationships
Lab 05 ONLINE LESSON Use down or up arrows to navigate.
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
MCQ Chapter 07.
Who wants to be a Chemist? By receiving an A on the Weather Exam?
% Composition, Empirical and Molecular Formulas
Comparison of X-ray diffraction patterns of La 2 CuO 4+   from different crystals at room temperature Pia Jensen.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Stoichiometry.
: 3 00.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Chapter 4 FUGACITY.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Crystal-Melt Equilibria in Magmatic Systems Learning Objectives: –How are crystal-melt equilibria displayed graphically as phase diagrams? –What are the.
James D. Miller Precambrian Research Center Department of Geological Sciences University of Minnesota Duluth Workshop on Nickel -Copper-Platinum Group.
James D. Miller Precambrian Research Center Department of Geological Sciences University of Minnesota Duluth.
G EOL 2312 I GNEOUS AND M ETAMORPHIC P ETROLOGY Lecture 9a Diversification of Magmas February 17, 2016.
Petrology Midterm I Powerpoints 1-8 Quizzes 1-3 Homework 1-2 Winter Chapters 1-10.
Geol 2312 Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
Geol 2312 Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
Presentation transcript:

P ARENTAL MAGMAS OF MAFIC LAYERED INTRUSIONS : USING AN UPDATED COMAGMAT MODEL FOR CALCULATIONS OF SULFIDE - SILICATE COTECTICS DURING THEIR CRYSTALLIZATION A LEXEY A RISKIN 1, G ALINA B ARMINA 1, K IRILL B YCHKOV 1,2, AND L EONID D ANYUSHEVSKY 2 1 Vernadsky Institute, Kosygin str., 19, Moscow, Russia 2 CODES and School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Australia

I NTRODUCTION 25 years ago we proposed a special petrologic technique (called geochemical thermometry ) designed to resolve inverse problems for mafic igneous rocks, including estimates of the initial temperature, trapped liquid and mineral compositions, as well as original modal proportions, as recorded in the whole-rock chemistry [1, 2]. This method is based on the premise that any crystal-liquid mush that produces a completely crystalline rock should pass through a stage when relative motions of solids and interstitial liquid have ceased, so that the system may be considered as closed. In this case, it is theoretically feasible to calculate all thermodynamic parameters for the initial system, using phase equilibria models designed for the calculation of equilibrium melting/crystallization relations in igneous rocks. In this paper we present results of applications of this approach for modeling the composition of parental magmas of several mafic layered intrusions, followed by quantification of sulfide-silicate cotectics during crystallization of these parents.

T WO MAIN ASSUMPTIONS Two main assumptions underlie this approach. The most important is that the original liquid and crystals are assumed to be in chemical equilibrium, with the initial temperature as an intensive parameter of the equilibrium. The second assumption is that there are samples having bulk compositions different from each other only due to variations of the modal proportions of cumulus minerals, with the trapped liquid and temperature being the same. If both assumptions are true, one can state that during equilibrium melting of samples having the same formation temperature the modeled compositions of residual melts will converge with falling temperature and intersect at a point in temperature-compositional space that represents the conditions under which the assemblage was formed [1, 2]. In practice, the method of geochemical thermometry is accomplished by means of the COMAGMAT magma crystallization model, because equilibrium crystallization is reversible with respect to equilibrium melting, so that the construction of melting lines can be replaced with the crystallization trajectories for starting compositions identical to those of the rocks under consideration [2, 3].

E STIMATES OF PARENTAL MELT COMPOSITIONS Using the COMAGMAT model [2] a set of low pressure calculations have been conducted for the most primitive rocks representing the Marginal Series and Lower Zones from the differentiated sills (Eastern Siberia and Kamchatka, Russia), more thick bodies (e.g. Partridge River intrusion, Minnesota, USA), and large layered complexes, such as Skaergaard, Kiglapait, and Dovyren (Northern Transbaikalia, Russia ) [3, 4]. It allowed us to define the range of initial temperatures and parental melt compositions intrinsic to the original crystal mush from which the most primitive rocks have been crystallized (some of them are given in first four columns in Table 1). In parallel, estimates of the original crystal-melt proportions for the intrusive parents were obtained. These modal proportions indicate that parental magmatic suspensions may contain from few percents (Siberian traps) to 15-25% (Talnakh and Kiglapait), and even 40-50% of crystals (Dovyren and Partridge River intrusion). This is in general agreement with results of dynamic calculations simulating emplacement of a non isothermal magma which show the primary crystallinity of intrusive magmas is strongly depend upon the extent of cooling during the injection process [6]. Coupled with the results of geochemical thermometry these evidences argue that almost instantaneous injection of super heated melts into magma chambers is unrealistic.

