Purpose/Function To guide the VTRA Stage I team members through the initial process of data collection To Assist the VTRA Stage II team to understand what.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Violence Potential:
Advertisements

Assessing Violence Potential: Community Protocol for Violence Threat/Risk Assessment (VTRA) and Intervention, 9 th Edition.
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April Division of Service Support,
Continuous Improvement Plan The will to win is meaningless without the will to prepare. ~ Joe Gibbs.
[Your District's] Comprehensive Guidance Program: Linking School Success with Life Success 1 [Your District’s] Comprehensive Guidance Program Responsive.
Incident Referral Forms Office of Family Services.
Functional Behavioral Assessment and Behavioral Intervention Plan
Module 4: Establishing a Data-based Decision- making System.
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying NJ State Board of Education February
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
SCIA Special Circumstances Instructional Assistance
1 Preventing Youth Suicide Creating Emotional Safety for our Students School District of Volusia.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Who are we and what do we do?. What is a BCT? An acronym for Behavioral Consultation Team that was formed in 2010 at IUN. It is a campus wide team that.
Violence Prevention. Preventing school violence is a top priority for school and public safety officials today. Efforts include creating more positive.
Threat Assessment Stafford County Public Schools
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Charter School Institute Department of Exceptional Students Enrollment Determination Procedures.
WORKPLACE VIOLENCE A SUPERVISOR GUIDE PLANNING PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENING –application as a guide to check past acts of violence –personal interviews with.
The Mobile Urgent Treatment Team (MUTT) was created to help children and teenagers in Crisis. MUTT will answer your questions and concerns about your child.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Meeting the Needs of Individuals
School Bullying Vodcast Six: Issues with parents and evaluating anti- bullying work Dr Ken Rigby Consultant Developed for.
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
Uintah School District Emergency Preparedness. Utah State law requires each local school board to adopt and maintain an emergency preparedness plan.
Intervention and Referral Services Linda Remolino, LPC, NCC Director of School Counseling North Plainfield School District.
DRM PPANI TRAINING. What is the purpose of a LAPPP The collection, analysis and interpretation of all relevant available facts and information to assess.
1 Manifestation Determination. 2 Today’s Goals and Objectives…. Define Manifestation Determination Discuss when to complete a Manifestation Determination.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
The Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan Presentation to School Committee December 20, 2010.
Quality, Safe Schools An Introduction for Families {Insert presenter’s name, date and training location here}
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Violence in the Workplace Keeping the workplace safe.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Threat Management, Assessment and Counseling Reducing the Risk of Violence in the Saint Paul Schools.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Module 3 The Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children 1 The Interstate Compact On Educational Opportunities for Military Children.
Special Education Update Brownsville Independent School District Special Services Department.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 9
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
After viewing if you have questions, concerns, or you do not understand any portion of the information provided please see a building administrator for.
Section 2 Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Establishing a Statewide Threat Assessment System for Oregon Schools Recommendations.
Policy and Procedure Updates Policy and Procedure 3210 Nondiscrimination Policy and Procedure 3319 Use of Physical Restraint and Isolation.
Overview of Crisis Protocols Introduction Ways We’re Trying to Make Campus Safer Transition to New Plan.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment pr/students/smspr021/
Module 3 The Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children 1 Providing policy, tools, and resources to further enhance the quality.
Group evaluation There is need to assess the degree to which a group is achieving or has achieved its set goals. The process of assessing this constitutes.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Threat Assessment Team Florida State University
Special Education Legal Boot Camp
Threat Assessment Procedures
What is the role of a school psychologist?
Emergency Contact Forms
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Public Health Planning and Analysis
Dr Ken Rigby Consultant
MANAGING THREATS IN OUR SCHOOLS
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
Elementary Student Assistance Programs
(COLOR SYSTEMS FLOWCHART HANDOUT, fancier than book): LETS LOOK AT OUR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A SYSTEM (LEVEL 1 AND LEVEL 2… THEN WE’LL DISCUSS YOUR SYSTEM.
Discipline – Fact or Myth?
Making Middle Grades Work
Presentation transcript:

Violence Threat/Risk Assessment (VTRA) Stage I Report Form Second Edition, 2011

Purpose/Function To guide the VTRA Stage I team members through the initial process of data collection To Assist the VTRA Stage II team to understand what initial data was gathered. Through this data, directions for further data gathering may be determined. To assist or guide the VTRA Stage III component in the development and implementation of a comprehensive multidisciplinary intervention, and to pre-determine a follow-up date for case review. The report form is truly a core component of the VTRA model. When used properly, it is a useful tool all through the process.

