July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Advertisements

California Community Corrections Performance Incentive Act Overview SB 678 Briefing San Francisco Regional AOC Office November 29, 2010 SB 678.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
Criminal Justice Realignment: What Counties Need to Know to Implement Presented: September 2011.
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Chief Michael Daly Marin County Probation Kevin O’Connell, Analyst, CPOC.
Fresno County month data provided to Chief Probation Officers of California (CPOC) & ORE future work Owen Research & Evaluation October 26, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION Parole Violator Management and Hearings in Local Jails.
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
Presented By: Chief Edward Medrano Gardena Police Department.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Sentencing and Punishment
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 11-16, 2004.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
ICAOS Rules Training Presented by: The Only Way to Go… Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
Understanding How Prison Sentences Work
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 1. 6-Month Preliminary Evaluation Report Post Release Community Supervision Offenders ▫From October 2011.
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Measuring Realignment at the Two-Year Mark: Jail Population Trends Linda M. Penner, Chair Kathleen T. Howard, Executive Director Curtis J. Hill, Executive.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FY Budget Worksession July 18, 2007 Scott Bradstreet Deputy Chief of Operations.
CHAPTER LOCAL FACILITIES FOR DETENTION County to maintain county jail; location; agreements for detention of prisoners Duties of.
Sentencing and Corrections. Judges Options Suspended Sentence: Sentence is given but is not imposed until the defendant messes up again (arrested or violates.
Realignment: The Role of the BSCC and the Composition of Local Detention Facilities Patricia Mazzilli, Executive Director Board of State and Community.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
Educational training on Voting Rights for people currently or previously involved in the criminal justice system.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Public Safety Realignment Act 2011 P UBLIC S AFETY R EALIGNMENT A SSEMBLY B ILLS : AB 109, AB 117, AB1 17 County of San Bernardino, Department of Behavioral.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions © 2015 Cengage.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
BUDGET TRAILER BILLS CHANGES TO PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS AND R EHABILITATION.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

July CPOC Meeting

Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community corrections grant program and funds it on this date) All changes PROSPECTIVE (including credits) except for CCP planning AB 109 Allocations are intended to cover the non, non, nons sentenced to local custody, post-release community supervision, and parole violators stay in county jail

Non, Non, Nons – N 3 Who stays local: Revises the definition of felony to include certain crimes that are punishable in jail for more than one year. Time served in jails, probation, or alternative custody instead of prisons: Non-violent offenders Non-serious offenders Non-sex offenders

Options for N 3 at Sentencing Jail instead of prison for the same period of time Felony probation Jail, early release to alternative custody Split sentence – imposed sentence of combined jail time with the remainder on mandatory probation Imposed sentences (everything but felony probation) prison prior attaches Split sentences cannot be longer than the original sentence when combining custody and supervision time.

Non, Non, Non Receiving Local Disposition

Options for N 3 after Sentencing Enhanced local custody and supervision tools: Alternative custody tools for county jails Home detention for low-level offenders Local jail credits like current prison credits (Day-for- day). Counties may contract for beds: With CDCR (costs still to be set) With other counties With public CCFs (Community Correctional Facilities) MAY NOT contract back parole revocations

State Prison Eligible The following sentences must be served in state prison: Prior or current serious or violent felony as described in PC (c) or (c) The defendant is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to PC 290 Excludes certain other specified crimes (now about 60) Note: excluded crimes are those for which a defendant can still be committed to state prison.

Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Who will be under local supervision: Current non-violent, non-serious offenders (can have serious or violent offenses in history) Some Sex offenders Former NRPs Who remains on State Parole: 3 rd strikers Individuals with a current violent or serious commitment offense High risk sex offenders as defined by CDCR Mentally Disordered Offenders (MDOs) Anyone on parole prior to October 1, 2011

Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Board of Supervisors must designate the county agency responsible to supervise PRCS and inform CDCR by August 1, 2011 CDCR must notify counties who is being released at least 30 days prior (however there will be more about this process and information sharing) Revocations will be handled by local courts starting October 1, 2011

PRCS Supervision and Revocations Supervision levels and case plan determined by supervision agency Statutory general conditions Consider sending specific conditions to CDCR prior to release Graduated sanctions including flash incarceration at the local level up to 10 consecutive days Revocations capped at 180 days (jail only, no return to prison) May discharge as operation of law after six months without violations

PRCS Administrative Process AB 117 significantly narrows the courts involvement to only the final revocation process Courts will be authorized to appoint hearing officers for the final revocation hearings The supervising agency will have the authority to handle all intermediate sanctions without court involvement, up to and including flash incarceration Must establish a review process for assessing and refining conditions AOC is to adopt forms and rules of court to handle the final revocation and termination hearings Modify conditions; revoke to jail for up to 180 days; refer to reentry court

PRCS Discharge Process Discharges by operation of law at the end of 3 years May discharge after consecutive 6 months of no violations Must discharge after a continuous year served with no violations Courts WILL NOT be involved in the discharge process for either PRCS or Parolees

Parole Violations BPH will retain authority over parole until July 1, 2013 Violations will still be served in jail starting October 1, 2011 Same sanctions available to PRCS, flash incarceration in the jail for up to 10 days Revocations capped at 180 days Only persons sentenced to a term of life can be revoked back to state prison Post July 1, 2013 the revocation process will work the same for parolees as it does for PRCS

DJJ Future DJJ – goes back to status quo, you can continue to send wards to DJJ however there is a cost per ward of 125,000 that may trigger in the budget if revenues dont materialize There will be another bill, to make all the necessary statutory changes There will be continued discussions through the summer about the future of DJJ

Community Corrections Partnerships (CCP) AB 117 clarifies the composition and the powers of the Executive Committee New Composition: CPO (chair) Sheriff Police Chief DA Public Defender Judge (or his or her designee) One appointment by the Board of Supv. of either DSS, MH, or ADP The plan is deemed accepted unless rejected by BOS by a 4/5ths vote Brown Act Planning Grants $100,000-$200,000 within the next 30 days

Board of State and Community Corrections July 1, 2012 CSA will be eliminated and replaced with the BSCC All CSA duties (except for CPOST) will go to the BSCC and some CCCJ and Office of Gang Policy Violence which are also eliminated Moved out of CDCR – independent board 12 member board, chair is the Secretary of Corrections and Vice Chair selected by board from Sheriff or CPO appointments Other members: 2 CPOs; 2 Sheriffs; Adult Parole Div Director; BOS; Police Chief; Public member; Judge; CBO for adult programs; and CBO for juvenile programs