T ABLE 1. P ARENTAL MELTS PROPOSED FOR MAFIC LAYERED INTRUSIONS [3, 4] AND A KOMATIITE - HOSTED N I DEPOSIT [5] Melt PRI, 1167 o C TALN, 1200 o C KIGL, 1230 o C DOV, 1252 o C KOM, 1612 o C SiO TiO Al 2 O FeO MnO MgO CaO Na 2 O K2OK2O P2O5P2O Fertile layered intrusions : PRI – Partridge River Intrusion (Minnesota, USA, h =500 m), TALN – Talnakh (NW Siberian Platform, Russia, h 150 m), DOV – Ioko-Dovyren (Nothern TransBaikalia, Russia, h =3.2 km), KOM – assumed parent for komatiite-hosted nickel sulfide deposits. Barred complexes : KIGL – Kiglapait (Labrador, Canada, h =9 km). Data for PRI, TALN, and KIGL are from [3]. Information on the Dovyren parental magma is from [4]. The KOM composition is from [5].

M ODELING SULFIDE - SILICATE RATIOS A unique ability of a new version of COMAGMAT to model precipitation of various sulfide-silicate assemblages [7] allows one to estimate bulk silicate-sulfide ratio in crystallized materials, both during equilibrium and fractional crystallization. To approach the goal we performed a representative set of calculations simulating equilibrium crystallization of five types of proposed parental magmas, ranging from komatiite to ferro-troctolite and tholeiitic compositions (Table 1). The main aim of this modeling was to quantify a combined effect of the temperature decrease and FeO-enrichment in the melt on the sulfide proportion during equilibrium crystallization of same cotectics, such as Ol+Pl, Ol+Pl+Aug, or Pig+Pl+Aug. All of the calculations were carried out at 1 atm with crystal increment of 0.5% and QFM conditions. Sulfur contents in the initial melts were given to provide sulfide saturation from the beginning of the crystallization process, with wt% S in TALN, 0.22 wt% in PRI, 0.18 wt% in KIGL, 0.15 wt% in DOV, and 0.40 wt% in the proposed KOM magmas. The most important results are summarized in Table. 2.

T ABLE 2. S ILICATE - SULFIDE RATIOS AND SULFIDE PROPORTIONS FOR DIFFERENT MINERAL ASSEMBLAGES, AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE AND F E O VARIATIONS IN THE MELT Mineral assemblage Parental magma Silicate/ Sulfide ratio T, o CFeO*, wt% Average sulfide proportion Ol+Sulf DOV wt.% KOM KIGL Ol+Pl+Sulf DOV wt.% KIGL PRI TALN Ol+Pl+Cpx+ Sulf KIGL wt.% PRI TALN Ol+Opx+Sulf KOM wt.% Ol+Pl+Cpx+ Opx+Sulf DOV wt.% KOM Pl+Cpx+Pig+ Opx +Sulf DOV wt.% Pl+Cpx+Pig+ Sulf DOV wt.%

R ESULTS In total, three of the sulfide-saturated melts (KIGL, DOV, KOM) are characterized by minimal silicate-sulfide ratios of for the Ol-Sulf cotectics, which is consistent with 1-2 wt% of sulfides in the crystallizing material (Table 2). Ol+Pl-Sulf cotectics demonstrate much more variable values in the range of which is consistent with a lower sulfide proportion of wt%. Crystallization of a gabbroic and gabbro-noritic assemblages ( Pl + Aug ± Pig ± Opx ) provides intermediate values of silicate-sulfide ratios of about (Table 2).

R EFERENCES [1] Frenkel et al. (1988) Geochem. Intern. 25 (6): [2] Ariskin, A. A. (1999) J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 90: [3] Ariskin, A. A. and Barmina, G. S. (2004) Geochem. Intern. 42 (Suppl. 1): S [4] Ariskin et al. (2009) Geochem. Intern. ( in press ) [5] Barnes, S.J. (2007) Economic Geology 102(2): [6] Sharapov, A. N. et al. (1997) Petrology 5 (1): 8–19. [7] Bychkov et al. (2009, this volume)

A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research is supported by AngloAmerican, BHP Billiton and Votorantim through AMIRA project P962 and by the Australian Research Council funding to the Centre of Excellence in Ore Deposits (CODES)