Pre – Activation of VTRA Stage I Team The Report form provides a list (not a complete list) of Violence/Threat Making Behaviours Also identifies/reminds the team of the three primary hypotheses in VTRA This helps to get the team into the proper frame of mind when discussing Worrisome Behaviors that have come to their attention. (Pg. 3 – Report Form) Violence/Threat Making Behaviours (Examples of high-risk behaviours addressed in this protocol include but are not limited to):   Serious violence or violence with intent to harm or kill Verbal/written threats to kill others (“clear, direct, and plausible”) Internet (Facebook, YouTube, etc.) text messaging, threats to kill others (refer to Appendix B of the National Training Protocol for abbreviations commonly used on the Internet and texting) Possession of weapons (including replicas) Bomb threats (making and/or detonating explosive devices) Fire Setting Sexual intimidation or assault Gang related intimidation and violence One: Is it a conscious or unconscious “Cry for Help”? Two: Conspiracy of two or more! Who else knows about it? Who else is involved? Three: Is there any evidence of fluidity?

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Reminders: Pre-Interview considerations Asses the Threat, not the Threat Maker (Pg. 3 – Report Form) When possible, interview the Threat Maker(s) or Student of Concern after initial data has been collected such as locker check, interviewing the individual who reported the threat as well as the police member doing an occurrence check for prior police contacts. This will help to avoid the “uni-dimensional assessment” and provide the interviewer(s) with data to develop case specific hypotheses and verbatim questions that can be asked in a strategic VTRA interview to test those hypotheses.   There should never be more than two people in the room interviewing the Threat Maker or Student of Concern.

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step I: Locate and secure, if possible, the threat maker and target(s) implement any immediate risk reducing procedures Do not allow students of interest any access to lockers, backpacks, etc. Determine if the threat maker has immediate access to means. (Pg. 4– Report Form)

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step II: Administrators, if possible, check the locker, backpack, etc. (Pg. 4 – Report Form)

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step III: Call the trained VTRA police member Share initial data and police will determine if a history of weapons possession, use, or violence is noted in police accessible records (Pg. 4 – Report Form) Stress the respect for each members’ professional Jurisdictional boundaries and mandates.

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step IV: School Administrator will notify the District/Divisional VTRA Team contact of the Stage I Team activation. (Pg. 4 – Report Form)

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step V: Principal (V.P.) and VTRA Police member, in collaboration with the counseling member will determine who will strategically interview sources of data including all participants directly and indirectly involved as well as “hard” data collection. (Pg. 4 – Report Form) Immediate Data may be obtained from multiple sources including:   Reporter(s) Target(s) Witnesses Teachers and other school staff (secretaries, teacher assistants, bus drivers, etc.) Friends, classmates, acquaintances Parents/caregivers (Call both parents) Current and previous school records (Call the sending school) Police record check Check the student(s), locker, desk, backpack, recent text books/assignment binders, cars, etc for data consistent with the threat making or threat-related behaviour Check/Search or question parents/caregivers about the student(s), bedroom etc Activities: internet histories, diaries, notebooks Other

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step VI: The Semi-Structured Interview Format Series of questions previously mentioned in the protocol section of the training. (Pg. 5 – 13, – Report Form)

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step VII: Notify the Threat Maker(s) and Target(s) Parent(s) or Guardian(s) at the earliest opportunity. (Pg. 14 – Report Form) The parents involvement, lack of involvement, or refusal of involvement all need to be recorded. Their information or participation can potentially provide a wealth of information

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step VIII: Contact other agencies to determine if they are in possession of any other pertinent information that in conjunction with the Stage I Data collected, requires them to disclose to the VTRA (Pg. 14 – Report Form) Other Agencies:   As per the formal signed protocol, other agency partners may be involved in the Stage I VTRA process as consultants to the school/police team and sources of initial data relevant to the case at hand such as past or current involvement by other agencies that once they are informed of the initial school/police data may release necessary information or physically join the team. Call Children’s Services (Child Protection) VTRA Member for record check relevant to the case at hand Call Mental Health VTRA Member for record check relevant to the case at hand Call Youth Probation VTRA Member for record check relevant to the case at hand Others Upon receipt of the Stage I data, partner agencies check to see if the student in question is or was a client and then the agencies determine if they are in possession of information that in conjunction with the Stage I data requires them to “disclose”. Generally Stage II VTRA Team designates will report that a record check has been completed and: 1) There is nothing to report. 2) There is information relevant to the case that needs to be disclosed as per the VTRA Protocol (significant risk of harm to the health or safety of others is present). 3) The risk is not immediate but a Release of Information Form should be requested to allow for a full disclosure of the contents of the file relevant to the case at hand.

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step IX: Collate the data and discuss all relevant information regarding the student. As a team, ask the question: “To what extent does the student pose a threat to school/student safety?” “Does the student pose a threat to himself/herself or someone outside the school (i.e. family)?” Determine Level of Concern, or Risk to Target(s) and/or Self (Pg. 15 – Report Form)

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Levels of Concern/Risk Low: Risk to the target(s), students, staff, and school safety is minimal Medium: The threat could be carried out, although it may not appear entirely realistic. Violent action is possible. High: The threat or situation of concern appears to pose an imminent and serious danger to the safety of others. (Pg. 15 – Report Form) Low Level of Concern Threat is vague and indirect. Categorization of low risk does not imply “no risk” but indicates the individual is at little risk for violence. Information contained within the threat is inconsistent, implausible or lacks detail; threat lacks realism. Available information suggests that the person is unlikely to carry out the threat or become violent. Within the general range for typical baseline behaviour for the student in question. Monitoring of the matter may be appropriate Medium Level of Concern Threat is more plausible and concrete than a low level threat. Wording in the threat and information gathered suggests that some thought has been given to how the threat will be carried out (e.g., possible place and time). No clear indication that the student of concern has taken preparatory steps (e.g., weapon, seeking), although there may be an ambiguous or inconclusive reference pointing to that possibility. There may be a specific statement seeking to convey that the threat is not empty: “I’m serious!” A moderate or lingering concern about the student’s potential to act violently. Increase in baseline behaviour. Categorization of risk indicates the individual is at an elevated risk for violence, and those measures currently in place or further measures, including monitoring, are required in an effort to manage the individual’s future risk.   High Level of Concern Threat is specific and plausible. There is an identified target. Student has the capacity to act on the threat. Information suggests concrete steps have been taken toward acting on threat. For example, information indicates that the student has acquired or practiced with a weapon or has had a victim under surveillance. Information suggests strong concern about the student’s potential to act violently. Significant increase in baseline behaviour. Categorization of risk indicates the individual is at a high or imminent risk for violence. Immediate intervention is required to prevent an act of violence from occurring.

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step X: Decide on a Course of Action (Pg. 16 – Report Form) Are there risk reducing interventions that need to be put in place immediately? With the input of all Threat Assessment Team members, decide on a course of action. If there is a low to medium level of concern, the student can likely be managed at school with appropriate (increased) supervision. Low to Medium Level of Concern Implement the Intervention Plan (Most students can be managed at school with interventions.)   Medium to High Level of Concern The Threat Assessment Team has determined that a Stage II Threat Assessment is needed.

Activation of VTRA Stage I Team Step XI: Develop a Stage I Intervention Plan Determine if Stage II Risk Evaluation and Longer Term Treatment Planning is Required Decide on a date to come back together to review the case (Pg. 17 – Report Form)

Violence Threat/Risk Assessment (VTRA) Stage I Report Form Second Edition, 2011